I know you are probably far more well-read on the scientific aspects than me. Like I said, I'm mostly going off best guesses based on faith. And to just keep in mind that ultimately we should just do what we feel God wants us to do, and the rest ultimately isn't all that important. It is hard for me to imagine God wants me to take an abortion-tainted, Mark of the Beast-lite poison, so if there are side effects to not taking it, I can live with whatever they are. I know this is just a discussion so I'm not trying to dissuade from having the conversation.
Shedding from the vaccinated
- Thread starter Grenadill
- Start date
I know you are probably far more well-read on the scientific aspects than me. Like I said, I'm mostly going off best guesses based on faith. And to just keep in mind that ultimately we should just do what we feel God wants us to do, and the rest ultimately isn't all that important. It is hard for me to imagine God wants me to take an abortion-tainted, Mark of the Beast-lite poison, so if there are side effects to not taking it, I can live with whatever they are. I know this is just a discussion so I'm not trying to dissuade from having the conversation.
In this flu study from 2018 they claim that those who are vaccinated are 6.3 times more likely to spread the flu than the unvaccinated. They even use the term "shedding".
Just to make a distinction on the point of shedding, vaccinated people are shedding the spike protein according to this theory, and not the virus itself. The spike proteins are in and of themselves toxic, but you will not get infected with the virus itself.
I am not vaccinated, but I did get sick for a few days after my co-workers got vaccinated.
I am not vaccinated, but I did get sick for a few days after my co-workers got vaccinated.
I have read it closely, and I think they refer to covid "in the wild" so to speak, when they say exposed to the study intervention. (meaning infection and not the vaccines) I could be wrong, but everything other than that seems absurd.
"...Exposure During Pregnancy, An EDP occurs if:
• A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention. (mother to child in utero)
• A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception. (This one is a bit tricky to explain I agree)
• A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
• A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. (natural infection)
• A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception..." (natural infection)
It`s a good find, but I`m not quite sure the guy you linked to is interpreting it correctly.
I personally do not buy the idea of viruses as presented by virology. I don't even buy the idea that the shots have mRna. It is a cover for the use of graphene. Moderna admitted it that their shots are an operating system. How do you create an operating system with mRna? Grahene on the other hand can get activated under a certain frequency and form crystals that can work as a data processing chip.
Like I said earlier, when the body get intoxicated it tries to get rid of the toxins, if it can. It could be all sort of toxins that get shed. So if anyone picks them up, it might produce a reaction according to their own state of health. The problem with shedding is quite serious as it would make everyone progressively worse and give the authorities an excuse to poisons us with even more drugs.
Last edited:
We’re on the same page then. I believe mainstream virology to be pseudo-science.
This scenario sounds plausible enough to me but I don’t know one way or the other. I’m keeping an open mind about all this. If this is true, it flips the narrative on its head. It would be the jabbed who are a danger to the unjabbed not the other way around.
Nothing surprises me in this upside-down world.
With respect, I think you are wrong. I say this because I have seen information about people who are vaxxed carrying up to several thousand times higher viral load. This is part of the reason why when they get a breakthrough infection it is much more serious, or so I have heard. It stands to reason they would be much more likely to spread viral particles or whatever. I will see if I can find and provide a source for these claims.
Edit: Found a couple of articles about what I mentioned above. Although it's questionable if we can trust any mainstream sources at all anymore.
Higher viral load with delta variant:
How the Delta variant achieves its ultrafast spread
Viral load is roughly 1,000 times higher in people infected with the Delta variant than those infected with the original coronavirus strain, according to a study in China.
www.nature.com
How do vaccinated people spread Delta? What the science says
Emerging data suggest that Delta could spread more readily than other coronavirus variants among people vaccinated against COVID-19. But key questions remain.
www.nature.com
I have personally experienced this btw, but I am not prepared to say it is conclusive. There is a certain person who I know to be vaxxed and the last two times I came in close/prolonged contact with them I became sick for 1-2 days afterwards. Symptoms were similar to a mild cold, runny nose, itchy/watery eyes, slight congestion, LOTS of sneezing (like seriously a ridiculous amount, 6-12 times in a row at certain points, it was miserable).
Allergy pills didn't help but interestingly at one point I took a zicam rapidmelt and within 15-30 minutes most of the symptoms disappeared and I felt 90% better. The next morning the symptoms returned but not as severely, and by the next day I was fine again. I take a ton of supplements and immune boosters and virtually never ever get sick, so I definitely feel like something strange is going on.
Last edited:
That's true. Since the "vaccine" isn't a real one and just contains some mRNA junk, assuming what we've been told is accurate. I suppose I should have been clearer on that point. The thing that worries me is the vaxxed effectively become carriers and walk around feeling fine, meanwhile carrying huge viral loads and spreading it around to everyone nearby. That plus the spike proteins, if that is a thing. It's weird though because I'm sure I've come into contact with many vaxxed at this point but it's that one person who has repeatedly gotten me "sick" (it was almost like a cross between a cold and an allergic reaction). So that's why I'm not sure what is actually going on anymore.
I dont want to start an huge discussion about germ vs terrain theory here, but based on what was revealed to us in the last weeks i think that the vaxxed are actually shedding parasites. The t.Cruzi that was find in the Pfizer vial is one of them. Maybe there are more. This parasite, the t.cruzi causes heart damage along with others skin diseases and it is responsible for the chagas disease in south America.
Are we 'coincidence theorists' ?
Why the people who had taken the Pfizer Vaxx are showing the same symptoms (myocarditis, pericarditis) that we see in people with the chagas disease, the same disease caused by the same parasite who was found inside the Pfizer vial ?
