I'm just taking it from what we know. We know there was a virus, people demanded to be allowed to stay home unless there was a vaccine. A vaccine was created way too quickly, with no long term testing, it was released onto the public and now here we are. I just think it is likely they rushed it too fast and messed it up in a hurry to keep the economy from crashing.
Well, lock downs mean the economy crashes, so the elites couldn't allow that forever. The vaccine was a way to get people back to work. Unfortunately for them the vaccine has backfired and now they have more problems on their hand. They want a somewhat legit system, so we stay asleep, and they are failing at that.
The places which pushed the vaccines the hardest also maintained lockdowns and mask mandates: think of New York, California, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc. Nothing really changed in that regard.
I agree. I think the big issue is if the vaccine are some conspiracy or not. I would be all for them being a conspiracy to get people to poison themselves, except for the fact that Israel and other big celebrities/politicians did get it.
I strongly disagree. We dont "know there was a virus" at all if by that you mean a novel virus that was the basis for an actual global emergency. There were no "novel symptoms", no novel virus was ever actually isolated and the data now clearly shows there were no surplus deaths before the the vaccine. Im not going to reprise this whole discussion of data manipulation, definition alteration etc...that horse has been beaten to a pulp. But if anyone still cares they can search the data themselves
knoema.com
unlimitedhangout.com
Nick was somewhat evasive on that topic, honestly, I think he should just have pounded on the question of Christianity and how it relates to Judaism. J-Lovers usually have a very weak doctrinal education (I don't think it's necessarily Nick's strong suit either, but he knows is way around the basics), and they tend to have to go back to some kind of loose Deism like Gavin McInnes or they have to go into weird "elder siblings in faith" or double covenant arguments. The reason those don't show up in actual debates that much is that they are very hard to defend. He also could have doubled down on the hologram thing, since AJ implied a couple of times that he is aware of the inconsistencies in the narrative.
There might be something to this.I strongly disagree. We dont "know there was a virus" at all if by that you mean a novel virus that was the basis for an actual global emergency. There were no "novel symptoms", no novel virus was ever actually isolated and the data now clearly shows there were no surplus deaths before the the vaccine. Im not going to reprise this whole discussion of data manipulation, definition alteration etc...that horse has been beaten to a pulp. But if anyone still cares they can search the data themselves
World Crude death rate, 1950-2022 - knoema.com
In 2020, crude death rate for WORLD was 37.57 deaths per thousand population. Crude death rate of WORLD fell gradually from 142.85 deaths per thousand population in 1971 to 37.57 deaths per thousand population in 2020. Number of deaths over a given period divided by the person-years lived by the...
Additionally crashing the economy wasnt an unwanted consequence. It was one of the primary purposes of the willful massive totally unnecessary overreaction and govt overreach. Thats has also been well established in numerous threads
If there's any remaining doubt about the "vaxxine" purpose(s) then I suggest reading this (posted by William Faulkner in the SADS thread)
Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement
The developers of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine have previously undisclosed ties to the re-named British Eugenics Society as well as other Eugenics-linked institutions like the Wellcome Trust.
If after reading that you think that this was just "botched because it was rushed in order to get people back to work"
"C'mon man"
That squares exactly with their history, yep.
After Dominick questioned him, Sánchez retracted the term, "bigot," and referred to Stewart as "prejudicial" and "uninformed,"[20] but he defended feeling discriminated, saying, "He's upset that someone of my ilk is almost at his level" and that Stewart is "not just a comedian. He can make and break careers."[21] When queried on the issue of whether Stewart likewise belonged to a minority group on account of his Jewish faith, Sánchez responded:
A day after his remarks,[22] CNN announced that Sánchez was no longer employed with the company.[14]
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
