Project Veritas/ James O'Keefe thread

Focus on Matthew Tyrmand. Who is he? What is his motive?



Note how there isn't any Wikipedia information on "Matthew Tyrmand". One will only find "Leopold Tyrmand".

FoiPn-FWAAEoPYX




Speaking of (((Tyrmand's))) hovering around "important people" (skip to 00:54 seconds)...



Edit.

@PatrickReports: Matt Tyrmand is now exposed. If you want to know why there's so much negativity and toxicity in media on the Right, look no further than little operators like Tyrmand. I hope all the people he has disparaged in the movement keep reminding their audience about Tyrmand.
gab.com

Patrick Howley on Gab: 'Matt Tyrmand is now exposed. If you want to know …'

Patrick Howley on Gab: 'Matt Tyrmand is now exposed. If you want to know why there's so much negativity and toxicity in media on the Right, look no further than little operators like Tyrmand. I hope all the people he has disparaged in the movement keep reminding their audience about Tyrmand.'
gab.com gab.com
 
Last edited:
paternos said:
I think James O'Keefe will or come back to Project Veritas in this nicely set-up drama serie or set up a new group. I was also thinking; this story gives me the same feeling I have around Andrew Tate, which I also distrust. The same huge media attention.
Click to expand...
Im willing to believe that O'Keefe was genuinely taken out by Pfizer, the RINOs and the De Santis, But that's a bit like Don Lemon crossing a line at CNN and getting taken out.

Both Lemon and O'Keefe are establishment and here the rest of the Conservative Inc. establishment are making up to Pfizer and apologising for letting their attack dogs go too far and attack the wrong corporations.

But how real is it all? NO-ONE remains up on YT without establishment approval.
Notice Alex Jones took his huge budget elsewhere else it wouldn't have been believable.

But Im not sure how much O'Keefe was the architect and how much he was just the face.
His silly carry on and absurd music videos and making every drama about himself don't inspire confidence.
So perhaps its more of a symbolic punishment for this Con Inc expose operation.

That video they put up:

"O'Keefe says it's a personal setting for the employees. And then we receive this heavily produced video.
He uses heavy studio top lights, the person to the right is blocked out, there are all these inserts in the video. He uses a high quality invisible microphone.
This is a video production, not a private setting which he makes us believe.
This is more WWF than a street fight.
I just don't trust the guy & project Veritas, something is off."

>He says that everybody is going to get a script of the overlong stagey soliloquy about himself that he's reading out to them. "Don't worry, no one else will see this speech, its just between us"
>Posts himself giving exact same entire speech on YouTube.

I've been at lots of leaving dos and formal farewell speeches, I've never seen anything so stilted and acted.
Cos he's mic'd up under studio lights speaking to and thinking of the public YT audience ..not the (pin-drop silent for long periods) people in this "entirely informal" closed little group.

The question remains:

Has PV under O'Keefe done good work?
Yes.
Has it stayed in a largely "safe" zone?
Yes.
Is that a big problem?
Not really. So what?

Has Alex Jones done good work?
Yes.
Has he avoided certain topics?
Yes.
Is he controlled opposition?
Yes.

Sometimes it's both/and.. O'Keefe has both been a safety net AND he and/or PV have done good work.
Do I think all this drama is 100% genuine? No.
 
budoslavic said:
Focus on Matthew Tyrmand. Who is he? What is his motive?



Note how there isn't any Wikipedia information on "Matthew Tyrmand". One will only find "Leopold Tyrmand".

FoiPn-FWAAEoPYX




Speaking of (((Tyrmand's))) hovering around "important people" (skip to 00:54 seconds)...



Edit.

@PatrickReports: Matt Tyrmand is now exposed. If you want to know why there's so much negativity and toxicity in media on the Right, look no further than little operators like Tyrmand. I hope all the people he has disparaged in the movement keep reminding their audience about Tyrmand.
gab.com

Patrick Howley on Gab: 'Matt Tyrmand is now exposed. If you want to know …'

Patrick Howley on Gab: 'Matt Tyrmand is now exposed. If you want to know why there's so much negativity and toxicity in media on the Right, look no further than little operators like Tyrmand. I hope all the people he has disparaged in the movement keep reminding their audience about Tyrmand.'
gab.com gab.com
Click to expand...

I hate the entire concept of physiognomy. Really I do. But there it is. Again.

At a minimum it's a good reminder to watch my posture and keep chewing steel wool for my jaw line.
 
