Tattooed women outnumber tattooed men

[Jackreacher]

I never thought bitches en masse would start getting tatts covering their arms, it just adds masculine qualities to their looks but here it is. I remember when I started seeing the tramp stamps on girls everywhere and thought it was a pretty stupid thing to do but at least it was a subtle way of letting ya know what's what. So what do we got now, fat chicks, ugly chicks, bitchy chicks, tatted chicks and some who are able to fit into all 3 of those lovely categories. It's as if they're willingly making themselves unpalatable to most men on purpose. Has there ever been a more obvious sign that any man worth his salt needs to be out of the West as soon as he can if he wants to be around genuinely feminine women?

 

[Sombro]

I never got why fat chicks would get tattoos, but looking at it...:

Fat chick = ugly and desperate

Fat chick with tattoos = uglier, but easier

Now it makes sense...

 

[commiejoe]

Might as well ask in this thread, how many guys here have tats?
Personally, I have none, I was never creative enough to think of what to get.

 

[iop890]

What do our rvfers in Thailand think about the yants that so many girls 'round these parts have? I used to think it was a thing for lower class sluts, but I've been seeing it more and more on rich girls, and girls in university.

Personally I'm more forgiving towards them then I am for a normal tattoo, but I'd still prefer nothing.

 

[Dr. Howard]

Might as well ask in this thread, how many guys here have tats?
Personally, I have none, I was never creative enough to think of what to get.

I have a bunch, I like them but am not dumb enough to get neck, face or hand tattoos (aka "Job Breakers").

Women have to be incredibly careful about tattoos, done wrong they break up their curves, which is what makes women hot to look at in the first place. Broad chest pieces make their shoulders look broad, and sleeves make their arms and hands look big.

The tramp stamp is good for making skinny girls look like they have hips, but it makes fat girls seem even more fat.

Conversely, a well placed secret tattoo like a SMALL star behind the ear, top of the hair line or ankle will make me look twice at a girl I may not have.

Tattoos can be modest and feminine or masculine and obnoxious. Women these days are choosing masculine and obnoxious to match their personalities.

 

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

I don't have any, and while I occasionally consider getting one (a phoenix of some sort), the immutability aspect always deters me. Who knows if I'll still like it in 10 years? If it will look good when I get old, no matter in how fine a shape I am? It's better to err on the side of caution. I view tattoos on women with disgust for precisely the same reason - it's a sign of recklessness, and restraint is even more critical for a woman than it would be for a man.

 

[Smooth Operator]

A tiny, two inch by two inch butterfly on her lower-hip/upper-pussy area is one thing; sleeves, giant tramp stamps and shit all over her back (girl I banged in less than an hour and a half last summer told me that her work, which was all colored, had so far set her back about 3k...just why!?). I know the girls (for the same reason that they do anything that only men used to do) will think we'll think of them as 'strong, confident and empowered!' with their full body ink, but you know what I think of when I see a girl with extensive ink?

- Someone with poor impulse control (Girls with poor-impulse control are almost always sluts...Not wife material!).
- Someone with zero future time orientation; that shit looks plenty different when she's 23 than it will at 43 (Girls with no future-time orientation will have no problem fleecing you in a divorce with little regard for the long-term future of your children and negative-regard for your own long-term future...Not wife material!).
- Someone who craves attention to the point that she'll spend hundreds of dollars to permanently mangle her skin (Attention whores are either sluts or teases, and if there's one thing I like less than a slut, it's a tease [at least sluts are fun]...Not wife material!).
- Someone who thinks she's 'unique and special' when she is in fact doing something that at least 23% of her peer group has done (Special Snowflake Syndrome, though in the west it's a pandemic...Not wife material!).
- Someone who with each thing she gets done becomes an increased risk for Hepatitis C, tetanus and even HIV (Not only are these diseases bad, but once you have them, if they can even be cured, it's such a bitch...Not wife material!).
- Someone who, with each work she has larger than my hand (about 8 inches by 6 inches), has taken between 10 and 20 additional cocks (Sluts have difficulty bonding with one man, we all know this...Not wife material!).

