Oklahoma Frat Shut Down - Racist Chant

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sherman

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
When I first saw this story, I thought that it took place on a public bus and they were harassing innocent passengers. But then when I took a closer look, I find out that this was a private party on a private chartered bus. They actually didn't intend to do anything public. They never forced their views on anyone. They didn't harass anyone. So we are talking about pure thought and not action. If someone is at fault, it is the person who recorded it and put it on YouTube. They are the ones who made it public.

Nobody seems to even recognize the basic issue, that this was private, which means that we are really talking about a thought crime. What about this situation. You are in your shower and decide to sing an offensive song about homosexuals. Your girlfriend, who you just had a fight with, records the song on her phone and gives it to your employer. You are then fired. Is this any different?

With the advent of cell phone cameras, we are now in a de facto liberal dictatorship where you have to speak euphemisms in a low voice to only people you completely trust because if you say anything that offends the ruling powers, you are dead.

You should be concerned about this no matter what your race because someday you may be fired from your job for cursing a feminist while sitting on the toilet in the privacy of your own home.
 

Sourcecode

Crow
Gold Member
If you have more questions the differences in free speech and hate speech.

Brandenburg v Ohio,Civil Rights Act of 1964 ect ect.

It's not hard to find out where lines cross
 

Enigma

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
Sherman said:
When I first saw this story, I thought that it took place on a public bus and they were harassing innocent passengers. But then when I took a closer look, I find out that this was a private party on a private chartered bus. They actually didn't intend to do anything public. They never forced their views on anyone. They didn't harass anyone. So we are talking about pure thought and not action. If someone is at fault, it is the person who recorded it and put it on YouTube. They are the ones who made it public.

Nobody seems to even recognize the basic issue, that this was private, which means that we are really talking about a thought crime. What about this situation. You are in your shower and decide to sing an offensive song about homosexuals. Your girlfriend, who you just had a fight with, records the song on her phone and gives it to your employer. You are then fired. Is this any different?

With the advent of cell phone cameras, we are now in a de facto liberal dictatorship where you have to speak euphemisms in a low voice to only people you completely trust because if you say anything that offends the ruling powers, you are dead.

You should be concerned about this no matter what your race because someday you may be fired from your job for cursing a feminist while sitting on the toilet in the privacy of your own home.

Can we stop with all the ridiculous analogies already?

If anyone is hyping this up, it's the people comparing getting kicked out of an extracurricular activity to death and imprisonment.

How will these young men ever continue now that they have to party at a different frat house this weekend?
 

worldwidetraveler

Hummingbird
Gold Member
Sourcecode said:
If you have more questions the differences in free speech and hate speech.

Brandenburg v Ohio,Civil Rights Act of 1964 ect ect.

It's not hard to find out where lines cross


"The Court held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is directed to inciting, and is likely to incite, imminent lawless action."

How about you break down how they were trying to incite imminent lawless action here. Do you believe they were going to hang some people or something?
 
Sourcecode said:
Ha.. Yes.. Because attempting to reeducate them will really work?
Any community service or reeducation these kids take will be them trying to cover their asses.
It's not gonna change them

How do you know they wouldn't come away with a different point of view? When I was a kid I grew up around people spouting casual racist shit and I might've taken it to heart if I had never met or been forced to interact with people from other races in school.

I learned it was a bunch of insecure bullshit and that people are ultimately people, whatever their skin color might be.

I think you are projecting.
 

Sherman

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
Enigma said:
Sherman said:
When I first saw this story, I thought that it took place on a public bus and they were harassing innocent passengers. But then when I took a closer look, I find out that this was a private party on a private chartered bus. They actually didn't intend to do anything public. They never forced their views on anyone. They didn't harass anyone. So we are talking about pure thought and not action. If someone is at fault, it is the person who recorded it and put it on YouTube. They are the ones who made it public.

Nobody seems to even recognize the basic issue, that this was private, which means that we are really talking about a thought crime. What about this situation. You are in your shower and decide to sing an offensive song about homosexuals. Your girlfriend, who you just had a fight with, records the song on her phone and gives it to your employer. You are then fired. Is this any different?

