Tattooed women outnumber tattooed men

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tuthmosis

Peacock
Gold Member
soup said:
Tattoos just make it easier for me to spot the sluts.

A little math, using your logic above, some research, and some other gems from this thread.

"Tattoos just make it easier for me to spot the sluts."

+

"Women With Tattoos Are More Promiscuous"

+

"A large percentage of women in their 20s have tattoos."

+

I've never met a girl who turned out to be a prude and then also had a tattoo*

*true story

---------------------------------------------------------

= Most women in my (our) target demographic are sluts.

= Look for tattoos if you like easy sex with few, or no, strings attached.


[attachment=6411]
 

Attachments

  • player_math.jpg
    player_math.jpg
    44.1 KB · Views: 3,491

Screwston

 
Banned
Ha check this out. A tattoo shop put up the picture on Facebook and these are some responses. I have a lot of tattoos and plan to fill up my entire body. This girl looks like she just got out the pen and looks disgusting. The tattoos on women wont go anywhere because very few guys tell them it looks like shit. As you can see, the betas will encourage ANYTHING women do.
2v3kaza.jpg


Leigh Ann Mitchell Truth. I love art. Why not wear it forever? ;-)
Paige Gallegos Hell yeah
Jacobi Orr She's hott
Mike Sharp Yea hate them umpa lumpas men, they all air heads n no class this chick rocks with her own expressiveness and individualism.
Skull Doll Pictures like this make me want to get covered in tattoos, they're so beautiful!
Laura Jo I've never heard a tattoo meant smut! Haha but coooooool. Clearly she's hottttt!

Paul J French
I'm glad the majority of people think that the orange girls that look like they have nut allergies are their idea of an attractive women .. These are the same girls that pay out hundreds of pounds on pictures of themselves so they can call themselves models lol ... I prefer to be different and have my own opinion on what I find truly beautiful ... For me she looks like a very naturally beautiful girl ... The fact she is covered in art adds decoration to an already glorious canvas ... If everyone liked coffee flavoured sweets there wouldn't be enough for the people that truly loved and got aroused by coffee flavoured sweets ( if that makes any sense) ... I don't see smut and dirt I see natural beauty and art ...

Casey O'Hara she's fine as hell!

Kellie Herrin Eye opening...so true!!!

Scott Edleman Tattoo'd women are very beautiful... Their tattoos show expression of who they are and things close to their heart......
 

Spike

Hummingbird
Gold Member
Nonpareil said:
A tiny, two inch by two inch butterfly on her lower-hip/upper-pussy area is one thing; sleeves, giant tramp stamps and shit all over her back (girl I banged in less than an hour and a half last summer told me that her work, which was all colored, had so far set her back about 3k...just why!?). I know the girls (for the same reason that they do anything that only men used to do) will think we'll think of them as 'strong, confident and empowered!' with their full body ink, but you know what I think of when I see a girl with extensive ink?

- Someone with poor impulse control (Girls with poor-impulse control are almost always sluts...Not wife material!).
- Someone with zero future time orientation; that shit looks plenty different when she's 23 than it will at 43 (Girls with no future-time orientation will have no problem fleecing you in a divorce with little regard for the long-term future of your children and negative-regard for your own long-term future...Not wife material!).
- Someone who craves attention to the point that she'll spend hundreds of dollars to permanently mangle her skin (Attention whores are either sluts or teases, and if there's one thing I like less than a slut, it's a tease [at least sluts are fun]...Not wife material!).
- Someone who thinks she's 'unique and special' when she is in fact doing something that at least 23% of her peer group has done (Special Snowflake Syndrome, though in the west it's a pandemic...Not wife material!).
- Someone who with each thing she gets done becomes an increased risk for Hepatitis C, tetanus and even HIV (Not only are these diseases bad, but once you have them, if they can even be cured, it's such a bitch...Not wife material!).
- Someone who, with each work she has larger than my hand (about 8 inches by 6 inches), has taken between 10 and 20 additional cocks (Sluts have difficulty bonding with one man, we all know this...Not wife material!).

As I said, a small tattoo that's only visible when she's in her underwear or naked is one thing. I don't have Facebook and even if I did, I couldn't check it. How 'Liked!' did this get by chicks on some of your guys feeds? Part of the reason I lost Facebook a few years ago is encapsulated by this type of asinine wholesale-liking of anything that glorifies womanhood or is posted by women.

