turkishcandy
Kingfisher
germanico said:turkishcandy said:
BMI is percentage of fat in the body right?
so if a 100 pound woman has 17 BMI, thats a whole 7 kilos of pure lard in her body.
How is more than that "unhealthy"?
Why do they consider a full 1/5 of your body made out of Crisco Shortening "healthy"? Under whose standards?
BMI is not percentage of fat. Body Mass Index is your weight divided by your height.
It's problematic because it doesn't take into account whether you have muscles or fat, heavy bones or light bones. 2 girls with the same BMI can look the opposite if one of them works out every day and the other one never works out. Therefore, a fit girl and a chubby girl can have the same BMI and that's why the acceptable BMI levels are too high for our eyes' sake. Plus, according to World Health Organization every girl who isn't chubby is ''unhealthy'' as shown in the picture above. I don't know what exactly they mean by ''healthy'', but it's probably something about how well equipped a girl is to wrestle with you.
Fat percentage, on the other hand, defines how stiff or wiggly your body is (can't find the right word for that). Girls who work out and girls who are just naturally thin can have different BMIs but same fat percentage, which makes sense because they all look attractive and healthy. But fatties can't cheat on fat percentage. That's why I believe body fat percentage can be an objective marker of how attractive a girl's body is. If it's too low, she is either ripped like a man or bony like a skeleton, which are both unattractive. If it's between 15 and 25, she's at healthy weight. If it's more than that, she needs to either lose weight or work out to burn that fat.