Shooting at Los Angeles International. TSA agent dead

Status
Not open for further replies.

Walderschmidt

 
Banned
Suits said:
greensteelhead said:
Right on time.....just when the O administration needed to divert attention from the scandals that have been brewing (Obummercare, Benghazi, IRS, NSA, etc. etc. etc.) and help the Prez's sagging approval numbers.

Look....shiney thing over there! Nothing to see here.

:tinfoilhat:

If the only response you have to his comment is a tin foil hat - you're no better than a girl who calls a man a misogynist for expressing "radical" views about women.

And the irony is we make fun of blue pill people and women in general for having closed minds.

Food for thought.

Wald
 

Architekt

Ostrich
thedude3737 said:
That's an extreme comparison.

I'm not comparing anything to anything here. Try read what I'm writing without shades of anger over your eyes - you're arguing like a feminist here, extrapolating from information that doesn't actually exist
 

Pacesetter20

Kingfisher
Gold Member
Suits said:
KorbenDallas said:
Under the constitution what the TSA does is against the law.
When you opt out, the groping, the way the TSA does it without probable cause for a crime, is a felony. If a cop did the same thing the TSA does on the street with no probable cause, that cop could get sued for big money. The metal detectors work. Like I said, I've noticed that some of the TSA employees seem to get a kick out of being above the law. Not all, but enough that makes me look at them with contempt.

That's cool, you're an expert on the constitution?

My understanding is that under US law, a search is only unreasonable when the individual being searched is unfairly targeted.

You have the right to travel.
You don't have the right to use public transportation.
If you don't want to be groped, just fly on a private plane.

What? Can't afford it? Lot's of people have private airplanes. You just need to work harder.

Last time I checked Delta, US Airways, American Airlines, et al are private companies.
 

kbell

Crow
Gold Member
They always tighten restrictions after these incidents. There was a scare about bombs in toothpaste containers or something like that, and as a result they limited you 3 oz fluid containers. I bet the shoebox bomb scare was the cause for the checking your shoes thing too.
 

Libertas

Crow
Gold Member
2Wycked said:
He even says we shouldn't assume all white men have the potential to be mass murderers. Like when feminists talk about rape culture and how all men are conditioned to view women as objects to be seized and then pretend they don't view all men as potential rapists.

And that's the gist of it. What these idiots don't get is that their preaching is inherently divisive, because it's all based around bullshit Marxist critical theory a la the Frankfurt School.

They say they're all for equality, but then they set up a division of someone that's guilty, and someone that's a victim. Then they get to disenfranchise one with guilt while keeping the other in a perpetual, non-productive state of anger. This is the primary reason why I believe conservatives have been found to be happier than those on the left. Not that I place much stock in conservatism- I believe it's also a losing philosophy, but at least it doesn't do this stupidity.

As for this incident, I find it amusing how the media is trying to instill fear that the guy had an "anti-government ideology." This shit is demonization tactics straight out of the SPLC.

Guy's a nut, but the tone of the media's reporting of the incident should make you question what their motivations are.
 

Veloce

Crow
Gold Member
Architekt said:
I'm not comparing anything to anything here. Try read what I'm writing without shades of anger over your eyes - you're arguing like a feminist here, extrapolating from information that doesn't actually exist

It's pretty much equivalent to allowing hipsters into the army

Might want to re-read your own posts before throwing out inflammatory insults comparing me to a feminist. Ironically, using smear tactics is exactly how a feminist argues.
 

Duke Castile

Crow
Gold Member
No one deserves to be murdered. But if it HAS to happen I prefer it be an asshole. There just happens to be a large asshole concentration in the security and law enforcement fields.
 

Roosh

Cardinal
Orthodox
Architekt said:
thedude3737 said:
That's an extreme comparison.

I'm not comparing anything to anything here. Try read what I'm writing without shades of anger over your eyes - you're arguing like a feminist here, extrapolating from information that doesn't actually exist

3 day ban for gratuitous attack on member.
 

Rapparee

 
Banned
Suits said:
Am I the only one who gets a little evil joy out of a TSA agent being the victim of a gunman in a "secure" airport environment?

No - the fact that one of those revolting parasites bit it is the one bit of good news to be found here. On a daily basis they abuse and humiliate the citizenry whose taxes sustain them. Nobody is forced to be a TSA agent: they are all complicit in tyranny and the more of the fucking subhuman shit-worms are shot, the better I'll be pleased.
 

Giovonny

Crow
Gold Member
Fisto said:
No one deserves to be murdered.

I disagree.

If a man rapes and murders my sister. He deserves murder.

If a man sets off a bomb that kills dozens of innocent people, he deserves murder.

If you kidnap and torture someone for your own sexual pleasure, you deserve murder.

If you rape little kids, you deserve murder.

If you kill innocent people, you deserve to murder.

Whoever organized 9/11, deserves murder.

The North Korean leader who starves his own people, deserves murder.

Shit, I think Bernie Madoff deserves to die.

Just my opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top