Single women in their 30s/40s are starting to realize they will die alone

Simply put, she’s not wife material. Wife material woman submits to her husband and takes care of the household and children. Why would anybody bother with these kind of essentially masculine women I really don’t know. Sorry darling, you’re just not wife material. Next!
IMO I think deep down she KNOWS she's not wife material. She's used to living a frivolous life with no responsibility. It's only because her mother keeps on her about getting married. At some point her mother will realize her middle aged daughter is old and no man will marry her.
 

MartyMcFly

Pelican
Other Christian
To be fair, eventually Stella got divorce-raped by the homosexual at the end of the tale (that would have been the subject of the sequel, if there were one).
Spoiler alert needed! I guess I will have to skip seeing this movie and take if off my watchlist now.

I didn't know this movie is based on the author's real life experience. I guess it is nice that a woman got divorce raped for a change. I guess a homosexual man is superior to a heterosexual female on the American hierarchy if they are both the same race. I think alimony is a scam and worse if the person is able-bodied after the divorce.

 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
We're heading into dark decades, with much loneliness, regret and bitterness.

Half of women are now childless at thirty for the first time ever: Official statistics show most common age for giving birth has risen to 31 - compared to 22 for baby boomers​

  • 53% of women born in 1991 were childless by their 30th birthday last year
  • The lowest rate of childlessness at 30 was 18% for women born in 1940
  • 31-years-old was the most common age for women born in 1975 to give birth

 

Coja Petrus Uscan

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
uHgetVYMK3Oe.jpeg

Screenshot from 2022-04-21 14-35-43.png
Screenshot from 2022-04-21 14-35-56.png
 

Eric

Chicken
Gnostic or New Age
At 40 it's over for women. If we see the Matrix at 40, we can struggle with it for 5 years and then fix our lives. For women this isn't the case. They're gambling heavily and they let the casino tell them what to do, until they've lost their entire hand and then it's over.
40?

Try 30, at 30 a woman is already 5 years past her youth, and reproductively speaking she is beyond middle-aged.
Also, men are not interested in old women that are past their youth and prime. In fact, if a woman is still single at 25 she is in dire straits, because that is when her youth is over. Hitting 25 for a woman is like falling off a cliff!
 
Last edited:

muscacav

Robin
Other Christian
At 40 it's over for women. If we see the Matrix at 40, we can struggle with it for 5 years and then fix our lives. For women this isn't the case. They're gambling heavily and they let the casino tell them what to do, until they've lost their entire hand and then it's over.
And guess what, most of them won't warn the young ones about this wicked path. That'd be to much of a humiliation to them and would require a kind introspection that was never cultivated from the beginning. It would be really awesome if older women came to that bitter conclusion and helped the younger to avoid the vapid/secular/worldly/materialistic path.

In other words --- and in a more cheerful tone --- women would benefit immensely from a female version of @Roosh , a "Rooshlina".
 
Last edited:

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
40?

Try 30, at 30 a woman is already 5 years past her youth, and reproductively speaking she is beyond middle-aged.
Also, men are not interested in old women that are past their youth and prime. In fact, if a woman is still single at 25 she is in dire straits, because that is when her youth is over. Hitting 25 for a woman is like falling off a cliff!
Yes, but 40 is over as in there's no coming back, 30 indeed is alarm bells. The tanker tries to change direction too late for sure, at least after their most valuable years to lock down a man have been wasted and evaporated.
And guess what, most of them won't warn the young ones about this wicked path. That'd be to much of a humiliation to them and would require a kind introspection that was never cultivated from the beginning. It would be really awesome if older women came to that bitter conclusion and helped the younger to avoid the vapid/secular/worldly/materialistic path.

In other words --- and in a more cheerful tone --- women would benefit immensely from a female version of @Roosh , a "Rooshlina".
They say 30 is the new 20 now. Females live in a fantasy world. They will do everything to keep one another in delusion, supported by the system.
 

Enoch

Hummingbird
We're heading into dark decades, with much loneliness, regret and bitterness.

Half of women are now childless at thirty for the first time ever: Official statistics show most common age for giving birth has risen to 31 - compared to 22 for baby boomers​

  • 53% of women born in 1991 were childless by their 30th birthday last year
  • The lowest rate of childlessness at 30 was 18% for women born in 1940
  • 31-years-old was the most common age for women born in 1975 to give birth

I'd be interested to know how many of the women under 30 have these children in the context of marriage. Rare to see a "respectable" girl from a "respectable" family having kids at a young age. Career first!
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
This thread is related to the unfortunate decline in the family. Why did this happen? Easy, look up the objectives of socialism/communism. If that seems too old, look into the blm website that once contained their broad objectives, which included destroying the nuclear family. They have since taken it down, funny that. Although I'm well aware of the left's disdain for the family, I don't get why they think life would be better for us all if we don't have families anymore? They seem to think that friends are a sufficient substitute. I found it very disturbing this year to hear the biden administration refer to Thanksgiving as "friendsgiving". Predictably, the left will use the current stats on household formations as evidence of a "changed world". We must be resolute on this. Because it was the left that created these conditions. How? In the same way, Edward Bernays convinced women to smoke.

