Red-Pilled After COVID?

[paternos]

Last thing is this simple fact: the majority of the people are not even remotely scientifically literate. They simply do not understand the scientific method and confuse science with dogma and authority (scientism). Many "intellectuals" still falsely believe that antecdotes are antithetical to the scientific method.

This is so true.

Never looked at it like that. It's indeed something completely different.

Scientism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Scientific method - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Many times, I've heard "Trust the science" instead of being encouraged to apply the scientific method ourselves. We are told that we are too dumb to conduct science ourselves because we lack access to billion-dollar equipment and decades of expertise in the field.

However, this approach is exactly what I take when examining a government narrative. Or anything, and most of us do, without thinking about it.

1. Observation: I have noticed that individuals who have received injection are still getting the flu.
2. Research: Do the Moderna/Pfizer injections provide effective protection against the flu?
3. Hypothesis: Injections do not have a positive effect in preventing the flu.
4. Test: Investigate whether "vaccinated" people experience a higher or lower incidence of illness compared to non-vaccinated individuals based on the data available.
5. Analysis: The analysis does not reveal any differences. Saw it jump either way.
6. Report: Based on my findings, it think the injections are not effective in preventing COVID-19 and thatthere might even be side effects.

1. Are there side effects to the corona injection?
2. Etc.

It's as simple as that. But we were told using the scientific method was criminal. That this can only be done by specialized WHO doctors.

As with many things, the people ruling us are a complete inversion of what they claim to be.

The talk about "the science" but they preach a weird mystical alchemy that only some initiated people can understand. That's Dogma. That's the opposite of the scientific method.

It almost makes you dizzy when you think about it. They are the exact opposite of what they claim to be.

They say Science but when you employ the scientific method yourself they get angry. Somehow that has been a weird experience. That you want to say to them, don't you see you are a dogmatist?

That why I like pics like this:


1. Observation: I see the sea is just as high +100 years ago

We always need to start with an observation, some research (tides, is the picture real, seasonal effects), a hypothesis etc.

The scientific method is for everyone, for always, not just state approved bureaucrats who provenly don't use the scientific method. That's so weird about it. None of the people at the top were sensible to any criticism of common sense.

 

[Aldebaran]

The talk about "the science" but they preach a weird mystical alchemy that only some initiated people can understand. That's Dogma. That's the opposite of the scientific method.

Covidian: "The Science® says that the sky is red. Therefore the sky is red."
Me: "OK, but if you use your eyes you can clearly see that the sky is blue?"
Covidian: "HERESY! ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE! SCIENCE DENIER! CONSPIRACY THEORIST!"

 

[Batman_]

This is so true.

Never looked at it like that. It's indeed something completely different.

Scientism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Scientific method - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Many times, I've heard "Trust the science" instead of being encouraged to apply the scientific method ourselves. We are told that we are too dumb to conduct science ourselves because we lack access to billion-dollar equipment and decades of expertise in the field.

However, this approach is exactly what I take when examining a government narrative. Or anything, and most of us do, without thinking about it.

View attachment 58373

1. Observation: I have noticed that individuals who have received injection are still getting the flu.
2. Research: Do the Moderna/Pfizer injections provide effective protection against the flu?
3. Hypothesis: Injections do not have a positive effect in preventing the flu.
4. Test: Investigate whether "vaccinated" people experience a higher or lower incidence of illness compared to non-vaccinated individuals based on the data available.
5. Analysis: The analysis does not reveal any differences. Saw it jump either way.
6. Report: Based on my findings, it think the injections are not effective in preventing COVID-19 and thatthere might even be side effects.

1. Are there side effects to the corona injection?
2. Etc.

It's as simple as that. But we were told using the scientific method was criminal. That this can only be done by specialized WHO doctors.

As with many things, the people ruling us are a complete inversion of what they claim to be.

The talk about "the science" but they preach a weird mystical alchemy that only some initiated people can understand. That's Dogma. That's the opposite of the scientific method.

It almost makes you dizzy when you think about it. They are the exact opposite of what they claim to be.

They say Science but when you employ the scientific method yourself they get angry. Somehow that has been a weird experience. That you want to say to them, don't you see you are a dogmatist?

