SJW Website Block List

Status
Not open for further replies.

Foolsgo1d

Peacock
Safe to say I have only ever visited cracked once and that was a link from RVF.

Wouldn't it be funny if a system admin for large companies were to block them on their networks and wifi? :lol:
 

Deluge

Hummingbird
Gold Member
Roosh said:
Cattle Rustler said:
Or you could use "http://www.donotlink.com/"

It won't affect their ranking when you visit them.

Hiding and blocking is letting the enemy win

Do not link is a SJW-friendly company that has recently put ads on their transition bar. So not only do you still give ad money to the site you click, you give it to Do Not Link as well.

Sites don't need your google juice from twitter or forums. They much rather have your ad money, which DNL still gives them. It's not a solution.

Roosh, have you ever considered blocking links on the forum to Jezebel and other feminist sites? Every time someone posts one of their articles on the EE forum for us to hate read we line their pockets.
 

Handsome Creepy Eel

Owl
Catholic
Gold Member
Still, while I appreciate the sentiment of this topic, isn't it true that the traffic they get from us is just a minuscule part of their overall traffic? There are legions and legions of feminists, betas and/or white knights around. We're a drop in the pool.
 

Deluge

Hummingbird
Gold Member
Handsome Creepy Eel said:
Still, while I appreciate the sentiment of this topic, isn't it true that the traffic they get from us is just a minuscule part of their overall traffic? There are legions and legions of feminists, betas and/or white knights around. We're a drop in the pool.

It's the principle that matters.
 

Christhugger

Kingfisher
Catholic
There's a retarded new format for "lists" thats been popping up in my fb in recent months. Those "10 things that..." List used to be a single webpage. Then they started breaking it up and only putting 1-3 items of the list per page.
Now.. When I click on most lists it takes me to some slide show where to present 10 facts takes 30-40 slides and page clicks on my part. I assume this is for some retarded click count or increased ad revenue purposes. I have never once been able to make it through all the pages , and close the window furiously each time after 2-3 clicks.

It sure would be nice to be able to block these damn list or know when they're coming before I click...
 

The Beast1

Peacock
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
Or you could use Adblock plus and "No-script" to remove the ads and their algorithms that count page clicks. I won't ever visit, but it's a lot more effective.
 

Texas_Tryhard

Woodpecker
Updated to block Huffington Post and dailylife[dot]com[dot]au.

The dailylife site I checked out (not living in Aussie). Holy shit...easy ban.

I was on the fence about Huffington, because although it's a SJW haven, it does actually come out with legitimate news for the most part (just with an extraordinarily leftist slant). However, there are other news sites, and HuffPo is starting to become like Cracked. There's always some stupid article written by a fem on the front page of Everything Else.

Keep the suggestions coming!
 

Texas_Tryhard

Woodpecker
Handsome Creepy Eel said:
Anyone mentioned Huffington Post yet?

As for Croatia, Jutarnji List and Večernji List are two main hamster engines that I try to avoid.

Unfortunately I don't speak the tongue, so I'd need to rely on your word that these Croatian sites are SJW. Before I block them, can you confirm that this is their main function or that they are heading strongly in that direction (ala Cracked and HuffPo)?
 

Handsome Creepy Eel

Owl
Catholic
Gold Member
They're mainstream papers with lots of news, just extremely leftist (gay or feminist propaganda featured on headlines, haven for feminist and white knight columnists, etc). Don't add them to the list. I was just listing them as our close equivalents of Huffington Post, but spreading feminist bullshit isn't their main purpose like it is with Huff.

Here are a few Croatian sites that you can safely add to the block list though:

Libela - a "gender, sex and democracy" portal, currently featuring a triumphant article about Gay Pride on its main page, as well as "1 in 10 female children abused" headline - do I need say more? http://www.libela.org/
Vox Feminae - same as Libela, currently up in arms about a "flash mob to protest abortion restrictions" and "Pope Francis hasn't done enough for women in Catholic Church" http://www.voxfeminae.net/
Autonomna Ženska Kuća - website of a "safe house" for abused women, blaring the "1 in 3 women are abused" propaganda at full power http://www.azkz.net/

In case someone wants to talk about how Croatia hasn't gone down the drain yet, I point you to the fact that all of these websites are receiving massive government subsidies every year.
 

Texas_Tryhard

Woodpecker
The three you mentioned are added. Thanks for the suggestions!

Handsome Creepy Eel said:
They're mainstream papers with lots of news, just extremely leftist (gay or feminist propaganda featured on headlines, haven for feminist and white knight columnists, etc). Don't add them to the list. I was just listing them as our close equivalents of Huffington Post, but spreading feminist bullshit isn't their main purpose like it is with Huff.

Here are a few Croatian sites that you can safely add to the block list though:

Libela - a "gender, sex and democracy" portal, currently featuring a triumphant article about Gay Pride on its main page, as well as "1 in 10 female children abused" headline - do I need say more? http://www.libela.org/
Vox Feminae - same as Libela, currently up in arms about a "flash mob to protest abortion restrictions" and "Pope Francis hasn't done enough for women in Catholic Church" http://www.voxfeminae.net/
Autonomna Ženska Kuća - website of a "safe house" for abused women, blaring the "1 in 3 women are abused" propaganda at full power http://www.azkz.net/

In case someone wants to talk about how Croatia hasn't gone down the drain yet, I point you to the fact that all of these websites are receiving massive government subsidies every year.
 

