Race riots 2020

This is not really a racial thing. It is Marxists versus western civilization.

Here are multiple thugs attacking a senior citizen, who wore an "All Lives Matter" t-shirt, in St. Louis. This is thoroughly sickening,

View attachment 23674

That senior has taken care of himself, haha.
5ef7ccf15b874.image.jpg
 
Last edited:

LeoniusD

Woodpecker

This is so symbolic - vaguely ethnic Asian beautiful woman stands for Police Lives Matter - ugly mishapen marxists attack her.

It´s virtue beauty and truth versus lies ugliness and destruction.

You have to realize that most black and marxist people think that the cops shoot thousands if not tens of thousands of unarmed blacks in the country. They don´t even believe that cops barely shoot 1000 armed perps per year (that is all races - blacks being under-represented there relative to their violent crime participation), let alone under a dozen unarmed blacks. Getting shot by a cop is relatively unlikely despite the corporate media and also social media telling you otherwise:


Each and everyone of those rather unlikely incidences will be blown up. Meanwhile 500.000+ violent-partly-armed incidences happen each year with cops. Relative to that we can deduct that US cops show utmost restraint and the races are getting as much kickback by the police as they dish out in crime participation - with Asians being the most lawabiding citizens overall.
 

Dismal Operator

Kingfisher
Libertarianism is the right wing of Jewish political ideology. Its logical conclusion– if not expressed goal– is the dissolution of national groups through open borders migration and corporate/ banker control over populations through the lack of regulation. It's the main force that has wrecked North America for at least 2-3 decades, but it's wrapped in "freedom!" so normies can look at it and think it's something noble. Even though no one ever votes for it, through corporate power it has become the economic and basic cultural force of our societies. And it's only getting worse, as the gatekeepers still persist with the "what, you're going to legislate what a private company can do?" Governments will not have to crack down on masks or vaccines or "racism", corporations will do it for them. And since corporations now control the basic parameters of societal function, they will (already do?) essentially control society.

That's been my biggest black pill recently, our misguided focus on freedom (or at least the libertarian concept), will lead to our figurative– or possibly literal– imprisonment.
Just in case someone needs an illustration of this, consider the targeting of Facebook over the last 10 days or so. The following ad was run in a few big city newspapers, sponsored by the NAACP, ADL and various Soros non-profits

What would you do with $70 billion?

We know what Facebook did.

They allowed incitement to violence against protesters fighting for racial justice in America in the wake of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Tony McDade, Ahmaud Arbery, Rayshard Brooks and so many others.

They amplified white nationalists by including news sources with known extremist ties in their “fact checking” program.

They turned a blind eye to blatant voter suppression on their platform. Could they protect and support Black users? Could they call out Holocaust denial as hate? Could they help get out the vote? They absolutely could. But they are actively choosing not to do so.

99% of Facebook’s $70 billion is made through advertising. Who will advertisers stand with?

Today, we are asking all businesses to stand in solidarity with our most deeply held American values of freedom, equality and justice and not advertise on Facebook’s services in July. Let’s send Facebook a powerful message: Your profits will never be worth promoting hate, bigotry, racism, antisemitism and violence. Please join us. #stophateforprofit stophateforprofi t.org
Since this call for jihad on FB the likes of Verizon, Proctor & Gamble, Starbucks, Unilever, Coca-Cola, North Face, Eddie Bauer, Hershey's, Levis, Honda, Dockers, Ben & Jerry, and more have announced that they're either going to stop or suspend advertising on Facebook until they neuter the First Amendment to their liking. FB stock was down 8% on Friday as a result.

“Based on the current polarization and the election that we are having in the U.S., there needs to be much more enforcement in the area of hate speech,” Luis Di Como, Unilever’s executive vice president of global media, said.

“Continuing to advertise on these platforms at this time would not add value to people and society,” Unilever said. The ban also will cover Instagram.

Coca-Cola Co. went further than most advertisers, announcing on Friday that it was pausing its global ad spending on all social-media platforms for at least 30 days—including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube and Snap Inc.

“There is no place for racism in the world and there is no place for racism on social media,” Coca-Cola Chief Executive James Quincey said in a statement.

[...]

Among the new measures Mr. Zuckerberg announced Friday, the company will label posts that violate its policies but are deemed newsworthy—giving Facebook the option of labeling President Trump’s posts, as Twitter has done recently. Facebook will also put in additional safeguards to prevent voter suppression and shield immigrants from ads that depict them as inferior.

The groups calling for the boycott, called Stop Hate for Profit, described the new policies as “a small number of small changes.”

“We have been down this road before with Facebook. They have made apologies in the past. They have taken meager steps after each catastrophe where their platform played a part. But this has to end now,” a statement said.

The group submitted a list of 10 changes that it would prefer, including providing an audit and a refund to advertisers whose ads are shown next to content that was later removed for violating Facebook’s terms of service.

[...]
Facebook has taken some steps in recent years to better police its platforms, adding workers and developing new technology. That has resulted in the removal of hate speech and other objectionable content.

“We acknowledge the efforts of our partners, but there is much more to be done, especially in the areas of divisiveness and hate speech during this polarized election period in the U.S.,” Unilever said. “The complexities of the current cultural landscape have placed a renewed responsibility on brands to learn, respond and act to drive a trusted and safe digital ecosystem.”

Mr. Di Como said Unilever would like to see a reduction in the level of hate speech on the platforms and wants independent companies to measure and confirm that progress has been made.
They've got Facebook, and the other big social media sites by extension, by the balls here, and in due time these sites will be nothing but corporate-approved speech. The goal of huge corporations is power and control, not profit
 

Max Roscoe

Kingfisher
This is so symbolic - vaguely ethnic Asian beautiful woman stands for Police Lives Matter - ugly mishapen marxists attack her.

