I have a serious question about this and a few of the other times in which a black guy just "popped off" and died during an arrest. Often, it seems to happen while they are being restrained. And, I am wondering if it might be Sickle Cell.
I wonder how the Black man was acting before he got restrained.
By that principle, so are essentially 95% of the topics / posts discussed on hereMeh, at the end of the day it's clickbait for anyone who isn't in the jurisdiction of said officers and who will never meet them at any stage of their lives.
"if it turns out"....? I think there's pretty clear video evidence that that was the case...Hopefully if it turns out they were doing the knee-on-neck routine for no good reason then they will suffer serious consequences and the family of the victim will be compensated appropriately.
AgreedMore hopefully the outcome will be a public and signal to other cops that the knee-on-neck routine is an unacceptable risk for everyone involved unless there is no other reasonable option.
What a disgraceful comment.But it's also worth noting that tens of thousands of cops in the USA went to work last week, made arrests and didn't kill anyone in the process.
Don't let anyone catch you up in the hype.
By that principle, so are essentially 95% of the topics / posts discussed on here
"if it turns out"....? I think there's pretty clear video evidence that that was the case...
Agreed
What a disgraceful comment.
Firstly, because, if anything, the fact that there is such clear damning video footage in this case is the reason it can't be defended. But that is rare.
How often must this happen where the police do this and there is no evidence and it essentially becomes "he says, she says" with the police getting off on a technicality or "internal investigation" that is swept under the carpet? The police in that video are brazen enough to think they can get away with it and do not seem worried for any potential consequences of their actions (ie death of the man nor the public backlash). It only hits the media when there is a death, but how often must this type of action by the police leave an individual with significant morbidity (e.g. paralysis) for the rest of their lives that we wouldn't even hear about?
Secondly, because it is this exact attitude from the silent majority general populace (who would not be targeted in this fashion) that enables the police to think that they can brazenly get away with it. They are the first to scream like a stuck pig if this type of action was directed at one of their clan but the first to dismiss it when it doesn't.
By that principle, so are essentially 95% of the topics / posts discussed on here
"if it turns out"....? I think there's pretty clear video evidence that that was the case...
Agreed
What a disgraceful comment.
Firstly, because, if anything, the fact that there is such clear damning video footage in this case is the reason it can't be defended. But that is rare.
How often must this happen where the police do this and there is no evidence and it essentially becomes "he says, she says" with the police getting off on a technicality or "internal investigation" that is swept under the carpet? The police in that video are brazen enough to think they can get away with it and do not seem worried for any potential consequences of their actions (ie death of the man nor the public backlash). It only hits the media when there is a death, but how often must this type of action by the police leave an individual with significant morbidity (e.g. paralysis) for the rest of their lives that we wouldn't even hear about?
Secondly, because it is this exact attitude from the silent majority general populace (who would not be targeted in this fashion) that enables the police to think that they can brazenly get away with it. They are the first to scream like a stuck pig if this type of action was directed at one of their clan but the first to dismiss it when it doesn't.
Yes and although highly influential it’s since been discredited. Participants were coached.Anybody heard of the Stanford Prison Experiment?
What just compensation can a father receive for the murder of his son? Taxpayers sending him money will somehow negate this killing?Hopefully if it turns out they were doing the knee-on-neck routine for no good reason then they will suffer serious consequences and the family of the victim will be compensated appropriately.
Yes and although highly influential it’s since been discredited. Participants were coached.
What just compensation can a father receive for the murder of his son? Taxpayers sending him money will somehow negate this killing?