WalterBlack
Ostrich
Looks like the Chinese don't fuck around when it comes to dealing with terrorists:
Chinese forces 'used flamethrowers' in Xinjiang operation
Chinese forces 'used flamethrowers' in Xinjiang operation
Paris terrorist attacks, 100+ fatalities (November 2015)
- Thread starter frenchcorporation
- Start date
- Status
Traktor said:
Silvestroyer said:
Something that people in the Western world and liberal thinker don't understand is the big Putin's appeal among Russians, mostly young people and mostly young women unlike Obama who was mostly a momentum in 2008 and slower in 2012, Putin popularity is constant, what leader has this devotion:
The irony of the whole debate and presidential race in USA is that Trump is the only candidate who understand that Putin is a human being, and is doing the best for his country and people, the idea of a leader placing more importance on the native and what is best for the majority is foreign to many people today, and not what other leader thousand of miles away want, gays are not even 3% of the population and most people don't want their kids being exposed to that, when Russia passes the "anti-gay" law, it is just doing what the majority of the people want, but we are fed by the media that "homosexuality" is the norm and "just like us".
Meanwhile Obama
Traktor said:
I got lost in between the author absolving Islam of any crime and his fascination with the mythical Islamic golden age. This is yet another example of western guilt-ridden and self-hating conscience.
Invading Iraq did not create Islamic terrorism, attacks all over the world were being carried out well before that. What is happening would have occurred no matter what action the west took or did not, this regret talk is completely inconsequential. The Muslims will justify their aggression in any way possible, they will bring up Iraq, Israel, the crusaders, the apostle Paul...you name it.
I am tired of hearing about this politically correct version of history where The Islamic caliphate ushered an utopian golden age. The Abbasid caliphate in Baghdad flourished thanks to the services of non-muslims who went on to translate most of the texts from invaded cultures such as greek, persian and Indians. Islam did not invent anything new. Translators like Al-Kindi and Avicenna were Zorostrian, others were greek orthodox. The knowledge survived in spite of Islam not because of it, and either way has nothing to do with the religion. In fact, Christianity has a better claim of credit for the work of Gallileo...
I am thankful that the muslims of that era more or less allowed secularism ( still collected poll tax from Dhimmis, who wore different clothe to separate them) as they ruled over a large number of minorities like christians, jews and persians who were not ethnically cleansed yet.
The knowledge would not have been lost if it wasn't for the Islamic conquests in the first place. Let's not forget them immeasurable amount of historical texts destroyed in the Alexandria library destroyed around 685 AD ( containing historical records possibly covering half a millennium of history) or the libraries set on fire in India later on. This is a much greater loss to humanity than anything contributed by Islam.
Checked my hometown news again today. In the 11 days since the attack:
- My hometown announces plans for a major Islamic Centre
- A mosque is announced in a town an hour to the west
- and today, another mosque is announced an hour to the south
They're moving quickly, but it makes sense: the last few years there saw an amazing avalanche of immigrant settlement, almost like they were being dumped out there en masse.
- My hometown announces plans for a major Islamic Centre
- A mosque is announced in a town an hour to the west
- and today, another mosque is announced an hour to the south
They're moving quickly, but it makes sense: the last few years there saw an amazing avalanche of immigrant settlement, almost like they were being dumped out there en masse.
N°6
Hummingbird
syrianguy said:
It is the fault of the Western man to gain knowledge from 'edu-taining' documentaries from the mass-media.
After the American-created modern Jihad went viral round 9/11, the BBC stepped up its glossy documentaries on Islamic golden age programming (emphasis on 'programming') such as several series by Qatar's Al-Jazeera's Somali journalist Rageh Omaar. He became the multicultural poster boy that would not be out of place at north London dinner parties of the liberal chattering classes and he also became the object of affection whom middle class women could exotically yearn for without hypergamic guilt. Of course he married a British woman, but not just anyone, he married a woman from the Norman/ Scots Montgomery-Cuninghame baronets.
It is always useful to look at who the children of the Anglo-Celtic élite are marrying as this points to things to come and also gives us an idea who they are socialising and networking with.
Not once has any BBC documentary mentioned that when the First Crusade was called, the Jihad against Christendom had already been in operation for 400 years and 2/3 of Christian lands had already been conquered. The Crusades were therefore too little too late.
N°6
Hummingbird
Latinopan said:Silvestroyer said:
Something that people in the Western world and liberal thinker don't understand is the big Putin's appeal among Russians, mostly young people and mostly young women unlike Obama who was mostly a momentum in 2008 and slower in 2012, Putin popularity is constant, what leader has this devotion:
The irony of the whole debate and presidential race in USA is that Trump is the only candidate who understand that Putin is a human being, and is doing the best for his country and people, the idea of a leader placing more importance on the native and what is best for the majority is foreign to many people today, and not what other leader thousand of miles away want, gays are not even 3% of the population and most people don't want their kids being exposed to that, when Russia passes the "anti-gay" law, it is just doing what the majority of the people want, but we are fed by the media that "homosexuality" is the norm and "just like us".
