Using your personal mobility to gain an edge in the market is a smart idea but I don't believe that you can find a property that cash flows with a 5-10% down payment. With that amount down it will negative cash flow and you will need at least some cash reserve to cover the smallest maintenance costs. Just trying to be realistic
Agreed. One unit that is very cash-flow positive offsets the one that's slightly negative.
I also make sure to only buy in places that are seeing demographic inflows. That means rent AND property values go up, so I get out of PMI quickly and move towards a cash flow positive situation. Before COVID, I read the book
Big Shifts Ahead and made some decisions based on that. Whereas my more recent purchase is in an idyllic place where remote workers are moving, there's no homeless people or graffiti...etc.
Overall, after maintenance and capex, I'm roughly break-even, but am accruing equity at a really excellent rate. I could sell one property, pay off some debt against the others and gain cash flow that way, or I could leverage even more and accumulate. Or I could focus on remodels. So many options open up if you have multiple properties. For me right now, I work a steady remote tech job and ALSO have a real estate license on the side. So I don't need cash flow to live off properties at the moment, although it would be nice. I also picked up a sweet commission from my last purchase.
Also, of course, you are right: the smaller the down payment, the longer you have to wait before you can cash flow once rented. Solutions are either to: 1. wait a little longer 2. Remodel thoughtfully to drive up rents 3. Airbnb/VRBO.
The place I'm in currently is small, it's downtown in a small town which gets a decent amount of tourists, so I'm looking at airbnb. The kitchen is pretty messed up(sellers completely failed some DIY jobs and they need to be redone), so when I remodel it'll look new and hopefully net a good airbnb rate. I'll do some amount of the remodeling myself.
Do you personally manage (field renter complaints, fix broken appliances, etc.) your properties or have a property management company do it for you?
I work with the tenants directly, and make sure to generally be as charismatic as possible with them particularly once they have been there a while. If your tenants don't resent you, the whole relationship is easy. I fix things that are easy to fix, I hire out the more difficult/labor-intensive parts.
Also, one thing that benefits me from living in an expensive area is that you probably only need a few properties to make an upper-middle-class nest egg. I follow the site biggerpockets.com which has quite a few people that invest in large quantities of modestly priced housing. A lot of them generate huge cash flow but they'll have 50-100 units between houses, duplexes, apartments, etc. There is no way I would possibly manage all of that myself.
Also, those attractive financing terms are you YOU to occupy the place as your principal residence, not to buy it as an investment property.
That's why I legitimately move in and live there for a year and satisfy the owner-occupant requirement. The loan doesn't "become" an investment loan when you move out after a year.
Further, for U.S. tax purposes, you want to make it your principal residence for at least 2 of the 5 years prior to sale.
So... buy in places that will be attractive for a long time and don't sell, at least not for decades.
Finally, lenders will look at your total debt burden and not net rent you expect to receive. So you can do this, but then you are going to hit a wall in the amount you can borrow pretty quickly.
Generally, lenders won't lend past a debt-to-income of 50%. My lender uses Fannie/Freddie loans and was able to take the leases from the other properties and offset the debt burden. If you don't offset the loans, I'm at something like 94% debt-to-income.
I also made a commission off my last purchase since I have an active real estate license. With Freddie loans you can even use the commission in your down payment, so you can potentially put 5% down, collect a 3% commission
which can be plowed directly into the down payment, and you don't even pay income tax on the commission until the day you sell. This means you would be able to go in with 2% down, but 5% equity upon closing. Unfortunately, Freddie does have stricter DTI requirements, so for this purchase I had to just put the 5% down and take the 3% as a standard commission.
Funnily enough, the automatic platforms that auto loan companies use kept rejecting me for a $34,000 car($600/mo payment), but then my lender approved me for a $700,000 house($3,000/mo payment). When I spoke with a human at an auto lender, they asked for documentation of the rents received, leases, tax returns, etc, and then approved that loan too.
Typically for investment properties traditional lenders will lend a max of 75% loan to value ratio and may charge a higher interest rate since it doesn't qualify under Fannie or Freddie programs aas a conventional loan.
Yeah, that's why I go to such efforts to get owner-occupant loans and stay away from investment property loans.