That why I like pics like this:

View attachment 58374
1. Observation: I see the sea is just as high +100 years ago

We always need to start with an observation, some research (tides, is the picture real, seasonal effects), a hypothesis etc.

The scientific method is for everyone, for always, not just state approved bureaucrats who provenly don't use the scientific method. That's so weird about it. None of the people at the top were sensible to any criticism of common sense.

Great summary - to add to this, this article is great to send to anyone that thinks vaccine injury stories aren't "valid".

Science/scientific process only works if there is zero bias, zero ulterior motives, and infinite funding/resources. The biggest issue is that people assume scientific research is conducted by scientists without egos, without biases, and is done purely "for the greater good", without ever considering why the research is being funded or who is funding it in the first place.

The only science that is "pure" is physics/cosmology/biology. Health/medicine/etc is probably the most corrupted and worthless "science" of the 20th and 21st centuries.

Anecdotal evidence is often the best evidence - Scientific Programmer

Anyone who ever had any interest in science will know that anecdotal evidence is the worst type of evidence possible. This is what scientists and science teachers repeatedly tell their audience. But is this statement true? If you have a …

scientificprogrammer.net

 

[analyst_green]

Great summary - to add to this, this article is great to send to anyone that thinks vaccine injury stories aren't "valid".

Science/scientific process only works if there is zero bias, zero ulterior motives, and infinite funding/resources. The biggest issue is that people assume scientific research is conducted by scientists without egos, without biases, and is done purely "for the greater good", without ever considering why the research is being funded or who is funding it in the first place.

The only science that is "pure" is physics/cosmology/biology. Health/medicine/etc is probably the most corrupted and worthless "science" of the 20th and 21st centuries.

Anecdotal evidence is often the best evidence - Scientific Programmer

Anyone who ever had any interest in science will know that anecdotal evidence is the worst type of evidence possible. This is what scientists and science teachers repeatedly tell their audience. But is this statement true? If you have a …

scientificprogrammer.net

I would argue that even physics/cosmology/biology have been corrupted by people pushing certain theories that are impossible to prove or disprove through empirical evidence. This includes the ideas of string theory, higher-dimensional space, or even evolution. Without making any objective judgement on the truth or falsehood of these theories, I can see that the motivation of many scientists that promote them comes from their atheistic mindset. If God is not real then science must be able to explain everything, or so they say.

And if something as fundamental as physics can be affected by bias, imagine how much greater the effect is on the medical sciences which are a murky haze comparatively speaking. All fields of science depend on human observation of the physical world, which is inherently unreliable. It is no surprise that the Covid delusion happened, I really think we had it coming. It's the natural culmination of many years of science being distorted by human bias, so that what was called healthcare is rapidly becoming "anti-healthcare". To see through this delusion, you either need to have genius-level IQ or a complete commitment to seeking Truth in all facets of life.

There is only one field of knowledge that is truly "pure" because it is completely self-contained, and that is mathematics. I am not talking about applied fields like statistics but what is officially termed pure mathematics, including number theory, geometry, combinatorics... You simply can't make anything up there, you're either right or you're wrong. You'll see the Western leadership class invoke scientific theories like evolution or multiverse theory, but you'll never see them bring up Fermat's Last Theorem!

 

[Batman_]

I would argue that even physics/cosmology/biology have been corrupted by people pushing certain theories that are impossible to prove or disprove through empirical evidence. This includes the ideas of string theory, higher-dimensional space, or even evolution. Without making any objective judgement on the truth or falsehood of these theories, I can see that the motivation of many scientists that promote them comes from their atheistic mindset. If God is not real then science must be able to explain everything, or so they say.

And if something as fundamental as physics can be affected by bias, imagine how much greater the effect is on the medical sciences which are a murky haze comparatively speaking. All fields of science depend on human observation of the physical world, which is inherently unreliable. It is no surprise that the Covid delusion happened, I really think we had it coming. It's the natural culmination of many years of science being distorted by human bias, so that what was called healthcare is rapidly becoming "anti-healthcare". To see through this delusion, you either need to have genius-level IQ or a complete commitment to seeking Truth in all facets of life.

There is only one field of knowledge that is truly "pure" because it is completely self-contained, and that is mathematics. I am not talking about applied fields like statistics but what is officially termed pure mathematics, including number theory, geometry, combinatorics... You simply can't make anything up there, you're either right or you're wrong. You'll see the Western leadership class invoke scientific theories like evolution or multiverse theory, but you'll never see them bring up Fermat's Last Theorem!