For an individual person to be anti-family is beyond my comprehension, as such, I am baffled to see how successful this agenda has been. I find the answer when I look at the sorts of people attracted to socialism. Socialism appeals to dysfunctional people. It's no coincidence they also want to abolish prisons and are in bed with actual criminals. If you plot a normal distribution curve, these are the left side of bell curve people. Within this cohort of people, you see very dysfunctional families. Quick pause and note, this is where I truly despise leftism, because, they use these dysfunctional families to justify abolishing the whole thing. The left is a serial abuser of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. What they miss, which is all too obvious, is that it's not the institution of the family that is somehow fundamentally flawed, rather, the cohort of people they base this assertion on are highly dysfunctional in everything they do.

Families within this cohort have higher incidents of abuse, dependency, poverty, and, of course, divorce. This leads to a host of maladies, but chief among them, and apropos, is it engenders envy, jealousy, and pride. No wonder they hate our conventional holidays, most never had one. Is that tragic? Yes. Are we called to mercy? Absolutely. But, we must not be foolish. Because these people have institutionalized their envy of a functional family. True to form, and just like every other agenda item they push, they want to bring down everyone to their level. If I can't have a Thanksgiving day feast with banter and kids and pies etc, then no one can. This is in the hearts of all those that seek to destroy this Godliest of all institutions.

As far as women go, they were possessed by this. There's a reason Eve ate from the tree first. If only these "cool kid" females actually knew who's tending this light that they're steadfast in following.
 

Blade Runner

Hummingbird
Orthodox
For an individual person to be anti-family is beyond my comprehension, as such, I am baffled to see how successful this agenda has been. I find the answer when I look at the sorts of people attracted to socialism. Socialism appeals to dysfunctional people. It's no coincidence they also want to abolish prisons and are in bed with actual criminals. If you plot a normal distribution curve, these are the left side of bell curve people. Within this cohort of people, you see very dysfunctional families. Quick pause and note, this is where I truly despise leftism, because, they use these dysfunctional families to justify abolishing the whole thing. The left is a serial abuser of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. What they miss, which is all too obvious, is that it's not the institution of the family that is somehow fundamentally flawed, rather, the cohort of people they base this assertion on are highly dysfunctional in everything they do.
Yes, it has become clear to me that although it theoretically doesn't have to be this way, it's an issue of ecology and balance. The boom in people created such a surplus of mediocrity and worse, that along with welfare and medical innovation, you sprung forth enough people to crash the system with the nonsense of leftism - just as you state it. Just like in revolutions, all you need is a critical mass to start it up and keep it rolling, mostly because also those that should have been vigilant fell asleep at the wheel. More was required of them, for sure - not to be nice, to keep standards, to keep men in hierarchical positions, to maintain principle and family - but the lure of neoeconomic luxury distracted them. Sadly, the cat's been near fully out of the bag, the genie out of the bottle, since at least the 1980s. I think for most of us who lived then, we realized (but didn't pay attention until later) that we passed the point of no return in the 1990s.
 

muscacav

Robin
Other Christian
This thread is related to the unfortunate decline in the family. Why did this happen? Easy, look up the objectives of socialism/communism. If that seems too old, look into the blm website that once contained their broad objectives, which included destroying the nuclear family. They have since taken it down, funny that. Although I'm well aware of the left's disdain for the family, I don't get why they think life would be better for us all if we don't have families anymore? They seem to think that friends are a sufficient substitute. I found it very disturbing this year to hear the biden administration refer to Thanksgiving as "friendsgiving". Predictably, the left will use the current stats on household formations as evidence of a "changed world". We must be resolute on this. Because it was the left that created these conditions. How? In the same way, Edward Bernays convinced women to smoke.

For an individual person to be anti-family is beyond my comprehension, as such, I am baffled to see how successful this agenda has been. I find the answer when I look at the sorts of people attracted to socialism. Socialism appeals to dysfunctional people. It's no coincidence they also want to abolish prisons and are in bed with actual criminals. If you plot a normal distribution curve, these are the left side of bell curve people. Within this cohort of people, you see very dysfunctional families. Quick pause and note, this is where I truly despise leftism, because, they use these dysfunctional families to justify abolishing the whole thing. The left is a serial abuser of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. What they miss, which is all too obvious, is that it's not the institution of the family that is somehow fundamentally flawed, rather, the cohort of people they base this assertion on are highly dysfunctional in everything they do.

