Cumlluminates
Woodpecker
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers
NYT: "Hiring pieces of shit and spreading shit is what we do"...
NYT: "Hiring pieces of shit and spreading shit is what we do"...
NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep With Mothers"
- Thread starter AManLikePutin
- Start date
puckerman
Ostrich
The author is named Stephen Marche.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Marche
I can't believe that anybody takes the New York Times seriously anymore.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Marche
I can't believe that anybody takes the New York Times seriously anymore.
"If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep With Mothers"
Alternate title for this article:
"Muh Dick"
Alternate title for this article:
"Muh Dick"
LionHound
Robin
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep Wit...
One of the dumbest titles for an article I've ever seen. Normies are going to see it and wonder wtf? Maybe they click on it and try to read through the drivel but I doubt the words will sway them one way or the other. Unless they're mentally ill. NYT must know where their bread is buttered and have decided to double down for their audience. Is the fact that these are all higher profile/famous/rich men lost on the writers/editors of NYT? Bad game, ''the old power corrupts'', and plain old deviancy theme is strong in all these men that have been accused. If the NYT were really concerned or smart they'd write an article specifically targeting famous/rich men and why they feel they can get away with such things. But that would be opening pandora's box (to them anyway) But nope they have this dumbass article written by a soy boy looping all men into this category.
One of the dumbest titles for an article I've ever seen. Normies are going to see it and wonder wtf? Maybe they click on it and try to read through the drivel but I doubt the words will sway them one way or the other. Unless they're mentally ill. NYT must know where their bread is buttered and have decided to double down for their audience. Is the fact that these are all higher profile/famous/rich men lost on the writers/editors of NYT? Bad game, ''the old power corrupts'', and plain old deviancy theme is strong in all these men that have been accused. If the NYT were really concerned or smart they'd write an article specifically targeting famous/rich men and why they feel they can get away with such things. But that would be opening pandora's box (to them anyway) But nope they have this dumbass article written by a soy boy looping all men into this category.
Germanicus
Kingfisher
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep Wit...
Sadly Marche is typical of middle class, educated, white Canadian males who live in the bigger cities. Yes, really.
Those of you who aren't Canadian are rightly disgusted by such a creature. Now imagine how I and the other few remaining Canadian men who aren't grovelling slaves experience day-to-day life with these eunuchs infesting our country.
Once upon a time, Canadian men were the shock troops of the British Empire. My forefathers charged through murderous machine gun fire at Passchendaele and Vimy Ridge to sake their bloodlust and to conquer for King and Country. The 3rd Canadian Division was assigned to take Juno Beach on D-Day all by itself. And by midnight on June 7, 1944 had pushed farther inland than any of the American or British ground forces. In Korea, Canadian men held their ground while outnumbered ten-to-one by ceaseless Chinese human wave attacks.
And today the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of these men joyfully revel in their weakness and emasculation as they earnestly pledge to hate themselves more for being white and male.
I really don't know how much longer my country can exist. The wages of cuckdom is destruction.
Sadly Marche is typical of middle class, educated, white Canadian males who live in the bigger cities. Yes, really.
Those of you who aren't Canadian are rightly disgusted by such a creature. Now imagine how I and the other few remaining Canadian men who aren't grovelling slaves experience day-to-day life with these eunuchs infesting our country.
Once upon a time, Canadian men were the shock troops of the British Empire. My forefathers charged through murderous machine gun fire at Passchendaele and Vimy Ridge to sake their bloodlust and to conquer for King and Country. The 3rd Canadian Division was assigned to take Juno Beach on D-Day all by itself. And by midnight on June 7, 1944 had pushed farther inland than any of the American or British ground forces. In Korea, Canadian men held their ground while outnumbered ten-to-one by ceaseless Chinese human wave attacks.
And today the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of these men joyfully revel in their weakness and emasculation as they earnestly pledge to hate themselves more for being white and male.