Texas_Tryhard

Woodpecker
Sp5 said:
I'm not in favor of an ideological orthodoxies, or denying myself access to any point of view.

I agree. As I said earlier in the thread:

"There's a reasonable criticism to be made for ignoring the other side, however, considering we're inundated with this shit 24/7, I have a pretty good idea of their counterarguments, without the necessary evil of giving them money indirectly."

This isn't so much to ignore the other side completely as it is to avoid giving them money (supporting them), and to avoid wasting your time with clickbait.

As I said before, I will not be blocking websites that do not significantly contribute to the echo chamber that formed around social justice in the mainstream media. There are reasonable websites with reasonable arguments. I liken blocking out the "noise" SJW websites to blocking out the schizophrenic homeless man who screams at you as you pass him on the street. His point of view isn't educational, and though you may pity him, you certainly don't want to accidentally find yourself in his alley.
 

spokepoker

Hummingbird
Instead of outright blocking it, maybe instead we can try to get thread creators to copy/paste the body of the articles content? This way we can read it ourselves without having to go to the actual sites.
'Course, there's the chance to miss out on entertaining comments.
 

Texas_Tryhard

Woodpecker
That's a forum policy if I remember right. But I've accidentally clicked links to those websites from other websites as well. This is a way to ensure you never misclick and end up funding the scum.

spokepoker said:
Instead of outright blocking it, maybe instead we can try to get thread creators to copy/paste the body of the articles content? This way we can read it ourselves without having to go to the actual sites.
'Course, there's the chance to miss out on entertaining comments.
 

...

Crow
Gold Member
TheWastelander said:
Cattle Rustler said:
Or you could use "http://www.donotlink.com/"

It won't affect their ranking when you visit them.

Hiding and blocking is letting the enemy win

Are you on a trolling kick lately or something? It's not hiding and blocking.

It's ignoring them and avoiding giving them money (which I already do without a program), made easier by the fact they have nothing worthwhile to say.

Not sure what you mean by a trolling kick, open your mind and stop viewing opposing views as "trolling".

To defeat your enemy you must know your enemy, to know your enemy you must study your enemy. The same way the CIA and FBI try to keep up with their enemies, people must do the same. Adapt or die.

And most importantly, as SP5 said...

I'm not in favor of ideological orthodoxies, or denying myself access to any point of view.

Personally, I just use Adblock, noscript, and Adblock Pro. It makes everything much better to my eye without the ads.
 

Alpharius

Kingfisher
Gold Member
It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.
- Sun Tzu

Just saying...

Also you could just not give in to temptation and avoid clicking the link altogether.
 

Texas_Tryhard

Woodpecker
I oftentimes scroll through a news ticker and see an article that interests me, click it, and realize it's some shit on Buzzfeed or Kotaku or io9, all of which are owned by companies that directly champion things I disagree with. I will not indirectly fund their campaigns through my clicks.

Adblock plus is certainly a possibility, but personally I like to support content creators I appreciate. I could either create a whitelist in Adblock+ or a blacklist. I think a blacklist is more conservative and less of a hassle. Others will obviously disagree, which is awesome and more power to you, but frankly, noone is forcing you to use this blacklist. If you don't have a moral problem with it, go ahead and check out their content, no big deal.

Osiris said:
It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.
- Sun Tzu

Just saying...

Also you could just not give in to temptation and avoid clicking the link altogether.
 

Blaster

Ostrich
Gold Member
Texas_Tryhard said:
Sp5 said:
I'm not in favor of an ideological orthodoxies, or denying myself access to any point of view.

I agree. As I said earlier in the thread:

"There's a reasonable criticism to be made for ignoring the other side, however, considering we're inundated with this shit 24/7, I have a pretty good idea of their counterarguments, without the necessary evil of giving them money indirectly."

This isn't so much to ignore the other side completely as it is to avoid giving them money (supporting them), and to avoid wasting your time with clickbait.

As I said before, I will not be blocking websites that do not significantly contribute to the echo chamber that formed around social justice in the mainstream media. There are reasonable websites with reasonable arguments. I liken blocking out the "noise" SJW websites to blocking out the schizophrenic homeless man who screams at you as you pass him on the street. His point of view isn't educational, and though you may pity him, you certainly don't want to accidentally find yourself in his alley.

I appreciate the effort involved in the blocklist and respect your reasons. Certainly, the list itself is useful.

But personally I think I'll just continue to avoid clicking the links or not logging into facebook more than once a month. In fact, nearly all of the unwanted Social Justice propaganda I see comes at me via facebook. And truthfully I remain mildly curious to which types of people buy in, which is why I haven't blocked/unfriended any of them.
 

Jeans

Sparrow
Been reading the manosphere for years and yet have somehow missed the advent of this term "SJW."

What does it stand for/mean? Searched around to try to see it spelled out somewhere, nothing. Driving me nuts over here.
 

Handsome Creepy Eel

Owl
Catholic
Gold Member
Jeans said:
Been reading the manosphere for years and yet have somehow missed the advent of this term "SJW."

What does it stand for/mean? Searched around to try to see it spelled out somewhere, nothing. Driving me nuts over here.

SJW = Social Justice Warrior

i.e. a person who views themselves as some sort of crusader for "social justice", i.e. fighting sexism, racism, chauvinism, discrimination, religion(s) and other phantom evils
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top