Great insight on the psyche of a tattooed girl. Great post ! +1

To each his own but i sure as hell won't ever take a tattoo. Nowadays you're more special NOT having a tattoo than having full sleeves. My buddies back home all have tattoos and been pushing me for years. Keep trying guys.

Tattoos have really lost their value since the hipsters started tatting their skinny spaghetti arms.
 

el mechanico

Owl
Gold Member
I love to rank on girls tats. I've been doing this before I even knew about negging. "How's that butterfly on your chest workin for ya? Not so good from here" or "So you like seafood huh?" Her: Why you say that? Me: Cause you have a shrimp tattoo on your ankle...Her:It's a scorpion..Me: I like shrimp are you sure?
 

R Smoov

Pelican
Whats even funnier are the girls who still think guys with tats are hot.
"Oh I like a man with tats!"
"He likes men too!"
 

soup

Owl
Gold Member
I was talking to a lesbian friend of mine about the explosion of female tattoos over the last year, and she said that the more feminine lesbians get tattoos to signify that they are bi (as opposed to going all out butch).

So, there's a functional reason.

Now our culture equates being a lesbian with being rebellious or cool, and we've got a huge trend with a masses of lemming chicks jumping on the band wagon.

A generation of girls ruined.
 

soup

Owl
Gold Member
Walking down the street with an alpha mentor of mine, and a girl with tats covering her body walks by.

I point it out and express my dissatisfaction.

He responds "It's OK- it's like reading the newspaper!"
 

Beyond Borders

Peacock
Gold Member
Nonpareil said:
A tiny, two inch by two inch butterfly on her lower-hip/upper-pussy area is one thing; sleeves, giant tramp stamps and shit all over her back (girl I banged in less than an hour and a half last summer told me that her work, which was all colored, had so far set her back about 3k...just why!?). I know the girls (for the same reason that they do anything that only men used to do) will think we'll think of them as 'strong, confident and empowered!' with their full body ink, but you know what I think of when I see a girl with extensive ink?

- Someone with poor impulse control (Girls with poor-impulse control are almost always sluts...Not wife material!).
- Someone with zero future time orientation; that shit looks plenty different when she's 23 than it will at 43 (Girls with no future-time orientation will have no problem fleecing you in a divorce with little regard for the long-term future of your children and negative-regard for your own long-term future...Not wife material!).
- Someone who craves attention to the point that she'll spend hundreds of dollars to permanently mangle her skin (Attention whores are either sluts or teases, and if there's one thing I like less than a slut, it's a tease [at least sluts are fun]...Not wife material!).
- Someone who thinks she's 'unique and special' when she is in fact doing something that at least 23% of her peer group has done (Special Snowflake Syndrome, though in the west it's a pandemic...Not wife material!).
- Someone who with each thing she gets done becomes an increased risk for Hepatitis C, tetanus and even HIV (Not only are these diseases bad, but once you have them, if they can even be cured, it's such a bitch...Not wife material!).
- Someone who, with each work she has larger than my hand (about 8 inches by 6 inches), has taken between 10 and 20 additional cocks (Sluts have difficulty bonding with one man, we all know this...Not wife material!).

As I said, a small tattoo that's only visible when she's in her underwear or naked is one thing. I don't have Facebook and even if I did, I couldn't check it. How 'Liked!' did this get by chicks on some of your guys feeds? Part of the reason I lost Facebook a few years ago is encapsulated by this type of asinine wholesale-liking of anything that glorifies womanhood or is posted by women.

I find it interesting that all the references to wife material are accepted and "liked" by so many here when, on the other hand, if someone came in here talking about their interest in seeking out wife material, they'd get clowned. I'm not trying to roast you specifically here; I just find it interesting and thought-provoking.

I see this a lot on pua/game/manoshre forums, etc. Where we want women to act like wife material, yet we typically don't acknowledge our inherent desire to have it - and even ridicule men who admit theirs.

If we're really all in it for the lay, who cares if they have tats, right? I find it sexy on some girls - even cute on some. Would I want a wife all tatted up? Probably not, but I'm not against admitting that marriage might someday be in the cards either.

Anyone have thoughts on this?
 

joehoya

Kingfisher
houston said:
Doesn't this look classy?
.....

