Subversive Media and the Jewish Mind

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Stack's movie reviews were an eye-opener. It's been years since I've seen movies like these, but in the 70s and 80s there were a lot of films about the 50s. The bait was wholesome-looking, clean cut boys and trim girls, G-rated music, and the pleasure of going back to an idyllic 1950s town. The hook, the subversion, was stuff like sex scenes, distant and clueless parents, insincere religiosity, the evil town conservative(s), the wisdom of youth/rock music, etc. It's hard to exaggerate how often this template was followed.

The template is simple enough.

Imagine the 1950's as seen through the eyes of a jealous young gamma male jew.
 

Athanasius

Pelican
The template is simple enough.

Imagine the 1950's as seen through the eyes of a jealous young gamma male jew.

Original sin leads to a perverse desire in men to corrupt something sweet and innocent, or to imagine that something sweet/pretty is dirty behind the scenes. This is the the foundation of pornography (at least any kind that would tempt me) and it's a theme of all these films. Corrupting shiksas in particular. The Jews put it onscreen but had a lot of help doing so, and Christians bought the tickets.

A few of these films, like the aforementioned Back to the Future as well as American Graffiti, had a gentler touch, but they were all selling the same basic product. Back to the Future got part of its comedy from Fox's mom being horny for him, which seemed funny 30+ years ago, but now, knowing what we all know now about Hollywood, can be seen in a different light. Although not specifically set in the 50s, the same script was followed in one of the most popular 80s films, Footloose, where the protagonist enlightens a conservative Oklahoma community. It's all so tiresome.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
See also "Dirty Dancing"

Dirty Dancing is a 1987 American romantic drama dance film written by Eleanor Bergstein, produced by Linda Gottlieb

Plot
In the summer of 1963, 17-year-old Frances Houseman, nicknamed Baby, is vacationing with her parents, Dr. Jake and Marjorie Houseman, and her older sister Lisa, at Kellerman's, an upscale Catskills resort whose owner Max is a friend of Jake's. Exploring one night, Baby secretly observes Max instructing the waiters to romance the guests' daughters, no matter how unattractive
 

Athanasius

Pelican
Porky's and its endless sequels, Animal House (set in early 60s), Mischief, Hollywood Knights, and there are many others I'm forgetting.

Revenge of the Nerds wasn't 50s but otherwise followed the same script and is pure gamma fantasy.

There have probably been hundreds of films like this. It was the type of garbage they'd air on HBO and Cinemax.
 
Porky's and its endless sequels, Animal House (set in early 60s), Mischief, and there are many others I'm forgetting.

Revenge of the Nerds wasn't 50s but otherwise followed the same script and is pure gamma fantasy.

There have been so many movies like this.


"Waiting" with the dude who looks like the transformers guy and the deadpool star as well.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Original sin leads to a perverse desire in men to corrupt something sweet and innocent, or to imagine that something sweet/pretty is dirty behind the scenes. This is the the foundation of pornography (at least any kind that would tempt me) and it's a theme of all these films. Corrupting shiksas in particular. The Jews put it onscreen but had a lot of help doing so, and Christians bought the tickets.

A few of these films, like the aforementioned Back to the Future as well as American Graffiti, had a gentler touch, but they were all selling the same basic product. Back to the Future got part of its comedy from Fox's mom being horny for him, which seemed funny 30+ years ago, but now, knowing what we all know now about Hollywood, can be seen in a different light. Although not specifically set in the 50s, the same script was followed in one of the most popular 80s films, Footloose, where the protagonist enlightens a conservative Oklahoma community. It's all so tiresome.

Member @ilostabet wrote a fantastic post about how things like nudity were not really the problem back in those days, that the current culture surrounding sex was the issue. It was raised in part in the context of swimming and how it was more or less inevitable that women would have to dress more scantily at the beach than they otherwise ought to in day to day life. He said that even at nude beaches there was not the sense of overt sexuality that pervades everything these days, and that there were indeed perverts that would masturbate from the cover of bushes and whatnot but they were an aberration and they were swiftly dealt with by the men in the area.

Where I'm going with this is that the old trope of the high school jock bullying the innocent nerd is also likely a gamma male inversion of alpha male tribal protectors getting rid of degenerate perverts to the extent they were able. Granted, bullies exist. But although I'm no alpha, even as a beta I have been forced to make it clear to degenerate gammas in the past that their presence around my tribal women was not acceptable.

