Project Veritas/ James O'Keefe thread

But it also sounds like the important donors support O'Keefe, so if they successfully get rid of him all that happens is Veritas becomes irrelevant and his donors stand him up a new organization.
Seems like the tribe thought it was worth it to sink their own organization just to harm James O'Keefe. They'll likely get kickbacks themselves from Pfizer and others, and James has to spend time and money to rebuild. Even if most of his donors support him in his new endeavors, it will take some time to rebuild the brand.
 
A couple of days ago, another thing hit me that the coup planners were doing while O'Keefe was removed from his position. The subverters had to have gone through all the Project Veritas files and tried to get the names and photos of O'Keefe's army of thots and twinks that go on the various honeypot dates. Those people could be in some real danger right now.
 

James O'Keefe Out At Project Veritas​

Project Veritas founder and CEO James O’Keefe is exiting the organization.

O’Keefe announced to his staff Monday that he was leaving over a conflict in vision between himself and the board in an poignant 15-minute video.

“Throughout my 13 years doing this my mission has evolved,” O’Keefe said in his announcement.
“Over the last few weeks I have felt a lot of despair and seen a lot of evil and felt overcome with various emotions.”
A clearly emotional O’Keefe expressed gratitude for his employees, but noted that:

“The external threats and pressure inflicted upon myself has been unimaginable,” O’Keefe continued.


Employees had been dissatisfied by O’Keefe’s management and alleged he wasted money and was “outright cruel” to his staff, according to the The Daily Beast.

Speculation has been rampant about the timing of this debacle as O'Keefe points out:

A few days after the Pfizer story, I was informed by an officer of Project Veritas that he would resign unless I step down as CEO. We’ve been having a conflict of vision over fundraising, there were tactical disagreements about the boldness of approach soliciting donations.”
As The Epoch Times' Zachary Stieber reports, O’Keefe said he confronted one executive at a meeting on Feb. 2 and said that if the person would not follow his lead, he would have to exit the group.

O’Keefe then fired the man.

Later that same day, a different officer informed O’Keefe he was going to the Project Veritas board to restructure the company.

O’Keefe said he received an agenda for the board meeting as he was set to depart on a flight, and that the meeting was scheduled for the moment he was due to land.

“It became clear to me in that moment [that] I would be removed from my position at Project Veritas,” O’Keefe said.
Project Veritas did not pick up the phone or respond to requests for comment.

O’Keefe, who started Project Veritas in 2010, said he’s not finished.

He said that “the mission continues” but will “perhaps take on a new name.”
“I’ll make sure you know how to find me,” he told Project Veritas employees. “I hope to see some of you soon.”
R.C. Maxwell, a Project Veritas employee and an O’Keefe ally, wrote on Twitter that O’Keefe “was removed from his position as CEO by the Project Veritas board.”

“They are in charge now,” Maxwell said.

O’Keefe said he has been suspended “indefinitely without compensation,” citing a board memo.

“I don’t know why this has happened or specifically why this has happened suddenly,” O’Keefe continued, adding he has “documentation” of everything.
The board has not yet issued a new statement.
 
^ Hilarious. PV is now irrelevant.
Agreed! Project Veritas is nothing without O'Keefe. They ought to simply shut down the organization.

What will they even do? Will they try to keep doing sting videos? I highly doubt it. I imagine every single thing they ever publish from now on will be globohomo compatible, and will never upset any existing powers that be. They'll be trying to do stings on conservatives now if they do any at all.
 
Agreed! Project Veritas is nothing without O'Keefe. They ought to simply shut down the organization.

What will they even do? Will they try to keep doing sting videos? I highly doubt it. I imagine every single thing they ever publish from now on will be globohomo compatible, and will never upset any existing powers that be. They'll be trying to do stings on conservatives now if they do any at all.
Seeing it go the way of Drudge Report and just being another tentacle of globohomo is the most likely outcome.
 

It's so weird.

O'Keefe says it's a personal setting for the employees. And then we receive this heavily produced video.

He uses heavy studio top lights, the person to the right is blocked out, there are all these inserts in the video. He uses a high quality invisible microphone.

This is a video production, not a private setting which he makes us believe.

This is more WWF than a street fight.

I just don't trust the guy & project Veritas, something is off.

YT link
 
It's so weird.

O'Keefe says it's a personal setting for the employees. And then we receive this heavily produced video.

He uses heavy studio top lights, the person to the right is blocked out, there are all these inserts in the video. He uses a high quality invisible microphone.

This is a video production, not a private setting which he makes us believe.

