The Black Knight said:Comte De St. Germain said:Just as I've seen women fuck over men in divorce rapes, I have more than a few guys who I've mentored under that went through hard times with their wife sticking right by them through thick and thin with crippling debt.
Women aren't so simple that we can paint the broad stroke that marriage is evil and that women are Satan incarnate. It's why I still hold true the mantra that us men will never ever be able to understand women nor should we try too.
OP you clearly are lacking in life experience if you're using such broad terms right here. There is no mathematical consistency or logical proof that will ever predict a woman's actions, or even at that a man's actions.
In the US, marriage IS evil in certain states given individual state laws that incentivizes non-desirable and destructive behavior. Any man (or person for that matter) that attempts a marriage and ends up being the higher earner of the two is putting themselves at enormous financial risk in certain states.
A few examples:
1. Some states have no caps on child support. Some cap at like 13,000/year max (Nevada). In states with no caps, women will sell abortions to rich men they've trapped. Pay them 150k now or you will pay 1 million+ over 18 years. They will also obviously fight tooth and nail for full custody to get max pay out.
1a. In some states, child support is paid out as a percentage of each persons incomes and time with children. In some other states, it's paid out entirely by non-custody parent.
2. Division of property, what is consider marital property, and pre-nup/post-nup recognition/enforcement varies from state to state.
3. Some states assume joint custody with children. Some automatically give the non-breadwinner custody. Some assume the woman regardless of situation should get full custody.
I'm of the strong opinion that one of the most important aspects to consider when settling down with a woman is what degree of real leverage you can maintain over your partner. Women already have enormous cultural and legal advantages in the US by and large so us current/future providers need every little bit of help we can get.
In certain states, the marriage/child support laws are beyond the pale and are straight up evil if you are looking to be the provider in the relationship (ex: Massachusetts). In other states, they are actually somewhat in the realm of being reasonable (ex: Texas).
For me at least, I've written off certain states for work and having a family solely because of the marriage/child support laws. The risk and lack of leverage is simply too high. I also believe the less incentives a woman has to blow up a marriage, the higher the odds of a marriage staying intact regardless of the woman or game. Women are impulsive, selfish, and emotional and many will cave in a time of weakness or struggle if they have an easily accessible lucrative exit option.
The point is that if anyone here decides to get married in the US, make sure you have a VERY thorough understanding of your states marriage and child support laws.
The following is a FANTASTIC source of info for each US state (and some overseas locations). EVERY man on this forum should check this site out and read up; if only to get a sense in detail how shit really works. I can't recommend it enough; it was a total game-changer for me:
http://www.realworlddivorce.com/
Scenario 4: 1.75-year marriage with 8-month-old child
A 25-year-old woman marries a 40-year-old never-married medical doctor earning $275,000 per year. She had been earning $50,000 per year working as a receptionist in a medical office. She has a child after a year of marriage, quitting her job during the 7th month of pregnancy due to fatigue. She files for divorce when the child is 8 months old (after 1.75 years of marriage), alleging that the father did not participate in the infant's care, e.g., he did not change diapers or get up in the middle of the night to soothe the baby. The mother will allege that the father was verbally demanding and abusive, though there won't be any witnesses to corroborate. The father had savings of $2 million that he accumulated prior to the marriage but there was no significant accumulation of assets during the less-than-two-year marriage. The mother seeks a division of assets as well as alimony.
"Seek and ye shall find works only if one believes in God and then finds her. It does not work that way in a divorce courtroom in Massachusetts," notes Nissenbaum, "Statutory provisions say this wife can get alimony only for half the time between the date of marriage and the service of the summons of the complaint for divorce. That means the wife will get alimony for about 10 months. She might get an award of rehabilitative alimony – which could be a lump sum or be paid over longer than 10 months." What about a substantial property division? "In a short marriage, the court tries to put the parties back into the situation they were in prior to the marriage. Thus it is not likely that wife will be awarded any part of husband's pre-marital assets, although to be practical and avoid paying lawyers, perhaps the wife would be given $100,000 or more in a lump sum. After all she needs a place for her and the baby to live in."
Nissenbaum thought that the wife would surely get custody and tax-free child support of approximately $43,316 per year ($952,952 over the next 20 years "so long as the child lived with her and was primarily dependent on the parents for support").
Sam Malone said:Judges don't give a shit about who banged who or why. They care about the kids. And consistency in their lives.