With the advent of cell phone cameras, we are now in a de facto liberal dictatorship where you have to speak euphemisms in a low voice to only people you completely trust because if you say anything that offends the ruling powers, you are dead.

You should be concerned about this no matter what your race because someday you may be fired from your job for cursing a feminist while sitting on the toilet in the privacy of your own home.

Can we stop with all the ridiculous analogies already?

If anyone is hyping this up, it's the people comparing getting kicked out of an extracurricular activity to death and imprisonment.

How will these young men ever continue now that they have to party at a different frat house this weekend?

It's more than an analogy. It is a direct consequence and extension of the same rational. It's not ridiculous because powerful forces are aggressively pushing these agendas and their intention is to expand the envelope and make more and more behavior inclusive. There is no death and imprisonment at least for now.
 
worldwidetraveler said:
"The Court held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is directed to inciting, and is likely to incite, imminent lawless action."

How about you break down how they were trying to incite imminent lawless action here. Do you believe they were going to hang some people or something?

Notice the word "government".
 

worldwidetraveler

Hummingbird
Gold Member
aSimpNamedBrokeback said:
worldwidetraveler said:
"The Court held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is directed to inciting, and is likely to incite, imminent lawless action."

How about you break down how they were trying to incite imminent lawless action here. Do you believe they were going to hang some people or something?

Notice the word "government".

Yes, you're right, educational institutions may have their own rules. Still, what constitutes as hate speech is typically defined by cases such as Sourcecode posted.

These were kids on a private bus. They were not out in public trying to garner support for illegal activities.
 
The European man is waking up all over the world. The sons of Achilles and Aeneas will march again in unison in righteous retribution.

davhor.jpg
 

Sp5

 
Banned
Sourcecode said:
If you have more questions the differences in free speech and hate speech.

Brandenburg v Ohio,Civil Rights Act of 1964 ect ect.

It's not hard to find out where lines cross

Yes, the line is drawn at direct threats and incitement to violence with the intention to carry out the threats and commit violence. That is the clear line. The frat boys did not cross that line.

Brandenburg dealt with a "criminal sydicalism" statute. The KKK members were on film organizing an armed rebellion and inciting each other to violence, which was the distinction. They were going to march on Congress and get "revengence," with guns in hand.

This fraternity thing was not a direct incitement to violence, just fools goofing on a bus.

The threshold to proscribe speech for incitement to violence or threats is set very high. See Watts v. United States 394 U.S. 705 (1969). Racist speech and gestures, even cross burning, is presumptively considered protected speech. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992), Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003). You can burn the American flag, too: Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)

Since state universities have some leeway to police conduct, they can probably do something, but dissolving an organization and mass punishment might be too much. There's a Due Process issue, too, if the OU president just ordered this without a hearing.
 

MidWest

 
Banned
Sp5 said:
Sourcecode said:
If you have more questions the differences in free speech and hate speech.

Brandenburg v Ohio,Civil Rights Act of 1964 ect ect.

It's not hard to find out where lines cross

Yes, Brandenburg dealt with a "criminal sydicalism" statute. The KKK members were on film organizing an armed rebellion and inciting each other to violence, which was the distinction. They were going to march on Congress and get "revengence," with guns in hand.

This fraternity thing was not a direct incitement to violence, just fools goofing on a bus.

The threshold to proscribe speech for incitement to violence or threats is set very high. See Watts v. United States 394 U.S. 705 (1969). Racist speech and gestures, even cross burning, is presumptively considered protected speech. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992), Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003).

Since state universities have some leeway to police conduct, they can probably do something, but dissolving an organization and mass punishment might be too much.


It doesn't matter, the President does not want his university to be labeled as a racist university. Regardless if people think the punishment was harsh, its his house his rules, they can go somewhere else.
 
Jon said:
The European man is waking up all over the world. The sons of Achilles and Aeneas will march again in unison in righteous retribution.

