Norway creating all-female special forces unit called Jegertroppen
- Thread starter Roosh
- Start date
SamuelBRoberts said:
Yeah - the "elite female" battalion would be sent to Oslo defending important facilities like fish restaurants and kindergartens. You would meet with those guys:
Also similarly to the Swiss do the Norwegian have their defensive capabilities using the local geography. The Swiss have the mountains and the Norwegians have the Fjords.
Zelcorpion said:
I dunno, they can yell loudly, but they're taking orders from the people who thought "girls who can't throw grenades in the right direction" would make great special forces soldiers. I like my odds.
Her training officer is simply failing to reach her in terms of motivation. He should try this:
"I want you to imagine you see an arab man in muslim garb with an AK47 in his hand and an ISIS flag draped across his shoulders. He's walking purposefully across an open field towards a playground full of children...
...and then a despicable Norwegian nationalist begins to cross from the other side of the park to tell the muslim he's not welcome in our country..."
"I want you to imagine you see an arab man in muslim garb with an AK47 in his hand and an ISIS flag draped across his shoulders. He's walking purposefully across an open field towards a playground full of children...
...and then a despicable Norwegian nationalist begins to cross from the other side of the park to tell the muslim he's not welcome in our country..."
Constitution45
Pelican
infowarrior1 said:
I reckon women from traditional backgrounds could give a good fight. But lets face it, these girls from Norway and America are just your run of the mill sheltered millennial kids. Thats the ironic thing about feminism etc, the women who don't campaign for it and come from the East, usually do well in masculine spheres, engineering, business etc. They seem to have a better understanding of the innate differences between men and women.
Where as these feminist go girl types to you find in the West, will just bleat and complain, until they run off into HR or primary school teaching.
I used to be a "jeger" in Norway. we had 13 girls who signed up voluntarily. after 3 days, there were only 2 left. After basic training there was 1 left.
She was fairly strong, ofc, not on the same level as guys the average guy. But i do think they contributed to an overall increased satisfaction level of our squad.
However, its certainly not a natural profession for girls, but there are som freakish tomboys who enjoys this work.
And if they can reach the required physical requirements, i say, let them.
She was fairly strong, ofc, not on the same level as guys the average guy. But i do think they contributed to an overall increased satisfaction level of our squad.
However, its certainly not a natural profession for girls, but there are som freakish tomboys who enjoys this work.
And if they can reach the required physical requirements, i say, let them.
I think it's ridiculous.
Put any ten men on a worksite and you'll get work done.
Replace one of those men with a woman and productivity drops through the floor. I've seen this firsthand on several occasions. The women don't even have to be pretty. It just fucks up the entire dynamic.
But the reality is that I think we've been conditioned to accept laughable levels of productivity in the workforce, where a team of 7 men and 3 women will achieves less than half of what an all male team 20 years ago would. Today it just seems "normal" for a 20 or 30 percent absentee rate, breaks totalling 2 hours per day and unofficial social media time making up another hour AT LEAST.
So in 20 years time it will simply be generally accepted that a few squads a year get fragged by their own grenades, only it wont be acceptable to attribute that directly to women, because that would be obviously false and sexist.
Put any ten men on a worksite and you'll get work done.
Replace one of those men with a woman and productivity drops through the floor. I've seen this firsthand on several occasions. The women don't even have to be pretty. It just fucks up the entire dynamic.
But the reality is that I think we've been conditioned to accept laughable levels of productivity in the workforce, where a team of 7 men and 3 women will achieves less than half of what an all male team 20 years ago would. Today it just seems "normal" for a 20 or 30 percent absentee rate, breaks totalling 2 hours per day and unofficial social media time making up another hour AT LEAST.
So in 20 years time it will simply be generally accepted that a few squads a year get fragged by their own grenades, only it wont be acceptable to attribute that directly to women, because that would be obviously false and sexist.
Roosh said:
Freakin' retards.
A. That is why you don't throw a grenade in an underhanded / softball type fashion.
B. They wouldn't be laughing if that had been a fragmentation grenade...
Semi-related :
@StefanMolyneux 17s
@StefanMolyneux 17s
pants said:
No you don't let them just because they meet the physical requirements as a 0,01-0,02% of the female population.
And the reasons for this are also already known.
The Israelis had the most experience with women in combat troops.
