Roosh interview: How Should We Deal With The Worst Of The Internet?

[Samseau]

Well, yeah. That's what happens when you pass the Civil Rights act. Qualified black men get jobs that less qualified white men used to have. Who cares what color the guy's skin is as long as the best man gets the job?

There's no denying that racism played a big role in the past. But I'm not here to debate that. I'm merely defending Roosh's assertion that white men are at the bottom of the totem pole in present politics.

Whether or not white men "deserve" this punishment is another question. Personally, my family mostly comes from the middle east and my mother from Korea. Nothing in our history is tied to white racism, yet we have to deal with this shit. How is that fair?

You mentioned affirmative action, and I disagree with that on the same principle: I'm all about competition. Giving black kids a jump start to make up for years of oppression sounds good in abstract but when you have scholarships being given out to black kids with a 3.3 GPA while the white kid with a 3.6 GPA has to work his way through school, I don't like that.

Hell, I wouldn't mind affirmative action if it was only concerned with race. Giving black men a leg up isn't the end of the world.

But giving black men, black women and white women crosses the line. I believe a society's social structure should be built around enriching males so that they can make big, strong families that preserve a country's legacy, and in order to do that it is the men who must have the majority of a country's wealth, not women.

Seriously, why are women included in affirmative action? I think that is some serious bullshit with no justification. White women claiming they were oppressed in the past is ahistorically hilarious. Almost without fail, white women were behind the biggest racists/killers of the past, encouraging the men to be even more violent and ruthless so the women could get more from the men.

Putting women, especially white women, on the affirmative action program was a scam.

 

[tawillionaire]

Well, yeah. That's what happens when you pass the Civil Rights act. Qualified black men get jobs that less qualified white men used to have. Who cares what color the guy's skin is as long as the best man gets the job?

There's no denying that racism played a big role in the past. But I'm not here to debate that. I'm merely defending Roosh's assertion that white men are at the bottom of the totem pole in present politics.

Whether or not white men "deserve" this punishment is another question. Personally, my family mostly comes from the middle east and my mother from Korea. Nothing in our history is tied to white racism, yet we have to deal with this shit. How is that fair?

There's what, 2 black senators? I highly doubt the other 98 are out making sure blacks have priority over whites. For all the talk of "these people don't want it equal, they want it better" that I see on RoK and these forums, well guess what -- you're falling into the same trap. White people still have plenty of advantages as you acknowledged yourself with your rape charge. I just don't buy that white guys are at the bottom (FYI, I'm Arabic as well, yet treated as white just like you).

As far as women in affirmative action -- I'm on this site so you know I agree.

 

[Quintus Curtius]

@Samulus:

True. The "women's movement" was able somehow to dovetail or conflate its dubious agenda with the real and legitimate need in the US for a racially integrated society.

They pulled it off with the help of sympathetic politicians who wanted votes, and were able to cram it through legislatures and the courts.

 

[Samseau]

Well, yeah. That's what happens when you pass the Civil Rights act. Qualified black men get jobs that less qualified white men used to have. Who cares what color the guy's skin is as long as the best man gets the job?

There's no denying that racism played a big role in the past. But I'm not here to debate that. I'm merely defending Roosh's assertion that white men are at the bottom of the totem pole in present politics.

Whether or not white men "deserve" this punishment is another question. Personally, my family mostly comes from the middle east and my mother from Korea. Nothing in our history is tied to white racism, yet we have to deal with this shit. How is that fair?

There's what, 2 black senators? I highly doubt the other 98 are out making sure blacks have priority over whites.

As far as women in affirmative action -- I'm on this site so you know I agree.

You must understand, the white democratic senators get into power by promising free shit to the minorities/poor, while the republican senators get into power by promising not to give free shit to minorities/poor.

At the end of the day, it's still a white game... for the rich whites who use each other and throw each other as food to minorities for their own gain.

A lot of people think whites stick together... couldn't be further from the truth. Vast majority of white wars have been white on white violence. I remember talking to one African and he told me WW2 was a "civil war", since it was just white on white violence.

70% of white history is just whites killing each other. Don't be surprised to see whites ruling in the future, because whites will do anything for power.

 

[TonySandos]

@Samulus:

True. The "women's movement" was able somehow to dovetail or conflate its dubious agenda with the real and legitimate need in the US for a racially integrated society.

They pulled it off with the help of sympathetic politicians who wanted votes, and were able to cram it through legislatures and the courts.

and because we didn't just focus on the race problem things have been a wasteland ever since.

Race was an issue because humanity only become less uncivil through learning with the centuries. It would have solved itself through experience and learning. Now we have bureaucratic organizations that tell us what to think and how to feel which further causes big problems.

 

[Saga]

Seriously, why are women included in affirmative action? I think that is some serious bullshit with no justification. White women claiming they were oppressed in the past is ahistorically hilarious. Almost without fail, white women were behind the biggest racists/killers of the past, encouraging the men to be even more violent and ruthless so the women could get more from the men.

12 Years a Slave illustrated that historical fact close to perfection: the most maniacal, cruelest person in the entire movie was a woman.

 

[Teedub]

People like Anal Dash give me hope that I may one day become dictator of India.

:highfive:

 

[pdub]

Well, yeah. That's what happens when you pass the Civil Rights act. Qualified black men get jobs that less qualified white men used to have. Who cares what color the guy's skin is as long as the best man gets the job?

That's not what happens in real life, what happens is that businesses, government and the military are forced to hire / promote less qualified applicants in order to meet a minority quota.

 

[Captain Gh]

The author of that piece was fair to Roosh since she's a good natured woman who's rational as well. I've noticed this from women who are not super hotties or really ugly. they fall in the middle and can't relate to the current culture on any level so they're wiiling to listen to a man and analyze what he's saying.

I call these women the good bitches in bad times!! these are the only women left who you can roll with!! you sacrifice looks with them, but you get a women who'll be down with as long as you don't fuck up. my kind of woman after I retire!!

 

[unbowed]

A lot of people think whites stick together... couldn't be further from the truth. Vast majority of white wars have been white on white violence. I remember talking to one African and he told me WW2 was a "civil war", since it was just white on white violence.

70% of white history is just whites killing each other. Don't be surprised to see whites ruling in the future, because whites will do anything for power.

The EU is fragmenting because it cannot reconcile dozens of unique cultures with their own histories, languages and customs (amongst gross economic mismanagement). Maybe in the US it can be reduced to "white on white violence" because Europe's far away and we've been conditioned to see "white" as guiltworthy, but that trivializes the legitimate struggle for existence as a nation, and a people. I'm sure this may mean nothing to people in the USA (especially with our stellar history classes) but I don't see why it's OK to reduce it to "white on white" which is essentially saying "whatever".

Europeans are very conscious of their background. Tell a Lithuanian he's a Pole, or a Pole he's a Russian, or a Czech he's a German or a German he's French and watch what happens. They're not fighting each other for fun, the cultural and economic components are paramount and have shaped the shifting borders and ethnic groups to this day. History is molded through these wars, but more fundamentally, it's due to the desire for self-preservation, which also comes through culture, art and language. There's plenty of "white" history not engulfed in war.

If anything, "whites" stand to lose the future due to the demographic disaster happening in the US/Europe, simple as that.

And WWII was extremely violent in non-white Asia, what was that guy thinking?