Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Leonard D Neubache" data-source="post: 1089010" data-attributes="member: 11069">I think it's ridiculous.Put any ten men on a worksite and you'll get work done.Replace one of those men with a woman and productivity drops through the floor. I've seen this firsthand on several occasions. The women don't even have to be pretty. It just fucks up the entire dynamic.But the reality is that I think we've been conditioned to accept laughable levels of productivity in the workforce, where a team of 7 men and 3 women will achieves less than half of what an all male team 20 years ago would. Today it just seems &quot;normal&quot; for a 20 or 30 percent absentee rate, breaks totalling 2 hours per day and unofficial social media time making up another hour AT LEAST.So in 20 years time it will simply be generally accepted that a few squads a year get fragged by their own grenades, only it wont be acceptable to attribute that directly to women, because that would be obviously false and sexist.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Leonard D Neubache, post: 1089010, member: 11069"] I think it's ridiculous. Put any ten men on a worksite and you'll get work done. Replace one of those men with a woman and productivity drops through the floor. I've seen this firsthand on several occasions. The women don't even have to be pretty. It just fucks up the entire dynamic. But the reality is that I think we've been conditioned to accept laughable levels of productivity in the workforce, where a team of 7 men and 3 women will achieves less than half of what an all male team 20 years ago would. Today it just seems "normal" for a 20 or 30 percent absentee rate, breaks totalling 2 hours per day and unofficial social media time making up another hour AT LEAST. So in 20 years time it will simply be generally accepted that a few squads a year get fragged by their own grenades, only it wont be acceptable to attribute that directly to women, because that would be obviously false and sexist. [/QUOTE]

Verification