This is more WWF than a street fight.

I just don't trust the guy & project Veritas, something is off.

YT link

I dont get the distrust.... he's done more, through PV, to expose things than any other person in media...

What are you suggesting? That this is all controlled oppostion?
 
It's so weird.

O'Keefe says it's a personal setting for the employees. And then we receive this heavily produced video.

He uses heavy studio top lights, the person to the right is blocked out, there are all these inserts in the video. He uses a high quality invisible microphone.

This is a video production, not a private setting which he makes us believe.

This is more WWF than a street fight.

I just don't trust the guy & project Veritas, something is off.

YT link


There's a simpler explanation: James O'Keefe is just insanely good at marketing himself, which makes him a borderline psychopath.

I have no doubt he will land on his feet, and I hope he does.

I see no clear reason to distrust O'Keefe at this point. If you end up thinking that everyone is controlled opposition, then you become doomer-pilled (not saying you are specifically, just writing generally).
 
I dont get the distrust.... he's done more, through PV, to expose things than any other person in media...

What are you suggesting? That this is all controlled oppostion?

Yes I get the feeling of controlled opposition, maybe better to call it harmless opposition.

GOP style opposition. Real whistleblowers can not have a Youtube channel. You are either banned / memory-holed and forced to exist on Bitchute, getting political asylum in Russia or killed.

Most that exists on YouTube is harmless to the system (music, kids playing games, ASMR videos) or state propaganda.

They are described as a "far right" activist group, that's classical propaganda to set the goal posts.

They play for me in the league of: Tim Pool, Daily Beast, Jordan Peterson, Lex Fridman

I have the feeling I'm watching an old style Discovery channel "reality show".

It's displaying these exciting stories, as if there are these evil individuals doing things that he uncovers. Thereby in my opinion staying clear from the real machinations of power. The org exists for all these years without large problems. While you could say; you filming people drunk on Tinder dates, bragging, how can that keep online, that's strange

It's this X-files type of content. As if there are all these magical hidden layers. The smoking man. And the whole main stream media is writing about it. Everyone. Suspicious to say the least.


Compare that to the coverage that someone like Nick Fuentes with Cozy or Andrew Anglin gets or Kanye West for example. It's incomparable.

Real opposition to power is ridiculised, or the achievement memory holed. See the coverage of China and Russia, North Korea and Iran.
Any achievements there are memory holed, mistakes ridiculised, if Putin would trip over a wire it would be all over the news.

They won't build the persona of a person they deem to be an enemy. As this global coverage is free marketing.

But I could be wrong, maybe I'm just too sensitive to the specific style and tone.
 
Last edited:
Yes I get the feeling of controlled opposition.

GOP style opposition. Real whistleblowers can not have a Youtube channel. You are either banned / memory-holed and forced to exist on Bitchute, getting political asylum in Russia or killed.

Most that exists on YouTube is harmless to the system (music, kids playing games, ASMR videos) or state propaganda.

They are described as a "far right" activist group, that's classical propaganda to set the goal posts.

They play for me in the league of: Tim Pool, Daily Beast, Jordan Peterson, Lex Fridman

I have the feeling I'm watching an old style Discovery channel "reality show".

It's displaying these exciting stories, as if there are these evil individuals doing things that he uncovers. Thereby in my opinion staying clear from the real machinations of power. The org exists for all these years without large problems. While you could say; you filming people drunk on Tinder dates, bragging, how can that keep online, that's strange

It's this X-files type of content. As if there are all these magical hidden layers. The smoking man. And the whole main stream media is writing about it. Everyone. Suspicious to say the least.


Compare that to the coverage that someone like Nick Fuentes with Cozy or Andrew Anglin gets or Kanye West for example. It's incomparable.

Real opposition to power is ridiculised, or the achievement memory holed. See the coverage of China and Russia, North Korea and Iran.
Any achievements there are memory holed, mistakes ridiculised, if Putin would trip over a wire it would be all over the news.

But I could be wrong, maybe I'm just too sensitive to the specific style and tone.
Keep in mind most Americans are cucked out of their minds and it is THEY who demand that Ye/Fuentes/Anglin get out of sight. Even my "conservative" friends will not budge an inch on the JQ or even race realism regarding the demographic shift cause of unchecked immigration. They believe the "magic dirt" theory of immigrants and frankly even on the vax issue most of the git it, kinda know it was BS, but don't REALLY want to discover the true depths of corruption and fraud because gosh darn it we still have a good medical system in this country.

