Shedding from the vaccinated

Some kind of toxins are being shed but what exactly it's anybody's guess at this point!
That's a good position to hold. At this point in time I'm only sure about how I'm affected when I'm around the vaxxed, which is I get a hoarse throat and a metallic taste in my mouth. Consequently, other than shopping and church, I try not to be around people. What it is my body is reacting to I don't know. It's all conjecture.
 
Some people get a weird eye sensation thing happen (along with throat stuff). Very odd.

Nonetheless, I like to follow to my Brother who went up to lepers because He had 100% faith, not 99% or less. 


God decides, and as He instructed, Love your Neighbour.

Something we should all remember with this new fear.
 
Last edited:
I'm staying with vaxxed friends with my wife and small kids for a week now and we have absolutely no symptoms of them "shedding". I'm in the hospital now and again there is no evidence of any "shedding".

I believe it's some psy-op to make you think "oh might as well take the shot and have my comforts back as the vaxxed are already shedding it on to me".

It's more magical thinking, don't fall for it. Take vitC, zinc, magnesium and spend time in the Sun and you'll be fine, even if you believe shedding is real.
 
We are all shedding toxins ALL THE TIME ... like going to the toilet as a crude example.

Whether you think you're healthy or not, that's how the body works - it detoxifies itself all the time and the more intoxicated you are the more it will try to do so until it gets clogged up and develops a chronic condition.

How much one is affected by other people's toxins shedding depends on their own condition and the condition of others around them. The way it works is either bio-chemical and/or bio-electric. The vaccinated/drugged people get loaded with additional toxins so naturally they are likely to spread more toxins onto the others. The recipient might not experience any symptoms again depending on their condition or they could. There are situations when if you're young and healthy you'd experience more acute symptoms as the body has more energy to deal with the toxins there and then. Hence why children always develop a fever when they detoxify.

So do we have to fear shedding from the vaccinated? Hello, no! The ultimate protection is the keep yourself in top condition and carry on with life without fear.

Today I was at a car mechanic who told me he was triple jabbed and I made sure to offer him a hand shake. He was wearing a mask all the time and made sure he quickly applied hand sanitizer after he shook my hand. It seems they are a lot more scared than us the unjabbed.
 
I have heard instances when even young children (below 10) have post Covid syndrome with sleep problems. For long I have thought that it only happens in MSM but now I know an instance where I know the parent IRL. I don't know them well but I don't think they would lie because they don't have any reason to do that.

I have a hypothesis based on shedding: the vax makes people shed some toxins but at the same time it makes themselves immune to this material. This means that they don't fall ill (we know some fall ill but only a minority yet) but they make unvaxed people ill.

The unsuspecting unvaxed gets ill from shedding. In a few cases they become so ill that they get into Hospitals. What happen there? They are mistreated with bad food and unncessary drugs. And they get shedded in the Hospital as well! The poisoning goes on and eventually they even die in some cases!

This was all planned. The nature of this does not allow normies to understand the mechanics because it is not just one trick (that the vaccine makes illness) but two tricks: the vaccine makes illness to people around vaccinated but not the vaccinated themselves. A normie will never understand something this tricky. It is also almost unbelievable for myself...

I don't have any proof for this other than:

* This vaccine was planned by Bill and Faucy. They knew they will need high level deceit to not go through with their plans and they could come up with something that works like this.
* I hear serious illness of unvaxed but in most case they are people who live with vaxed.
* I see many cases when parents vaccinate themselves and their children get ill immediately. There is a surge in the number of child illnesses at the beginning of this school season and shedding could explain that. Even the children of unvaxed had health issues because they are shedded by teachers. But children of unvaxed get well faster and generally they are less ill.

(I have seen strange things on my own and other's unvaxed children. Nothing serious but strange symptoms that I have not witnessed ever before and then later I have heard that these symptoms are know side effects of the vax. The symptoms caused by shedding are similar to what is possible by the vax: abrupt eye pain, wounds hard to heal, stomach or head pain, menstruation issues to name a few)

The problem of this hypothesis is that it is almost impossible to prove or disprove. My observations don't have very much statistical power due to the small numbers.

