This idea of "surprise rape" is an outrage, and comes very close to making regret rape legally equivalent to the real thing.
We are supposed to believe that just because these sluts did not have an accurate idea of what the guy looked like, they did not really "consent". How is this different from "He seemed really sweet and like someone who was looking for a relationship so I let him fuck me; but he never texted me the next morning proving he was an asshole -- therefore, he misled me, so consent was obtained by deceit, so in fact I was raped"?
A civil suit for damages by an aggrieved online whore against this heroic codger would be understandable, and if a judge ruled that she needs to be paid 10 centimes for her troubles, I would consider that fair. But the idea that the state sees fit to charge him with a crime and put him in prison is despicable and yet another example of out of control misandrist Year Zero laws. This insanity should be called out for what it is and resisted at every step.
We are supposed to believe that just because these sluts did not have an accurate idea of what the guy looked like, they did not really "consent". How is this different from "He seemed really sweet and like someone who was looking for a relationship so I let him fuck me; but he never texted me the next morning proving he was an asshole -- therefore, he misled me, so consent was obtained by deceit, so in fact I was raped"?
A civil suit for damages by an aggrieved online whore against this heroic codger would be understandable, and if a judge ruled that she needs to be paid 10 centimes for her troubles, I would consider that fair. But the idea that the state sees fit to charge him with a crime and put him in prison is despicable and yet another example of out of control misandrist Year Zero laws. This insanity should be called out for what it is and resisted at every step.
