Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Graft" data-source="post: 1251492" data-attributes="member: 11507">I've written a couple of times on what I believe is the main problem with the dating market and why everyone, but particularly men, are losing so badly.On Linkedin, there are three settings that you can activate for privately job searching so that recruiters can contact accordingly:1. &quot;Actively Looking&quot; . This will tell recruiters that you are looking for a job, and looking for it now.&nbsp; Most people using this setting are either out of work or unhappy with their current work.2. &quot;Passively Looking&quot;. This means that you are happy where you are at, but for a &quot;Whoa&quot; offer, you would leave your current role.3. &quot;Not Looking/Off&quot; This turns off the feature and hides your name from recruiters who are looking for potential job seekers. They can still find you and message you, but your name won't be delivered to their inbox/screen.Most young women are in bracket #2, &quot;passively looking.&quot;&nbsp; There are some women in bracket #1, but much more in bracket #3.&nbsp; If a guy has a &quot;Whoa&quot; value prop, they'll engage in a relationship, but otherwise, they're happy being single.&nbsp; Most women are getting laid a couple times a month at most.&nbsp; Truth is, they are mostly satisfied without consistent men, chasing their career/education, having cocktails with their friends, soaking in the validation from their instagram selfies.&nbsp; The women in bracket #3, which there are plenty, don't give a shit about men at all, besides for the e-attention that they give and the occasional free drink at a bar.Even on dating apps, where you'd think most women would be &quot;Actively Looking,&quot; most of us can attest to how hard it is to get a girl out 1-4 times even if there's a conversation + number exchange + date.&nbsp; I usually text a girl for 2-3 weeks to get her out at first and then go into chase mode after that, constantly competing with her perpetually busy life.&nbsp; I shake my head at these women so many times, as a guy who has a lots of value, as they are possibly ignoring their future husband for their job/friends/test/etc.&nbsp;&nbsp; Almost all men start in bracket #1, actively looking to get laid.&nbsp; A huge amount go to #3 once they give up with the sexual marketplace.&nbsp; Men can't live without women the same way that modern women can live without men-we will always have the need to ejaculate. This is the modern problem with dating.&nbsp; As you can see with the hundreds of thousands of words posted and hours spent on this forum, there is a large disparity between the priorities of the different genders.&nbsp; Women are close to the #1 priority for men, if not the absolute pinnacle.&nbsp; Men are typically a 3-6 priority for women, usually falling well behind her career, her friends, and herself.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Graft, post: 1251492, member: 11507"] I've written a couple of times on what I believe is the main problem with the dating market and why everyone, but particularly men, are losing so badly. On Linkedin, there are three settings that you can activate for privately job searching so that recruiters can contact accordingly: 1. "Actively Looking" . This will tell recruiters that you are looking for a job, and looking for it [b]now[/b]. Most people using this setting are either out of work or unhappy with their current work. 2. "Passively Looking". This means that you are happy where you are at, but for a "Whoa" offer, you would leave your current role. 3. "Not Looking/Off" This turns off the feature and hides your name from recruiters who are looking for potential job seekers. They can still find you and message you, but your name won't be delivered to their inbox/screen. Most young women are in bracket #2, "passively looking." There are some women in bracket #1, but much more in bracket #3. If a guy has a "Whoa" value prop, they'll engage in a relationship, but otherwise, they're happy being single. Most women are getting laid a couple times a month at most. Truth is, they are mostly satisfied without consistent men, chasing their career/education, having cocktails with their friends, soaking in the validation from their instagram selfies. The women in bracket #3, which there are plenty, don't give a shit about men at all, besides for the e-attention that they give and the occasional free drink at a bar. Even on dating apps, where you'd think most women would be "Actively Looking," most of us can attest to how hard it is to get a girl out 1-4 times even if there's a conversation + number exchange + date. I usually text a girl for 2-3 weeks to get her out at first and then go into chase mode after that, constantly competing with her perpetually busy life. I shake my head at these women so many times, as a guy who has a lots of value, as they are possibly ignoring their future husband for their job/friends/test/etc. Almost all men start in bracket #1, actively looking to get laid. A huge amount go to #3 once they give up with the sexual marketplace. Men can't live without women the same way that modern women can live without men-we will always have the need to ejaculate. This is the modern problem with dating. As you can see with the hundreds of thousands of words posted and hours spent on this forum, there is a large disparity between the priorities of the different genders. Women are close to the #1 priority for men, if not the absolute pinnacle. Men are typically a 3-6 priority for women, usually falling well behind her career, her friends, and herself. [/QUOTE]

Verification