Paint sprayer in hand, a young French woman defies the system

[Huxley Badkin]

Generation identitaire

*video*

Make no mistake: these guys are pushing for "France is for whites", not "France is for French".

Maybe their ancesters should have applied the same to Africa, instead of colonizing it and iplementing the French way of life there.

Spoken exactly like a true SJW.

 

[Galahad]

The scary thing about France is their passion for Algiers. Imagen if Algiers did not get independent then it would be part of France and this means also part of the EU.
Well on the other hand then all those refuges would probably not cross the Mediterranean see. Kind of a pre base in northern Africa.

 

[Mage]

Perfect pair of titties. I wouldn't even notice she has no hair.

WB and WWO (Would write over)

 

[TheMan]

I am amazed that a dyke did this.

I wouldn't say she's a dyke, she's straight, heterosexual I think!

And as you can see, she despises the ultra-feminist Femen:

I

Even with the fucked up hair I'd hit that.

C'mon guys, that is not her.
Just check wiki for Anne Hidalgo

 

[TheMan]

The original painting says "France for the French" which is crossed out, and underneath is written "French women for the Africans".

This is racist and humiliating and funded by the Mayor !

This woman erased the word Africans and wrote Frenchmen instead.

She also wrote the word "Collabos" which is a term used to denounce French people who collaborated with the nazis during WW2, hinting that the leftists and liberals are collaborating with the new enemy.

She also wrote, in English : Antiracist is a code for anti-white.

The black dude insulted her saying basically "fuck your race". Who's being racist now ?

Wonder how long it would take that same girl—or even society as a whole—to admit that feminism is a code for anti-male & subsequently anti-equality.

My money is on, a long as fucking time from now.

 

[Foolsgo1d]

I would laugh but I live in a country which allows a bunch of known Muslim terrorist sympathizers and in many cases actual terrorists to scream insults and wave banners with such lovely terms as "UK is Sharia now", "behead British soldiers".

I hope France does not fail the shit test like we have.

 

[CactusCat589]

Generation identitaire

*video*

Make no mistake: these guys are pushing for "France is for whites", not "France is for French".

Maybe their ancesters should have applied the same to Africa, instead of colonizing it and iplementing the French way of life there.

Spoken exactly like a true SJW.

It's mikado, he picks the Arab or black side against caucasians if it's about race, Islam over Christianity if it's religion, liberalism over conservatism if it's politics, etc.

 

[Cyr]

Generation identitaire

Make no mistake: these guys are pushing for "France is for whites", not "France is for French".

Maybe their ancesters should have applied the same to Africa, instead of colonizing it and iplementing the French way of life there.

Mikado, I normally enjoy your contrarian opinions, but your argument makes no sense. Do you believe in collective guilt? That because this women's ancestors colonized Africa, (or not, she just happens to be of the same race), it makes sense to 'colonize' her country and 'implement the African way of life'?
That doesn't seem very just. Is it ok to kill Germans because of WW2? Or implement a genocide on Rwandans?

 

[lskdfjldsf]

 

[mikado]

Generation identitaire

*video*

Make no mistake: these guys are pushing for "France is for whites", not "France is for French".

Maybe their ancesters should have applied the same to Africa, instead of colonizing it and iplementing the French way of life there.

Spoken exactly like a true SJW.

It's mikado, he picks the Arab or black side against caucasians if it's about race, Islam over Christianity if it's religion, liberalism over conservatism if it's politics, etc.

Even if it was the case, Samseau, Blick mang, and countless other names on the forum do the same.
And I have been repped by forum members PRECISELY because I still try to associate red pill with my personal religious and social beliefs, even if they are widely different than the majority of the forum, so your point is blatantly false.
I wonder why no one highlights this when the people I mentionned above post.
Seems like a case of cherry picking again. A phenomenon on this forum that I already denounced at least one year ago.

Generation identitaire

Make no mistake: these guys are pushing for "France is for whites", not "France is for French".

Maybe their ancesters should have applied the same to Africa, instead of colonizing it and iplementing the French way of life there.

Mikado, I normally enjoy your contrarian opinions, but your argument makes no sense. Do you believe in collective guilt? That because this women's ancestors colonized Africa, (or not, she just happens to be of the same race), it makes sense to 'colonize' her country and 'implement the African way of life'?
That doesn't seem very just. Is it ok to kill Germans because of WW2? Or implement a genocide on Rwandans?

I don't need to direct you to my countless posts on the forum where I precise that I DISAGREE with imposing your culture to a majority.

The fact that Europe colonized Africa does not imply Africans should "take over" Europe. Just that Europe opened the Pandora box, and that the French culture has been so heavily mixed with the one of immigrants that by claiming "France to whites" you run the risk of ruining the lives of millions of people from 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th generation of immigrants who fully identify with the current French culture, but are still facially non-white.

Even posters like Zelcorpion, Teedub or Samseau whom I regularly disagree with agree that I am among the rare guys who can be considered red pill, even though I have a background far different from theirs.

I find it ironic how some people are quick to call me a SJW when I have precisely advocated for conforming to the culture of the host country when you immigrate, and voiced opinions that could even get me fired from my job either on the forum, or in real life.
Maybe I should start learning about how the ignore function works.

 

[CactusCat589]

I never pidgeonhole people based on one example. It seems that every time you weigh in on these threads, you do align yourself in the way I've outlined. And you didn't deny my charge, which is good because at least you're honest. There's nothing wrong with it in and of itself, since most everyone supports their in-group.

And I think it's good for the community to have people who'll keep us honest. I even agree with the post you wrote on racism in the manosphere and hypocrisy a while back. But what you wrote crosses the line, is all I'm saying.

