Obama Only Calls on Female Reporters During Press Conference

[Duke Castile]

It seems I'm wrong about him in this instance.

Just seeing this by the way.

 

[TravelerKai]

So how come Obama isn't getting slammed for sexism?

Because men have let this stupid shit slide for too long. Too many times on RVF we have discussed what happens if you give women too much slack. Give em an inch they will take that mile in a heartbeat. Same shit applies to white knights and manginas, because they are emulating effeminate behavior. In this case he either wants pussy or votes from women, or maybe both. Let him do it. Other blue pill men of all age groups need a system shock of some kind. They need to keep seeing that the Democrat party hates men. Not just white men, all men. Their army of women that mooch off social programs and fucked up alimony laws can be their downfall if these men would just wake the fuck up. There are plenty of conservative minded women to help tip the balance of power.

I'm not advocating Republican party, not yet at least, but if these idiotic liberals are to start loosing their grip on this society, it is going to be up to the men to decide this and stop being liberal and supporting these idiots.

Women in the US during these times will be regarded as having the highest amount of power any society of women has ever had. Even though Historians make rules about saying things like this, there is more than enough evidence to make this argument. I am confident about saying that now. If men want to live better they need to stop kissing women's asses and take them off the pedestal.

 

[Troll King]

So, he is basically the beta-orbiter and chief of the USA?

I have said it before and will say it again. Women now control elections. At the national level they collectively have more than 50% of the ballot, I think in the last presidential election it was 58%. At the local level it can easily be in the 70% or higher depending on the location.

Also, women know that husbands and fathers of girls are going to act differently than fathers of boys. I have seen some relate this to conspiracy theories and the PTB but I think it is a bit more unconscious and evolutionarily generated. I doubt, as with many things, that individual women are even aware of it.

IF you want to know who will win the next election, and to what degree they will pander to women and make men's lives worse, just look at which candidates, male or female, have daughters instead of sons.

 

[Soberane]

So, he is basically the beta-orbiter and chief of the USA?

I have said it before and will say it again. Women now control elections. At the national level they collectively have more than 50% of the ballot, I think in the last presidential election it was 58%. At the local level it can easily be in the 70% or higher depending on the location.

Also, women know that husbands and fathers of girls are going to act differently than fathers of boys. I have seen some relate this to conspiracy theories and the PTB but I think it is a bit more unconscious and evolutionarily generated. I doubt, as with many things, that individual women are even aware of it.

IF you want to know who will win the next election, and to what degree they will pander to women and make men's lives worse, just look at which candidates, male or female, have daughters instead of sons.

I think is different for women with daughters, Palin was a woman running for vice president with 3 daughters and become the most hated woman in politics by the media and women in general.

 

[Troll King]

So, he is basically the beta-orbiter and chief of the USA?

I have said it before and will say it again. Women now control elections. At the national level they collectively have more than 50% of the ballot, I think in the last presidential election it was 58%. At the local level it can easily be in the 70% or higher depending on the location.

Also, women know that husbands and fathers of girls are going to act differently than fathers of boys. I have seen some relate this to conspiracy theories and the PTB but I think it is a bit more unconscious and evolutionarily generated. I doubt, as with many things, that individual women are even aware of it.

IF you want to know who will win the next election, and to what degree they will pander to women and make men's lives worse, just look at which candidates, male or female, have daughters instead of sons.

I think is different for women with daughters, Palin was a woman running for vice president with 3 daughters and become the most hated woman in politics by the media and women in general.

True. True.

That was something that really opened my eyes. I was pretty shocked, and I think a lot of people on the left were too, at how fast and viciously leftist women tore her down.

I don't know where her kids play in this role but I have suspected for a long time that many of the reasons leftist women went after her so viciously is because she mirrored them in a lot of ways and also because she rivaled them in other ways. I never thought she was hot but to be honest she is far better looking than any leftist female politician than I have seen. That would be true with most leftist women in general I think.

As it is though, her being a woman I bet she would have done worse against men than our mangina VP Biden has.

 

[It_is_my_time]

Obama is the most feminist major presidential candidate by miles. This is just par for the course. And when either Hillary or Elizabeth Warren win in 2016, the same shit will continue, and it will keep getting worse and worse for men in the USA.

 

[Soberane]

So, he is basically the beta-orbiter and chief of the USA?

I have said it before and will say it again. Women now control elections. At the national level they collectively have more than 50% of the ballot, I think in the last presidential election it was 58%. At the local level it can easily be in the 70% or higher depending on the location.

Also, women know that husbands and fathers of girls are going to act differently than fathers of boys. I have seen some relate this to conspiracy theories and the PTB but I think it is a bit more unconscious and evolutionarily generated. I doubt, as with many things, that individual women are even aware of it.

IF you want to know who will win the next election, and to what degree they will pander to women and make men's lives worse, just look at which candidates, male or female, have daughters instead of sons.