And afterward I'm sure they went home and wrote a fictional story about how I, the inferior neanderthal, was guarding by force what I could not keep with the strength of my character and intellect alone.
 
It is the essentially feminine mentality of conquering by deception what you cannot by force. It’s a part of my own mind that withered more and more away the more I trained physically through weightlifting and martial arts. It’s still there, as it is for every other man of my race that I’ve met in this country, and I’ve often wished it could just be surgically removed somehow without affecting any other part of my mind (which I like on the whole). But there is no doubt to me that the more you can assert yourself physically or even by way of mere presence, the less active (((that part))) of the mind becomes.

In short, it’s the most effective survival strategy that can be employed against physically superior opponents. I wouldn’t be surprised if most weak-bodied men use similar tactics, regardless of ethnicity, if they have the intellect to do so.
 
It is odd how they slam Christians both for being prudes and having kids. Simultaneously. As if there is no contradiction.

This goes with the point I made above. It is a fundamentally feminine mind that does not deal in concepts like cognitive dissonance, which require a baseline of logos to be recognized.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
It is the essentially feminine mentality of conquering by deception what you cannot by force. It’s a part of my own mind that withered more and more away the more I trained physically through weightlifting and martial arts. It’s still there, as it is for every other man of my race that I’ve met in this country, and I’ve often wished it could just be surgically removed somehow without affecting any other part of my mind (which I like on the whole).
...

I must be part Jewish. I've noted previously that I think on some level sigmas are simply successful gammas, but perhaps that's putting the cart before the horse. Maybe gammas are actually weak sigmas. Your experience seems to match mine. I survived by entering a very low-tier social setting and ironically by virtue of being surrounded by plebs I was thrust by default into a position of tribal dominance which I was forced to live up to. But knowing that, it's easy to see how most gamma males never manage to escape the gravity well of their dysfunction.
 

ilostabet

Pelican
It is odd how they slam Christians both for being prudes and having kids. Simultaneously. As if there is no contradiction.

You know, all criticisms, or accusations, against Christianity and Christians are, in part, correct – though they all seem paradoxical, and almost contradictory, with some groups focusing on one side and others on another side, or sometimes all sides. And there is a reason why: Christianity is paradoxical. Christ is both man and God, can we get more paradoxical than this?

So you see, on the one hand, there’s the criticism that Christianity is repressive of sexuality, and on the other that they make too many children; on the one hand that Christianity violently destroyed the European native religions, while on the other it’s said that it taught Europeans docility and a ‘slave morality’; or you hear that Christianity is a Jewish invention to subjugate the gentiles, but on the other that it is anti-semitic; on the one hand that Christianity is dark and only sees perversity in the world, and on the other that it has an attitude of childish joy toward it; or that it oppresses women, but it also puts them on a pedestal; or that it exalts poverty and modesty, but also that it adorns its temples in gold and its priests with exuberant clothing; or that it suppressed pagan practices, but also that it incorporates it into itself; or that it considers suicide the worst sin, but encourages martyrdom for the faith; that Christ said to love your enemies, but also said that they were those within your own house; that He told Peter to get a sword, but then reprehended him for using it; that He is the Prince of Peace, but He came to set the world on fire and how He wished it was already burning.

So the accusations are true, but what do they mean? It is precisely because it is paradoxical that Christianity is true, because man is a paradoxical being. We were made in God’s image, but then betrayed Him, so we share some traits with the beasts. Our very existence in this world is the result of a paradox. It is not Christianity that they are accusing, but human existence. It is not in one extreme or the other that we find the Truth, but in the middle. And you will notice that Christ always provides the middle ground – He doesn’t punish the adulterous woman, but also tells her to sin no more. All cultures and religions sin from one side or the other (the Hebrews themselves oscillated between radical Left Hand heresy, and the extreme legalism of the Right Hand – during Christ’s time this was the major heresy, and so you can find more plentiful admonitions against it in the Gospels).

But I think the critics do not understand that Christianity is not lukewarm, it is not a compromise between extremes, but the existence of both simultaneously. Christ is fully man and fully God, and died to free us of death. What a paradox! It is a union of opposites, without annulling any of them.

