Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Technology
Silicon Valley and tech news
Parler thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Athanasius" data-source="post: 1337547" data-attributes="member: 16809"><p><strong>Roosh</strong>: I am very curious about this as well. Forget who it was but Malkin or someone was saying they were seeing huge engagement there. My guess is that Twitter and Google are massively throttling things and/or flat out lying about your subscriber numbers. It's very strange, for example, how various personalities just have about the same usage counts.</p><p></p><p><strong>Gooz Boos: </strong>Great post, helpful to know about all the Unix forks (sounds similar to how VD forked Wikipedia to make Infogalactic). You were on the right track with poison pills-- something like what you said, or calling back to a centralized system and making it so Wrongthink installs don't work any longer. I have wondered how long it'll be until we have social media that work more like blogs and forums, where Roosh's posts are housed on Roosh's server, not on some central site where SJWs can break the search algorithms and deplatform content. Unsure how they make that work, though. Napster comes to mind. The music files were on people's servers, but it was rolled up and knocked out quickly after successful lawsuits (not defending the fact that Napster was mostly piracy, just more of its model and vulnerability to being shut down). I'd be curious to know how an SJW-proof Twitter replacement might work from the standpoint of data storage and how the search functionality would work across all these servers and yet be immune to compromise by SJWs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Athanasius, post: 1337547, member: 16809"] [B]Roosh[/B]: I am very curious about this as well. Forget who it was but Malkin or someone was saying they were seeing huge engagement there. My guess is that Twitter and Google are massively throttling things and/or flat out lying about your subscriber numbers. It's very strange, for example, how various personalities just have about the same usage counts. [B]Gooz Boos: [/B]Great post, helpful to know about all the Unix forks (sounds similar to how VD forked Wikipedia to make Infogalactic). You were on the right track with poison pills-- something like what you said, or calling back to a centralized system and making it so Wrongthink installs don't work any longer. I have wondered how long it'll be until we have social media that work more like blogs and forums, where Roosh's posts are housed on Roosh's server, not on some central site where SJWs can break the search algorithms and deplatform content. Unsure how they make that work, though. Napster comes to mind. The music files were on people's servers, but it was rolled up and knocked out quickly after successful lawsuits (not defending the fact that Napster was mostly piracy, just more of its model and vulnerability to being shut down). I'd be curious to know how an SJW-proof Twitter replacement might work from the standpoint of data storage and how the search functionality would work across all these servers and yet be immune to compromise by SJWs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Technology
Silicon Valley and tech news
Parler thread
Top