The Afghanistan Conflict Thread

budoslavic

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member
518796ca22fe35ca.jpg
 

infowarrior1

Crow
Protestant
IV drug users. That has always been the case. A place with high poppy production will have people shooting heroin.

Where are the stats on sodomy? It isn't even mentioned in your link. Why not?

Big correlation between sodomy and IV drug use. This is why originally sodomites infected drug users by sharing needles with them.

As for why not. They refuse to mention that link.
 

C-Note

Hummingbird
Other Christian
Gold Member
I saw a little of MSNBC at the gym today after Biden's speech. For the most part, the network's pundits were pushing the narrative that Biden did a good job with the withdrawal after a few initial missteps. There was one notable exception:


My impression is that the DNC is not quite ready to put Kamala Harris in the Oval Office. I think they're probably afraid it would lead to them getting massacred in the 2022 nationwide elections. So, they're trying to keep Biden going for at least another year or so.
 

soli.deo.gloria

Woodpecker
Orthodox
Gold Member
Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. What makes you think the media tells the truth about the Taliban? Are there names we could use to verify the story, or is it just a case of flesh lampshades and masturbation machines?

I heard the Taliban has a rollercoaster of death that snaps the neck and then launches poor Afghans into a giant furnace which can burn up to six million bodies per hour. I'm not sure how they managed to pull that off but I believe it because I saw it on the TV.
 

Gimlet

Pelican
Big correlation between sodomy and IV drug use. This is why originally sodomites infected drug users by sharing needles with them.

As for why not. They refuse to mention that link.

You are moving the goal posts because you posted a link that does not prove what you intended. No worries, enjoy your evening.
 

infowarrior1

Crow
Protestant
You are moving the goal posts because you posted a link that does not prove what you intended. No worries, enjoy your evening.

Proof:

Now extrapolate to Afghanistan.
 

Samseau

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member
There is considerable evidence of a certain outside group of rootless cosmopolitans subverting a nation and creating enemies, over and over again. In that regard this is just history repeating itself. The most recent extremely bloody example was the Bolvshevik Revolution in Russia in which tens of millions died. If one looks at the background of the neocons from Paul Wolfowitz to Bill Barr to Anthony Blinken one sees the fingerprints of this same group all over the US creation of enemies (ISIS, Al Queda, etc).

I do not see large scale war as a probability. It's not just the advent of the nuclear bomb, though that is a large part of it, but if one does not desire conquest and plunder of resources, then war is the wrong tool for the job, just as it was in Afghanistan (or Vietnam, or Iraq, or Grenana, or anywhere else the US has failed despite having the strongest warmaking powers of anyone).

In the past wars were fought mainly for resources and plunder. The US, which has been the most aggressive military state by far of the past 75 years, does not even take the spoils of war from the nations it invades. And all former empires have willingly surrendered their colonies, even in cases where there was strong support to keep them. In other words, global empires don't work or aren't even pursued by the global powers any longer.

Whatever the goal is, and whoever the evil boogeyman of the day is, war either doesn't achieve their outcome or there are more effective methods of doing so. Just think of a boogeyman evil country and tell me how war will benefit them? It doesn't.

What does China actually want? To run the American government? Or just to control the global economy and dominate international trade? They have been working hard on the latter for decades, without any war. The Taliban? A way of life that is the natural order of patriarchy. Does anyone think they want to force the west to live under patriarchy, and will wage war to make us do so? The point is war, even if it could be won, war would not accomplish the goals that modern nations have, any more than war against Afghanistan accomplished the goal of bringing it democracy. War is the wrong tool for that.

What we should be worried about is an Alex Jones style prison planet police state tracking and control grid, and the tools to achieve that do not include war, but have been very successful in curtailing our freedoms and stability over the past 20 years. THAT is the real enemy, not North Koreans wanting to do communism or Russians being traditional and anti-gay or Venezuelans wanting to sell us oil and do European style socialism. If anything, war would disrupt the global multinational corporate control grid that all countries except the Final Five live under, setting back the global control grid, and while there can be small scale conflicts for resources or territory, large scale war is not a winning proposition for anyone's agenda.

War has been used for thousands of years for all kinds of reasons. Resources and plunder actually only make up the small scale wars. The really huge wars are fought for pride or God. Muslims, for example, are fighting for God, and will take the fight to us, again and again, on behalf of God. Likewise, WW1 was not fought for resources or plunder, it was 100% about power and control, a pride issue. All European nations were filthy rich at the time, richer than they had ever been, and committed suicide, twice, in pointless world wars.