I start to believe in this hypothesis though. We don't isolate from vaxed people but we regularly drink pine tea and it seems to be enough. If anyone became ill in my family then I would separate him/her from the vaccinated until getting better.
 
I had zero exposure to vaxxed in Minsk, 'cos they don't even have the bad bad vaxxes there (only sputnik)...

It feels like a dumb risk to have exposed myself to vaxxed family etc... but done now.

The theory is they can transmit spike protein by breath/skin?

If the RNA is self-replicating, then it wouldn't matter if you don't get a syringe full... it would just take longer to have any effect.

Ah, who knows. This was a mistake... I'll just have to wait for a blood-scan QR.

Maybe I'll get a 'green pass'... so there's that.
 
I had zero exposure to vaxxed in Minsk, 'cos they don't even have the bad bad vaxxes there (only sputnik)...

It feels like a dumb risk to have exposed myself to vaxxed family etc... but done now.

The theory is they can transmit spike protein by breath/skin?

If the RNA is self-replicating, then it wouldn't matter if you don't get a syringe full... it would just take longer to have any effect.

Ah, who knows. This was a mistake... I'll just have to wait for a blood-scan QR.

Maybe I'll get a 'green pass'... so there's that.
If the gene modifying agent would spread by itself unstoppable then it is game over. But I don't believe that. If that was the case then they would not push the vaccines because they would have already won. They would not create such a bioweapon because that is dangerous for themselves as well.

In my understanding the vaxed are shedding some poisonous agent but with time we detoxify of that agent and it does not cause long term harm. In the short term when someone feels bad symptoms then it is clever to reduce contact and start detoxifying. But there is no need to worry about the issue as long as you don't feel ill.
 
The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic is merely the most recent demonstration that our current approach to emerging zoonotic infectious disease is ineffective. SARS, MERS, Ebola, Nipah and an array of arenavirus infections sporadically spillover into human populations and are often contained only as a result of their poor transmission in human hosts, coupled with intense public health control efforts in the early stages of an emerging epidemic. It is now more apparent than ever that we need a better and more proactive approach. One possibility is to eliminate the threat of spillover before it occurs using vaccines capable of autonomously spreading through wild animal reservoirs. We are now poised to begin developing self-disseminating vaccines targeting a wide range of human pathogens, but important decisions remain about how they can be most effectively designed and used to target pathogens with a high risk of spillover and/or emergence. In this Perspective, we first review the basic epidemiological theory establishing the feasibility and utility of self-disseminating vaccines. We then outline a road map for overcoming remaining technical challenges: identifying high-risk pathogens before they emerge, optimizing vaccine design with an eye to evolution, behaviour and epidemiology, and minimizing the risk of unintended consequences.

 
The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic is merely the most recent demonstration that our current approach to emerging zoonotic infectious disease is ineffective. SARS, MERS, Ebola, Nipah and an array of arenavirus infections sporadically spillover into human populations and are often contained only as a result of their poor transmission in human hosts, coupled with intense public health control efforts in the early stages of an emerging epidemic. It is now more apparent than ever that we need a better and more proactive approach. One possibility is to eliminate the threat of spillover before it occurs using vaccines capable of autonomously spreading through wild animal reservoirs. We are now poised to begin developing self-disseminating vaccines targeting a wide range of human pathogens, but important decisions remain about how they can be most effectively designed and used to target pathogens with a high risk of spillover and/or emergence. In this Perspective, we first review the basic epidemiological theory establishing the feasibility and utility of self-disseminating vaccines. We then outline a road map for overcoming remaining technical challenges: identifying high-risk pathogens before they emerge, optimizing vaccine design with an eye to evolution, behaviour and epidemiology, and minimizing the risk of unintended consequences.


Scientists are working on vaccines that spread like a disease. What could possibly go wrong?





jh-spread.png
 
The vaccinated aren’t radioactive. Even if they ‘shed’ spike proteins, these cannot harm you any more than them shedding skin cells.

The whole ‘shedding from the vaxxed’ narrative is just a way to stoke fear among the unvaccinated.