You're either in the wrong thread or on the wrong site altogether. By the way, I think the Greeks are too busy lazing about to care about dumb American news stories.
 

worldwidetraveler

Hummingbird
Gold Member
MidWest said:
It doesn't matter, the President does not want his university to be labeled as a racist university. Regardless if people think the punishment was harsh, its his house his rules, they can go somewhere else.

I imagine that is the same reason men will get booted once a woman yells rape. Who wants to be known as a rapist university? It will be interesting to see if any legal suits are brought against the university.
 

la_mode

 
Banned
Blacks & gays (of any race) have a special protection in the US.

Had they chanted out "no chinks/spics/kikes/camel jockeys" - the MSM wouldn't care. Only gays could conjure up the same level of attention. Even if they specifically said white gays.

SJW facebook pages wouldn't be getting replies by the minute from the hivemind for any other ethnicity. You also wouldn't see Hispanics sharing this with all their Hispanic friends nearly to the extent that blacks are (had Hispanics been the ones insulted).

While I understand there are differences in American history regarding blacks vs other minorities, these sorts of things are actually wanted by both the blacks and the whites.

The SJW whites can feign outrage (which they wouldn't do for any other ethnic minority), the blacks can say whites are still racist (which many are but this allows them to say it without being accused of race-baiting), and essentially everyone is satisfied including the media, as they are always in search of some new cannon fodder. This is even pleasing to the hardcore racists in whichever factions of the KKK may be left in some states, considering it's music to their ears hearing it everytime they turn on TV. It's a win-win for everyone.

No one should be too surprised by some collegiate white boys in a state like Oklahoma getting drunk and reciting chants that are basically par for the course in notoriously red states (of course pointing this out may end up being more controversial than the chant itself). These guys probably aren't even true racists, and if they are, does anyone really care what they think? Some college guys get drunk, chant out things similar to stuff they heard growing up, and it makes CNN breaking news.

They aren't going to be able to shake this off, it will be there forever and their names will appear on google forever as the SJW's want them publically lynched. They're already kicked out of the school, but of course this isn't enough for the SJW's.

There used to be massive protests until a few years ago regarding illegal immigration, which was almost entirely directed towards Hispanics. Large groups of white men would chant racial slurs in public towards Hispanics, and the SJW's made about as much noise as a feather falling on marble.

Kappa Alpha also probably enjoys this because they've always been historically known as the racist frat, now it's SAE.
 

Troll King

Kingfisher
Enigma said:
How many actual Southerners do we have in here?

Lynching was widespread until less than 50 years ago. When you or your parent's generation was being terrorized and murdered for the color of your skin, it is not something you take as a "joke".

And neither do these boys singing the song. They understand exactly how hateful and derogatory it is.

If you're a major university in the South, this is simply something you can not be seen condoning. These issues are still very fresh in people's minds and surrounded with a large amount of tension.

If you want to see a real double standard, read people's posts about Muslims attacking people because of their religion and then watch them take the exact opposite stance about white people attacking others for their race.

"But they aren't actually racist" ignoring the fact that these boys' parents didn't even attend the same schools as blacks. Yeah, there's absolutely no chance that they actually harbor any animosity towards blacks, it's all an aberration created by the media :tard:

Enigma said:
TheWastelander said:
Oklahoma isn't in the South, but point taken.

Geographically, no. Culturally, yes.

Just look at the Tulsa Race Riot.

Whelp, I was trying not to post in this thread.

But here it is. The middle school that I went to in the South used to be the high school when my dad went to the same school. It was rebuilt after the KKK blew it up. They did this because we were, technically I believe (I don't want to give too much info here). either the first or the second school to be desegregated before even Little Rock. They had to call in the National guard to force the desegregation.

I have seen my dads picture in the small town, with many of the same building still there and a few diners and RX places still in business, with jeeps with guards manning .50 Cal machine guns and soldiers with bayonets fixed to their M14s.

There is still some racism. You will occasionally see stars and bars but unless the guy rocking them is wearing an Outlaw jacket or some other 1%er patch the likelihood of him saying anything to a non-white person in any manner is incredibly unlikely. Even more unlikely for him to actually do something, but I have seen it before and in those couple of cases the white dude was more likely to walk away fucked up.