There were not one, but multiple incidences where joint units had a certain mission. Those mixed-sex units had far higher mortality rate and fail ratio than the unisex ones. They found that when it gets tough, then men risk their lives to protect that one woman among them. Once they even abandoned the target and preferred to defend that one woman from harm. The Israeli officers got plenty of shit for such assessment. Since then they have adapted the strategy and are only having all-female squads that they use for off-frontline duties.
Just as you find with the gander-ratio that things don't add up due ot the fact that there are 100 times more geniuses and super-high-IQ men born and that male motivation to succeed in large groups on average is biologically ingrained to always surpass the average women - then you find out that the demand to hoist 50% of women onto CEO seats is just pure madness.
The same internal predisposition is happening in combat:
+ men have an ingrained instinct to protect women and children - women have zero instincts to protect men, quite the contrary
+ PTSD is for men far less common than it would happen to women - women do get triggered far easier and the new SJWs and thin-skinned feminists are clearly proof of that, but there are also examples of women in the Israeli forces who sue the government quite often for PTSD cases even if most of those are related to just the tough basic training
So even if you have the rare woman who meets the physical criteria (which I also doubt, because they get injured like 50 times more than men for the same things), then you have the basic biological mental makeup of men and women to deal with.
The report of the Israelis ended by saying that the only way to be equal is to somehow condition the male protective instinct out of them. But such men would be dangerous in real life. Because in real life women get away with doing things to men that no man would be left without a punch.
So that is why we won't let them.
sterling_archer
Hummingbird
xmlenigma said:
I doubt it. That TV show is completely red pilled and hilarious. Gay german lieutenant? Rene having plates? Shutting up women left and right? They don't make series like that anymore.
sterling_archer said:
They made it that way because it was so hilarious and crazy. No one would ever think back then that a female combat force was to be taken seriously. They could have created the resistance out of apes or dogs.
It's only now that we are supposed to bow down to reason and accept granny soldiers or all-female superwomen:
60yo warrior grannies from Mad Max Furiosa.
One armed 100 pound woman easily bests any 200 pound muscular man.
Here let me use you as a prop while I shoot - a man has to be good for something.
Those bitches will have a rough awakening when the Caliphate Wars start.
FFS.
Why can't reality simply abide by soycialism?
Is reality sexist or something...?
First woman to join infantry regiment since defence chiefs lifted ban on females serving in combat units quits after two weeks admitting she underestimated the 18-week course
- The first woman to join an infantry regiment has quit after two weeks of training
- The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind
- When she resigned, she admitted underestimating physical requirements
- Her resignation is a huge blow to officials who are determined to integrate women
The first woman to join an infantry regiment since defence chiefs lifted a ban on females serving in combat units has quit after just two weeks of training, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind her male counterparts on endurance marches and failing other physical tests at a training base in Suffolk.
It is understood that when the woman resigned, she admitted having underestimated the physical requirements of being an infantry recruit. She also told officers that living in female-only accommodation made her feel ‘like an outsider’ and weakened her resolve. Her resignation is a huge blow to officials who are determined to integrate women into fighting units in the Army, Royal Marines and Royal Air Force.Last night, the Ministry of Defence refused to name the recruit, but it is understood she was a steward in the RAF who wanted to transfer into the RAF Regiment, an infantry unit that fought with distinction in Afghanistan and Iraq. Its primary roles are to guard air bases and provide troops to support Special Forces operations.
The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind her male counterparts on endurance marches and failing other physical tests at a training base in Suffolk
...
She is understood to have been one of just three women who applied to join the RAF Regiment and the only one considered fit enough to start the course at RAF Honington alongside 44 men.
A source at the base said: ‘Even though she was way off the pace of most of the men, she gained a lot of people’s respect. She tried her best and was honest enough to admit the course was too tough for her.
‘She was a bit isolated outside training hours because she lived apart from everyone else.
‘There was a lot of secrecy surrounding her participation. The guys were surprised to see her. There was pressure on her instructors to help her to pass the course. I think the RAF wanted good PR out of it.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...y-regiment-quits-two-weeks.html#ixzz5GlIKboCx
So...
She wasn't even training for a normal infantry unit.
Merely an Airforce security guard unit...?
I know the "Air Defence" boys like to consider themselves "special forces", yet at end of the day, they're neither commandos nor SAS types...
Why can't reality simply abide by soycialism?
Is reality sexist or something...?