"Conservatives" today like their pathetic servitude. I mean look at "right wing" views on gay marriage over the last 20 years. Cuckservatives are more accepting of buttsex marriage than liberals were 20 years ago!

There is no coming back from this. Find a tribe and community, pray to God, and also pray the collapse we are going through RIGHT NOW isn't too painful.
 
It's displaying these exciting stories, as if there are these evil individuals doing things that he uncovers. Thereby in my opinion staying clear from the real machinations of power. The org exists for all these years without large problems. While you could say; you filming people drunk on Tinder dates, bragging, how can that keep online, that's strange

The relevant metric is COVID. During the scamdemic, James O'Keefe and PV were the only big organization questioning the narrative, featuring whistleblowers, etc.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the "real" machinations of power? Would you like O'Keefe to infiltrate the Committee of 300?

Compare that to the coverage that someone like Nick Fuentes with Cozy or Andrew Anglin gets or Kanye West for example. It's incomparable.

Anglin, Fuentes, and Ye are not journalists. They are political commentators and entertainers. You can't compare them with O'Keefe.

O'Keefe has been subject to serious and severe censorship, including on YouTube. Unlike the Fuentes, however, O'Keefe is careful to stay within YouTube guidelines -- and even then he faces problems.
 
Yes I get the feeling of controlled opposition, maybe better to call it harmless opposition.

GOP style opposition. Real whistleblowers can not have a Youtube channel. You are either banned / memory-holed and forced to exist on Bitchute, getting political asylum in Russia or killed.

Most that exists on YouTube is harmless to the system (music, kids playing games, ASMR videos) or state propaganda.

They are described as a "far right" activist group, that's classical propaganda to set the goal posts.

They play for me in the league of: Tim Pool, Daily Beast, Jordan Peterson, Lex Fridman

I have the feeling I'm watching an old style Discovery channel "reality show".

It's displaying these exciting stories, as if there are these evil individuals doing things that he uncovers. Thereby in my opinion staying clear from the real machinations of power. The org exists for all these years without large problems. While you could say; you filming people drunk on Tinder dates, bragging, how can that keep online, that's strange

It's this X-files type of content. As if there are all these magical hidden layers. The smoking man. And the whole main stream media is writing about it. Everyone. Suspicious to say the least.


Compare that to the coverage that someone like Nick Fuentes with Cozy or Andrew Anglin gets or Kanye West for example. It's incomparable.

Real opposition to power is ridiculised, or the achievement memory holed. See the coverage of China and Russia, North Korea and Iran.
Any achievements there are memory holed, mistakes ridiculised, if Putin would trip over a wire it would be all over the news.

They won't build the persona of a person they deem to be an enemy. As this global coverage is free marketing.

But I could be wrong, maybe I'm just too sensitive to the specific style and tone.
Yeah...

I think the bigger point is to throw him out, then dox all the sources of PV and keep them from ever having an effective expositional voice on the body politic.
 
The relevant metric is COVID. During the scamdemic, James O'Keefe and PV were the only big organization questioning the narrative, featuring whistleblowers, etc.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the "real" machinations of power? Would you like O'Keefe to infiltrate the Committee of 300?



Anglin, Fuentes, and Ye are not journalists. They are political commentators and entertainers. You can't compare them with O'Keefe.

O'Keefe has been subject to serious and severe censorship, including on YouTube. Unlike the Fuentes, however, O'Keefe is careful to stay within YouTube guidelines -- and even then he faces problems.
Indeed. PV is the only thing out there getttin the data and people ot admit to it. They absolutely have some prior intel guys on their crew.

NOW its all going to be compromised and the reporters doxxed.

I am 90% certain that Pfizer and its evil minions are behind this.
100%
 
Indeed. PV is the only thing out there getttin the data and people ot admit to it. They absolutely have some prior intel guys on their crew.

NOW its all going to be compromised and the reporters doxxed.


100%
I think James O'Keefe will or come back to Project Veritas in this nicely set-up drama serie or set up a new group. I was also thinking; this story gives me the same feeling I have around Andrew Tate, which I also distrust. The same huge media attention.
 
This confuses me most.

If you are an anti-establishment person with a certain number of viewers you get kicked out of Youtube,
but PV was still able to publish there.

But I guess this is just coincidence.
It isn't that black and white. If you dance around certain issues that will get you banned, you can survive on those platforms by doing the dance well. We need people like this to get based messages out on normie platforms. Otherwise our messages will only live in fringe platforms normies will never find.

Condemning someone who shares most of our views for failing the purity test of not being banned from YT is not helpful.
 
Back
Top