I have also seen some people, mostly frat guys, get drunk at college and think it was cool to say racist shit or repeat Dave Chappelle and Chris Rock jokes ad nauseam. These were usually incredibly sheltered idiots who are about the least likely to ever start a fight or say something racial to some ones face.

Personally, that is what I see here. But, I am also not on the receiving end of it and it is quite possible that I am just not that attuned to it. While I have had a lot of non-white friends here in the states and over seas growing up, I have also been the subject of racism, or at least hate, as a white guy. Got my ass kicked, and almost kicked even more times, by members of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt in middle and high school.

Also, at least around here, I haven't been to OK before, there are a lot of problems that effect white people that are generally caused by blacks. Also probably vice versa, but there are not many blacks in some of these areas but a large portion of them do engage in stereotypical behavior. Most of the time this is just blasting music loudly or something that doesn't matter. But other times, and I have worked with a few of these types and been friends with them, it does. An example would be of several old friends of mine. They like to hang out on "the hill" (basically the poorer black suburbs or ghetto, around here projects and other descriptors all pretty much describe poor whites) and sell crack.

They didn't smoke it. Instead they bragged about intentionally selling it to white girls to get them addicted so they could pimp them out or gangbang them for drugs as payment. I doubt the older church going ladies know about this, but plenty of younger guys and working class guys (a surprising number of construction workers don't just use meth but also supplement with crack) know about it and if you are a small town of about 15k people with about 4% black (seriously, I think we have more Asian and latinos) then that is going to influence some of the more white trash elements. Some of those elements may also be middle class white guys.

Not saying any of it is right. I am rambling a bit here, so I do apologize. I actually started this post to give a bit of my own observations about the south. So, here is a bit of history.

I didn't actually know much about the desegregation of my middle school, again which was my dads high school, until I took a racial history class in college. It was an interesting class, also kinda boring being mixed up with all the SJW crap.

I had a final project to write and I went and researched the desegregation. I went to the local newspaper, that existed then and still does, and they were more than happy to let me go through their microfilm and these huge books that had a copy of every paper they every published going way back.

It was really interesting to read through all the documents written at the time. One thing that really impressed me was how thorough and detailed and basically on point the newspapers were back then compared to today.

Another thing that blew my mind was that all the black people who were local were pretty much against integration. They wanted more money and better resources for their school. I remember one black preacher who said he feared integration because he thought it would lower the moral fabric of the black community. He suggested better and newer books and offered a compromise where the civil rights oriented teachers could come and teach at the black school a few days out of the week. He especially wanted the science teachers to teach. I thought that was interesting, because it kept with the spirit of integration while keeping the children safe from bullying and harm.

Now, here is where I found it really interesting. There were several individuals who were leading the KKK and they were all from out of state. The leader was from New Jersey. It was found out during his trial that a large part of the KKK soldiers were also from out of state. This really pissed off a lot of the whites who were on the fence. They didn't like northerners coming down to stir up racial animus.

Do you guys want to know what this leader was tried for, among many things, more than twice? He was brought up on charges of SEDITION. I found that really amusing. Each time the jury was going to convict his KKK soldiers would bomb or burn something and scare a few of the white jury members into voting no. That is how he got off both times. If I remember correctly, after the second trial they passed some laws that mentioned him by name and made it illegal for him to come back to the state. They basically figured out some way to deport his ass.

Well, I have posted enough in this thread so I will bow out before ending up on the wrong side of Tuth's hammer. I just wanted to share that last part mainly. For the record, I am not condoning these guys actions.

I know I am a bit racist and I could see myself, especially in my younger days, laughing about this and being coaxed into chanting along. I also don't have much love for frats. From the little bit of the video I watched these sounds like the types of assholes who go bar hopping and end up annoying the fuck out of everyone when they show up for their two natty lites on their way to the next bar. I guess I will just say the following. Some of the best guys I have met have been black. Some of the worst ones too. Just cause a few dumbasses from the south do something stupid, doesn't mean that we all think the same way or do the same thing.
 