Those pics reminded me of a wedding I attended earlier this year. The bride was OK looking, wearing a beautiful strapless wedding dress, and the most god awful cheap unicorn with rainbows & roses tattoo on her left shoulder-blade. It made an otherwise lovely scene look like the guy was marrying a prostitute.
 

WesternCancer

Crow
Gold Member
I've always wanted to bang a chick that's like 100% covered in tattys, but id probably only do it for the novelty.

This tattooed chick from okc just booty called me asking me to come to her place. I told her I had to get up early and study. I kind of feel bad passing up a guaranteed notch.
 

Cookie

Woodpecker
At least these girls have decent looking tats. Whenever I go to the beach I see tons of women with flat out retarded tattoos.

Personally I don't mind a girl who's inked up, as long as it looks aesthetically pleasing.

Earlier this year I was banging a girl who was all tatted up (full back work, anklets, tats up her arms and on her wrists) and I thought it was awesome.

On the flip side I hate piercings, those are like an automatic kill switch for my boner.
 

teh_skeeze

Pelican
Beyond Borders said:
I find it interesting that all the references to wife material are accepted and "liked" by so many here when, on the other hand, if someone came in here talking about their interest in seeking out wife material, they'd get clowned. I'm not trying to roast you specifically here; I just find it interesting and thought-provoking.

I see this a lot on pua/game/manoshre forums, etc. Where we want women to act like wife material, yet we typically don't acknowledge our inherent desire to have it - and even ridicule men who admit theirs.

If we're really all in it for the lay, who cares if they have tats, right? I find it sexy on some girls - even cute on some. Would I want a wife all tatted up? Probably not, but I'm not against admitting that marriage might someday be in the cards either.

Anyone have thoughts on this?
Women are the gatekeepers of sex
Men are the gatekeepers of commitment

I personally haven't seen anyone ridiculed for admitting that they have a desire for a good wife. Oneitis is looked down upon. That's because oneitis limits options, which will lead to a world of hurt when dealing with women.

I think that's why most of us are here. Today's society has put the screws to "good and worthy" men. So we come here to learn and discuss how we can better navigate the minefield that is the modern SMP.

Since we are bonders by nature and the gatekeepers of commitment, I don't see any contradiction to trying to qualify women as wife material, even if marriage isn't the end goal.

I look at some of the wedding photos posted in this thread, and some of the girls are damn cute. However, heavily inked women is a huge turnoff for me, despite having several tattoos myself (Hypocrisy? I don't care, fuck you!). If one of them threw it at me, I'd certainly take it, but it would end as soon as I got my nut. I would never try to open one of them though.
 

soup

Owl
Gold Member
WesternCancer said:
I've always wanted to bang a chick that's like 100% covered in tattys, but id probably only do it for the novelty.

This tattooed chick from okc just booty called me asking me to come to her place. I told her I had to get up early and study. I kind of feel bad passing up a guaranteed notch.

You should come to north Brooklyn. Nothing short of a tattoo epidemic here.
 
soup said:
WesternCancer said:
I've always wanted to bang a chick that's like 100% covered in tattys, but id probably only do it for the novelty.

This tattooed chick from okc just booty called me asking me to come to her place. I told her I had to get up early and study. I kind of feel bad passing up a guaranteed notch.

You should come to north Brooklyn. Nothing short of a tattoo epidemic here.

Hipster Brooklyn is ground zero for insane liberalism.

Liberalism denies all traditional social bonds, i.e. kinship, shared language and cultured based down over generations, shared values religious or otherwise, ethnic preference, etc. Individualism reigns supreme, and having any "tribe" based on real values is racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.

The problem is humans are not individuals. They have evolved to function within a hierarchical tribe of about 100 to 200 people. Leaders of the tribe, like the high IQ elite of America, were the ones who set the rules. But the vast majority of people have always NEEDED to conform to their tribes norms. Their identity comes from conformity.

Since broad efforts have been made to quash this normal human behavior, via criminal law and/or propaganda, there is an emptiness left in many people.

If they cannot modify their character and ideals, what is left? Triviality and Banality, the essence of post modernism. They modify their bodies, because to do so causes no offense. It is the last method of identity acquisition the politically correct regime allows that is somewhat unique.

