TheFinalEpic said:ics:
[img=700x900]http://static.seattletimes.com/wp-c...b4-11e6-a313-3b8443f9a5bc-1020x1220.jpg[/img]
TheFinalEpic said:ics:
Mentavious said:Anyone ever see Full Metal achelmist brotherhood? Reminds me of that.
Belgrano said:
Hannibal said:Mentavious said:Anyone ever see Full Metal achelmist brotherhood? Reminds me of that.
That would be what we're referencing, yes.
I only ever saw the original Full Metal Alchemist, but they did have that story arc with the dad who combined his daughter with the dog.
![]()
I would assume that eventually researchers will use this as a stepping stone as they gain more focus on the needed organ, and require less and less of the "creature." Ideally, you'd want to grow the needed tissue/organ with minimal supporting tissue necessary. But you first have to focus on producing the organ. This kind of stuff is never pretty at first. Most medical research isn't. It does raise questions ethically, but in the end, if it allows us to grow a person a new liver, kidney in an incubator, and that organ will be a perfect DNA match that minimizes complications and the need for lifelong anti-rejection drugs, then the price may be worth it.Moto said:I think this has been going on for a while. While it can theoretically lead to some good, these creatures have no human rights and no animal rights. I assume they are used largely for organ harvesting and kept alive in downright disturbing conditions.
Hannibal said:Mentavious said:Anyone ever see Full Metal achelmist brotherhood? Reminds me of that.
That would be what we're referencing, yes.
I only ever saw the original Full Metal Alchemist, but they did have that story arc with the dad who combined his daughter with the dog.
![]()
Comte De St. Germain said:Watch Brotherhood it's infinitely better in my humble opinion.
Edit: God damn it someone beat me to it. So co-sign the above.
Belgrano said:Teutatis said:I'm all for scientific progress and break troughs, but this... I don't like it.
Where does it stop, a half human half pig creature?
Ha, if only you knew!
'Humans evolved after a female chimpanzee mated with a pig': Extraordinary claim made by American geneticist
Scientists currently suppose that chimpanzees are humans' closest living evolutionary relatives, a theory amply backed by genetic evidence.
However, as Dr McCarthy points out, despite this genetic similarity, there are a massive number of divergent anatomical characteristics distinguishing the two species.
These distinguishing characteristics, including hairless skin, a thick layer of subcutaneous fat, light-coloured eyes, protruding noses and heavy eyelashes, to name but a few, are unmistakeably porcine, he suggests.
There are also a number of less obvious but equally inexplicable similarities between humans and pigs in the structure of the skin and organs.
Indeed, pig skin tissues and heart valves can be used in medicine because of their similarity and compatibility with the human body.
Dr McCarthy says that the original pig-chimp hook up was probably followed by several generations of 'backcrossing', where the offspring of that pairing lived among chimps and mated with them - becoming more like chimps and less like pigs with every new generation.
(...)
In its conclusion he writes: 'I must admit that I initially felt a certain amount of repugnance at the idea of being a hybrid. The image of a pig mating with an ape is not a pretty one, nor is that of a horde of monstrous half-humans breeding in a hybrid swarm.
'But the way we came to be is not so important as the fact that we now exist. As every Machiavellian knows, good things can emerge from ugly processes, and I think the human race is a very good thing. Moreover, there is something to be said for the idea of having the pig as a relative.
:mindblown: