OnlyFans / Online camgirls

Optimus Princeps

Woodpecker
Orthodox Catechumen
This unironically would work. You'd be like a high-iq redpill version of batman. Imagine doing this a few times, ironing out all the kinks in it. Boom then write up a short book on it or make a series of videos that you can sell for $50 with personal coaching sessions offered for extra. Not only do you become financially independent but you train an army of men to go out there and effectively kill the whole industry. If my career doesn't work out I think this will be my backup.
 

Cynllo

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
Are there statistics on how many women do OnlyFans or some other kind of cam site or sell nude photos? I'm hoping it's rare, but I can be naive.

According to Similar Web (which analyses web traffic) OnlyFans OnlyFans gets between 1,054,000,000 and 1,836,000,000 minutes of viewing a month. I'm not sure exactly, which is correct, as I'm not sure if people who leave the site within a few seconds are counted. I think it's probably the smaller number. That's equal to over 2,000 years or about 25 lifespans. Or 17.5 million hours.

I found one reference online that there are 1 million women posting on the site. So the average woman gets towards 18 hours of eyeballs on her a month.

Since most of the poster will give up/not be active etc., I imagine that there are probably not more than 250,000 engaged in all forms of online prostitution. While the number of real life prostitutes is towards 45 million. Yet, I think the affect of these 250,000 women is worse than the prostitutes.

Take the number from OnlyFans and divide that by what I am guessing is the average amount of time with a prostitute - 30 minutes. OnlyFans is about the equivalent of 35,133,333 prostitute falls.

Using the same maths, the main video site (not named) is equivalent to 550,125,000 engagements with a prostitute.

If you add up all the the sites, they must equate to somewhere in the region 3-6 billion engagements. That would be the equivalent of every prostitute in the world seeing 12 men per day, every day of the year.

Death penalty for the company owners.
 

Optimus Princeps

Woodpecker
Orthodox Catechumen
According to Similar Web (which analyses web traffic) OnlyFans OnlyFans gets between 1,054,000,000 and 1,836,000,000 minutes of viewing a month. I'm not sure exactly, which is correct, as I'm not sure if people who leave the site within a few seconds are counted. I think it's probably the smaller number. That's equal to over 2,000 years or about 25 lifespans. Or 17.5 million hours.

I found one reference online that there are 1 million women posting on the site. So the average woman gets towards 18 hours of eyeballs on her a month.

Since most of the poster will give up/not be active etc., I imagine that there are probably not more than 250,000 engaged in all forms of online prostitution. While the number of real life prostitutes is towards 45 million. Yet, I think the affect of these 250,000 women is worse than the prostitutes.

Take the number from OnlyFans and divide that by what I am guessing is the average amount of time with a prostitute - 30 minutes. OnlyFans is about the equivalent of 35,133,333 prostitute falls.

Using the same maths, the main video site (not named) is equivalent to 550,125,000 engagements with a prostitute.

If you add up all the the sites, they must equate to somewhere in the region 3-6 billion engagements. That would be the equivalent of every prostitute in the world seeing 12 men per day, every day of the year.

Death penalty for the company owners.
Think about what a diabolical and twisted mind you'd have to have to create something like that. It's amplifying porn and prostitution, corrupting exponentially more women who participate and men who pay for it. It's unironically one of the worst things to ever come from technology.
 

bk19xsa

Robin
OF goes straight up against the concept of God. It's proper nihilism as there is no end to the debasement it causes to human kind. It's tempting, provides quick gratification and pushes humans, particularly females, to stoop to animal levels of making money. A great Satanic entrapment. At least prostitution in old times was hush hush and men had an individual release with real sex. OF is not even masculine. It breeds Simps and Thots.

Most likely the women (and men) on OnlyFans are irreligious or spiritually dead, have given up on God or are straight up atheists. A small percentage of content aka porn creators who might be religious are willing to sin to get some desperate money and are likely from poorer nations. There might also, unfortunately, be the kinkier religious ones who just can't help but get pulled in to OF because of their lustful nature and are quite likely the least percentage of the total content creators.

I see such things as clear evidence of the devil and his minions at play.
 