On a side note - what else can observed in Brooklyn? Absolutely fanatical, tyrannical liberalism. Walk into a bar and start spouting game principles or say you are sick of queers. You'll get the most vicious stares of hate.

I've made girls cry in Williamsburg over the most mundane, mildly anti-PC concepts. It's truly sad. The tattoos suck for these babes, but when the whole shitstorm comes and they realize their worldview is a daft fantasy, they are going to end up in the loony bin.
 

soup

Owl
Gold Member
Don_Johnson said:
soup said:
WesternCancer said:
I've always wanted to bang a chick that's like 100% covered in tattys, but id probably only do it for the novelty.

This tattooed chick from okc just booty called me asking me to come to her place. I told her I had to get up early and study. I kind of feel bad passing up a guaranteed notch.

You should come to north Brooklyn. Nothing short of a tattoo epidemic here.

Hipster Brooklyn is ground zero for insane liberalism.

Liberalism denies all traditional social bonds, i.e. kinship, shared language and cultured based down over generations, shared values religious or otherwise, ethnic preference, etc. Individualism reigns supreme, and having any "tribe" based on real values is racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.

The problem is humans are not individuals. They have evolved to function within a hierarchical tribe of about 100 to 200 people. Leaders of the tribe, like the high IQ elite of America, were the ones who set the rules. But the vast majority of people have always NEEDED to conform to their tribes norms. Their identity comes from conformity.

Since broad efforts have been made to quash this normal human behavior, via criminal law and/or propaganda, there is an emptiness left in many people.

If they cannot modify their character and ideals, what is left? Triviality and Banality, the essence of post modernism. They modify their bodies, because to do so causes no offense. It is the last method of identity acquisition the politically correct regime allows that is somewhat unique.

On a side note - what else can observed in Brooklyn? Absolutely fanatical, tyrannical liberalism. Walk into a bar and start spouting game principles or say you are sick of queers. You'll get the most vicious stares of hate.

I've made girls cry in Williamsburg over the most mundane, mildly anti-PC concepts. It's truly sad. The tattoos suck for these babes, but when the whole shitstorm comes and they realize their worldview is a daft fantasy, they are going to end up in the loony bin.

I agree with a lot of what you say here. Our culture tries to sell "individualism" to a lot of people that would, deep down inside, probably feel more comfortable being the followers. But, most girls are just too stupid to realize that getting a tattoo is a permanent commitment to a fad. Even though they know they are going to get old, they are drunk on power, and their erroneous, in the moment judgment makes them think they are going to be young and attractive for ever.

But, I'd argue that a core tenet of liberalism is that all men are sentient beings, not dogs, and, given the opportunities, we can potentially improve ourselves. And this is why we all need access to education, and basic necessities.. so we can have some options.

Not all beta males are inveterate followers like women. Some of them just don't know that there is a "red pill." I think it might be too early since the Game has come on-line to make a call on whether or not all men's alpha/beta status is set in stone.

The real contradiction is for women. I believe it is close to impossible for most women to square the feminist agenda with finding happiness in their own lives. This is why so many of them are on anti-depressants.

You hate ALL queers? I know a bunch of them that are cool. And, they have better game than most guys.

Williamsburg is definitely left leaning, and it is also a pyro-technic insanitarium of pussy.
 

Screwston

 
Banned
A new trend I've been noticing is girls with dia de los muertos tattoos who have no idea where it comes from. I see a lot of white trash type girls with them online who say they only want white guys lol.
 

Parlay44

Peacock
Gold Member
Huge chest tattoos are gaining popularity in my circle. I hate it personally.

They're limiting their marketability in the dating market. They can no longer be social chameleons by changing their clothes and hairstyle. When you look at them you just think ...skank.
 

Sombro

Ostrich
Agnostic
"It's a confidence thing, it shows you are not afraid of pain, and that you can make choices for life."

No, it's an attention whoring crutch. If you were confident, you wouldn't "need" to do it.

While the numbers are few, the women I have the most respect for are stunning and confident, without the need to chase fads.*

*Save the long lecture about tats being a tradition with sailors, soldiers, society's fringe groups, etc. When ignorant twenty-something chicks and housewives are getting tattoos, it is a fad.

:tard:

You know how ridiculous it looks to see a bumper sticker on a Rolls-Royce? Well...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top