There is so much that can keep a man bewildered today. Here's the thing that I find helps me out and helps to put the whole thing into proper perspective. For all the rah rah rah go girl, go homo, go cross dresser, go top rung of the intersectional stack etc., one consistent thing remains abundantly clear and obvious - this is an anti-merit ideology.
Its an ideology of losers because its for losers. And women en masse have adopted this.
Apropos, what people like the recent "justice" gingsberg did was to help create an environment that favored "less represented groups", i.e. affirmative action and quotas etc. The net effect is that "they" created a tilted "playing field", all the while insisting the equalize the playing field, which made it possible for more women and others to "achieve" certain things, namely, prestigious job titles and professions and accolades.
A litmus test to determine the validity of my claim can be made by observing what happens when a person who holds non-affirmative action/quota intentions or, at the very least, demands merit as the only qualifier is introduced to the fray - like Donald Trump. The response is predictable..."they" go insane and for good reason, because, they depend on this help and would not be in their positions had it not been for this help.
My point here is that when you remove these constructs from society, indeed, if society were to remove political correctness and re-embrace meritocracy than men will have the upper hand.
There is truth in the feminists critique that history has been patriarchal but its not how they tell the story. No, there wasn't a phalogocentric conspiracy that kept women down. Rather, the outcomes we've observed everywhere are a result of the harsh Darwinian conditions, i.e. survival. Under such conditions merit is fundamental and is a direct function of overall fitness. And under these conditions men did the best. This tells us everything.
As observed, feminists are quite jealous of men. They know their mythology about social constructs and "if only there wasn't this artificial male...than coach would have put me in for that last play" are all coping mechanism with the truth.
And the truth is under meritocratic conditions men outperform women.
Its an ideology of losers because its for losers. And women en masse have adopted this.
Apropos, what people like the recent "justice" gingsberg did was to help create an environment that favored "less represented groups", i.e. affirmative action and quotas etc. The net effect is that "they" created a tilted "playing field", all the while insisting the equalize the playing field, which made it possible for more women and others to "achieve" certain things, namely, prestigious job titles and professions and accolades.
A litmus test to determine the validity of my claim can be made by observing what happens when a person who holds non-affirmative action/quota intentions or, at the very least, demands merit as the only qualifier is introduced to the fray - like Donald Trump. The response is predictable..."they" go insane and for good reason, because, they depend on this help and would not be in their positions had it not been for this help.
My point here is that when you remove these constructs from society, indeed, if society were to remove political correctness and re-embrace meritocracy than men will have the upper hand.
There is truth in the feminists critique that history has been patriarchal but its not how they tell the story. No, there wasn't a phalogocentric conspiracy that kept women down. Rather, the outcomes we've observed everywhere are a result of the harsh Darwinian conditions, i.e. survival. Under such conditions merit is fundamental and is a direct function of overall fitness. And under these conditions men did the best. This tells us everything.
As observed, feminists are quite jealous of men. They know their mythology about social constructs and "if only there wasn't this artificial male...than coach would have put me in for that last play" are all coping mechanism with the truth.
And the truth is under meritocratic conditions men outperform women.