Man is not a rational animal, and man does not live on bread alone. He never has been, and never will be. The reasons (or lack thereof) for the actions of tyrants will always be half-madness as much as they are half-reason. The reasons the elites want war is because it gives them everything they want: absolute power, control, domination over our souls, and any pleasure they desire. You think too small, no offense, with your idea that nations have goals. There are no nations anymore, and even when nations were meaningful, they still were easily fooled into murdering each other. But today, there are no nations, just men, with absolute power, who have amassed so much money they only look forward to fulfilling their sickest desires.

One thing the doom and gloomers forget about is that all tyrants make huge mistakes at some point... Some of you talk like these "elites" can control all outcomes.

Statistically through history, humanity wins.

No doubt they make huge mistakes, but those huge mistakes never lead to peace rather just a lot more violence and death. First they lose control and get killed themselves, then the monster they created goes berserk, Stalin style, and eats a whole lot more before it dies of old age.

But to your general point about humanity and history, actually, statistically, the opposite is true. We know this because our written history is very small compared to our total existence; DNA testing (which I believe does not show the full picture of our true age) shows we are at least 150,000 years old, many DNA calculations place it over 250,000 years. Humanity has been around for quite some time, and we have less than 1% of it written down.

So, the question is, did it take us 150,000-250,000 years to discover how to write and pass on the info, or, has writing been invented many times, thousands and thousands times, by different civilizations over hundreds of thousands of years, each of them losing their history upon their eventual obliteration?

Keep in mind the oldest history we have talks extensively about civilizations no one has any idea of anymore, such as Plato's famous Atlantis reference or Herodotus' description of ancient civilizations, that were all lost in the burning of Alexandria 1700 years ago. So we do know that writing has been around for quite some time, longer than our historical record provides, and therefore the safe assumption is that writing has been around for thousands of years, at least.

Beyond that time, anything could have happened: countless civilizations could have risen and fallen, many more sophisticated than what we have now, all reduced to dust (anti-darwin thesis); we could have been nothing more than brute savages who have evolved into noble beings. It is seemingly all conjecture and speculation. Yet.. There is no reason to doubt that our distant ancestors were much different than we are today. There's nothing to suggest that humans have substantially changed in the last 2500 years based on historical evidence; indeed, Greek plays from Aristophanes (~300 BC) read like a skit from a modern Saturday Night Live. If evolution was real, we should notice real tangible differences between humans 2500+ years ago to today, no?

If Whites from 2500 years ago in Greece are basically the same as they are today, why should we doubt that 2500 years before that Whites were similar, if not the same? Likewise, so on and so forth, for tens of thousands and then hundreds of thousands of years? What could have substantially changed us in that timeframe, if we weren't the same? Since there is no reason to suggest humans have substantially changed (since the DNA is basically the same), we can therefore conclude a very important conclusion: humanity is not in the habit of progress. Quite the contrary, it has been murdering itself for hundreds of thousands of years, most likely, and it wasn't until God had enough mercy to send his Son down to educate us, that any sort of progress has been made at all.

95% all of our history is what has been given to us by our Christian forefathers. Had it not been for the miracle of God, we'd still be stabbing each other with pointy sticks, and there is no reason to doubt it.

History shows there is no history before Christ. We are forced to conclude that before Christ, men lived without God and ceaselessly slaughtered one another to the point that no history could ever survive. Therefore, the new Godless world, that has been steadily gaining ground since the "enlightenment," has become increasingly irrational with each new war more destructive than the last, and none of the most destructive wars held for any tangible reason.

It's pretty obvious that humanity is resorting back to it's old, godless ways, and that means death, and lots of it, on mass scale that wipes out civilizations. It will be the Christian elements that survive the storm, as usual, and live to record on how humanity destroyed itself yet again having turned away from God.

You were off concerning the plandemic and I think you are off again. The elites want a prison planet, not a war planet. Their prison planet is heavily reliant on the infrastructure. Conventional war destroys infrastructure. You won't see military offensives in countries which are flooded with 5G etc. We don't have to wait for WW3 because it's already here, it's the plandemic, it's a war against the people, it always has been, only fought with different means and under different slogans.

My original response to the scamdemic was to reserve judgement and be prepared in case it was really bad. The reaction from the Chinese government was truly insane and lent a lot of credence to the idea that the WuFlu was actually dangerous, so a month or two lockdown was not a big tradeoff versus what the potential risks were. That the lockdowns were kept way past the point of usefulness was obviously the tell that it was a scam, and honestly there was no way to predict that outcome except from cynicism.

Back then, I still thought the American people still had some fight left in them, after all we elected Trump, surely people would defend their rights! But boy was I wrong on that one. I was not wrong about the original approach, but I was wrong about not fearing the scamdemic. Turns out my countrymen are weaklings and dupes; I was wrong to give them more credit.