I think is different for women with daughters, Palin was a woman running for vice president with 3 daughters and become the most hated woman in politics by the media and women in general.

True. True.

That was something that really opened my eyes. I was pretty shocked, and I think a lot of people on the left were too, at how fast and viciously leftist women tore her down.

I don't know where her kids play in this role but I have suspected for a long time that many of the reasons leftist women went after her so viciously is because she mirrored them in a lot of ways and also because she rivaled them in other ways. I never thought she was hot but to be honest she is far better looking than any leftist female politician than I have seen. That would be true with most leftist women in general I think.

As it is though, her being a woman I bet she would have done worse against men than our mangina VP Biden has.

When women see men with daughters they know they can pander and incite to his white knight instinct, he can't say may things for fear to being labeled women hater and how he hates his own daughters, women like Palin or Ann coulter are hard place in the same category, even when they are labeled as women haters the narrative fall apart because is coming from a woman, that is why many Republicans are now letting the Republican women be the one that talks for them, it makes them look weak a bit, but is a smart move in politics, notice how Fox news has replaced the men with women all over their broadcasting.

I never thought she was hot but to be honest she is far better looking than any leftist female politician than I have seen. That would be true with most leftist women in general I think.

Palin is not bad looking for a woman her age that has popped out 5 kids, don't let herself go fat and don't shop her hair.

On average, conservative women are better looking than liberals, is a well know phenomenon

 

[Hotwheels]

Would smash every one of them repeatedly.

Bet they make breakfast as well.

 

[Soberane]

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uMqNZOtkWiY/U-Ame44S6YI/AAAAAAAA7Oo/rkA2YUGmKw8/s1600/10524696_1
[img]http://i.minus.com/iS2WlM98npDqW.gif0201989547294800_5660509256885389601_n_crop.jpg[/img]

Would smash every one of them repeatedly.

Bet they make breakfast as well.

I have to thanks Fox News for he amazing display of legs and mini skirts.

This one has Literally her ass out, her cheeks are siting on that sofa

You can see in the video below how she pull her skirt up to show more legs

Co-anchor Brian Kilmeade asked Earhardt if she ever wore pantsuits herself, and she said she had, but, "Here at Fox, we like to be feminine. So we don't wear the pants." Kilmeade wanted to make sure he wasn't misunderstood, though — he is firmly against pantsuits. "If I was to run for office, I'd run on the pro-skirt platform," he said

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/03/fox-anchor-here-at-fox-we_n_89695.html

Fox News has a different contract for women, a dress code for its females anchors, they must wear mini skirt, also, smile constantly and never interrupt the males anchors and stop talking if the male anchor starts to talk while she is talking.

It is funny to watch many of the shows they have, is like a frat house for men where women are the toys to play around.


The females anchors get called out by big producers if they don't smile to often or don't sit feminine enough.

 

[Hotwheels]

Short haired women are not welcome at Fox News.

I like that

 

[Soberane]

Short haired women are not welcome at Fox News.

I like that

Former Fox producer:

Fox News’ Ideal Woman: “Blonde, Giant-Haired, Hypersexualized, Combative” (VIDEO)

http://www.slate.com/blogs/trending..._about_roger_ailes_ahead_of_book_release.html

Roger Ailes likes legs and attractive women, in a biography they explain that is why the females are seated behind the glass table or in corners of the table.

Look how strategically are the females seated on The Five

Even when they put Tantaros behind the table they make sure you can see her legs

Here is how they do it.

When Karl Rove insisted that it was way too early to call Ohio, and hence the election, for Barack

Obama on election night 2012, Megyn Kelly was sent on an epic march through the studio to the “Decision Desk”:

On her trek, Kelly said that the Decisioneers used to be on the same set as the election anchors, but “then for some reason, they moved them down the hall.” But there were two excellent reasons, according to a Fox employee who told Sherman, “This is Fox News, so anytime there’s a chance to show off Megyn Kelly’s legs they’ll go for it.”

http://wonkette.com/539031/roger-ai...-glass-desk-to-not-be-able-to-see-your-snatch


These below are the official poster for a Spanish TV serie on Fox News Latino

He is quoted saying on the biography

Ailes: "Move That Damn Laptop, I Can't See Her Legs!"

Ailes: "I Did Not Spend X-Number Of Dollars On A Glass Desk For Her To Wear Pant Suits"

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/13/i-cant-see-her-legs-roger-ailes-rampant-sexism/197552

They put Jeanine Pirro behind a desk and they barely show her below the wrist, she is over 60.



But when the opportunity arrives, don't miss it.

This is from 2009


NOt matter how much MSNBC try to push women like Rachel Maddow, Jezebel with fat cows like Lindy West, Tumblr with colored hair, and hipster with Skrillex, Fox News sell femininity, and of course it works.
Male brain is programmed one way.