Can someone explain to me why Project Veritas needs some bureaucratic power structure like a “Board of Directors” anyway? Why create these bloated subversive administrative structures in the first place? Just seems out of character for a supposed scrappy organization with little infrastructure other than a website and maybe a rented office suite? I don’t understand why O’Keefe would allow himself to be set up in this way, but reading between the lines, I suspect he was stocking his staff with female eye candy.
 
Parmesan said:
Can someone explain to me why Project Veritas needs some bureaucratic power structure like a “Board of Directors” anyway? Why create these bloated subversive administrative structures in the first place? Just seems out of character for a supposed scrappy organization with little infrastructure other than a website and maybe a rented office suite? I don’t understand why O’Keefe would allow himself to be set up in this way, but reading between the lines, I suspect he was stocking his staff with female eye candy.
Click to expand...
The opposition research done by leftists gives you the answer.

Here is Think Progress's list of donors: https://archive.thinkprogress.org/project-veritas-funding-2e4ef0319195/


The reason you have this "board of directors" structure is for the same reason it (ostensibly) exists at corporations. It allows your major capital providers to oversee and manage what happens within the organization.
 
Easy_C said:
The opposition research done by leftists gives you the answer.

Here is Think Progress's list of donors: https://archive.thinkprogress.org/project-veritas-funding-2e4ef0319195/


The reason you have this "board of directors" structure is for the same reason it (ostensibly) exists at corporations. It allows your major capital providers to oversee and manage what happens within the organization.
Click to expand...
Makes sense. I suppose beggars can’t be choosers, but it seems like such subversion was inevitable. The dissident right really needs its own Soros to fund these offensive operations.
 
F3wu5-8XMAAAzmf




Project Veritas Implodes Six Months After Firing James O'Keefe​

Project Veritas has reportedly imploded roughly six months after bad actors infiltrated the undercover whistleblower organization and orchestrated the ouster of founder James O'Keefe.

Earlier Thursday, the Project Veritas X account tweeted: "SOS Hannah Giles just fired us all," before it was quickly deleted.

Sources tell the Post Millennial, however, that they've indeed 'all been fired.'

More details were provided by the Post Millennial:

Giles, who became notorious for starring in the ACORN video with founder and former CEO James O'Keefe, took over for O'Keefe after he was summarily pushed out by the board of directors. She took over as CEO only to destroy the company entirely.

"She came to all hands in April with her fat sidekick Ben Wetmore and all they did for 3 days was talk sh*t about James and relitigate all the terrible things he did to her/them 10-12 years ago. I knew right then her entire agenda was revenge," a source said.

On-air talent Christian Hartsock, James Lalino were both laid off after Giles told staff that a restructuring would be underway. Kalen Eriksson, Jaime Phillips, Alyssa Dehen, were also fired. The terminations were done via a Zoom call with HR, with a few of those in the New York office. Giles did not make an appearance.

"She's a lying sack of sh*t," a source told The Post Millennial. "No one respected her anyway."

On Monday, five people were fired according to the report - including a more recent hire, producer Pam Browne, who was brought in by O'Keefe last year. Others who were fired were allegedly done so in retaliation for their undercover work (!?). The remaining employees are 'primarily admin,' after around 20 people were fired on Thursday.

"Since James quit, the donations dried up...the donations never resumed," one source told the Post Millennial, adding "The board were desperate to bring Hannah on board because they thought it would be cute but the problem is she's a charlatan and a fraud. Everything she's ever done has been a failure and she lied to everyone claiming she had all these donors she could bring in."

James O'Keefe, meanwhile, can be found here at his new venture, O'Keefe Media Group (OMG).
Click to expand...

Project Veritas Implodes Six Months After Firing James O'Keefe | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com

Original source
thepostmillennial.com

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: CHAOS at Project Veritas—almost ALL employees have been laid off: sources

“SOS Hannah Giles just fired us all.”
thepostmillennial.com thepostmillennial.com
 
AC :