I agree about the spike protein. It just feels like a stretch that an inert object a few nanometers across could survive transit out of a person, through the air and onto another person's body, and effect them in any meaningful way. I know people that wash their clothes to “remove the spike protein from the vaccinated”, and I don’t know if that’s helpful, mentally or physically.

Regarding the vaccinated not being “radioactive” however, that’s where I begin to wonder. Biologically, we are big electrical vessels of conductive water. Last month I was working on a live show that uses something called a J-tech box to beam a 4K wireless signal to a Jumbotron screen hundreds of feet away. When people stood near it it would glitch out the signal, and thats due to people’s electrical fields interfering with it’s operation.

I know it can sound very “new age”. Like “frequencies”, man. But I can’t help but wonder if the modalities of something finer are being tinkered with via the injections.

The channels by which women’s menstrual cycles synchronize when in prolonged proximity are not really understood. Look into the research over the years regarding it, it’s very elusive.

There’s a component to biology and reproductive health that is undeniably electrical, and it is good to at least look at that angle when considering the “shedding” phenomenon.
 
The shedding danger

Even those who rejected the RNA and spikes of the gene shot are not safe from it, because the danger of vaccine shedding has not been ruled out.

By Wolfgang Wodarg

An excerpt:

Shedding, finally someone is looking

It is therefore necessary to look at the extensive literature of at least the last thirty years on this subject in order to also find out the state of knowledge about gene transfer or shedding. A pioneer in this laborious work is Helene Banoun from Marseille. She is a pharmaceutical biologist, former Inserm (15) researcher and member of the "Independent Scientific Council" in France.

She published a review paper in November 2022 presenting previous findings on the risks of transferring nucleic acid sequences or their products from treated individuals to contacts. In doing so, she criticizes the fact that such studies were not deemed necessary for RNA injections to prevent SARS-CoV-2. Her paper is entitled: Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products (16).

Thus, their research was less concerned with details of the effect of RNA shots on the "vaccinated" than with the question of whether the RNA or its products (spikes) could be transmitted to "unvaccinated contacts." Such studies apparently did not occur prior to marketing approval for the genetic interventions declared as "vaccinations."

In this regard, the protocol for Pfizer's phase I/II/III trial of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which began in May 2020, mentions the possibility of transmission of the study product by inhalation or skin contact as well as transmission through the semen of a male exposed by inhalation or skin contact and the possibility of an adverse vaccine reaction due to such exposure (17).


Such "shedding" of genetic information or of its products, however, was not increasingly discussed until, for example, children or close partners of the newly "vaccinated" were suddenly observed to have symptoms or even diseases similar to those that had meanwhile become more common in the RNA shot recipients themselves.

Helene Banoun was alerted, among other things, by the report of a stroke in a 7-year-old child who had no risk factors and whose parents had been freshly vaccinated. When a healthy seven-year-old suddenly suffers a stroke, people take a closer look. And literature on this she found plenty (18).

How can shedding occur?


Exosomes - the parcel service in the body


RNA or its double-stranded counterpart, DNA, are regularly passed from living cells and from decaying cells. Most commonly through a type of intercellular "parcel service" called extracellular vesicles (EVs) or exosomes. These are particles strangulated from cells and enclosed with their cell membranes, which at first glance look like viruses. These are found everywhere in and also on the body. They are as small as viruses, survive the passage through the stomach, and - unlike foreign-enveloped viruses - are left alone by the immune system. Exosomes can be loaded by the sending cells and bring their contents to specific target cells. Thus, they can contain nucleic acids such as RNA or DNA fragments in plasmids and at the same time proteins, enzymes, messenger substances or parts thereof. They are also used to transport cellular waste for recycling in the spleen or liver.

The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used for gene therapy are effectively artificial copies of such transport vehicles. They, too, are designed so that they are not recognized and destroyed by the immune system and can then empty their contents into body cells.

A review paper on the safety of nanoparticles in biomedical applications states that exposure to LNPs can occur through ingestion, injection, inhalation, and skin contact. The latter has also been observed where the nanoparticles are produced (19).

Nanosystems are therefore increasingly used for the delivery of peptides, proteins, vaccines, or gene fragments via skin and mucous membranes (20). This also seems to work with exosomes (21).

