Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Simeon_Strangelight" data-source="post: 1183524" data-attributes="member: 6783">Yes and no - personally I think that the gender ratios are even more important below age 30. Europe had a massive female oversupply from the 1800-1950s. In the US there was a shortage of 7 mio+ men in the 1950s. In Europe there had been many wars and empire building, also men had terribly dangerous professions. A society with far less men than women in the delicate under 25 age range results in women scrambling to marry fast, because no good men are going to be left for them. For example - England and London especially had a huge prostitute population since there was no welfare and the oversupply of women meant cheap pussy. In the US in the 1950s and early 60s societies were more conservative than before because women were competing for the fewer men and behaving accordingly. That is a far more important factor than pure population. People in bigger cities tend to be - I would not say liberal - but they tend to soak up the current-day propaganda faster, also they tend to act more as if the opinions of their neighbors don't count, because they usually don't, while people in the countryside are shaped by the environment and a slutting around girl is going to be infamous, or a known communist is going to be looked upon negatively. And yes - city folk are easily manipulated by the media and academia. If I owned the media and academia, then I could make the liberal progressives into fascist eugenicists within one generation and they would think this is all natural. In fact the countryside would resist this a bit more.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Simeon_Strangelight, post: 1183524, member: 6783"] Yes and no - personally I think that the gender ratios are even more important below age 30. Europe had a massive female oversupply from the 1800-1950s. In the US there was a shortage of 7 mio+ men in the 1950s. In Europe there had been many wars and empire building, also men had terribly dangerous professions. A society with far less men than women in the delicate under 25 age range results in women scrambling to marry fast, because no good men are going to be left for them. For example - England and London especially had a huge prostitute population since there was no welfare and the oversupply of women meant cheap pussy. In the US in the 1950s and early 60s societies were more conservative than before because women were competing for the fewer men and behaving accordingly. That is a far more important factor than pure population. People in bigger cities tend to be - I would not say liberal - but they tend to soak up the current-day propaganda faster, also they tend to act more as if the opinions of their neighbors don't count, because they usually don't, while people in the countryside are shaped by the environment and a slutting around girl is going to be infamous, or a known communist is going to be looked upon negatively. And yes - city folk are easily manipulated by the media and academia. If I owned the media and academia, then I could make the liberal progressives into fascist eugenicists within one generation and they would think this is all natural. In fact the countryside would resist this a bit more. [/QUOTE]

Verification