James O’Keefe appears to put a gangstalker who got too overt on blast.
Notice, the guy is using his cell phone just like we describe here. I have told you, I see this everywhere, from parking lots to grocery stores, to the cable guy in my basement. James thinks he is taking a picture, but the reality is domestic surveillance is plugged into the camera and mic live, and there is a team assigned to handle James’ follow, watching in some command bunker somewhere, controlling all the surveillance people assigned to James. Remember the reporter we detailed on the surveillance page, who was gangstalking a black guy, and he was videoing a parking lot the guy was walking toward just like this, as he said into his phone, “You’ll see him now…” Also understand, this guy did not go in alone. He was not the one agent sent in to bug James. He was just the most obvious of the five to seven people I would assume were surrounding James in there, and one of the probably eight hundred to four thousand, just like him, who are on call in that section of that community to do a pass-by as domestic surveillance/informants, and who were at some point or other assigned to walk or drive by James that day. This is fascinating to me, as it indicates O’Keefe is not entirely aware of how things work. Either that, or he is, and he was just given a script which features him re-enacting what we have done here, and exposing the gangstalking/domestic-surveillance himself, so the exposure is controlled, rather than having someone like me be the one with the microphone, calling for outright war, and killing everyone involved. Of course, I doubt my calls will be necessary, if people figure out they are running hostile intel ops against their children, in the schools, using other children. This could be a notable step toward Civil War II. Also, to be clear, this dude is not a “Fed.” He will, if investigated, appear to be a regular civilian, with a regular 9 to 5 in the civilian sector, living down the street in a regular house. He will be as provably unconnectable to the US government as Ray Epps, who probably reports to the same command structure, which may be entirely in the private sector, even as it’s higher-ups will wield notable government influence over other agencies.

I have told you, a cataclysm, which will rip America apart, and leave two aggrieved parties which will never be able to live together, is coming. Surveillance has fundamentally betrayed the spirit of the Constitution, common decency, our children in schools, and their fellow freedom-loving citizens to a despotic, all-intrusive “government” of some sort. I truly believe when it hits, the reveal of the level of intrusion by surveillance, will mean either they will need to kill, drive out, or completely subjugate everyone else, or they will be completely killed or driven out, since we have no desire to subjugate anyone. I think the full truth will come out, and once it does, there will be no living together, anymore than you would have Jews from the camps and German Nazi guards living side by side in Israel. It will be the happening of happenings, and I do not see how it can be avoided at this point. It is just this massive tsunami wave heading for our shores. And this was one more inkling of the fact it cannot be hidden any longer.

 
CynicalContrarian said:
AC :

James O’Keefe appears to put a gangstalker who got too overt on blast.
Notice, the guy is using his cell phone just like we describe here. I have told you, I see this everywhere, from parking lots to grocery stores, to the cable guy in my basement. James thinks he is taking a picture, but the reality is domestic surveillance is plugged into the camera and mic live, and there is a team assigned to handle James’ follow, watching in some command bunker somewhere, controlling all the surveillance people assigned to James. Remember the reporter we detailed on the surveillance page, who was gangstalking a black guy, and he was videoing a parking lot the guy was walking toward just like this, as he said into his phone, “You’ll see him now…” Also understand, this guy did not go in alone. He was not the one agent sent in to bug James. He was just the most obvious of the five to seven people I would assume were surrounding James in there, and one of the probably eight hundred to four thousand, just like him, who are on call in that section of that community to do a pass-by as domestic surveillance/informants, and who were at some point or other assigned to walk or drive by James that day. This is fascinating to me, as it indicates O’Keefe is not entirely aware of how things work. Either that, or he is, and he was just given a script which features him re-enacting what we have done here, and exposing the gangstalking/domestic-surveillance himself, so the exposure is controlled, rather than having someone like me be the one with the microphone, calling for outright war, and killing everyone involved. Of course, I doubt my calls will be necessary, if people figure out they are running hostile intel ops against their children, in the schools, using other children. This could be a notable step toward Civil War II. Also, to be clear, this dude is not a “Fed.” He will, if investigated, appear to be a regular civilian, with a regular 9 to 5 in the civilian sector, living down the street in a regular house. He will be as provably unconnectable to the US government as Ray Epps, who probably reports to the same command structure, which may be entirely in the private sector, even as it’s higher-ups will wield notable government influence over other agencies.

I have told you, a cataclysm, which will rip America apart, and leave two aggrieved parties which will never be able to live together, is coming. Surveillance has fundamentally betrayed the spirit of the Constitution, common decency, our children in schools, and their fellow freedom-loving citizens to a despotic, all-intrusive “government” of some sort. I truly believe when it hits, the reveal of the level of intrusion by surveillance, will mean either they will need to kill, drive out, or completely subjugate everyone else, or they will be completely killed or driven out, since we have no desire to subjugate anyone. I think the full truth will come out, and once it does, there will be no living together, anymore than you would have Jews from the camps and German Nazi guards living side by side in Israel. It will be the happening of happenings, and I do not see how it can be avoided at this point. It is just this massive tsunami wave heading for our shores. And this was one more inkling of the fact it cannot be hidden any longer.

Click to expand...
AC thinks up to 10% of the population is employed in a surveillance network on the other 90%, including children in the network being used to spy on other children expected to be questionable as adults.