First RNA "vaccines" with inhalable or skin-applicable exosomes are under development (22).

If yes: how, what, how long, how much.


Thus, transmission of RNA from lipid nanoparticles or exosomes to "unvaccinated" persons in contact with RNA-treated persons appears possible.

Possible routes of transmission include contact with body fluids such as blood, breast milk, tissue juice (lymph), mucus from all body orifices, aerosols (23), and sweat. Here, the dose certainly plays a major role in the effect.

This immediately leads to a second important question:

So how long should one be cautious when coming into contact with RNA "vaccinated" individuals?

The presence of transmissible RNA has so far been reported in the literature to range from a few days after injection to at least four months. This does not yet take into account the possibility that cells may be reprogrammed in such a way that the production of spike proteins becomes their program to be reactivated at any time.

There are now several indications of this as well. For example, in 2021, researchers from MIT published a disturbing paper in which they provided strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse transcribed into DNA and integrated into human DNA (24).

If confirmed, such altered cells could keep producing the spike proteins indefinitely, even after the infection has long subsided. Such insertions could repeatedly lead to false-positive results in a PCR test, even in the long term.

Spike proteins produced immediately after injection may persist for a long time even in free form: Vaccine-induced spike mRNA circulates in plasma as early as the day of injection and for up to 14 days thereafter, with peak levels measured on the fifth day (25). However, it can take up to four months for the spikes to be absent from exosomes as well.

It has even been observed in experiments with transgenic humanized mice that - after contact with such RNA-bearing exosomes - they developed antibodies against spike proteins. Shedding with the triggering of immune reactions thus seems to be possible even without incorporation into the DNA even after four months.

I got you under my skin


The RNA molecules are supposed to stimulate the cells of the "vaccinated" to produce artificial spike proteins of the Wuhan virus, which then trigger the formation of antibodies when a part of them also appears on the surface of their gene-modified cell.

Recently, however, it has been observed that whole spikes or parts of spike proteins are also packaged into exosomes and such spiked vesicles have been found throughout the body. Their spike cargo then also manages to protrude through the exosome wall and trigger an immune response. The possibility of shedding through normal skin seems particularly troubling. Here, exosomes loaded with spikes and RNA have been found especially in sweat. As already mentioned, they can be passed on through the intact skin like nanoparticles.
 
There is a nice jujitsu gym attached my regular gym now that I have moved to the beach. A few days ago after my workout I watched some of the class and talked to the instructor (great guy) and I was very tempted to get back into jujitsu. In the past I did it for a few years and won a few tournaments. However then I was reminded about the shedding.... I don't know if its a thing or if it isn't a thing, but I don't want to be rolling around doing jiujitsu with someone who is vaccinated. So I doubt I will partake in anymore jiujitsu, I will just stick with surfing.

#TeamPureBlood
 
The good thing is that visits to the gym are voluntary, so you can avoid a possible danger.

But what if someone is in intensive care due to an accident with blood loss and is dependent on blood reserves (from other people)?
That already gave me a headache 1.5 years ago.
 


The comments tell a different story... They are YouTube comments so they must be taken with a grain of salt but the comments fall in line with a lot of what I have herd about shedding.

Some of the comments:

My two roommates are fully vaccinated and I am not however within seven days of the first their dose I had G.I. bleeding. I’m older in my late 50s so no period issues. I have dealt in animal viruses so I know that shedding is often the case. Yes I eventually caught Covid from one of them who came home from working the airport post fully vaxxed1 & 1/2 years later. Lasted a month. The other room mate has had multiple surgeries for skin cancer, and a recent blood clot in leg from a short trip to Arizona. Currently very lucky. Both still really deny the side effects. They are both in the Tri-care military medical system, and neither one of their doctors said anything about side effects with either of these two, so the don’t really believe they got the bad shot. - (this account has been on YouTube since 2011, I highly doubt its a fresh pysop to spread "misinformation")

