Maybe. I think the biggest problems comes from psychiatric and recreational drugs, as well as broader cultural issues especially atheism. Drinking out of a plastic cup on a daily basis probably won't affect you if you eat well and lift.
Don't forget the final trick: Operation Covid-19. Basically a boomer eugenics program.Not sure if MORE people are becoming detached from reality or if its just more obvious now as anyone can communicate with the world using social media and publicly demonstrate how dumbed down they are.
Let's consider all the tricks that got successfully played on Boomers.
Vietnam
War on Drugs
War on Poverty
Great Society
Food pyramid
Vaccines
Circumcision
Operation Enduring Freedom (truly dystopian)
Debt - mortgage/ car/ credit card/ on and on
Not taking into account more controversial things such as
9/11
JFK
Moon Landing
Yes, some very, very bad things are on the way. My wife, who btw is the stereotypical blonde, knows this as well, she has told me that before the end of the year we are all going to face some serious danger. Right now they are "words" being spoken openly, take note, this is their heart speaking and it will lead to actions soon enough.The thread title sums up the Washington D.C NG/Fed/State police surge situation perfectly.
They are going to be kept there till at least the end of 2021. Some bad things are coming down the line and they want that area to be locked down.
I have an idea about the circumcision thing. I believe it is an act of ownership over a slave nation. Just a thought but in view of occult teachings it makes a lot of sense.Not sure if MORE people are becoming detached from reality or if its just more obvious now as anyone can communicate with the world using social media and publicly demonstrate how dumbed down they are.
Let's consider all the tricks that got successfully played on Boomers.
Vietnam
War on Drugs
War on Poverty
Great Society
Food pyramid
Vaccines
Circumcision
Operation Enduring Freedom (truly dystopian)
Debt - mortgage/ car/ credit card/ on and on
Not taking into account more controversial things such as
9/11
JFK
Moon Landing
The very idea of 'objective reality' is already a departure from Truth, and it's the overall achievement of Modernity. It only works for making machines (which are purely objective), but it destroys any possibility of understanding anything - and thus gives rise to all aberration.
Material reality (which is termed now 'objective') is actually SUBJECT to a higher, non-material order - but modern man does not recognize this. He believes it is truly objective - impersonal, unconnected, to be taken in itself (of the 'object'). But because this material reality is not SUBJECT to spiritual reality, it is meaningless. And if it is meaningless, then it is also not objective - the object starts as the only thing, and becomes irrelevant in the end.
This is why we can have both the belief in 'human gender' (and in the ability to change it) and advanced surgery techniques to attempt to bring that unreality about, to use one example.
The Truth is that reality is both objective and subjective, we simply have lost any idea of what those words mean because of our focus on 'objectivity'.
2+2=5, by Most Reverend Donald J. SanbornThis question is something I’ve thought about pretty frequently, especially in progressing with my faith in God. I think about the problem with sort of a basic math analogy:
In math, there are immutable truths/laws that form the foundation of the whole structure. These must be accepted or else nothing makes any sense or has any useful application. 1 + 1 = 2, with no exceptions. If you accept the premise that sometimes 1 + 1 = 3, then you’ve lost the whole plot. If that can be true, there isn’t any reason the answer can’t be 5 or 500, or anything else you decide.
God’s morality is no different. The Word is the truth and Christ is the cornerstone, the fundamental building block. I think E. Michael Jones calls it logos. If that is dismissed, you lose your grip on reality.
Take sexuality. If you divorce sex from reproduction and instead tie it solely to pleasure, you get promiscuity without reproduction. 1+1 now equals 3. If sex is solely for pleasure, why limit it to just a man with a woman? If 1+1 can be 3, there isn’t any reason it can’t be 4. And if a man can fulfill the role of a woman in sex, why then can’t he just become a woman for all intents and purposes? The same goes for abortion, the value of life, etc.
If you can accept the lie that 1+1 = 3, you don’t have a basis to object to it being 253. Even though one is closer to the truth, they’re both equally wrong. If you apply that math to reality, both answers will get your plane crashed or collapse your bridge, it just depends on how quickly. If you apply that morality to society, you’ll get the same results. People have rejected the most fundamental truth and the cornerstone of reality. The rest of it will just keep unraveling by itself like that loose string on a sweater.
I was gonna hit the like button...........The Mind
Drug use is a pretty good demonstration of this disconnect from reality. Anybody who has ever been a drug addict or at least has had friends and family who have been addicts know full well that one of the primary purposes of drug use is to escape from reality.
Drug use can create false emotions—the addict can experience what he perceives to be, for example, love, happiness, and euphoria by ingesting various chemicals. But these emotions are in fact just simulacrums of the real emotions that one obtains from real world experiences such as bonding with your father, playing with your children, or being with your wife.
Drug use can also create false experiences through hallucinations. One can ingest a hallucinogen and interact with people or objects that don’t exist, or have visions of places that one has never been to. This replaces real interactions with real people and places that exist outside of one’s individual mind.
Relationships with other people are fundamental to the human mind, after all we are mentally (as well as physically) social creatures. We naturally seek approval from others for our actions and beliefs. Do “likes” constitute real interactions or are they “unreal” interactions? A “like” is often just a few pixels on a screen that people will give as a blind reaction to some fleeting thing you say on Facebook. That may not be a real “approval” in the sense that the other person has actually thought about what you said or did, or has had a distinct emotional reaction to what you said or did. Likewise, a Facebook friend isn’t a real “friend” in the sense that you both have some kind of positive interaction, or even any kind of interaction beyond a few more pixels on a screen.