Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
NYT Article: "What Sleeping With Married Men Taught Me About Infidelity"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thomas More" data-source="post: 1183500" data-attributes="member: 8402"><p>A guy in this situation usually has children and financial considerations as well. If his wife is frigid, and he's only willing to be "honorable" as a response to her dishonoring him, then he has to give up his children, subject himself to the court system and the divorce industrial complex, and have his income and assets devastated? </p><p></p><p>I think getting a little on the side is a justifiable alternative to nuking your life. Frankly, in the long run, a guy like this will decide it's worth giving up access to his children, and to pay a couple of year's income to break her ownship contract over him, but a guy usually has to come around to such a momentous decision gradually.</p><p></p><p>There's a man's side to this situation, and the woman's side. You're viewing this entirely from the woman's side. She doesn't have to shape up and start being less frigid. She knows her husband is stuck with her, or he'll lose his shirt and access to the kids. Fuck him. He's screwed. That's what she thinks, and that's what people who support the feminine imperative think.</p><p></p><p>I take the man's point of view in situations like this. The women have more than enough of society and the legal system taking their point of view.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thomas More, post: 1183500, member: 8402"] A guy in this situation usually has children and financial considerations as well. If his wife is frigid, and he's only willing to be "honorable" as a response to her dishonoring him, then he has to give up his children, subject himself to the court system and the divorce industrial complex, and have his income and assets devastated? I think getting a little on the side is a justifiable alternative to nuking your life. Frankly, in the long run, a guy like this will decide it's worth giving up access to his children, and to pay a couple of year's income to break her ownship contract over him, but a guy usually has to come around to such a momentous decision gradually. There's a man's side to this situation, and the woman's side. You're viewing this entirely from the woman's side. She doesn't have to shape up and start being less frigid. She knows her husband is stuck with her, or he'll lose his shirt and access to the kids. Fuck him. He's screwed. That's what she thinks, and that's what people who support the feminine imperative think. I take the man's point of view in situations like this. The women have more than enough of society and the legal system taking their point of view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
NYT Article: "What Sleeping With Married Men Taught Me About Infidelity"
Top