This needs to be considered further…, I myself, my daughter and my sister are not vaccinated and yet…., my daughter that works as a medical assistant and exposed to vaccinated people has developed very heavy menses with clots and now twice a month. I myself as a PA being around my vaccinated patients has experienced spotting after not having a period for 17 years and then there is my 61 year old sister working/painting along my fairly newly vaccinated sister and she develops the same pains she experienced when in labor…. All three of these situations are unusual and there has to be an explanation. Too coincidental not to be from shedding. - (account from 2016)

I am unvaxed and post menopausal for several years. Yet after spending a whole day where relative came home post vax I've experienced period cramps. Equally my friends 14 yr old daughter started bleeding heavily midcycle on the day her dad came home after his vax. She described it as ger daughter had "period from hell" which would not stop...go figure - (account from 2008)

In SARS Cov 1, they created 'vaccine mice' where unvaccinated mice were placed together and impacted by the vaccinated mice. The contamination went on until the third generation.
 
Last edited:


The comments tell a different story... They are YouTube comments so they must be taken with a grain of salt but the comments fall in line with a lot of what I have herd about shedding.

Some of the comments:

My two roommates are fully vaccinated and I am not however within seven days of the first their dose I had G.I. bleeding. I’m older in my late 50s so no period issues. I have dealt in animal viruses so I know that shedding is often the case. Yes I eventually caught Covid from one of them who came home from working the airport post fully vaxxed1 & 1/2 years later. Lasted a month. The other room mate has had multiple surgeries for skin cancer, and a recent blood clot in leg from a short trip to Arizona. Currently very lucky. Both still really deny the side effects. They are both in the Tri-care military medical system, and neither one of their doctors said anything about side effects with either of these two, so the don’t really believe they got the bad shot. - (this account has been on YouTube since 2011, I highly doubt its a fresh pysop to spread "misinformation")

This needs to be considered further…, I myself, my daughter and my sister are not vaccinated and yet…., my daughter that works as a medical assistant and exposed to vaccinated people has developed very heavy menses with clots and now twice a month. I myself as a PA being around my vaccinated patients has experienced spotting after not having a period for 17 years and then there is my 61 year old sister working/painting along my fairly newly vaccinated sister and she develops the same pains she experienced when in labor…. All three of these situations are unusual and there has to be an explanation. Too coincidental not to be from shedding. - (account from 2016)

I am unvaxed and post menopausal for several years. Yet after spending a whole day where relative came home post vax I've experienced period cramps. Equally my friends 14 yr old daughter started bleeding heavily midcycle on the day her dad came home after his vax. She described it as ger daughter had "period from hell" which would not stop...go figure - (account from 2008)

In SARS Cov 1, they created 'vaccine mice' where unvaccinated mice were placed together and impacted by the vaccinated mice. The contamination went on until the third generation.

Good find. The long standing accounts definitely add credibility to the comments.

This sounds unfortunate for me. I am not vaxxed, but obviously almost everyone around me is vaxxed, at work, in public, etc. I haven't lived with anyone that's vaxxed, but it sounds like just being around a vaxxed person for a while is enough.

So far I haven't had any side effects that I've been aware of, but it seems likely I probably have received some of this shedding.
 
The mRNA payload is taken up by various cells in the body when vaccinated, and then the spike-protein will be expressed on the surface of cells. The immune system will then produce corresponding antibodies. I don't see any way for the mRNA payload itself to jump from one host to another.
 
Well, as far as I understand it, the mRNA payload is not the problem in the shedding process. But the spike proteins are since they are dangerous for the human body themselves.
 
Well, as far as I understand it, the mRNA payload is not the problem in the shedding process. But the spike proteins are since they are dangerous for the human body themselves.

The spike protein is only dangerous when expressed by your cells, which requires the mRNA programming.
It's really a question of the Adeno-associated virus (AAV) viral vector that they use. 80 Percent of the adult population already have antibodies to (natural) AAV, and there are many types of them. I think they use AAV2 for most gene therapy in humans. So if the mRNA is to enter human cells, you must be infected with the AAV virus that they use in the vaccine. (carrying the mRNA payload)

But since they use very small amounts I don't think it's likely. What's more concerning is the potential of vertical transmission, (mother to child) or maybe even genetic changes in human populations is the long run, so that you can inherit these genetic alterations.
 
Back
Top