Questions for the OP, because this sticks out at me:
we agreed that I could spend 7 days with my son a month in my hometown. We also agreed we would meet halfway.
- Is this an ex-wife or a baby mama ? Regardless of the answer, is your name on the bc ?
If the baby was conceived during the marriage, then legally the kid is your responsibility. If this is a baby mama, and your name ain't on the bc, then you have no legal standing, and may need to prove paternity.
- This $800 a month.. have you been ordered by the court to pay it, or are you giving her the money "just because" ? Have you been to court at all yet ? For anything ?
If you're giving her money just because, stop. Buy clothes and toys for the kid, but YOU buy them. Ship them down if you have to. But unless you have a court order telling you to give her $800/month, stop it.
You're setting a precedent for possibly paying her more than what the calculation could be (assuming you impute HER income). Or worse, paying CS for a child that's not your responsibility.
But anyway she has signed a contract I wrote last month stating she would meet me or my parents half way so he can spend time with me and my side of the family.
NewDayNewFace said:Thanks for the advice. I have no problem paying 800$ but I don't know anybody else paying that high of child support. Based on my gross income it is a good deal to pay that. Besides that however my main concern is her throwing in my face she doesn't have to meet me half way.
Sam Malone said:If your annual income is $100K/year, and her potential, potential income is, say, $60K/year, the difference is.. $40K.
The CS percentage for one child (at least in NY) is I believe 17%.. Of the difference ($40K).
17% of $40K is $6800, annually. Divided by 12 months = $566.66
Obviously if her potential income is considerably less, then your monthly CS payment will be higher.
TonySandos said:On what Engineer said;
Yea it's nice to draw up ever decision as you wish, but if you keep it out of court for your entire lives, she can still support and possible gain back payments past the age of 18 if the court allows it. Most states have monthly and yearly caps. I'd rather work with that than have a woman's appeasement lording over me for the rest of my life.
Again on what Engineer said;
if you don't take it to court, her willingness is all you have as far as say in how to raise the child goes. We all know women are the more stubborn and less rational sex.
NewDayNewFace said:This girl is moving back to my hometown next June just because she wants to get back with me so bad.
NewDayNewFace said:Everything I give her has Child Support on it just to cover my tracks.
NewDayNewFace said:She ended up calling the cops for absolutely no reason and went through all of my belongings.
NewDayNewFace said:Everything I give her has Child Support on it just to cover my tracks.
This girl is moving back to my hometown next June just because she wants to get back with me so bad. We have been broken up for ten months but it's been ridiculous. She has visited me at my work locations 2x and spent weeks with me at my work locations. Whenever we have been together physically we get along but whenever she goes back to Florida she goes crazy and pushes me away. She wants me to live with her in Florida for 10 months until she moves back to my hometown.
It's to a point where I don't want to be with her at all. She can't get that through her head though and she still wants me to spend time with her on her terms. I rather not go out of my way to spend time with her. If she lived in my hometown it may have been a different story. She flew to Connecticut last month where I was working and we spent three weeks together. It was rocky at the beginning because she found out I flew out of the country on vacation without her. Idk why she was mad because I am single. She ended up calling the cops for absolutely no reason and went through all of my belongings. Towards the end of her trip we started to get along. Once she left however she goes crazy and makes it unmanageable to even talk to her let alone get along with her.
Me getting an apartment in Florida is out of the question. I don't want anything to do with that state. I plan on staying in my hometown for a very long time unless I just get a permanent job somewhere else that will make me a millionaire.
Onto said:Sam Malone said:If your annual income is $100K/year, and her potential, potential income is, say, $60K/year, the difference is.. $40K.
The CS percentage for one child (at least in NY) is I believe 17%.. Of the difference ($40K).
17% of $40K is $6800, annually. Divided by 12 months = $566.66
Obviously if her potential income is considerably less, then your monthly CS payment will be higher.
I wish, but that is not correct. In NY it's 17% of your gross - FICA + Daycare/Medical/etc. The Mother's pay really doesn't come into play. I believe the man's salary is capped at $130,000/year now but the judge can always go higher if he wants.
TonySandos said:Sam Malone, only actual income counts and it only decides in possible decreases in support paid.
You also have the money vs object as "gifts" backwards. The court counts money doled out. Toys, diapers and other things count for nothing when showing a record of support lent. Are you speaking from a place of experience or not?