First woman to join infantry regiment since defence chiefs lifted ban on females serving in combat units quits after two weeks admitting she underestimated the 18-week course
- The first woman to join an infantry regiment has quit after two weeks of training
- The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind
- When she resigned, she admitted underestimating physical requirements
- Her resignation is a huge blow to officials who are determined to integrate women
The first woman to join an infantry regiment since defence chiefs lifted a ban on females serving in combat units has quit after just two weeks of training, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind her male counterparts on endurance marches and failing other physical tests at a training base in Suffolk.
It is understood that when the woman resigned, she admitted having underestimated the physical requirements of being an infantry recruit. She also told officers that living in female-only accommodation made her feel ‘like an outsider’ and weakened her resolve. Her resignation is a huge blow to officials who are determined to integrate women into fighting units in the Army, Royal Marines and Royal Air Force.Last night, the Ministry of Defence refused to name the recruit, but it is understood she was a steward in the RAF who wanted to transfer into the RAF Regiment, an infantry unit that fought with distinction in Afghanistan and Iraq. Its primary roles are to guard air bases and provide troops to support Special Forces operations.
The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind her male counterparts on endurance marches and failing other physical tests at a training base in Suffolk
...
She is understood to have been one of just three women who applied to join the RAF Regiment and the only one considered fit enough to start the course at RAF Honington alongside 44 men.
A source at the base said: ‘Even though she was way off the pace of most of the men, she gained a lot of people’s respect. She tried her best and was honest enough to admit the course was too tough for her.
‘She was a bit isolated outside training hours because she lived apart from everyone else.
‘There was a lot of secrecy surrounding her participation. The guys were surprised to see her. There was pressure on her instructors to help her to pass the course. I think the RAF wanted good PR out of it.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...y-regiment-quits-two-weeks.html#ixzz5GlIKboCx
So...
She wasn't even training for a normal infantry unit.
Merely an Airforce security guard unit...?
I know the "Air Defence" boys like to consider themselves "special forces", yet at end of the day, they're neither commandos nor SAS types...
Obviously, the problem was her isolation (as she and the source said.) The solution is to bring in a dozen women and put them in the men's barracks.
Hell, they need to shower together also (actually we'll only bring that element in if these 10 fail. Then the problem will clearly be the isolated shower.)
Hell, they need to shower together also (actually we'll only bring that element in if these 10 fail. Then the problem will clearly be the isolated shower.)
N°6
Hummingbird
Let them join their own military units.
The control system is feminists giving men white feathers to shame them to go to fight other men they have no quarrel with so that they can take their jobs and inheritances.
When men make comrades out of enemies as what happened on Christmas Eve 1914, the whole control system faces collapse.
This is why male groups which risk fostering camaraderie that would exclude feral female behaviour such as hypergamy are being phased out.
The control system is feminists giving men white feathers to shame them to go to fight other men they have no quarrel with so that they can take their jobs and inheritances.
When men make comrades out of enemies as what happened on Christmas Eve 1914, the whole control system faces collapse.
This is why male groups which risk fostering camaraderie that would exclude feral female behaviour such as hypergamy are being phased out.
CynicalContrarian said:
Let me tell you something about the RAF Regiment.
They do airfield security. Thats it. They are not a proper infantry regiment and the only connection they have with special forces is to wave them goodbye as the proper soldiers fly out of an airfield.
Now let me tell you a story, are you sitting comfortably? Good, then I'll begin.
Many years ago I was in the Metropolitan police in London and was based in Uxbridge, right on the western edge of London. RAF Uxbridge is nearby, its a proper RAF base and therefore has a contingent of RAF Regiment on guard at all times.
Anyway I was the duty officer at Ruislip police station on a night shift, nothing was happening, no one was around and I was bored out of my skull. So I read the force major incident plan for that area of London. One thing I remember reading was that during any major incident in Uxbridge was that we ordinary coppers would be armed before the local RAF Regiment was issued with live ammo.
Just think about that for a moment.
RAF Regiment are a bunch of wankers.
I see a simple solution - replace all male soldiers with women and Muslim and Somali immigrants - just stuff the barracks full with gender-neutral Arabs and women, give them the same showers, same bunk beds and see the full glory of the LGBTQQQQERWERWERT unfold. Of course - recruit trannies as well at great cost - even if you have to pay them 200.000$/year just so that they show up. Put them all together and remove the men and officers entirely - what happens in their barracks is in their own little SJW-utopia.