OnlyFans / Online camgirls

Gimlet

Kingfisher
Looking at all the recent developments in the past week and when Biden gets inaugurated soon, his policies are going to rapidly crash the economy. When this happens, we will start seeing more women going this route to make a quick buck. The levels of their debasement will reach new lows.

Perhaps this explains the countless "articles" we have seen the last few years proclaiming Sex Work is Real Work.
 

wannable alpha

Woodpecker
More clown world news

Divorced woman spends $30,000 on surgeries to get more matches on Tinder | Daily Mail Online
Divorced woman who spent $30,000 on cosmetic surgeries to get more matches on TINDER now earns $1.5M a year on OnlyFans by posting photos of her sexy new look
---------
But a much needed dose of reality from NY Times. I know it has a reputation for being a cultural Marxist rag but sometimes it does carry sensible articles.

Jobless, Selling Nudes Online and Still Struggling - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
TD/DR - Three women profiled.
  • The hottie made $64,000 in six months
  • The fatty made only $500 in three months
  • The 36-year old made only $250 in six months

Article says that OF has 90 million users and one million "content creators" and the market is saturated (duh). The not so successful women are now worried about their future employment prospects. .

Only popular IG models, pornstars and other celebs are making good money by being able to channel traffic from existing social media platforms to OF accounts. For normies it's a struggle to get decent money and takes a lot of time and effort to grow their subscriber list.
 

Cervantes

Woodpecker
More clown world news

Divorced woman spends $30,000 on surgeries to get more matches on Tinder | Daily Mail Online
Divorced woman who spent $30,000 on cosmetic surgeries to get more matches on TINDER now earns $1.5M a year on OnlyFans by posting photos of her sexy new look
---------
But a much needed dose of reality from NY Times. I know it has a reputation for being a cultural Marxist rag but sometimes it does carry sensible articles.

Jobless, Selling Nudes Online and Still Struggling - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
TD/DR - Three women profiled.
  • The hottie made $64,000 in six months
  • The fatty made only $500 in three months
  • The 36-year old made only $250 in six months

Article says that OF has 90 million users and one million "content creators" and the market is saturated (duh). The not so successful women are now worried about their future employment prospects. .

Only popular IG models, pornstars and other celebs are making good money by being able to channel traffic from existing social media platforms to OF accounts. For normies it's a struggle to get decent money and takes a lot of time and effort to grow their subscriber list.
An article in the NYT telling women they could make $64k per month on OnlyFans: not surprising.
A byline that reads "Gillian Friedman": priceless.
 

prendergast

Sparrow
An article in the NYT telling women they could make $64k per month on OnlyFans: not surprising.
A byline that reads "Gillian Friedman": priceless.
Kinda surprising that the New York Times didn't inflate the numbers for "fatty" and "36-year-old". I thought simps would collectively pay more than $500 to see a fat woman show off her body given the times we live in, but I guess it's a good thing that even simps have retained an idea of what's considered attractive. Or maybe the fat woman didn't show enough to please them...

But you'd think that the New York Times would lie about the numbers so as to get every woman, young, old, fat, or skinny, on the website/app in order to subvert the dating scene even more.
 

Cervantes

Woodpecker
The thing that's amazed me about onlyfans is women becoming actual prostitutes for pennies because of a clever marketing campaign*.

(*e.g.: the photos of some whore in front of a house she supposedly bought with money from her johns. This tapped into the outrage posters here and elsewhere and got a heap of free publicity.)
Deep down a lot of women would post nudes online for free if it didn't cost social status.
 
More clown world news

Divorced woman spends $30,000 on surgeries to get more matches on Tinder | Daily Mail Online
Divorced woman who spent $30,000 on cosmetic surgeries to get more matches on TINDER now earns $1.5M a year on OnlyFans by posting photos of her sexy new look
My word. I don't get how they can call that a "sexy new look."

I think she actually looked pretty enough beforehand, especially that shot of her in the yellow dress where she looked natural, down-to-earth, and slightly demure. In her old photos there's a softness, warmness, and liveliness in her eyes, whereas in the new photos her eyes seem kind of devitalised and coldly disconnected. Maybe it's because she's wearing contacts, I don't know. But the eyes say a lot about a person.

There's a grotesque and over-exaggerated quality to so much of the plastic surgery that women get. I kinda feel sick when I see someone with massive, unnatural lips and soccer ball-shaped breasts that have no natural 'give.' It honestly makes me wonder whether some guys see the world in low res or something because I really don't 'get' the attraction towards that kind of look.

Plastic surgery fanatics seem to lose sight of the fact that the sheer size of body parts isn't the only factor. There has to be a natural "flow" and harmony of proportions. Plus, there are finer details that surgeons don't seem to have the capacity to fake with their current level of technology.
 

mgill0600

Pigeon
My word. I don't get how they can call that a "sexy new look."

I think she actually looked pretty enough beforehand, especially that shot of her in the yellow dress where she looked natural, down-to-earth, and slightly demure. In her old photos there's a softness, warmness, and liveliness in her eyes, whereas in the new photos her eyes seem kind of devitalised and coldly disconnected. Maybe it's because she's wearing contacts, I don't know. But the eyes say a lot about a person.

There's a grotesque and over-exaggerated quality to so much of the plastic surgery that women get. I kinda feel sick when I see someone with massive, unnatural lips and soccer ball-shaped breasts that have no natural 'give.' It honestly makes me wonder whether some guys see the world in low res or something because I really don't 'get' the attraction towards that kind of look.

Plastic surgery fanatics seem to lose sight of the fact that the sheer size of body parts isn't the only factor. There has to be a natural "flow" and harmony of proportions. Plus, there are finer details that surgeons don't seem to have the capacity to fake with their current level of technology.
Came in to say this. I would wife up the before photo girl. Oh sure, the after girl hits all the right physical triggers, but she's not "relationship material", call her the equivalent of the bad boy if you want, but you don't bring her home to momma. And that's before even knowing she sells her body for money.
 

kosko

Peacock
Gold Member
Kinda surprising that the New York Times didn't inflate the numbers for "fatty" and "36-year-old". I thought simps would collectively pay more than $500 to see a fat woman show off her body given the times we live in, but I guess it's a good thing that even simps have retained an idea of what's considered attractive. Or maybe the fat woman didn't show enough to please them...

But you'd think that the New York Times would lie about the numbers so as to get every woman, young, old, fat, or skinny, on the website/app in order to subvert the dating scene even more.
The fatty woman is just lazy. Period. One Million OF whores on the platform and one can not expect to just throw up some picture and just expect money to roll in, there has to be a minimum effort to promote to produce reuccring subcribers. All one needs is just 3 months of basic minimal effort, and a whore can build her OF to return $10K/month in revenue.
 

Cuchulainn2016

Woodpecker
The fatty woman is just lazy. Period. One Million OF whores on the platform and one can not expect to just throw up some picture and just expect money to roll in, there has to be a minimum effort to promote to produce reuccring subcribers. All one needs is just 3 months of basic minimal effort, and a whore can build her OF to return $10K/month in revenue.
Or, an enterprising gentleman can sign up to some girls onlyfans account, then resell her stuff on, making the effort to entice guys to that dummy account and making the bank himself.

A digital pimp in other words.
 

eradicator

Peacock
Gold Member
Top