It´s virtue beauty and truth versus lies ugliness and destruction.

You have to realize that most black and marxist people think that the cops shoot thousands if not tens of thousands of unarmed blacks in the country. They don´t even believe that cops barely shoot 1000 armed perps per year
One correction--the police in America *kill* around a thousand Americans a year. Not shoot. Last year they killed 9 unarmed black men, or less than 1% of the total. What this tells you is that there is a big police violence problem in this country, but that there doesn't seem to be a racial component to it, or if there is one it is that police are more afraid to shoot black men but will more readily kill whites.

As to the video, the grotesque profanity and ugliness these people are constantly putting out makes me really question how anyone has sympathy for them. No matter your personal beliefs about minorities, how could you want to be part of a group that is always yelling, cursing, and being violent? Is there even an image of Anti Fa doing something that is a positive action? I mean that crappy garden in the CHAZ is the only thing positive thing I have ever seen them say or do.

That video reminds me of an experience I had in Puebla, Mexico. I was walking around this beautiful old city built by the French, with churches everywhere and incredible architecture (it has some of the best food in the country and is where mole was supposedly invented). I wandered through some weird communist type gathering where a band was playing truly horrendous music, and the people there were all dressed in ugly clothes, as they loudly yelled ugly lyrics.

I turned the corner and saw three beautiful young college age girls who were wearing nice dresses and I stopped and chatted with them. They agreed the music was awful, and were there doing some wholesome activity, which I can't remember. We hung out a couple more times but more than anything my takeaway from that interaction was the harsh contrast between the beautiful, kind, happy, Godly family oriented girls and the ugly, disjointed, disturbing scene we just left, and how obvious it would be to an outside observer that one is good, and the other bad.

Plato described the three trancendentals of human existence as what is Good, Beautiful, and True, a message that Thomas Acquinas and many other Christians have expounded upon. If you open your eyes, you will see, the good is beautiful, true, and Godly. The evil is ugly, sinful, and wrong. People like Kim Kardashian are incredibly ugly to me. I mean inside and out. Their voice, their appearance, their lack of modesty, it is all a big turnoff. I have found that while pornography used to make me think "oh, a hot and sexy woman", I now find that generally if I see a girl performing pornography, it is a physical as well as emotional turnoff to me.

Here is an example of the Good, Beautiful, and True in action. You could show this picture to a stranger from another country, followed by the video above, and it would be so easy to pick which are the good people. The well dressed young white people cleaning up profanity and graffiti or the masked, cursing, yelling woman telling you to "suck her dick"

 
Last edited:

This is so symbolic - vaguely ethnic Asian beautiful woman stands for Police Lives Matter - ugly mishapen marxists attack her.

It´s virtue beauty and truth versus lies ugliness and destruction.

You have to realize that most black and marxist people think that the cops shoot thousands if not tens of thousands of unarmed blacks in the country. They don´t even believe that cops barely shoot 1000 armed perps per year (that is all races - blacks being under-represented there relative to their violent crime participation), let alone under a dozen unarmed blacks. Getting shot by a cop is relatively unlikely despite the corporate media and also social media telling you otherwise:


Each and everyone of those rather unlikely incidences will be blown up. Meanwhile 500.000+ violent-partly-armed incidences happen each year with cops. Relative to that we can deduct that US cops show utmost restraint and the races are getting as much kickback by the police as they dish out in crime participation - with Asians being the most lawabiding citizens overall.
Savannah Hernandez, Infowars reporter.
 

It_is_my_time

Hummingbird
What is awesome is Edward Dutton can answer the previous post by wayfaringstranger in a scientific explanation. Basically these people are genetic mutants who would not have survived before modern medicine and the result is they form to a death cult of ideology.
Edward Dutton is back on Richard Spencer's "McSpencer Group" show this week and does a great job of scientifically breaking this down. He does this time to time, because so many questions come in regarding it. The show is up on Youtube for those curious to hear the scientific reason for the Antifa/BLM/SJW mobs.

To explain it quickly, it is based on the premise of "Spiteful Mutant". Only 10% of all children born before modern medicine went on to have their own children. 50% died in childhood, the other 40% did not successfully reproduce. This is normal among all mammals. Due to modern technology now 80% of those born go on to have children. So you have a lot of people with inferior immune systems that are living among us. This cause them to have mental issues. And their politics will be based on their mental issues, which is anxiety. Their anxiety is solved through religion, looking for a greater cause for being, but the modern religion today is not Christianity but instead SJW. So they become rabid SJW libtards.

They then discuss if there is any way to avoid this, have a modern society without creating these types of people and it is extremely difficult to do. The cycle will continue to repeat. Strong humans advanced society, this allows the weak to survive and thrive, the weak then tear it down and die out and the strong have to rebuild it. Even trying to select for strong genetics often doesn't work due to "regression to the mean". And if you try to select for high IQ, you then often end up with other severe problems, such as severe autism or severe allergies.
 

jordypip23

Ostrich
Gold Member
The guy with the gun reminds me of Tony Montana, in Scarface. I wonder if he will have to play out the final scene in the movie, when the hordes of BLM activists start trying to move in to his place. Lol.
You read my mind hahah. This is the white middle aged equivalent to Scarface (except not a criminal drug lord). Not even an army is going to take that man, his family & his mansion out that he worked so hard for. Hopefully.

Must be a rare mansion estate within the city limits I'm guessing. Didn't know St. Louis city had estates like that, but guess I'm not too surprised since it was once a roaring powerhouse of a city decades ago.
 
Top