Families within this cohort have higher incidents of abuse, dependency, poverty, and, of course, divorce. This leads to a host of maladies, but chief among them, and apropos, is it engenders envy, jealousy, and pride. No wonder they hate our conventional holidays, most never had one. Is that tragic? Yes. Are we called to mercy? Absolutely. But, we must not be foolish. Because these people have institutionalized their envy of a functional family. True to form, and just like every other agenda item they push, they want to bring down everyone to their level. If I can't have a Thanksgiving day feast with banter and kids and pies etc, then no one can. This is in the hearts of all those that seek to destroy this Godliest of all institutions.

As far as women go, they were possessed by this. There's a reason Eve ate from the tree first. If only these "cool kid" females actually knew who's tending this light that they're steadfast in following.
Igor Shafarevich was cancelled long before the social media was invented. We know who was behind. You can read his book on this evil phenomenon that seems to follow humanity long before Marx and Engels.


Quote from the book:
The majority of socialist doctrines proclaim the abolition of the family. In other doctrines, as well as in certain socialist states, this proposition is not proclaimed in such radical form, but the principle appears as a de-emphasis of the role of the family, the weakening of family ties, the abolition of certain functions of the family. Again, the negative form of the principle is more common. As a positive statement about specific relationships between the sexes or between parents and children, it appears in several variants as the total obliteration of the family, communality of wives and the destruction of all ties between parent and child to the point where they may not even know each other; as an impairment and a weakening of family ties; or as the transformation of the family into a unit of the bureaucratic state subjected to its goals and control
 
Last edited:

Optimus Princeps

Woodpecker
And guess what, most of them won't warn the young ones about this wicked path. That'd be to much of a humiliation to them and would require a kind introspection that was never cultivated from the beginning. It would be really awesome if older women came to that bitter conclusion and helped the younger to avoid the vapid/secular/worldly/materialistic path.

In other words --- and in a more cheerful tone --- women would benefit immensely from a female version of @Roosh , a "Rooshlina".
This shows a complete dysfunction of how society is supposed to work in general. There is no community or passage of knowledge down from elders. While there are some men who are vocal about this, I bet you have not many in real life and have only been reached by them through the use of the internet. It seems like a vicious cycle. Men and women are sent off to college after being inundated with propaganda and advice from our boomer parents to have fun, study and focus on our career. Have casual sex while drinking and experimenting with drugs. This leads to the lack of family development and especially effects women due to their short biological clock of fertility. Then, because of the lack of community that caused this in the first place, the next generation does not get the warning that would have been nature's remedy to any mistakes made by the prior generation in any healthy society.

The world's community is globalism. The world's church elders are Nicki Minaj, Cardi B, degenerate rappers. The role models we have are on the television, where jews promote degeneracy, blasphemy, nihilism, feminism, and anti whiteness. It all starts with building up local communities to fix it at a local level, as on a macro scale it is an impossible problem. Meet your neighbors, become active in your church, grow some food and sell it at local farmers market. Hang out with the guys at the local gun shop, etc.. We cannot do much alone but together through taking little steps, praying, and putting God first, we will be taken care of and communities will begin to form so the future generations will be better off.
 

muscacav

Robin
Other Christian
This shows a complete dysfunction of how society is supposed to work in general. There is no community or passage of knowledge down from elders. While there are some men who are vocal about this, I bet you have not many in real life and have only been reached by them through the use of the internet. It seems like a vicious cycle. Men and women are sent off to college after being inundated with propaganda and advice from our boomer parents to have fun, study and focus on our career. Have casual sex while drinking and experimenting with drugs. This leads to the lack of family development and especially effects women due to their short biological clock of fertility. Then, because of the lack of community that caused this in the first place, the next generation does not get the warning that would have been nature's remedy to any mistakes made by the prior generation in any healthy society.

The world's community is globalism. The world's church elders are Nicki Minaj, Cardi B, degenerate rappers. The role models we have are on the television, where jews promote degeneracy, blasphemy, nihilism, feminism, and anti whiteness. It all starts with building up local communities to fix it at a local level, as on a macro scale it is an impossible problem. Meet your neighbors, become active in your church, grow some food and sell it at local farmers market. Hang out with the guys at the local gun shop, etc.. We cannot do much alone but together through taking little steps, praying, and putting God first, we will be taken care of and communities will begin to form so the future generations will be better off.
Exactly! A little bit off-topic by have you observed the pervasive overt and covert satanic reference in video music and singer's costumes?
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
Yes, it has become clear to me that although it theoretically doesn't have to be this way, it's an issue of ecology and balance. The boom in people created such a surplus of mediocrity and worse, that along with welfare and medical innovation, you sprung forth enough people to crash the system with the nonsense of leftism - just as you state it. Just like in revolutions, all you need is a critical mass to start it up and keep it rolling, mostly because also those that should have been vigilant fell asleep at the wheel. More was required of them, for sure - not to be nice, to keep standards, to keep men in hierarchical positions, to maintain principle and family - but the lure of neoeconomic luxury distracted them. Sadly, the cat's been near fully out of the bag, the genie out of the bottle, since at least the 1980s. I think for most of us who lived then, we realized (but didn't pay attention until later) that we passed the point of no return in the 1990s.