Most of the 'víruses' that were described in the last 80 years were never isolated properly. They only isolated particles that were actually exosomes, parts of our human genome.
I was called dvmb by some old members of the forum on another thread just because i told them that the "sars-cov2" were never isolated. It is the truth, even the CDC and the Wuhan lab scientists have admitted this. The PCR test cannot identify the virus. The PCR test can be triggered by exosomes and other human genome particles. There is no way to detect viruses properly using the PCR.
So the shedding coming from the vaxxed cannot be from the "viral load", since they dont have this "load".
The spike protein cannot survive outside of the body much longer. Cell proteins are extreme fragile and can be easily destroyed by heat and light. So i dont believe they are shedding only the protein. I think they are shedding way more than just the (s)-protein.
Most of the diseases transmitted from one human to another are transmitted by parasites that we share with our fellow humans.
This explain why some people who became ill by working in proximity with the vaxxed were easily healed by the ivermectin.
I have 100% sure that this parasite, the t cruzi who is also the responsible for the chagas disease (parasite induced myocarditis) is causing the heart damage induced by the Pfizer vaccine. Since he was only observed in the Pfizer vials and not in the others explain why only the pfizer vaccine is causing heart damage.
Dr lee merrit, who is unvaxxed reported in her last interview that she was working next to the vaxxed and became ill, symptons of respiratory and cardiac disease. She took the ivermectin and it is now 100% healed.
Are we 'coincidence theorists' ?
Why the people who had taken the Pfizer Vaxx are showing the same symptoms (myocarditis, pericarditis) that we see in people with the chagas disease, the same disease caused by the same parasite who was found inside the Pfizer vial ?
Most of the 'víruses' that were described in the last 80 years were never isolated properly. They only isolated particles that were actually exosomes, parts of our human genome.
I was called dvmb by some old members of the forum on another thread just because i told them that the "sars-cov2" were never isolated. It is the truth, even the CDC and the Wuhan lab scientists have admitted this. The PCR test cannot identify the virus. The PCR test can be triggered by exosomes and other human genome particles. There is no way to detect viruses properly using the PCR.
So the shedding coming from the vaxxed cannot be from the "viral load", since they dont have this "load".
The spike protein cannot survive outside of the body much longer. Cell proteins are extreme fragile and can be easily destroyed by heat and light. So i dont believe they are shedding only the protein. I think they are shedding way more than just the (s)-protein.
Most of the diseases transmitted from one human to another are transmitted by parasites that we share with our fellow humans.
This explain why some people who became ill by working in proximity with the vaxxed were easily healed by the ivermectin.
I have 100% sure that this parasite, the t cruzi who is also the responsible for the chagas disease (parasite induced myocarditis) is causing the heart damage induced by the Pfizer vaccine. Since he was only observed in the Pfizer vials and not in the others explain why only the pfizer vaccine is causing heart damage.
Dr lee merrit, who is unvaxxed reported in her last interview that she was working next to the vaxxed and became ill, symptons of respiratory and cardiac disease. She took the ivermectin and it is now 100% healed.
N°6
Ostrich
Good find.
It correlates with the former accepted view that the Spanish Flu didn’t spread by troops returning home from the trenches but by vaccinated soldiers arriving at the front from basic training.
Where did you read about that?
I can totally see using parasites as bioweapon.
This hoax is a complete replay of the spanish flu one. Soon to be followed by an arm conflict too.
This is the full article with the microscopic analysis of evertything they found in the vaccines, including the parasite t. cruzi:
American Scientists Confirm Toxic Graphene Oxide, and More, in Covid Injections
It is a human right, and global law governed under the Nuremberg Code, that vaccine specific ingredient information is disclosed. It is critical, required and necessary information so anyone,…
dailyexpose.co.uk
And here's some short video about the t. cruzi parasite actions on the body:
This is the full article with the microscopic analysis of evertything they found in the vaccines, including the parasite t. cruzi:
American Scientists Confirm Toxic Graphene Oxide, and More, in Covid Injections
It is a human right, and global law governed under the Nuremberg Code, that vaccine specific ingredient information is disclosed. It is critical, required and necessary information so anyone,…
And here's some short video about the t. cruzi parasite actions on the body:
Really fascinating article and video, thank you. Parasites make a total sense as like I have already said in this thread the fact that use the old ladies toilet was what got me into trouble.
Last edited:
Is Ivermectin good against this parasite? That would also make sense. I have done a quick search and it seems to be effective against some kind of Trypanosoma parasite: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23135008/
The linked video is real science: the drawings in the begeinning are backed up by actual video captured from a microscope. What we see happening is likely to really happen.
I have looked up this parasite and this is what causes the so called "sleeping sickness". Symptoms: Fever, severe headaches, irritability, extreme fatigue, swollen lymph nodes, and aching muscles and joints are common symptoms of sleeping sickness. From here: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/sleepingsickness/gen_info/faqs-east.html
That's unsettling.
I also get headache from spending extended time with vaccinated people. Normally I don't have headaches at all and these only happen when I am close to the vaxed. The count of occasions is yet small to be sure but it is very sus.
A guy I know got his booster shot. His dog died by a stopped heart that week (it was happy when he last saw it and cold dead in 1.5 hours. Looks like it died while sleeping. The dog was less than a year old. It was not totally healthy but this is still too much of a coincidence for me).
For me it is not conclusive yet but I am very suspicious about shedding.
A guy I know got his booster shot. His dog died by a stopped heart that week (it was happy when he last saw it and cold dead in 1.5 hours. Looks like it died while sleeping. The dog was less than a year old. It was not totally healthy but this is still too much of a coincidence for me).
For me it is not conclusive yet but I am very suspicious about shedding.