Make no mistake: these guys are pushing for "France is for whites", not "France is for French".

Maybe their ancesters should have applied the same to Africa, instead of colonizing it and iplementing the French way of life there.

Just classless. Say that again after someone writes a message in whichever Arabic or Muslim country you have ties to, saying "Arab women for white men!" - and with your political leaders protecting it, and people will respect it or give it serious consideration a little more.

 

[mikado]

I have edited my post where I explained why, and how I said that.
I will quote it again.

The fact that Europe colonized Africa does not imply Africans should "take over" Europe. Just that Europe opened the Pandora box, and that the French culture has been so heavily mixed with the one of immigrants that by claiming "France to whites" you run the risk of ruining the lives of millions of people from 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th generation of immigrants who fully identify with the current French culture, but are still facially non-white.

Even posters like Zelcorpion, Teedub or Samseau whom I regularly disagree with agree that I am among the rare guys who can be considered red pill, even though I have a background far different from theirs.

I find it ironic how some people are quick to call me a SJW when I have precisely advocated for conforming to the culture of the host country when you immigrate, and voiced opinions that could even get me fired from my job either on the forum, or in real life.

 

[Ziltoid]

The fact that Europe colonized Africa does not imply Africans should "take over" Europe. Just that Europe opened the Pandora box, and that the French culture has been so heavily mixed with the one of immigrants that by claiming "France to whites" you run the risk of ruining the lives of millions of people from 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th generation of immigrants who fully identify with the current French culture, but are still facially non-white.

Good thing nobody claimed that, then. It's always a convincing debate tactic to completely make up something what the other side is supposedly saying, then argue against that instead of what they actually said.

This was about an obviously racist mural saying "French women for Africans" being vandalized, and you're trying to hamster this into being about white supremacy. And you WONDER why people think of you as reminiscent of SJWs... WTF dude.

And for the record I see guys like Scorpion, Samseau, and a few others routinely called out for their proclivities.

 

[mikado]

The fact that Europe colonized Africa does not imply Africans should "take over" Europe. Just that Europe opened the Pandora box, and that the French culture has been so heavily mixed with the one of immigrants that by claiming "France to whites" you run the risk of ruining the lives of millions of people from 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th generation of immigrants who fully identify with the current French culture, but are still facially non-white.

Good thing nobody claimed that, then. It's always a convincing debate tactic to completely make up something that the other side is supposedly saying, then argue against that instead of what they actually said.

This was about an obviously racist mural saying "French women for Africans" being vandalized, and you're trying to hamster this into being about white supremacy. And you WONDER why people think of you as reminiscent of SJWs... WTF dude.

I am not talking about this mural. I never did, actually.

I am talking about the post on Generation Identitaire. Which was on this page.
Read again please before accusing people.
Thanks.

 

[Ziltoid]

In a thread, about the mural.

 

[mikado]

Then you should have told Galahad to create a new thread in which I would have posted.
If the mods do agree we can do it.

Anyway sorry to everyone for the thread derail.
I will stop posting for a while, because I am tired of all the baits I (successfully) fall into.

 

[CactusCat589]

That doesn't look remotely like what you posted. And I'd agree, except they wrote "France for the French", not "France for the whites". I get that you interpreted it that way. To me, that's a call to stop open immigration from other countries (i.e. not French), people who aren't 2nd, 3rd, 4rth, or 5th generation immigrants. They can apply for citizenship and the French can choose the best candidates from Africa: the skilled, the educated, the graduates from the universities of Egypt and Nigeria. That to me is entirely reasonable, and in my opinion, right.

Edit: Okay, it looks like there was a video posted halfway down the thread, that I missed and didn't see. I thought you were talking about the mural. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

 

[lskdfjldsf]

Even if it was the case, Samseau, Blick mang, and countless other names on the forum do the same.

We're advocates for our own people and our own traditions. You are an advocate for the Senegalese people and Islamic traditions while living in a European country. We can respect each other as men and find common ground on a range of issues (as we have many times in the past), but we will never be playing for the same team. This is exactly why multiculturalism does not work and cannot work; it's not a source of enrichment or strength, it's a source of chronic conflict and tension.

I would be equally appalled by a mural in Dakar suggesting that Senegalese women belong to the French.

 

[mikado]

Even if it was the case, Samseau, Blick mang, and countless other names on the forum do the same.

We're advocates for our own people and our own traditions. You are an advocate for the Senegalese people and Islamic traditions while living in a European country. We can respect each other and find common ground on a range of issues (as we have many times in the past), but we will never be playing for the same team. This is exactly why multiculturalism does not work and cannot work; it's not a source of enrichment or strength, it's a source of chronic conflict and tension.

I would be equally appalled by a mural in Dakar suggesting that Senegalese women belong to the French.

I will respond to this because it seems we are mistaken.

I was not responding to the mural per se (which the thread is about, and I should have focused on this first) but to the video posted by Galahad. Which is not the same.
My opinion is that French Women belong to French people. There are exceptions, with interracial or interreligious marriages, which I have no problem against (it will probably be the same for me anyway). However yes, in general, fellows of a country should get spouses from the same country. This is normal and natural. No questions asked.

 

[DavidTheGnome]

What exactly is the purpose of the original message? Or is this supposed to be some kind of thought provoking art work?

The purpose is, I'd say: to have the Frenchmen slowly getting used to humiliation, castration, mockery and liberalism. Sowing despair and shame in our hearts. Showing us how defenseless we are against the system...

We have lots of offending messages like that in our public space. It is so that we get used to all kinds of insults, and to foster the liberal agenda against strong patriotic men.

Holy shit, nice breakdown. I will be paraphrasing your post in the future.