Pretty terrible. It's an open secret apparently in the medical field that it's overworked mothers having a sort of breakdown and committing infanticide.Does anyone here want to share the red pill on SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome)? Hint: there is said to be a direct cause to the babies' deaths that the public cannot stomach.
The biggest risk factors for SADS are a previous heart attack or coronary heart disease given 75% and 80% of SADS cases are linked with these conditions, respectively.
Other potential risk factors include:
- Heart issues including ejection fraction of less than 40 percent, combined with ventricular tachycardia; prior cardiac arrest; abnormal heart rhythms; Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome; fainting episode with no known cause; extremely fast or low heart rates; heart blocks; former or current congenital heart failure; cardiomyopathy (dilated and hypertrophic); changes in potassium and magnesium in the blood; thickened heart muscles; and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation after a heart attack
- Family history
- Genetics
- Obesity
- Diabetes
- Use of drugs
Does anyone here want to share the red pill on SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome)? Hint: there is said to be a direct cause to the babies' deaths that the public cannot stomach.
Babies are not born with neck muscles strong enough to move their head or keep it in place.
Minor or mild shaking will snap the neck, or improper placement of the child could block breathing. The child itself, exhausted after exercising the neck muscles for the first time could put itself in a position where it can’t breathe. The child will look like it is moving the head after sleeping and two minutes later it’s dead.
SIDS is caused by abuse or neglect, but babies are born in such a fragile state that they can also get themselves killed even when there is a high level of care attended to them.
SIDS has nothing to do with SADS. “SADS” shouldn’t exist as a term. It literally means that the medical establishment is uninterested in the cause of death, which shouldn’t ever happen in a healthy society.
If it were that simple, SIDS wouldn't exist as a term either. It'd be called something else, like infant asphyxiation. What "SADS" has made clear is that if the medical community ever calls something a "sudden death syndrome", the cause is politically untouchable.SIDS has nothing to do with SADS. “SADS” shouldn’t exist as a term. It literally means that the medical establishment is uninterested in the cause of death, which shouldn’t ever happen in a healthy society.
I don't buy this or any kind of "sudden death syndrome". There's always a cause.My younger brother died of sudden adult death syndrome. 12 years ago whilst in his early 20’s.
Interesting hypothesis about this. I'd be curious for more detailed statistics that would bear this out - for example, if mothers with babies dying of SIDS have more children afterward, or if they have older children too. If this hypothesis is correct it would seem that in most cases it would be an only child dying from SIDS and a higher rate of divorce for the mothers, who don't have more children afterward. And I'd be surprised if SIDS happens to the middle child in a family with 3+ kids.Pretty terrible. It's an open secret apparently in the medical field that it's overworked mothers having a sort of breakdown and committing infanticide.
It happens regularly but not often. Normally, where I live, it will be reported a couple of times a year.I don't buy this or any kind of "sudden death syndrome". There's always a cause.