Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Culture
Culture general
Stanford Rape Case: Victim Letter Going Viral
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ovloV" data-source="post: 977829" data-attributes="member: 11249"><p>You can nitpick if it was "rape" or technically "sexual assault" all you want. That doesn't really matter to me because California law treats all sexual penetration as the same regardless of what was used. </p><p></p><p>But if you look at CA Penal Code 289 D subsection d) He should get three years for sexual penetration on someone who was unconscious or unable to give consent. </p><p></p><p>So yeah, according to the books (which may or may not be fair), he got off really light. You can't give people lesser sentences because they go to Stanford. If you think 3 years is too much for the crime, that's a differnt issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ovloV, post: 977829, member: 11249"] You can nitpick if it was "rape" or technically "sexual assault" all you want. That doesn't really matter to me because California law treats all sexual penetration as the same regardless of what was used. But if you look at CA Penal Code 289 D subsection d) He should get three years for sexual penetration on someone who was unconscious or unable to give consent. So yeah, according to the books (which may or may not be fair), he got off really light. You can't give people lesser sentences because they go to Stanford. If you think 3 years is too much for the crime, that's a differnt issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Culture
Culture general
Stanford Rape Case: Victim Letter Going Viral
Top
