Photo of white woman with four children enrages woke twitter

Garuda said:
Teedub said:
Norwegian girl gets upset that she's 100% white. Go to the comments.

She'll go the Elizabeth Warren route and claim Sami ancestry.

That's the problem with self-loathing. Especially with something you can't change. Why be upset about something one doesn't have control over.

Rather than one's conduct and character.

This is another consequence of being Godless. That of not knowing one's true value and duties to fellow man and to God.

And being beholden to lies and falsehoods.
 
STG said:
The Catalyst said:
Wow wouldn't it be cool to be such a purebreed? Although I guess it doesn't count since she's part British, so I guess it dilutes the effect.

British and Norwegian is a nationality. It is a false, arbitrary, political definition.

Many of the original British people are descended from Germanic tribes who are closely related to the original Norwegians.

I say original because a person born in Norway with, say, African ancestry is not Norwegian.

Why is it Anglo/British people seem so cucked and aggressive while Scandi people seem less so, if they are so closely related?
 
The Catalyst said:
Teedub said:
Norwegian girl gets upset that she's 100% white. Go to the comments.

Wow wouldn't it be cool to be such a purebreed? Although I guess it doesn't count since she's part British, so I guess it dilutes the effect.

That's probably an error and the reverse is true, british DNA is part norwegian, but gets falsely attributed to something else.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
STG said:
The Catalyst said:
Teedub said:
Norwegian girl gets upset that she's 100% white. Go to the comments.

Wow wouldn't it be cool to be such a purebreed? Although I guess it doesn't count since she's part British, so I guess it dilutes the effect.

British and Norwegian is a nationality. It is a false, arbitrary, political definition.

Many of the original British people are descended from Germanic tribes who are closely related to the original Norwegians.

I say original because a person born in Norway with, say, African ancestry is not Norwegian.

The Left likes to claim the problems in Africa are from Europeans imposing artificial boundaries - dividing up or caging different tribes within the "artificial" boundaries drawn by the colonial power. Yet the Left also demands that a person of African descent born within these same "artifical" boundaries in Europe is a European.

Which is it Marxists?


She's got no British or Irish blood, it's the other way around, British and Irish people have Norvegian/Scandinavian blood. She's 100% Scandinavian.
 

mr-ed209

Sparrow
It's cultural marxism at its finest; when the poor tear down the rich. Similarly low status, low value and lacking virtue people will tear down those of high status and virtue. Everything about that image is 'triggering' to the nihilists who failed to develop the values to obtain it for themselves. A deliberate healthy young family with wealth.
 
Teedub said:
Norwegian girl gets upset that she's 100% white. Go to the comments.

Yet another example of how powerful the media are.
A specific worldview, broadcasted through each type of mass media, and sustained over decades is bound to produce results.

Also, as gullible as this chick is, we should stay vigilant and not consider ourselves too smart to fall for propaganda.
The easiest man to brainwash is probably the one who thinks he is immune to it.
That comment section gives me hope though.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
infowarrior1 said:
@mr-ed209
Read this:
https://spandrell.com/2017/11/14/biological-leninism/

This was why they were so successful. By making normally low status people high-status. They ensured absolute loyalty and totalitarian power in the soviet union.

They had spies and agents everywhere and hence power because of this.

They achieve that by inverting the moral order. For example virtuous Christians are "haters", while sodomites are the new exalted class.

The Bolsheviks also used common thugs and petty thieves to enforce their class warfare dogma, substituting envy for basic economics, telling the poor that the wealthy got rich by exploiting them. Stalin was a bank robber.

Origins of Marxist thoughts:

nx6NY1E6jqM?t=206
 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
Teedub said:
Norwegian girl gets upset that she's 100% white. Go to the comments.

PT "So youre 100% white?"

Her "Yes"

PT "Do you have any Cuban in you?"

Her "Uh..no"

PT "Would you like to have some?"

Her "Uh...Huh...how?"

PT "Im Cuban"



In the old days thats what Id have said :wink:
 

BlastbeatCasanova

Kingfisher
infowarrior1 said:
@mr-ed209
Read this:
https://spandrell.com/2017/11/14/biological-leninism/

This was why they were so successful. By making normally low status people high-status. They ensured absolute loyalty and totalitarian power in the soviet union.

They had spies and agents everywhere and hence power because of this.

Should be required reading, the way he breaks it down and relates to current times is very eye-opening.
 

PixelFree

Kingfisher
911 said:
She's got no British or Irish blood, it's the other way around, British and Irish people have Norvegian/Scandinavian blood. She's 100% Scandinavian.

FWIW the Scandinavians had a roaring slave trade in Ireland from 841 to 875, until the Irish rebelled (largest slave rebellion in all of Europe):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Ireland


Viking period

From the 9th to the 12th century Viking/Norse-Gael Dublin in particular was a major slave trading center which led to an increase in slavery.[4] In 870, Vikings, most likely led by Olaf the White and Ivar the Boneless, besieged and captured the stronghold of Dumbarton Castle (Alt Clut), the capital of the Kingdom of Strathclyde in Scotland, and the next year took most of the site's inhabitants to the Dublin slave markets.[4]

When the Vikings established early Scandinavian Dublin in 841, they began a slave market that would come to sell thralls captured both in Ireland and other countries as distant as Spain,[5] as well as sending Irish slaves as far away as Iceland,[6] where Gaels formed 40% of the founding population,[7] and Anatolia.[8] In 875, Irish slaves in Iceland launched Europe's largest slave rebellion since the end of the Roman Empire, when Hjörleifr Hróðmarsson's slaves killed him and fled to Vestmannaeyjar.[citation needed] Almost all recorded slave raids in this period took place in Leinster and southeast Ulster; while there was almost certainly similar activity in the south and west, only one raid from the Hebrides on the Aran Islands is recorded.[9]

Slavery became more widespread in Ireland throughout the 11th century, as Dublin became the biggest slave market in Western Europe.[9][5] Its main sources of supply were the Irish hinterland, Wales and Scotland.[9] The Irish slave trade began to decline after William the Conqueror consolidated control of the English and Welsh coasts around 1080, and was dealt a severe blow when the Kingdom of England, one of its biggest markets, banned slavery[10] in its territory in 1102.[6][9] The continued existence of the trade was used as one justification for the Norman conquest of Ireland after 1169, after which the Hiberno-Normans replaced slavery with feudalism.[6][11] The 1171 Council of Armagh freed all Englishmen and -women kept as slaves in Ireland.[12] It was clear from the Decree of the Council of Armagh that English were selling their children as slaves. "For the English people hitherto throughout the whole of their kingdom to the common injury of their people, had become accustomed to selling their sons and relatives in Ireland, to expose their children for sale as slaves, rather than suffer any need or want."[13]
 

Gremlin

Woodpecker
Teedub said:
Norweigian girl is back:


Turns out she had a black boyfriend in the past, not surprised.

Offer her the opportunity to trade her blue eyes, blond hair, skin tone and thin figure with an Australian aboriginal or a gypsy, and see how much she hates herself.
 
Top