Meanwhile Obama
The discarded Obama election campaign poster sums up Western financial-democracy.
It seems that Putin has started a charm offensive in Europe.
It was Francis Parker Yockey who predicted in 1948 when American international capital and Stalinism had triumphed over Europe that Russia would one day take the mantle of Western civilisation from the corrupt Anglo democratic élites. Just after WW2, it wasn't easy for the average reader to see anything civilised with Russia and his prediction was unpopular.
In the Soros Pussy Riot era against Putin's conservative Russia, one wonders if we are seeing a struggle for the Western soul.
Lizard King
Pelican
Syrianguy nailed it.
Frankie Boyle is a left leaning liberal, that's why he writes for the Guardian.
I never bother reading Guardian links. I'm getting narrow minded in my old age.
Frankie Boyle is a left leaning liberal, that's why he writes for the Guardian.
I never bother reading Guardian links. I'm getting narrow minded in my old age.
Direct or subtle
Sparrow
scotian said:
Same way they are going to "vet" them : by politely asking.
"Sir, are you a terrorist? No? :angel: Cool. And, wait, are you gay? Yes? Ok, cool, welcome to the West."
This vetting process is a joke (there are no trustworthy police databases left in Syria or Irak, so how the hell could we check their pasts?).
:idea: We should call it, cuck-vetting!
Cuck-vetting of gimmegrants! Cuck-Screening refugeehadists.. : good luck with that!
Do you know what the Afghans do to get vetted and obtain asylum in the West?
They buy a.. letter, in Kabul, letter supposedly from the Talibans :dodgy: and threatening them. Just a printed letter with a taliban-logo on it, and it's enough to get asylum in Germany or Canada. Such false letters are for sale, between 200 and 1000 dollars in Afghanistan..
Direct or subtle said:
I've literally been losing sleep over PM Trudeau's commitment to continue with his October campaign promise to admit 25,000 Syrians before the end of the year, they will be landing airplanes with 900 refugees on each flight in the next week or so. The refugees will come from camps in neighbouring countries and the government has basically admitted that they won't be properly screened over there but we shouldn't worry because members of our armed forces will do that when they arrive here and stay on military bases before being allowed into Canadian cities. My concern is that in the coming months a terror attack happens, then the US will freak the fuck out and who knows what they'll do, God forbid a Syrian passes through Canada and commits an act of terror stateside, they'll probably invade us!
Grizzly Bear
Pigeon
AnonymousBosch said:
I know I won't be the only one:
Moved to a large city in the north of England a few years ago. As a born and bred Londoner I was amazed how white, still working class, and culturally English the city was. Any real pub was like Cheers – the same people who drank in them thirty years ago were still propping up the bar today. In the city centre it was rare to see a foreigner who wasn't a member of the local student population. This goes for service staff who were local and white. Even the tramps were white until Romania et al were recently granted EU travel rights and the city was flooded with Gypsies.
Fast forward to 2015: Muslims everywhere. A quick walk to the shops and one will encounter Somali Muslims, Pakistani Muslims and – who have appeared in droves during the last six months – nondescript Arabic Muslims. While the first two appeared following the benefits shake up of a couple years prior (i.e. immigrant arrivals to London who would normally be housed there are being sent on buses up north for more affordable housing under the guise of welfare cuts), the latter is mystifying by how quickly and en masse they have arrived. My eyes and ears tell me 'refugees' have been brought into the UK under the rug and in extreme numbers for many months now.
There are a number of things that can be considered from the current situation in Europe, and the European governments are directly influencing what is happenning..the coercively engineered migration that is being seen in the UK, France and Germay has been engineered to create civil unrest bordering on civil war.
* it is aimed at causing people to be afraid of the Muslims.
*How the “War on Terror” is orchestrated from abroad and how NATO seeing things through.
*How the war is being waged against civilian populations which aims to divide and conquer all that would oppose a global tyrannical governance.
*How there is no war on terror. There is a war that is using terror proxy groups against nation states that are resisting the United States.
*How there is no such thing as ISIS. ISIS is a creation of the United States, known to us by official military sources and declassified documents.
*How terrorists are coming into countries disguised as refugees to destabilize those countries.
*How this is being used to create “civil war” and social unrest.
*How the media propaganda campaign is used to promote fear to paralyze the people.
*How there may be a new campaign against dissidents. How they are worried about the alternative media who question the state-controlled narratives. Attacking alternative media as “theorists” and a crackdown on those who report rational questioning of the established order.