As I said, a small tattoo that's only visible when she's in her underwear or naked is one thing. I don't have Facebook and even if I did, I couldn't check it. How 'Liked!' did this get by chicks on some of your guys feeds? Part of the reason I lost Facebook a few years ago is encapsulated by this type of asinine wholesale-liking of anything that glorifies womanhood or is posted by women.

I find it interesting that all the references to wife material are accepted and "liked" by so many here when, on the other hand, if someone came in here talking about their interest in seeking out wife material, they'd get clowned. I'm not trying to roast you specifically here; I just find it interesting and thought-provoking.

I see this a lot on pua/game/manoshre forums, etc. Where we want women to act like wife material, yet we typically don't acknowledge our inherent desire to have it - and even ridicule men who admit theirs.

If we're really all in it for the lay, who cares if they have tats, right? I find it sexy on some girls - even cute on some. Would I want a wife all tatted up? Probably not, but I'm not against admitting that marriage might someday be in the cards either.

Anyone have thoughts on this?

I was thinking exactly the same. Why worry about wife material? Most guys in the manosphere were hurt by a former girlfriend/wife and are still looking for a serious girlfriend/wife. What they don't see is that a man get's betaised sooner or later in a every serious relationship, even if you're "alpha". I think serious relationships only make sense when you're +50.

I like to use tats as in indicator for promiscuousness, though this indicator is not as strong anymore in countries where tats become sooo mainstream.

Some of the worst tats I saw on women:
- A turtle
- A fishhook
- A red pepper ("because I'm spicy in bed")

 

[The Great Basilisk]

I hate big tattoos(sleeve etc.) but i'm fine with smaller ones. My last ex-gf took a small tattoo on her arm, which was fine. Current regular has 2 small tattoos as well. If i started to ignore girls with tattoos, i would get MUCH less ass and that's not ok.

 

[Jackreacher]

The only people who should be getting tattoos are members of the Yakuza only because they do it right

 

[The Beast1]

Tattoos on both men and women are major red flags for me.

I wouldn't hire someone with visible tattoos.

 

[Days of Broken Arrows]

There's a larger issue here someone should write about at ROK. IMO the media's push toward glamorizing tattoos on women is yet another way they're deliberately masculinizing Western women.

It's not enough to have them not having kids, taking power jobs, cursing like sailors, smoking, etc. Now they have to look like "a slightly more voluptuous version of your father" to quote the late, great Frank Zappa.

The media shames anything associated with traditional masculinity and femininity and thus glorifies the inverse. If we're repulsed, well, I bet a lot of other guys are too but are too cowed to say so. So we're left pointing out the Emperor's New Clothes, so to speak.

Anyone who thinks they're "adding" to the beauty of the female body by adorning it with tattoos needs to be bitch-slapped into next week, especially the mindless media-MTV-fashion mag cheerleaders.

 

[SheriffBart]

This proves what I've felt about tattoos since people that weren't sailors and convicts started getting them. They are a bogus egotistical fad. Which is exactly what women, especially modern western women, are into. Makes sense for women to outnumber men.

I have anecdotal evidence to support the tattoo=whore theory. Only chick to ever try to give me porn star BJ was covered in em.

 

[Ziltoid]

While that statistic is probably technically true, I have to wonder what percentage of women actually have substantial tattoos as compared to men, and not just some butterfly on their shoulder type shit.

I don't mind tattoos on girls that much, except for the fact that they usually get ugly, stupid, and masculine ones... Girly/artsy shit like flowers, vines, birds, etc is OK by my book.

 

[Dr. Howard]

Tattoos on both men and women are major red flags for me.

I wouldn't hire someone with visible tattoos.

and this is why I have worn long sleeves from the interview to at least through my first two performance reviews in past jobs. Once I've established a good rep the short sleeves and tattoos come out!!

