Share Of American Adults Having NO Sex Reaches All-Time High

R

Rakers

Sparrow
Share of American adults having NO sex reaches all-time high, with one in four 18-to-30-year-old men remaining celibate throughout 2018

Share of U.S. adults not having sex in 2018 reached an all-time high

Nearly 1 in 4 adults who were celibate were 20-something men

The portion of Americans 18 to 29 reporting no sex in the past year more than doubled between 2008 and 2018, to 23 percent

Since 2008, the share of men younger than 30 reporting no sex has nearly tripled to 28 percent

$


$


$


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...eople-not-having-sex-reached-record-high.html
 
Syberpunk

Syberpunk

Pelican
Gold Member
"Whatever could be the cause of this?" the NPC Journalists will say.


Me: "You're the "journalists", why the fuck are you asking us?"
 
A

Akwesi

Kingfisher
Hilarious how the number of girls not having sex plummeted when the financial crisis hit in 2008. Really tells you everything you need to know. Also, if you focus on the 2006-2010 line for 18-30 women only, it looks like a bitch on her back spreading her legs.
 
RedKurrant

RedKurrant

Sparrow
Spot on observation by one of the commentators:

'So, I'm 40, very good looking and fit, and can tell you the problems. Speaking to many young guys, the #1 thing they tell me is after #metoo, most women are very risky to date. These kids are scared to put a move on. Also, none of these young kids make de ent money. Women dont want losers who still live with mommy at 28 years old. And lastly, the biggest problem is everyone staring at screens all day. I used to bed so many women by walking by them, just giving a smile, and saying good morning when in NYC walking to work. They would turn back, give me a huge smile, and I would ask her name. The rest is history. Today, it cant be done because women are either starting at screens while walking or wearing headphones. Flirtation is all but dead. It's really sad"
 
N

Nordwand

Pelican
Other Christian
Am I correct in thinking that by adding together the red and blue lines, it can be said that almost two thirds of men get no, or next to no sex?
 
E

Eusebius

Hummingbird
Gold Member
This forum is really ahead of the curve. Members started talking about the tightening of the sexual marketplace and increase in the male sexual "underclass", and then a couple of years later studies confirm it all.
 
joost

joost

Kingfisher
I remember seeing a Japanese figure (maybe a politician) on tv 15 years ago talking about the decline in fertility rates. He talked about how the economy should be prosperous so the men could make money and thus, have confidence. And without, you don’t even bother talking to a girl.

Decades ago you would end up marrying your neighbor or someone who lived a few blocks from you. These days girls put some bikini pics online and there’s guys from (literally) thousand of miles “courting” them. They now have a sense of power, knowing men will throw plenty of resources to bang them.

If you didn’t won the genetic lottery, there’s a limit on what game and money can get you. If you’re a 3 on looks, it doesn’t matter how much money you have. You won’t be able to bang 10’s (in the US!). The impression I have here (in the US) is when you say hi (just being polite), the girl looks at you with that “I have a boyfriend” face.

I remember also a study in UK were girls said they could live without sex but not without their phones.

Younger men are clueless these days. They don’t have money to rent a place but spend $1000 a month eating fast food out and buying useless gadgets. Depend exclusively of dating sites to talk to girls...

To sum it up, they’re just big kids. Too much video games, porn and weed.
As for girls, they have so high standards...online.
 
A

Abelard Lindsey

Woodpecker
Two causes, which are likely interconnected. First, lots of young people are overweight with medical issues. Second, young people for whatever reason are growing up without being properly socialized to interact effectively with others. Consider also that a full 75% of young people are deemed unfit for military service. Some of this is due to drug use and criminal convictions. But the majority of this is due to overweight and medical issues.
 
M

Manbeline

 
Banned
Abelard Lindsey said:
Two causes, which are likely interconnected. First, lots of young people are overweight with medical issues. Second, young people for whatever reason are growing up without being properly socialized to interact effectively with others. Consider also that a full 75% of young people are deemed unfit for military service. Some of this is due to drug use and criminal convictions. But the majority of this is due to overweight and medical issues.
Click to expand...
You would think games like Fortnite, Apex Legends, the hot military games would get kids interested in physical activity and the army. But I'm seeing the very opposite: dancing.
 
kosko

kosko

Peacock
Gold Member
Nordwand said:
Am I correct in thinking that by adding together the red and blue lines, it can be said that almost two thirds of men get no, or next to no sex?
Click to expand...

