I don't want to get too involved in things that I wasn't concerned with in the first place, but I have to say that your behaviour, SilentCal, is absolutely insufferable. You're hijacking every thread and every post about sedevacantism, spewing vitriol and being passive-agressive if not outright agressive, and your dishonesty and ill-will in arguments boggles the mind.So you recognize Pope Francis now? I though you were undecided (since you said it, after all). I guess you changed your mind?
I was actually surprised when I came around here because I was reading how sedes were accused of exactly that, and Roosh was agreeing with that. It surprised me because this is wholly incoherent with my personal experience. It seems to me that the clergy and learned people (those who looked up and chose V2) exhibits disdain if not hostility to sedes, when they're so quick to lend a hand to muslims, buddhists and whatnot. I've been called a pharisee just for quoting some V2 documents side-by-side with encyclicals from previous popes. So far my experience on this forum has been coherent with that, but maybe I'm wrong and some sedes are indeed problematic? My intent is not to pretend sedes are victims, I actually don't discuss sedevacantism that much, I've done my research, chose the path that seemed most truthful to me, and that's that. But every time I look up this thread or others threads explicitly talking about sedevacantism it is nothing but worthless bickering, usually initiated by someone pro-V2.