 

[Dr. Howard]

This proves what I've felt about tattoos since people that weren't sailors and convicts started getting them. They are a bogus egotistical fad. Which is exactly what women, especially modern western women, are into. Makes sense for women to outnumber men.

I have anecdotal evidence to support the tattoo=whore theory. Only chick to ever try to give me porn star BJ was covered in em.

I agree, on the whole, however one of the sweetest girls I've ever dated was half japanese with a huge full back tattoo (like the yakuza style) and no other visible tattoos. Again its girls that are LOOK AT MY TATTOOS!! types vs. "oh yes, I happen to have a tattoo that you are seeing for the first time since I am naked" modesty applies to tattoos and personalities I guess.

 

[The Beast1]

Tattoos on both men and women are major red flags for me.

I wouldn't hire someone with visible tattoos.

and this is why I have worn long sleeves from the interview to at least through my first two performance reviews in past jobs. Once I've established a good rep the short sleeves and tattoos come out!!

You're probably a good dude and I'd probably enjoy your company. But when it comes to tattoos, the reaction I have is visceral.

Keep the long sleeves on, the judgement comes out regardless of how long i've known someone. They get put into the box of "misfit" toys. I personally know what I liked as a kid and teenager, but I change too much to want to have the same thing on my body as I get older.

Knew this girl who was a solid 8. Group of friends decided to go on a beach trip. Discovered the nastiest sleeve in the world.

She's a solid 7 now because of it. Shame because she was pretty good looking.

Thankfully most people don't care and I'm in the minority.

 

[Jackreacher]

Another thing is I can't take women with tattoos seriously, much less so then women in general aside from banging them while in the states. I don't flat out ignore them like I do the Obeasts, you can't if you're in the US that's like cutting off 80% of bangable women nowadays.

 

[RexImperator]

Large tattoos on girls just seem more and more common now in the US, and almost every girl has a tattoo somewhere. It's at the point where the best situation you can hope for is a "only" a small discrete tattoo somewhere.

 

[Quintus Curtius]

Whenever we think it can't get any worse, it does. There's just no end to it.

How many dots need to be connected, how many outrages do you have to read about, before we draw the inescapable conclusions?

That we're done, done, done. Finished.

Just skimming the "Everything Else" thread right now, I am seeing threads on:

Redneck scum chicks fighting and assaulting each other
Human scum American woman attention whoring during her abortion
More American women have tattoos than men

Et cetera, et cetera.

Every time we think we've hit bottom, we find out that the bottom is even further down. Where does it end? Will women literally devolve into primordial slime, or some other subhuman organism?

If a Tamerlane or a Genghis Khan swept in and destroyed everything, it would be good fresh start. Where are you Tamerlane? We need you now.

I mean, they're barely human now. And I mean that almost literally. Most American women don't even excite me at all. For me, it's foreign or nothing.

I can't even tolerate their presence. I don't want them crossing my field of vision. I don't want them near me. Just being around them drives me into a fury. I have to be honest.

 

[darklightdispatch]

The real contradiction is for women. I believe it is close to impossible for most women to square the feminist agenda with finding happiness in their own lives. This is why so many of them are on anti-depressants.

I think this really hits the nail on the head. The last thing nearly any woman actually wants is to be "strong and independent." Feminism is an easy sell when they're young and attractive because it's flattering, encourages them to revel in their peak-SMV power, and absolves them of personal responsibility.

I think we underestimate how profoundly non-individualistic women actually are. Tattoos are a good example. Women aren't getting them because they want to stand out and be different, they're getting them because they're fashionable and all their friends (and celebrities) are doing it. Back when tattoos really were unusual and counter-culture, how many normal girls were getting inked?

Also, look at something like boy bands or Justin Bieber. There's nothing equivalent for men. Women are herd animals that gravitate toward crazes.

Even "red pill" men underestimate just how different men and women are.