And this is how it is possible that while the Church was unified in Europe, so many paradoxes that are healthy found themselves fully realized: Europe was, at the same time, unified, but divided into multiple entities, without any suppressing the others; underlining always the brotherhood between peoples, it kept them separate; while it focused on the primacy of Christian culture, preserved local, regional and national cultures; and while insisting on keeping Latin or Slavonic masses, it also ensured the maintenance of hundreds of languages and dialects in the continent.

When that primacy of Christ, the paradox, was broken, the opposites started to die in uniformity. Christianity insists on having black and white, untainted and simultaneous. The modern world is the result of the destruction of this coexistence of extremes, and as it goes on it becomes an ever more pale shade of grey that is both suffocating and insufficient to everyone.
 
It is the essentially feminine mentality of conquering by deception what you cannot by force. It’s a part of my own mind that withered more and more away the more I trained physically through weightlifting and martial arts. It’s still there, as it is for every other man of my race that I’ve met in this country, and I’ve often wished it could just be surgically removed somehow without affecting any other part of my mind (which I like on the whole). But there is no doubt to me that the more you can assert yourself physically or even by way of mere presence, the less active (((that part))) of the mind becomes.

In short, it’s the most effective survival strategy that can be employed against physically superior opponents. I wouldn’t be surprised if most weak-bodied men use similar tactics, regardless of ethnicity, if they have the intellect to do so.

At first glance, this statement makes sense and appears to offer an adequate explanation of the situation. I would, however, point out that this explanation only limits itself to the individual. I have noticed that no matter how much we try, in this society and its "packaged" propaganda, we consistently fall for individualistic reasoning and explanations. This is by no means a judgement of your intelligence or character, Michael. While my own experience leads me to exercise an abundance of caution around your statements, I sincerely applaud your turn to Christ.

Intellect is critical. Not every individual is genetically destined to impose presence or use physical force against opponents, no matter the amount of training. As Christians, as reasonable human beings, or as racial ideologues, we must understand that different individuals must occupy different tiers of a society, based on their inherent talents. I fear that we have miscalculated and misunderstood (((them))) by assuming that these subversions are due to mental or physical weakness by attempting to conquer by deception. The fact of the matter is that there never was many of (((them))) - ever. When attempting to conquer a host territory, they understood full well that no amount of physical force will lead to success, due to their small numbers, thus enters the subversion strategy.

But let us not forget the unity and bond of those peoples. While one individual amongst us may feel good physically and go on categorizing himself or other individuals of his own race/community/religion into Greek alphabets, the opponent is hard at work in filling the ranks of every societal organization that they have managed to subvert or control, with individuals of every type from their tribe. Certainly, hatred, victimhood narratives, and envy towards the conquered people (i.e. us) also plays a role, but one must ask: Who is coming up with these narratives? The intellectuals of the opponent, of course. While they have the men of our peoples convinced that they need to visit the gyms frequently and to score points with as many women as possible, they are busy hiring yet another unqualified member of the tribe into a corporate or governmental position, while crafting narratives to ensure those individuals are not "counter-subverted" by us, or by reason.

I shall wrap up with this: Members of this forum may or may not be aware of this, but the very idea that (((their))) mind is more akin to the feminine mind and functions as such, was proposed by none other than one Otto Weininger, at turn of the last century. Upon converting to Christianity in 1902, and seemingly arriving at that realization, he then went on to say something that also describes the modern day:

Our age, which is not only the most Jewish, but also the most effeminate of all ages; an age in which art represents only a sudarium of its humors; the age of the most gullible anarchism, without any understanding of the State and of justice; the age of the collectivist ethics of the species; the age in which history is viewed with the most astonishing lack of seriousness [historical materialism]; the age of capitalism and of Marxism; the age in which history, life, and science no longer mean anything, apart from economics and technology; the age when genius could be declared a form of madness, while it no longer possesses even one great artist or philosopher; the age of the least originality and its greatest pursuit; the age which can boast of being the first to have exalted eroticism, but not in order to forget oneself, the way the Romans or the Greeks did in their Bacchanalia, but in order to have the illusion of rediscovering oneself and giving substance to one’s vanity.

But here is the question I would pose: What if Otto Weininger, himself, was not being sincere in his ideas and statements?
 