I really don't know how much longer my country can exist. The wages of cuckdom is destruction.
Another day, another misandrist media hit piece.
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep Wit...
^
Here's his fat, feminist wife looking fat & superior
Lots of gunt here
The happy couple at his book launch, a book about hearing everyday about how he's not making the bed.
A bit more candid than the posey one above. At arm's length tho.
^
Here's his fat, feminist wife looking fat & superior
Lots of gunt here
The happy couple at his book launch, a book about hearing everyday about how he's not making the bed.
A bit more candid than the posey one above. At arm's length tho.
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep Wit...
Seeing as we're on the topic, notice how the Onion also indulges in some male shaming today. This article was almost certainly written by a woman. You can tell because it's not funny, and secondly, because it's seething with petty misandry.
Little does this bitch know: I will be fucking eighteen years olds until I'm forty or fifty at least, while she internally weeps over wasted eggs in her Manhattan apartment.
Seeing as we're on the topic, notice how the Onion also indulges in some male shaming today. This article was almost certainly written by a woman. You can tell because it's not funny, and secondly, because it's seething with petty misandry.
Little does this bitch know: I will be fucking eighteen years olds until I'm forty or fifty at least, while she internally weeps over wasted eggs in her Manhattan apartment.
puckerman
Ostrich
I found his Facebook page. He posted a link to his article on it. Anybody can comment on it, whether you are his friend or not. Go for it, guys:
https://www.facebook.com/stephen.marche
https://www.facebook.com/stephen.marche
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep Wit...
Why did it take you so long? Explain yourself!
El Padrone said:
Why did it take you so long? Explain yourself!
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep Wit...
So true. Every time that a character in a crime drama threatens to expose someone by "sending information to New York Times", I burst into uncontrollable laughter.
puckerman said:
So true. Every time that a character in a crime drama threatens to expose someone by "sending information to New York Times", I burst into uncontrollable laughter.
Sumanguru
Kingfisher
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep Wit...
Wow. These are terrible photos. With his second chin and wrinkled blazer, he looks like shit. And her body language. Look how she keeps her distance, even leaning away from him in one pic. Hand in pocket. Painful grimace. Hiding the wedding ring in 3 out of the 4 pics (and the one pic you can see the ring is the one where she's blatantly leaning away from him). It's even worse because he's obviously in love with her (look how intensely he's staring at her, with a genuine smile. He's really happy to be married to her. And ironically, that's probably part of why she's grossed out by him).
Gentlemen, if you ever see your chick giving off body language like that, either elevate your game or abandon ship.
Conscious Pirate said:^
Here's his fat, feminist wife looking fat & superior
Lots of gunt here
The happy couple at his book launch, a book about hearing everyday about how he's not making the bed.
A bit more candid than the posey one above. At arm's length tho.
Wow. These are terrible photos. With his second chin and wrinkled blazer, he looks like shit. And her body language. Look how she keeps her distance, even leaning away from him in one pic. Hand in pocket. Painful grimace. Hiding the wedding ring in 3 out of the 4 pics (and the one pic you can see the ring is the one where she's blatantly leaning away from him). It's even worse because he's obviously in love with her (look how intensely he's staring at her, with a genuine smile. He's really happy to be married to her. And ironically, that's probably part of why she's grossed out by him).
Gentlemen, if you ever see your chick giving off body language like that, either elevate your game or abandon ship.
Jetset
Ostrich
RE: NYT: "If You Let Boys Be Boys, They will Murder their Fathers & Sleep Wit...
In defense of El Padrone:
When the NYT's reporting is good, it's extremely good, and they often have good travel and food sections. Due to their bias, they do sometimes pick up on useful pieces of legitimate stories that others miss.
It's just this utter lunacy that they insist on not only publishing (fine, I can ignore it), but promoting in my feeds (now you're wasting my time). You unfollow, the disgust subsides after a few months, you think you can bang this leftist plate again after you see a decent article, then they publish something telling you that men need to learn to cry more or a short story about a man who is beside himself because he obliviously ignored emergency phone calls about his dying father for anonymous gay sex, and the cycle begins anew.