*How coercive-engineered migration could have been easily prevented.
*How the Military Industrial Complex is profiting from all of this.
*How France and Germany are taking its orders from Washington
If the people do not realize that this is government complicity, then we will find ourselves in a military state.The ultimate aim of all of the above is to gain greater control over the civilian population, before long you will have a chip inserted in your arm so you can be tracked wereever you go ..orwellian... the primary end game is complete control over the worlds population.
* it is aimed at causing people to be afraid of the Muslims.
*How the “War on Terror” is orchestrated from abroad and how NATO seeing things through.
*How the war is being waged against civilian populations which aims to divide and conquer all that would oppose a global tyrannical governance.
*How there is no war on terror. There is a war that is using terror proxy groups against nation states that are resisting the United States.
*How there is no such thing as ISIS. ISIS is a creation of the United States, known to us by official military sources and declassified documents.
*How terrorists are coming into countries disguised as refugees to destabilize those countries.
*How this is being used to create “civil war” and social unrest.
*How the media propaganda campaign is used to promote fear to paralyze the people.
*How there may be a new campaign against dissidents. How they are worried about the alternative media who question the state-controlled narratives. Attacking alternative media as “theorists” and a crackdown on those who report rational questioning of the established order.
*How coercive-engineered migration could have been easily prevented.
*How the Military Industrial Complex is profiting from all of this.
*How France and Germany are taking its orders from Washington
If the people do not realize that this is government complicity, then we will find ourselves in a military state.The ultimate aim of all of the above is to gain greater control over the civilian population, before long you will have a chip inserted in your arm so you can be tracked wereever you go ..orwellian... the primary end game is complete control over the worlds population.
spalex
Kingfisher
Latinopan said:Silvestroyer said:
Something that people in the Western world and liberal thinker don't understand is the big Putin's appeal among Russians, mostly young people and mostly young women unlike Obama who was mostly a momentum in 2008 and slower in 2012, Putin popularity is constant, what leader has this devotion:
The irony of the whole debate and presidential race in USA is that Trump is the only candidate who understand that Putin is a human being, and is doing the best for his country and people, the idea of a leader placing more importance on the native and what is best for the majority is foreign to many people today, and not what other leader thousand of miles away want, gays are not even 3% of the population and most people don't want their kids being exposed to that, when Russia passes the "anti-gay" law, it is just doing what the majority of the people want, but we are fed by the media that "homosexuality" is the norm and "just like us".
Meanwhile Obama
I'm actually looking forward to Putin invading here.
N°6 said:Latinopan said:Silvestroyer said:
Something that people in the Western world and liberal thinker don't understand is the big Putin's appeal among Russians, mostly young people and mostly young women unlike Obama who was mostly a momentum in 2008 and slower in 2012, Putin popularity is constant, what leader has this devotion:
The irony of the whole debate and presidential race in USA is that Trump is the only candidate who understand that Putin is a human being, and is doing the best for his country and people, the idea of a leader placing more importance on the native and what is best for the majority is foreign to many people today, and not what other leader thousand of miles away want, gays are not even 3% of the population and most people don't want their kids being exposed to that, when Russia passes the "anti-gay" law, it is just doing what the majority of the people want, but we are fed by the media that "homosexuality" is the norm and "just like us".
Meanwhile Obama
The discarded Obama election campaign poster sums up Western financial-democracy.
It seems that Putin has started a charm offensive in Europe.
It was Francis Parker Yockey who predicted in 1948 when American international capital and Stalinism had triumphed over Europe that Russia would one day take the mantle of Western civilisation from the corrupt Anglo democratic élites. Just after WW2, it wasn't easy for the average reader to see anything civilised with Russia and his prediction was unpopular.
In the Soros Pussy Riot era against Putin's conservative Russia, one wonders if we are seeing a struggle for the Western soul.
Obama was like fireworks, lots of light and shining stuff but that was it, Obama had 3 mayor players in the 2008 election, the press that worked as his PR agency, Hollywood elite who worked his spoke person, and Wall Street, that was his donor. Add the young people who wanted to be "in the right side of history", he was supposed to be Jesus 2.0 with jetpack.
Obama is the equivalent of the Devil Imho, his whole purpose is to create civil unrest , to marginalize the majority, to support muslims , gays and liberals at any cost, and to try to create conflict with the Russian people who will not listen to his liberal bullshit ..the sooner he is gone , the better for the world at large.
spalex
Kingfisher
Yep. Here we go.
Who could have predicted that? Oh that's right.... Fucking everybody!
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34917226
Who could have predicted that? Oh that's right.... Fucking everybody!
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34917226
spalex said:
Damned workplace violence...
They're go to stick to that 'bank robbery' line to the grim end, even if/when we find out the perpetrators were named Mohamed, Ahmed and Muhammad.
- Status