Roosh said:Cattle Rustler said:Or you could use "http://www.donotlink.com/"
It won't affect their ranking when you visit them.
Hiding and blocking is letting the enemy win
Do not link is a SJW-friendly company that has recently put ads on their transition bar. So not only do you still give ad money to the site you click, you give it to Do Not Link as well.
Sites don't need your google juice from twitter or forums. They much rather have your ad money, which DNL still gives them. It's not a solution.
Handsome Creepy Eel said:Still, while I appreciate the sentiment of this topic, isn't it true that the traffic they get from us is just a minuscule part of their overall traffic? There are legions and legions of feminists, betas and/or white knights around. We're a drop in the pool.
Handsome Creepy Eel said:Anyone mentioned Huffington Post yet?
As for Croatia, Jutarnji List and Večernji List are two main hamster engines that I try to avoid.
Handsome Creepy Eel said:They're mainstream papers with lots of news, just extremely leftist (gay or feminist propaganda featured on headlines, haven for feminist and white knight columnists, etc). Don't add them to the list. I was just listing them as our close equivalents of Huffington Post, but spreading feminist bullshit isn't their main purpose like it is with Huff.
Here are a few Croatian sites that you can safely add to the block list though:
Libela - a "gender, sex and democracy" portal, currently featuring a triumphant article about Gay Pride on its main page, as well as "1 in 10 female children abused" headline - do I need say more? http://www.libela.org/
Vox Feminae - same as Libela, currently up in arms about a "flash mob to protest abortion restrictions" and "Pope Francis hasn't done enough for women in Catholic Church" http://www.voxfeminae.net/
Autonomna Ženska Kuća - website of a "safe house" for abused women, blaring the "1 in 3 women are abused" propaganda at full power http://www.azkz.net/
In case someone wants to talk about how Croatia hasn't gone down the drain yet, I point you to the fact that all of these websites are receiving massive government subsidies every year.
Sp5 said:I'm not in favor of an ideological orthodoxies, or denying myself access to any point of view.
spokepoker said:Instead of outright blocking it, maybe instead we can try to get thread creators to copy/paste the body of the articles content? This way we can read it ourselves without having to go to the actual sites.
'Course, there's the chance to miss out on entertaining comments.
TheWastelander said:Cattle Rustler said:Or you could use "http://www.donotlink.com/"
It won't affect their ranking when you visit them.
Hiding and blocking is letting the enemy win
Are you on a trolling kick lately or something? It's not hiding and blocking.
It's ignoring them and avoiding giving them money (which I already do without a program), made easier by the fact they have nothing worthwhile to say.
I'm not in favor of ideological orthodoxies, or denying myself access to any point of view.
- Sun TzuIt is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.
Osiris said:- Sun TzuIt is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.
Just saying...
Also you could just not give in to temptation and avoid clicking the link altogether.
Texas_Tryhard said:Sp5 said:I'm not in favor of an ideological orthodoxies, or denying myself access to any point of view.
I agree. As I said earlier in the thread:
"There's a reasonable criticism to be made for ignoring the other side, however, considering we're inundated with this shit 24/7, I have a pretty good idea of their counterarguments, without the necessary evil of giving them money indirectly."
This isn't so much to ignore the other side completely as it is to avoid giving them money (supporting them), and to avoid wasting your time with clickbait.
As I said before, I will not be blocking websites that do not significantly contribute to the echo chamber that formed around social justice in the mainstream media. There are reasonable websites with reasonable arguments. I liken blocking out the "noise" SJW websites to blocking out the schizophrenic homeless man who screams at you as you pass him on the street. His point of view isn't educational, and though you may pity him, you certainly don't want to accidentally find yourself in his alley.
Jeans said:Been reading the manosphere for years and yet have somehow missed the advent of this term "SJW."
What does it stand for/mean? Searched around to try to see it spelled out somewhere, nothing. Driving me nuts over here.