That's why I'm not making that mistake again, I can see that society's pyschopaths have some very big things planned in store for us, and I know no one will stop them, so WW3 is easy to see now. I must also mention that one of the earliest to warn everyone about how bad the scamdemic would get was Zelscorpian aka Simeon Strangelight, and that guy was predicting WW3 as the goal of the elites on this forum for at least 6 years. :lol:

If you believe that the elites created the scamdemic for their end game of total lucifian control, then you pretty much must agree that they are also marching us to WW3 just like Albert Pike and the Reece Commission said they would. War is, after all, the best way to gain control over a society. War allows the trillionaires even more power and control, because once people fear an enemy, you can make them do anything. Hence why in 1984, they are always in a perpetual state of war. War is always the ultimate tool for control. The usual suspects want world domination with a single government ruling over all in a prison state.... war is how you get there.

We have way too many nations, too many governments right now to be easily controlled, by a single government, so war will be needed to remove most of them.
 
Last edited:

MRAll134

Pelican
I have not seen this posted in the last few pages. A "rogue" GOP member has gone missing in Afghanistan, after trying to rescue Americans there:

GOP Congressman Missing In Afghanistan While on ‘Rogue Evacuation Mission’: WaPo
United States Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) has reportedly gone missing while trying to enter Afghanistan amid the Taliban takeover and chaotic U.S. departure.

According to The Washington Post, the Republican Congressman was on a ‘rogue evacuation mission,’ ignoring warnings from the State Department not to travel to the country.

Mullin reportedly contacted the embassy in Tajikistan in an attempt to move cash into Afghanistan.

“Embassy officials told Mullin they could not assist him in skirting Tajikistan’s laws on cash limits on his way to visiting one of the most dangerous places on earth,” the Post reported.

“As of late Tuesday, U.S. officials said they were unsure of Mullin’s location. Mullin’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment,” the report continues.



Source: https://breaking911.com/breaking-go...hile-on-rogue-evacuation-mission-report-dsyd/
 

FrancisK

Pelican
Catholic
Gold Member
I have not seen this posted in the last few pages. A "rogue" GOP member has gone missing in Afghanistan, after trying to rescue Americans there:

GOP Congressman Missing In Afghanistan While on ‘Rogue Evacuation Mission’: WaPo
United States Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) has reportedly gone missing while trying to enter Afghanistan amid the Taliban takeover and chaotic U.S. departure.

According to The Washington Post, the Republican Congressman was on a ‘rogue evacuation mission,’ ignoring warnings from the State Department not to travel to the country.

Mullin reportedly contacted the embassy in Tajikistan in an attempt to move cash into Afghanistan.

“Embassy officials told Mullin they could not assist him in skirting Tajikistan’s laws on cash limits on his way to visiting one of the most dangerous places on earth,” the Post reported.

“As of late Tuesday, U.S. officials said they were unsure of Mullin’s location. Mullin’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment,” the report continues.



Source: https://breaking911.com/breaking-go...hile-on-rogue-evacuation-mission-report-dsyd/



Oof poor guy, good intentions but man that wasn’t very smart….all sides want him dead I hope he’s okay.
 

La Águila Negra

Ostrich
Other Christian
I have not seen this posted in the last few pages. A "rogue" GOP member has gone missing in Afghanistan, after trying to rescue Americans there:

GOP Congressman Missing In Afghanistan While on ‘Rogue Evacuation Mission’: WaPo
United States Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) has reportedly gone missing while trying to enter Afghanistan amid the Taliban takeover and chaotic U.S. departure.

According to The Washington Post, the Republican Congressman was on a ‘rogue evacuation mission,’ ignoring warnings from the State Department not to travel to the country.

Mullin reportedly contacted the embassy in Tajikistan in an attempt to move cash into Afghanistan.

“Embassy officials told Mullin they could not assist him in skirting Tajikistan’s laws on cash limits on his way to visiting one of the most dangerous places on earth,” the Post reported.

“As of late Tuesday, U.S. officials said they were unsure of Mullin’s location. Mullin’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment,” the report continues.



Source: https://breaking911.com/breaking-go...hile-on-rogue-evacuation-mission-report-dsyd/

Quite frankly this is an insane story, not sure if it can be taken at face value

The video below is about an Ukrainian Soviet draftee that deserted in 1983 and has been living in Afghanistan ever since. He found himself an Afghan wife. Up till 500 Soviet soldiers decided to stay in Afghanistan instead of going back home, or were unable to go back home

 
Last edited:

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
I saw a little of MSNBC at the gym today after Biden's speech. For the most part, the network's pundits were pushing the narrative that Biden did a good job with the withdrawal after a few initial missteps. There was one notable exception:


My impression is that the DNC is not quite ready to put Kamala Harris in the Oval Office. I think they're probably afraid it would lead to them getting massacred in the 2022 nationwide elections. So, they're trying to keep Biden going for at least another year or so.
Will of the people matter?. That so 2019.........Brrrrrrrrr
 
Top