Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pendleton" data-source="post: 1427843" data-attributes="member: 18309">I have seen about as much evidence for QAnon being a psyop as I saw for Q&#039;s predictions - zero. Obviously, anything is possible, but with government backing I would have expected QAnon to be much more successful. Instead, it was just some nonsensical rantings in a few corners of the internet. Most people had never heard of it until the media began reporting it because they decided it was a convenient way to portray all Trump supporters as crackpots.The arguments that it was intended to keep people passive sound the same as the arguments people make that Trump was a secret deep state plant whose purpose was to keep the masses pacified. What exactly are the revolutionary things Q followers would have been doing if they hadn&#039;t &quot;trusted the plan&quot;? They would be doing what they are doing now - nothing or being fixated on some other delusion.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pendleton, post: 1427843, member: 18309"] I have seen about as much evidence for QAnon being a psyop as I saw for Q's predictions - zero. Obviously, anything is possible, but with government backing I would have expected QAnon to be much more successful. Instead, it was just some nonsensical rantings in a few corners of the internet. Most people had never heard of it until the media began reporting it because they decided it was a convenient way to portray all Trump supporters as crackpots. The arguments that it was intended to keep people passive sound the same as the arguments people make that Trump was a secret deep state plant whose purpose was to keep the masses pacified. What exactly are the revolutionary things Q followers would have been doing if they hadn't "trusted the plan"? They would be doing what they are doing now - nothing or being fixated on some other delusion. [/QUOTE]

Verification