The bridge between mathematics and physics is pretty narrow isn't it? I thought the "higher dimensions" things like multiverses and string theory were a result of mathematical calculations? I do agree that things like string theory and are pretty absurd and worthless to talk about, and they're not actually true scientific theories.

On this subject, almost no one knows what a scientific theory is. For instance, evolution is not a theory, it's a fact. The full term is: the theory of evolution by natural selection - lots of people forget this. A scientific theory is higher up in the hierarchy than a scientific law, a theory explains an observed phenomenon using a repeatedly tested and proven hypothesis, a law is simply an observed pattern. For instance, we can predict how gravity behaves using Newtons laws with some degree of accuracy; with Einsteins theory of general relativity, we can make predictions with more or less 100% accuracy. The theory of gravity, explains what gravity is, which is without question a real force of nature (though the theory of general relativity suggests it's not actually a force at all).

Natural selection is the theory that attempts to explain evolution. Which, by the way, was promoted by Darwin and TH Huxley who were not atheists though certainly outspoken again organized religion and very untraditional for their time. True rebels.

 

[MichaelWitcoff]

One of my brothers got an inflamed heart from his first injection, so he did not get any further ones and doesn’t listen to people telling him that he needs boosters or whatever.

 

[rodion]

I have a bizarre nostalgia for 2020. The daily displays of insanity, hypocrisy and cathartic vindications of what you’d always suspected, was just absolutely wild.

I remember the George Floyd protests, and the media moving in lockstep to declare that protests were not spreading the virus while people were unable to attend funerals and weddings of loved ones. I remember the absolutely brazen fraud during the election (they literally just stopped counting until they could pull out the correct number of ballots and expelled Republican adjudicators), and how every corporation, every celebrity, every democrat, every republican, every media company acted in unison to crush dissent.

It seemed so clumsy, so hubristic, near comically evil. Surely they were overloading the NPC circuitry to breaking point? It was definitely not sustainable, too many normies going off the reservation. The Ukraine war came at the right time to deflect and distract to distant shores.

I am optimistic and I maintain that a ton of people were redpilled during 2020, everything went so fast and got so out of control. It felt like the globalists nearly jumped the gun, and now they have to reel things back in again, because I can’t see the same level of compliance or trust returning for generations. But perhaps I am hopelessly naive.

 

[analyst_green]

The bridge between mathematics and physics is pretty narrow isn't it? I thought the "higher dimensions" things like multiverses and string theory were a result of mathematical calculations? I do agree that things like string theory and are pretty absurd and worthless to talk about, and they're not actually true scientific theories.

Pure mathematics can be done entirely in the realm of logic/abstraction, while physics involves the application of math to explain the created world. However, observation of physical phenomena has led to many advancements in pure math. One example is the Wiener process, which was discovered by observing the random motion of a liquid particle. It's modeled by a set of stochastic equations, but these equations can be studied in their own right, as pure math. Their existence doesn't depend on physics, it simply helped their discovery. The Wiener process is also used in finance to model asset pricing, so perhaps it could have been discovered through that instead.

I think what this tells us is that there's an underlying order and logic to the world that shows up in various observable phenomena. But if you do the opposite, if you try to apply this logic or pure math to your own physical theories like string theory, there are so many chances for things to go wrong because of human bias or error.

 

[analyst_green]

One of my brothers got an inflamed heart from his first injection, so he did not get any further ones and doesn’t listen to people telling him that he needs boosters or whatever.

Sounds like he's got his head screwed on the right way. My cousin got heart inflammation from his first mRNA shot, then he went to take the second and eventually a booster

 

[Viktor Zeegelaar]

I have a bizarre nostalgia for 2020. The daily displays of insanity, hypocrisy and cathartic vindications of what you’d always suspected, was just absolutely wild.

Yeah it was a time of breaking through boundaries in one's worldview, and vehemently and fiercely explore the dark ''age of Empires'' map to places one had not seen yet. Sure it was tough with all what was going on, but it gave such a rush in seeing how the map truly looked liked that would've never happened without it.

But don't be too sad, you'll see more than enough action in the coming years as the next steps on the global chessboard are being ensued!