I'm not convinced of this at all. I have known people who believed they were being followed by a pervasive network like this, that would have multiple people in car and on foot tailing them even on a day running errands all over the city, and following them when they traveled out of town, maintaining multi-car surveillance efforts continuously. These were low level nobodies. I thought these people were suffering paranoia due to long term drug use, but AC believes this is real, and pretty much everybody who's not in the network is being tracked continually by those who are in the network.

I don't believe this is true.

I do think the NSA is surveilling and recording all our online traffic and communications. This data is scanned by software, and now by AI systems to flag it for human review, but most of it is never seen by a human. There's too much data, and too few humans doing this kind of data review.

I do think O'Keefe is a big enough cheese to get actual human surveillance.
 
Thing is, you don't need to. The algorithmic surveillance flags targets for further investigation. Then the targeting team will review hits for potential additional action.

A lot of that kind of surveillance isn't there to investigate. It's designed to put stress on the target and make their life miserable.

 
Thomas More said:
AC thinks up to 10% of the population is employed in a surveillance network on the other 90%, including children in the network being used to spy on other children expected to be questionable as adults.

I'm not convinced of this at all. I have known people who believed they were being followed by a pervasive network like this, that would have multiple people in car and on foot tailing them even on a day running errands all over the city, and following them when they traveled out of town, maintaining multi-car surveillance efforts continuously. These were low level nobodies. I thought these people were suffering paranoia due to long term drug use, but AC believes this is real, and pretty much everybody who's not in the network is being tracked continually by those who are in the network.

I don't believe this is true.

I do think the NSA is surveilling and recording all our online traffic and communications. This data is scanned by software, and now by AI systems to flag it for human review, but most of it is never seen by a human. There's too much data, and too few humans doing this kind of data review.

I do think O'Keefe is a big enough cheese to get actual human surveillance.
Click to expand...

It is a difficult premise to 'prove'. That is certain.
Where I live in Australia, I don't readily see it. Even though I've been looking.
Could just be a very American centric situation.
It would be the sort of circumstance that control freak authoritarians would love to instill of course.

The East German Stasi were effective enough back in the day, without the aid of computers.
So today, with the aid of technology. It would be all the easier to have active human surveillance wandering the streets. Driving around.

Then add in the sheer number of 5th Columnists that the Greedy Globalists have been trafficking into America via Mexico or into Europe via Africa & the Arab world.

Plenty of scope to have a surveillance network of your own on the ground, which is not aligned with the host nation.
 
Probably should read a lot of the Patriot Act. For example this paragraph on this page https://www.hsaj.org/articles/183
So many things are in plain sight but not when buried in thousands of pages of documentation and nebulous wording...but I trust no one.

Community partnerships​

Since September 11th, it has become apparent that Homeland Security is not an effort that can be conducted by law enforcement alone. Instead, an effective Homeland Security strategy must include partnerships not only with other law enforcement organizations, but also with businesses, citizens, emergency management, public health, and many other private and public organizations with a stake in terrorism prevention and response. Partnerships need to be expanded to take advantage of the many skills necessary to plan for, mobilize, and respond to terrorist acts. For homeland security, this means building trust with Arab-American and Islamic-American communities, not with empty promises but by demonstrating how law enforcement can protect them in their neighborhoods, workplaces, places of worship, and other public spaces. 25

There is often some misconception that in community-oriented policing, “community” is defined by certain geographical boundaries. Daniel Flynn suggests that law enforcement agencies look beyond traditional geographical boundaries and that agencies also look at areas or groups with shared character or identity and those with common problems or concerns. Flynn points to ethnic, cultural, and racial communities, as well as businesses, schools, and churches. 26 In community-oriented policing, the police are only one of the many local government organizations responsible for responding to community problems. In community-oriented policing, other government agencies are called upon and recognized for their abilities to respond to crime and social disorder issues. Community-based organizations also are brought into crime prevention and problem solving partnerships with law enforcement. Encouraging citizen involvement in programs such as neighborhood watch, youth education, and other activities with law enforcement has been found to increase social cohesion among citizens and decrease fear of crime. 27 The emphasis on building community partnerships encouraged by community-oriented policing may also help reduce citizen fear of terrorist events. 28

The prevention of terrorist activities requires not only effective communication between local and state agencies and the federal government but, perhaps more importantly, with the community. By building community partnerships facilitated by community policing, law enforcement can develop responses aimed at reducing levels of fear. While citizen fear of terrorist events is somewhat different from fear of crime, some of the same techniques and programs can be used in its reduction. Citizen awareness campaigns can inform citizens about what police and government are doing to prepare for and prevent a future attack. 29
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top