Many on the forum have been saying this for a long time now. You take a step out and interact with your average dude and he is not getting shit all in relation to tail.

It was Annomonioum Boch who blared this alarm years ago and when he brought his premise forward I decided to take a deep dive and keep notice best I could here in my on local environment. Most men aren't getting shit, women are more restritive and resistant. For men, Vegetael beavhour of toltaling checking out, dabling in perverse behvaiour (being cool with being a cuck, in some large poly group, getting with faux-women, p4p - becoming more the norm) is creeping up. For women, it is coldness with an explosion in the sale of sex toys. You average woman uses a toy to get off more than a real man these days. Women eventually check-out and go cold from the carousel and retreat back to toys and dealing with men they have a history with.
 
L

LexisNexis

 
Banned
RedKurrant said:
Spot on observation by one of the commentators:

'So, I'm 40, very good looking and fit, and can tell you the problems. Speaking to many young guys, the #1 thing they tell me is after #metoo, most women are very risky to date. These kids are scared to put a move on. Also, none of these young kids make de ent money. Women dont want losers who still live with mommy at 28 years old. And lastly, the biggest problem is everyone staring at screens all day. I used to bed so many women by walking by them, just giving a smile, and saying good morning when in NYC walking to work. They would turn back, give me a huge smile, and I would ask her name. The rest is history. Today, it cant be done because women are either starting at screens while walking or wearing headphones. Flirtation is all but dead. It's really sad"
Click to expand...

The usual Blame Men bullshit

It's all to do with women

They are simply less inclined to lock in with a man on their level and spend more time single reveling in their social media-facilitated options and having sex with a select group of attractive men
 
yankeetravels

yankeetravels

Kingfisher
This made the rounds in a couple of my circles. I think what blows me away is how fast the rise of men without sex has gone up in 10 years. Think that all but confirms social media and dating apps have had a huge impact, but the author of the article does not directly say that.

One point I think the writer did nail was the lack of marriages and young people's living situations. Marriage is at an older age and more younger people live with their parents. I can tell you living with parents makes you a little less motivated to go out and bang. I've done it anyway when I was younger and in college I fucked while my roommate was sleeping 10 feet away in the other bed, but I don't think every young person is comfortable with that. Plus, less 20's people are living together. What that point suggests is people have more regular sex when they're in relationships, which I think is true for the ordinary man.

Another thing the article didn't bring up was the men who had sex in the year but not monthly. Imagine adding the men up together who got no sex (28% according to the article) plus those who bang maybe once or a few times a year. That has to be a large percentage, would not be surprised if it's more than half. Really kind of closer confirms the 20/80 rule.

I saw one vlogger make a video presenting his thoughts on the article. We talk about the decline but he made one very good point relating to that. He noticed the 30's men getting the most sex, entering marriages, and being more established in career/pay. But, what happens in 10 years when the men having no sex grow to their 30's? They may not have enough experience to replace the current 30's men with women. Hell, this might have happened with the 20's men already compared to last decade. Will 40's men be the next best generation? Will celibacy continue to rise? Will men still be living with their parents in their early 30's?
 
Disco_Volante

Disco_Volante

 
Banned
I'd also add the past 10 years has had unprecedented quotas of women hired into corporate jobs and med school slots.

Limited jobs, limited spots in medical schools / dental school/ PA school / etc.... every spot given to a woman is knocking a young man out of the game.
I've heard the big four CPA accounting firms are big on hiring young women, as their process is mostly automated with software anyways. In the oilfield women are untouchable and get promoted quickly. They are repulsed by men who make less money than them, or have less prestige. Their minds can't handle it so they don't date. I don't think most men under 35 even have much money.
Corporations are giving women favored access to cash flow streams men invented / created.

Look at Title IX, they take millions generated by young men (football team) and give it to women's sports so they can fly chartered jets to games where they make layups lol. They've really clamped down on computer science, too. My alma matter put 4 women in charge of the computer science department, each will make like 150K+ per year.

They're basically confiscating everything man created, mandating it be given to them unearned.
 
L

LexisNexis

 
Banned
The black pill that Roosh has come upon, that all this isn't coincidence, that everything you see is engineered by an international clique to atomize and disenfranchise, is really the best explanation
 
Top