Sp5

 
Banned
MidWest said:
Sp5 said:
Sourcecode said:
If you have more questions the differences in free speech and hate speech.

Brandenburg v Ohio,Civil Rights Act of 1964 ect ect.

It's not hard to find out where lines cross
Yes, the line is drawn at direct threats and incitement to violence with the intention to carry out the threats and commit violence. That is the clear line. The frat boys did not cross that line.

Brandenburg dealt with a "criminal sydicalism" statute. The KKK members were on film organizing an armed rebellion and inciting each other to violence, which was the distinction. They were going to march on Congress and get "revengence," with guns in hand.

This fraternity thing was not a direct incitement to violence, just fools goofing on a bus.

The threshold to proscribe speech for incitement to violence or threats is set very high. See Watts v. United States 394 U.S. 705 (1969). Racist speech and gestures, even cross burning, is presumptively considered protected speech. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992), Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003). You can burn the American flag, too: Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)

Since state universities have some leeway to police conduct, they can probably do something, but dissolving an organization and mass punishment might be too much. There's a Due Process issue, too, if the OU president just ordered this without a hearing.


It doesn't matter, the President does not want his university to be labeled as a racist university. Regardless if people think the punishment was harsh, its his house his rules, they can go somewhere else.

Ah, but it's not the President's house. It's the people of Oklahoma's house, subject to state and federal law and the Constitution.

Look at it this way: professors teach all kinds of controversial ideas in class. They have academic and Constitutional freedom to provoke debate. Students come from all kinds of backgrounds, from Evangelical Christian to Black Muslims to Atheists. Queer activists and Mormons. Some of what many such groups fo is deeply objectionable and "intimidating" or "inappropriate" to others. They have to have leeway to be different.

I am all in favor of putting these guys names out there and giving them a social sanction, but why does everything have to have a legal punishment?
 

Troll King

Kingfisher
Jon said:
The European man is waking up all over the world. The sons of Achilles and Aeneas will march again in unison in righteous retribution.

davhor.jpg

Well now, dude has been here longer than me, has far fewer posts, and probably won't be here tomorrow. And I have the word Troll in my name! :)
 

Disco_Volante

 
Banned
2 of the SAE's have now been expelled from OU.

http://www.koco.com/news/ou-investi...wing-fraternity-singing-racist-chant/31686542

No other college will take them, itd be a PR nightmare for any other college to let them enroll.
Campuses are ground zero for social justice warriors so these kids are basically fucked.
They should be punished, but ruining their lives by running them off every campus is overdoing it. Black people say 'nigger' all the time.

SAE at OU has (had) 160 members, punishing them all for the actions of maybe 8 of them is pretty absurd.

I wonder if the sorority girl who recorded and leaked this video feels any remorse? OU's reputation is now shit, they've lost football recruits, now they cant have date parties with them etc.....I bet some of the other sororities are pissed at this girl.
 

Libertas

Crow
Gold Member
Disco_Volante said:
2 of the SAE's have now been expelled from OU.

http://www.koco.com/news/ou-investi...wing-fraternity-singing-racist-chant/31686542

No other college will take them, itd be a PR nightmare for any other college to let them enroll.
Campuses are ground zero for social justice warriors so these kids are basically fucked.
They should be punished, but ruining their lives by running them off every campus is overdoing it. Black people say 'nigger' all the time.

I wonder if the sorority girl who recorded and leaked this video feels any remorse? OU's reputation is now shit, they've lost football recruits, now they cant have date parties with them etc.....I bet some of the other sororities are pissed at this girl.

Well, that didn't take long.

That's where I think the line needs to be drawn and the point Sherman was making earlier. When we start to have moral panics over private behavior, anyone is under threat for running afoul of the prevailing orthodoxy, whatever that is.

As a matter of fact these guys are probably going to be a bigger threat now than if they had just been mandated to do some community service like Wastelander suggested. They're going to be blacklisted from academia and any good job that might have been waiting for them. They're a bigger threat now because they no longer have anything to lose.

The university disbanding the fraternity and punishing the students was appropriate, but ruining someone's life over this is something that bothers me, no matter how horrible what they said was.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top