Sitting Bull

Woodpecker
Trad Catholic
OF goes straight up against the concept of God. It's proper nihilism as there is no end to the debasement it causes to human kind. It's tempting, provides quick gratification and pushes humans, particularly females, to stoop to animal levels of making money.
Indeed. The most striking aspect of this is, I find, in relation to sleep.
Sleep and rest are ones of the few simple joys of life left to mostly everyone, even in those very hard times. Occasions to forget all your troubles ...
But no, some OF girls actually leave their webcam on while they're sleeping so a customer can pay and trigger a device that will wake them up by triggering their genitals, damaging their health a little more.

There was times when, righty or wrongly, I was so engrossed with what I was doing that I did not go to sleep, or slept far less than usual. But the idea of going to sleep expecting, even hoping that this sleep will be messed up with with seems definitely sub-human to me.

It's an extreme expression of this truth that lust makes people restless.
 

Sephorax

Pigeon
Non-Christian
What do you think the progression is for girls to actually do this? Do they experiment for a while (with promiscuity) then move on to things like sugar or OF? I'm curious as to how long that takes or what barriers they have to break down, mentally or otherwise (socially? I guess it's hidden mostly that's why) to consider it in the first place.

Probably mainly for money. I think they notice how a lot of men are super thirsty for them and they convert it into a business. If men wouldn't be as overtly thirsty as they are today this whole idea would drop instantly. But then again. This concept existed in different forms for centuries. So I think it is naive to think this concept would disappear. Even in a Christian or heavily religious society.

Thirst/sex/etc. sells. Things that people lack in their life sells. E.g. if a guy is lonely he will want a woman and some women use this to get money out of it.

Just like there is men taking millions of dollars from men (grifters) this is the woman equilivant. I think these women are more predatory in nature. Especially if there is not a man behind the scenes pulling the strings.

To defend yourself from these people is to control your impulses and understand that if you actively look for something and are desperate, you can end up in the webs/claws of grifters/salesmen/saleswomen/fakers. I see these women as grifters as well since they "fake" intimacy, love and attention. Which men look for. It's like holding a carrot in front of men and in the meanwhile take their money.
 
Last edited:

Blade Runner

Hummingbird
Orthodox
Yes, it was probably step by step until it caught the exponential growth phase (word of mouth or social tracking). I'd guess it is through largely lies or lottery (look, this guy gave me money for xyz, not much, etc free!), but don't forget that what things like online dating did were just provide occasions to maybe get with a lot better looking guys (whenever desired), but mostly were for attention or free dinners, a scaled back version of going all out. I guess OF is "safer" but it is indelible or easily "found out." Sugaring must be "I'm going out on scammy dates anyway", getting paid just makes it more worth my time. Blah blah blah
 

droughtmeat

Kingfisher
Catholic
Yep, I agree. The demand is simply so high that if you're a normal looking girl (essentially a 6 or above), there is good money to be made. Of course, the less attractive girls usually have to upload more explicit content to get views and subscriptions, but as long as they're willing to do that, they will make decent cash.

In addition, a lot of men have simply become numb to regular porn. That girl next door feeling has always been appealing to a lot of men. However, that girl will not be able available in the real world. While there are obviously a ton of promiscuous girls, there are also many who are willing to deprive themselves of sex and relationships as they wait for the right guy. Every now and then they'll be promiscuous for a week or two just to get that validation. Then once they turn 30 they will just settle for the next best guy.
 

Easy_C

Peacock
Yep, I agree. The demand is simply so high that if you're a normal looking girl (essentially a 6 or above), there is good money to be made. Of course, the less attractive girls usually have to upload more explicit content to get views and subscriptions, but as long as they're willing to do that, they will make decent cash.

In addition, a lot of men have simply become numb to regular porn. That girl next door feeling has always been appealing to a lot of men. However, that girl will not be able available in the real world. While there are obviously a ton of promiscuous girls, there are also many who are willing to deprive themselves of sex and relationships as they wait for the right guy. Every now and then they'll be promiscuous for a week or two just to get that validation. Then once they turn 30 they will just settle for the next best guy.

