My instinctive reaction to the "victim statement" (OP) is that it stinks. Overall, it just stinks.
First red flag: this does not sound like the writing of a woman who is in any way mentally stable, not due to whatever happened but as a core part of her personality. You cannot trust anything extreme neurotics/hystericals like this say, period.
Second, you write a tenth of a novel on something you claim you don't even remember? The gruelling aftermath of something you completely don't remember? Read between the lines and its just more attention whoring. The first purpose of the text is to gain positive attention desperately craved and an excuse for what was most probably a heated fumble engaged in by both parties who were both extremely intoxicated. This is much better than admitting that you did not have the self-control to not get extremely drunk and let yourself be in isolation by a dumpster and engage in sexual activities with an elite college athlete, who realistically could have had his pick of plenty of other women to bang. She was most likely very drunk and looking very easy so the dude was opportunistic for sure, yet probably similarly to the woman, extremely intoxicated. How is her poor judgment allowed to be excused while his is absolutely not, because she claims to remember absolutely nothing about it? That's the second purpose of the text: to excuse herself of irresponsible and slutty behavior. Assuming she genuinely didn't remember anything (of which I am still skeptical), the victimhood hyperbole scattered in almost every single sentence is a comprehensive attempt to absolve herself of being a girl who willingly gets blind drunk and gets fucked behind dumpsters. Instead of being at best a dumb girl who got drunk to the point that she lost the ability somewhere during the act to consent to sexual activity, or at worst a vile slut shit scared of losing her boyfriend and being labeled that girl who fucked Brock by the dumpster/in a dark alley like a crackwhore/whatever else you want to call this type of woman, she is instead a brave victim, and an inspiration to true (or false, whore cares these days) rape victims, battling every day against the horrific trauma of something she doesn't even remember. I've had operations before but I have no mental trauma from the pain of having my skin sliced open because I wasn't conscious to feel any of the pain. If she was truly completely blacked out, she didn't even endure the "worst" of it. So instead she comes up with all this exaggerated "aftermath" hyperbole. Real rape victims tend not to want to relive the experience let alone post a minature novel on the internet about how horrific men are and about how blameless, terrified and virtuous she is.
Did the guy drag the girl from the public gathering to the alley/behind the dumpster isolation? No, because people would have clearly seen the struggle if she was not consenting at that time. The guy is also heavily intoxicated, and she is responsive in his eyes (assuming her exaggerated description of her level of initial intoxication at the start of the sexual activity), so it is far more plausible that she was active, drunk, horny and that to this drunk 19 year old college athlete another drunken fumble. The question of her maybe falling asleep later on or drifting in and out of the drunken haze is probably there, but this guy is drunk as fuck as well - how is he meant to know (assuming again she is telling the truth that she was limp and then asleep) at the precise second that she is no longer capable of "consent"? Both parties are not behaving perfectly here: the girl is behind a dumpster getting fingered (which she would not be doing sober) and the guy for all we know could be in and out of sleep as well. The responsibility should be borne equally if there is to be true equality: this is a situation of two human beings highly intoxicated, not just one, yet somehow the man is supposed to know, in his own heavily intoxicated state, the precise moment at which the girl "theoretically withdraws consent".
A top college athlete, almost certainly not without options as far as girls go, on a handsome scholarship to one of the most reputable colleges in the entire world, in his right mind would risk all that to rape a (most likely) average looking drunken slut? He like her was drunk out of his mind. That's why he defended himself legally as aggressively as he did, and did his utmost to "fill in the details" that the girl conveniently and (in my opinion) rather conspicuously forgot. Of course when the course of his life is on the line, he is going to bring as much of the truth to the table as he can. The "victim"'s sexual past and general mental condition are absolutely relevant. The reason she was so affected by the aggressive questioning because the truth fucking hurts. Nearly 10,000 words of hamstering away her own past mistakes is the result. What are you, a strong, virtuous, independent woman capable of making your own decisions as mental equal to a man, or a weak, vulnerable, perennial victim who has no more capacity for agency than a little child? Common sense would dictate that you cannot have one without the other, but these women are masters of social manipulation, highly skilled social chameleons: when the "I'm just as strong and independent as a man" suits her goals, she will play that role, but she reverts to the "I'm just as vulnerable and incapable as a toddler please help my helpless little incapable and traumatized self" when shit gets too difficult.
As for the guy running away when being chased by a couple white knights, this doesn't automatically mean guilt at all. He is intoxicated and outnumbered; the dudes could have weapons. What's far more important is the implicit content of this annoying diatribe.
Of course there's a possibility that this was a clear cut rape as I have not heard all the facts, but based on that buzzfeed mini-novel, something stinks, enough so for me to rule innocent until proven guilty. Unfortunately members of the jury are not raised in a vacuum; there are white knights and bitter old feminist hags and even otherwise reasonably intelligent people simply brainwashed by this "rape culture" hysteria.
I can safely say that victims of ROP refugee gangrapes at Swedish music festivals are far more in need of help than some self-absorbed slut who most likely had a drunken fumble with a college athlete while having a boyfriend and needed to play the victim card because she couldn't handle the consequences of her actions if she had held her hands up like a "real man" and admitted to family and her boyfriend that she fucked up and perhaps more pertinently admitted to herself that she is a self-absorbed, mentally unstable slut. The 10,000 words are as much a cry for attention from other people as they are a therapeutic essay for herself to justify her own idiocy and worthlessness.
TLDR just my opinion but I call bullshit on this one, at the very least it is not beyond reasonable doubt. But the US justice system and college kangaroo courts don't care: this guy's (previously exceptionally promising) life is ruined. What a waste. Maybe he can try - somehow - to rebuild something, perhaps in a different country, when he gets out.