EgoDeath

Pigeon
I cut out a bunch of stuff from the first post, specifically this part about the weaker sex and their god or some sect in Judaism being a hermaphrodite, Baphomet, Judaism being inherited from the mother, etc. Pushing equality in all it's forms, being the out-group, being the people of the book, at the very least it's culturally inherited although defining what a Jew is a game as olde and eternal as the Jew himself. :laughter:

Intelligence is also different from having a tendency towards being sly, sneaky, deceptive, indirect, all feminine qualities, (though many can lie á la dead face, which has been known to baffling to experience) keeping a smile not to lose face, vengeance, passive aggressive, which is the case with "the Jew", and not the intelligence, though I have noticed Jews tend to be good orators; not stuttering, albeit sophistic, whether this untrue or is due to (epi)genetic factors, cultural emphasis on education, Talmud being an oral tradition and arguing in the synagogues, tools of the trade of being in media, theatre etc. I leave up to you. It's not like they are mutually exclusive, on the contrary; all of these force-multiplied by nepotism, cheating on entrance exams in the ivy leagues, bribes, blackmail etc. Then some speculate about being descendant from the snake or eve from the garden of Eden. Back on track, the IQ meme is bunk, I know, but in some ways especially in these hyped cases, as also the IQ averages show in Israel etc. and that people like Epstein, in the port authority, neocons etc. wall street are morons, what they do is not hard, it's just lies, blackmail and back stabbing.

In terms of the vengeance element: a feminine mind tends to really go for the outrage per square memory, storing aside every tiny slights in all it's many sided variations, pent up to be unleashed at a later date. Like a ray of light being shone through a diamond, pressurized under seething temperature.

Keeping in mind different phenotypes and differences in these Lé IQ variabilities among converts, Khazar or
Ashkenazi, Dönmeh, the "mythical" Hebrews (see: Human Genome Project results), "Israelis", et.al.

I feel for EMJ's wishful thinking about the baptismal thing, but, when Michael calls himself a Jew, or ethnically Jewish, it's kind of a small baptism in and of itself, splash! Niqqa. Amen.

May Michael stay strong, true and vigilant, in keeping with the faith.


A skilled liar knows to weave his narrative around the truth.
 
Last edited:
I know EMJ has good intentions as a good Christian, but that thought process leads to lowering one's guard against subversion. When that's the prevalent way of thinking, i.e. that Judaism is a religion as opposed to a set of rules governing a group of people, then (((they))) quickly deduce that all they'll need are a few drops of baptismal water to gain the trust of the Christian masses in their host country.

There is a scene in the German, 1940 movie "Jud Süß" where the assistant and future son-in-law of the council chairman of the city of Stuttgart, having become frustrated at the actions of the Financial Councillor Joseph Süß Oppenheimer, says "we can never be as smart as the Jews," to which the chairman replies "of course we can - the Jew is not smart, he's just cunning."

It is really a fantastic movie with somewhat comical, albeit true depictions of their actions, such as the wordplay employed in confusing the opponents and trying to achieve more nefarious goals:

 
St. Paul referred to himself as a Jew even after his conversion, so I’m not sure why some people flip out when I do it too. An Asian man who comes to Christ doesn’t cease to be Asian.

I think we can all agree that St. Paul's conversion was not an ordinary event. While Saul of Tarsus did live within an empire not necessarily friendly to Christians, he did not enjoy the Philo-Semitic society that we have to endure in the West, today. The Roman Empire did not have an over-representation of Jews within its Senate and other governmental or military bodies. They were as capable of persecuting Jews, as they did Christians. His earlier persecution of Christians was strictly of his own volition and that of his tribe. St. Paul's miraculous and divine conversion has been unmatched, ever since.

As to whether a Korean who turns to Christianity must cease to be Korean: I dedicated some time to perform cursory research and was unable to find a period of time in history where Koreans consistently led double lives under the cover of Christianity or other false racial covers, while attempting to subvert, conquer, and destroy other civilizations or cultures. Nor does a Korean's cultural code of conduct and norms (vis-à-vis the "Talmud") dictate that all other peoples are inferior and must be treated as cattle.

Having stated all of that, I must say that I do wish the best for you in strengthening your truthful and honest faith in Christ. Where you may see potential suspicion from me or others, consider that it may perhaps be another test in finding additional truths in and for your self.
 
Top