I think that’s far more perception than reality that there’s “good money to be made”. The median revenue for a “content creator” is shockingly low. Double digits per month I believe.
 

bucky

Hummingbird
Other Christian
I think that’s far more perception than reality that there’s “good money to be made”. The median revenue for a “content creator” is shockingly low. Double digits per month I believe.
I saw an article saying as much. Can't remember the exact figures, but I think it was only like 2% or less of the girls on OF who were even making anything like what you'd earn at a normal office job, or maybe even a minimum wage job.
 

8ball

Kingfisher
Catholic
Are there statistics on how many women do OnlyFans or some other kind of cam site or sell nude photos? I'm hoping it's rare, but I can be naive.

Virtually every attractive girl in the US now attempts a sugar daddy lifestyle or try to make money via non-nude lewd videos on tik-tok/instagram between the ages of 18-23. Often a combination of both.
Few of these end up on the only fans route.
Its a difficult road though, very little success and permanent damage.

We are looking at the most damaged generation of women in history. One on end you have anti men, anti white, anti christian propaganda in all colleges and the media, and most women dont have the critical thinking capabilities to challenge this. On the other, a pay for play normalization on a massive scale has occurred, and again they dont posses the long term thinking capabilities of how damaging this is.
 

Sephorax

Pigeon
Non-Christian
Yep, I agree. The demand is simply so high that if you're a normal looking girl (essentially a 6 or above), there is good money to be made. Of course, the less attractive girls usually have to upload more explicit content to get views and subscriptions, but as long as they're willing to do that, they will make decent cash.

In addition, a lot of men have simply become numb to regular porn. That girl next door feeling has always been appealing to a lot of men. However, that girl will not be able available in the real world. While there are obviously a ton of promiscuous girls, there are also many who are willing to deprive themselves of sex and relationships as they wait for the right guy. Every now and then they'll be promiscuous for a week or two just to get that validation. Then once they turn 30 they will just settle for the next best guy.

Both sexes have huge issues.

Men are craving love but are weak in character and body and don't inspire it from women. And quite frankly a good portion of women are not able to give love. Maybe from their bad health, choices, etc.

Women don't want to give their love to the average man because he is unattractive in body and mind.

Plus the health of both sexes is worse than before.

E.g. women who are on birth control for years will be affected severely. It lowers their testosterone and raises other hormones. Changing their preferences but also causing massive health issues. It also seems to numb them more.

Men are weak from lack of physical work which is needed less and less.

I do think women genuinely look for men they are attracted and want to give love to. Same for men. A lot of men look for love. But neither sex inspires to be better than they are. And so the natural attraction is gone.

What is left is a tit for tat dynamic. Like hookers and clients.

That being said I do believe there are women out there who are good for men and on your level. You just have to put yourself out there as much as possible in the ways that is organic to you.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
It's funny when you hear a young girl blame her being on onlyfans on the thirsty men. Like the drugdealer blaming the drug addict. Both are at fault. I'm really starting to realize the profound depth of the fact that women don't take responsibility and accountability for their actions - they're like big children who were never supposed to be out in the wild by themselves. It's a crazy thing, no matter all the crazy stuff that's going down now. When the Godly hierarchy is distorted, either by turning it around or horizontalizing it by making it allegedly equal, the entire system just collapses.
 

Sephorax

Pigeon
Non-Christian
It's funny when you hear a young girl blame her being on onlyfans on the thirsty men. Like the drugdealer blaming the drug addict. Both are at fault. I'm really starting to realize the profound depth of the fact that women don't take responsibility and accountability for their actions - they're like big children who were never supposed to be out in the wild by themselves. It's a crazy thing, no matter all the crazy stuff that's going down now. When the Godly hierarchy is distorted, either by turning it around or horizontalizing it by making it allegedly equal, the entire system just collapses.
If you know this why do you expect them to take responsibility?

Without a market there would not be opportunity to make money. Thirsty men create the market. The OF girl provides. Without thirsty men there would be no opportunities. A lot of human nature is opportunistic.

You can then say it is bad that she does it. But there will be others who will happily fill in her place. At all times.

So then you need something like strict rules. E.g. traditional religions. Or accept the way it is now and move accordingly.

Even with strict rules they will often be broken. E.g. I see muslim women in Europe cheating with non-muslim/religious European men. Eventhough they come from a strict household.

I think acceptance and moving accordingly in every situation you are in is the answer for most men to be most succesful and content. But this takes more mental fortitude.
 
Top