Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Old player fools 342 women, online and IRL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Lizard of Oz" data-source="post: 690112" data-attributes="member: 5521"><p>This idea of "surprise rape" is an outrage, and comes very close to making regret rape legally equivalent to the real thing.</p><p></p><p>We are supposed to believe that just because these sluts did not have an accurate idea of what the guy looked like, they did not really "consent". How is this different from <em>"He seemed really sweet and like someone who was looking for a relationship so I let him fuck me; but he never texted me the next morning proving he was an asshole -- therefore, he misled me, so consent was obtained by deceit, so in fact I was raped"</em>?</p><p></p><p>A civil suit for damages by an aggrieved online whore against this heroic codger would be understandable, and if a judge ruled that she needs to be paid 10 centimes for her troubles, I would consider that fair. But the idea that the state sees fit to charge him with a crime and put him in prison is despicable and yet another example of out of control misandrist Year Zero laws. This insanity should be called out for what it is and resisted at every step.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Lizard of Oz, post: 690112, member: 5521"] This idea of "surprise rape" is an outrage, and comes very close to making regret rape legally equivalent to the real thing. We are supposed to believe that just because these sluts did not have an accurate idea of what the guy looked like, they did not really "consent". How is this different from [i]"He seemed really sweet and like someone who was looking for a relationship so I let him fuck me; but he never texted me the next morning proving he was an asshole -- therefore, he misled me, so consent was obtained by deceit, so in fact I was raped"[/i]? A civil suit for damages by an aggrieved online whore against this heroic codger would be understandable, and if a judge ruled that she needs to be paid 10 centimes for her troubles, I would consider that fair. But the idea that the state sees fit to charge him with a crime and put him in prison is despicable and yet another example of out of control misandrist Year Zero laws. This insanity should be called out for what it is and resisted at every step. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Old player fools 342 women, online and IRL
Top