I've been listening to a lot of Dr. James Lindsey lately. He's taken on the mantle to deconstruct this neo-marxist ideology. During a recent interview with either TPUSA or Daily Mail, I can't remember exactly, he had this to say, and I'm paraphrasing...

"We let our guard down after the fall of the Soviet Union and had the false expectation that this ideology was over forever". I think its really that simple. The 1990s was a good time, bill clinton notwithstanding. Most people worried more about sportsball or the Oscars than they did about the backroom deals being done in the dark. Every so often the agenda revealed itself, but, such events tended to be sporadic. It was met with a token reaction and forgotten about shortly thereafter. In other times, such an event would have been dealt with swiftly. I think that explains our situation very well.

Today things are very different. Certainly, this neo-marxism is now very serious. That said, sportsball across the board has seen dramatic declines in ratings and fans. The same thing can be said about the oscars, which once again was down significantly year over year. This tells me that the bread and circuses trick is wearing off.
 

Optimus Princeps

Woodpecker
Exactly! A little bit off-topic by have you observed the pervasive overt and covert satanic reference in video music and singer's costumes?
Definitely. My old roommate from a few years back and I would make it a game showing eachother all the occult and satanic symbols prevalent in pretty much every famous "artist"'s (using that term loosely) music video. As time goes on they do it more and more openly. I remember a while back the biggest talk was of justin beiber/skrillex's video of where are u now had a bunch of symbols flashing of devil horns, the eye of horus, etc.. and back then we thought that was really overt and evil. Yet now they're not even hiding it, but just openly putting such evil and horrible things.

I think they love to rub it in the normies face and it gives them a sick pleasure to say, "look at these idiots dancing to this satanic and cursed song, when it's right in their face, they're so stupid satan was right they deserve pain and death." Essentially satan will do whatever possible to mock God's creation. I have also heard that there is some rule they go by where it is okay to make people do or participate in evil as long as they consent so having this symbolism, as well as having information about most true "conspiracies" out in the open is a loophole for them to do so.
 

muscacav

Robin
Other Christian
Definitely. My old roommate from a few years back and I would make it a game showing eachother all the occult and satanic symbols prevalent in pretty much every famous "artist"'s (using that term loosely) music video. As time goes on they do it more and more openly. I remember a while back the biggest talk was of justin beiber/skrillex's video of where are u now had a bunch of symbols flashing of devil horns, the eye of horus, etc.. and back then we thought that was really overt and evil. Yet now they're not even hiding it, but just openly putting such evil and horrible things.

I think they love to rub it in the normies face and it gives them a sick pleasure to say, "look at these idiots dancing to this satanic and cursed song, when it's right in their face, they're so stupid satan was right they deserve pain and death." Essentially satan will do whatever possible to mock God's creation. I have also heard that there is some rule they go by where it is okay to make people do or participate in evil as long as they consent so having this symbolism, as well as having information about most true "conspiracies" out in the open is a loophole for them to do so.
Ticket-takers as Vox Day puts

 

Seeker79

Kingfisher
Ticket-takers as Vox Day puts

Using prestige to select people for jobs, grad school, and political appointments is fine. I don’t think we appreciate how difficult it is to find competent people with high conscientiousness trait. In addition, people with prestigious pedigree are guaranteed to have useful connections and have been socialized in certain ways. Bottom line, we want shortcuts because assessing people is difficult.

However, there is a problem with the prestige institutions. Before, Ivy leagues, top corporations (think Fortune 50, MBB consulting, and investment banking), and other exclusive institutions used to offer some value prospect. Nowadays they are a hotbed of woke liberalism.
 

MartyMcFly

Pelican
Other Christian
Ticket-takers as Vox Day puts

Explained very well. This really explains why parents would spend hundreds of thousands in bribe money and/or really push their kids to study 80 hours a week to get their kid into an elite university when in theory the kid could go to a less famous university (assuming he/she is a fairly decent student), work very hard to get good grades, and transfer to the elite university in 2 years. My guess is such transfer students are also seen as second class within the elite universities and they lost valuable networking opportunities because the cliques are often formed in the freshman years.

"They only recruit at the most elite colleges, and they want recruits to be attractive, energetic, articulate, socially smooth, and have had elite personal connections, jobs, and extracurriculars. They don’t that much care about your grades, what you’ve learned, or what you did in your jobs or extracurriculars, as long as they were prestigious."

This helps explain why many highly competent people will do fairly well in organizations (to include politics), but often can't rise to the very top of the pyramid.
 
Top