They could easily fix this if they wanted to, but there's a divorced, bipolar cat lady in Greenwich Village who is paying real money for her supply of Liberal Drama Outrage Porn.
In defense of Stephen Marche:
His wife's chin is more prominent than his. Her test levels are through the roof. Being a typical blue pill chump, he mistakenly thought he would be the beneficiary of her libido, and instead ended up trained to hate himself for wanting to bang his own wife.
His constant meditations on gender and "male loneliness" - according to the Amazon 'Look Inside' tool, the synopsis of his book notes that they decided to give up his tenure-track job and prioritize her career, the introduction is entitled "How Much Should a Man Speak?", and the first chapter opens with a description of his wife demanding an iPad to send a work email in the middle of the birth of their child while he meekly suggests that perhaps it should be a moment about them as a family - point to a textbook case of an unwanted failed provider, a placeholder male, trying to understand where things have gone so terribly wrong. It's all a vague, mealy-mouthed expression of his own cognitive dissonance, his awareness that something just isn't right about all of this, despite dutifully doing everything he was told.
Naturally, Marche has an advanced degree in Drama. Literally. He thrives on this shit. I submit that the article is an angry outburst over his realization that everybody is getting laid except him. He's lived a life in service to these ideas, only to find that even his liberal culture heroes would be happy to impregnate his wife, ghost her, and leave him to clean up the burning wreckage of his marriage just for shits and giggles. He is more frustrated with his benighted male experience than ever before. His beta rage is actually understandable, and he might even be dangerously close to a breakthrough - or a mass killing, I don't know.
Handsome Creepy Eel said:
In defense of El Padrone:
When the NYT's reporting is good, it's extremely good, and they often have good travel and food sections. Due to their bias, they do sometimes pick up on useful pieces of legitimate stories that others miss.
It's just this utter lunacy that they insist on not only publishing (fine, I can ignore it), but promoting in my feeds (now you're wasting my time). You unfollow, the disgust subsides after a few months, you think you can bang this leftist plate again after you see a decent article, then they publish something telling you that men need to learn to cry more or a short story about a man who is beside himself because he obliviously ignored emergency phone calls about his dying father for anonymous gay sex, and the cycle begins anew.
They could easily fix this if they wanted to, but there's a divorced, bipolar cat lady in Greenwich Village who is paying real money for her supply of Liberal Drama Outrage Porn.
Germanicus said:
In defense of Stephen Marche:
His wife's chin is more prominent than his. Her test levels are through the roof. Being a typical blue pill chump, he mistakenly thought he would be the beneficiary of her libido, and instead ended up trained to hate himself for wanting to bang his own wife.
His constant meditations on gender and "male loneliness" - according to the Amazon 'Look Inside' tool, the synopsis of his book notes that they decided to give up his tenure-track job and prioritize her career, the introduction is entitled "How Much Should a Man Speak?", and the first chapter opens with a description of his wife demanding an iPad to send a work email in the middle of the birth of their child while he meekly suggests that perhaps it should be a moment about them as a family - point to a textbook case of an unwanted failed provider, a placeholder male, trying to understand where things have gone so terribly wrong. It's all a vague, mealy-mouthed expression of his own cognitive dissonance, his awareness that something just isn't right about all of this, despite dutifully doing everything he was told.
Naturally, Marche has an advanced degree in Drama. Literally. He thrives on this shit. I submit that the article is an angry outburst over his realization that everybody is getting laid except him. He's lived a life in service to these ideas, only to find that even his liberal culture heroes would be happy to impregnate his wife, ghost her, and leave him to clean up the burning wreckage of his marriage just for shits and giggles. He is more frustrated with his benighted male experience than ever before. His beta rage is actually understandable, and he might even be dangerously close to a breakthrough - or a mass killing, I don't know.