And for sure liberals hate it

 

[TravelerKai]

Cot damn that's brutal. Those posts got my blood going this morning. They basically do the same thing I do to my wife No pants! I had no idea FOX was always like that. I watched some Fox and CNN on another screen to watch the election results in realtime, and I was enjoying the FOX ladies at that time. I had no idea it was always like that because I usually do not watch TV for news.

 

[Soberane]

Cot damn that's brutal. Those posts got my blood going this morning. They basically do the same thing I do to my wife No pants! I had no idea FOX was always like that. I watched some Fox and CNN on another screen to watch the election results in realtime, and I was enjoying the FOX ladies at that time. I had no idea it was always like that because I usually do not watch TV for news.

Cot damn that's brutal. Those posts got my blood going this morning.

It is soft erotica, like pinups, they don't have to be naked just play a role and let the skirt move more and more upward.

They basically do the same thing I do to my wife No pants!

Yeah, good thing for you, I remember an episode on cheaters, when after the guy caught his girlfriend with other guy on a mall, the first thing he said was "you don't wear that sexy clothes when you are with me"

Not looking sexy for her man in front of people is a disrespectful thing to do against a man, a woman should always show everyone else that her man has not just a hot woman, but the hottest woman.

Support her man


Fox News just play the old pinup theme, they need to show legs, even when the female is behind the desk she has to find a way to show legs, like S.E Cupp

But there is something deeper here, Fox is supposed to be the conservative church goer puritanical clossed minded network, yet, they have attractive beautiful females displaying their sexuality all over the the place, MSNBC is supposed to be the open minded sexuality open sex positive pro sexual revolution network, yet, they have ugly women and dykes like Maddow.

If you search on internet about the issue of females Fox's anchors skirt, you end up in tons of progressive, socialists and feminists sites, this is the same narrative we see when these same groups talk trash about Victoria's Secret models and beauty pageants being sexist and oppressive.

When women see Fox's females anchor, they are remembered how they would look like if they put effort into it, women hate to see better looking women in TV, but can't stop talking about it.


Fox News Uses a “Leg Cam” to Ogle Female Panelists

There’s a camera that they have, and what they do — I’m told this is absolutely true — they sort of sort the women they have by the degree of attractiveness, and particularly the degree of attractiveness of the legs. I believe it’s the seat on the front right where, having arranged this hierarchy, they put the woman with the best legs there and they have a camera that goes directly for the legs. And so essentially they have what they call the “leg cam,” and that is to accentuate the sleekness and design of that particular person on-air.

This is the "leg cam"

https://archive.today/bSZXr#selection-3703.0-3709.144


Look at a analysis on networks appearance

TV news shows have always put a premium on appearance, more so for women than for men. And it’s hardly a revelation that some networks place more pressure on women than do others: C-SPAN has no makeup room at all, just a collection of powder compacts that guests can use if they are so inclined. At MSNBC, Rachel Maddow is known to prefer minimal makeup, while other anchors want more, and the artists oblige with a range of choices, from neutral tones to berry hues. Bloomberg TV tends toward the corporate aesthetic; CNN favors a professional style that makes women and men look crisp, as if they have been ironed. As for Fox, suffice it to say that there is a YouTube montage devoted to leg shots of Fox anchors, who are often outfitted in body-hugging dresses of vibrant red and turquoise, their eyes enhanced by not only liner and shadow but also false lashes. A Fox regular once commented to me that she gets more calls from network management about her hair, clothes, and makeup than about what she says. “I just think of it as a uniform,” she said of her getup.

Read more at http://www.newshounds.us/it_s_not_y...ear_more_make_up_09022012#p1uFEWpyC42aRFtK.99

It is not surprised that the men and women at MSNBC look alike

Now, NRA launched a program where they use the same formula, legs all the way

And if she has tits, better shake them

 

[Hotwheels]

But there is something deeper here, Fox is supposed to be the conservative church goer puritanical clossed minded network, yet, they have attractive beautiful females displaying their sexuality all over the the place,

I don't look at Fox as "churchgoer" but rather more traditional in it's values. And traditional men AND women prefer the attractive female versus the mud shark feminist harpy's that populate the other networks.

The hot female hosts convey the same message they promote vocally, one of traditional values.

If MSNBC had a bunch of hot ass anchors promoting feminist ideals it would come off as disingenuous as everyone knows hot ass women don't need nor want feminism. If anything, feminism is bad for women that get where they are due to their appearance as it creates more competition for them.

btw-I caught some of that NRA channel a while back at a local bar and I chuckled when I saw the broads in heels and short dresses/skirts. They know their market.

 

[MidWest]

^^^Interesting insights. But I'm more of an ass man when it comes to female anchor hosts, I want my female hosts to have curves. Fox News and MSNBC don't got shit on Telemundo and Univision.











Traditional or not, Univision and Telemundo knows how to attract men in particular.


Edit--Why did Soberane get banned?

 

[kosko]

[Draft post removed by moderator.]