Amazing to see George S. be relegated from most evil person in the world to second rate 'bagman' on the basis of one simple article.
This isn't aimed at you personally, but I have to say that it's interesting to see people lose touch with reality. It is hilarious that members are so desperate to be proven right on their earlier assessments that they will say anything to convince themselves and others it must be true. Rather like the mainstream media, there are people who have invested some much time and energy in BS narratives that they have no choice but to keep digging to convince everyone their long held beliefs are true. BlackRock has a China investment strategy. And?
In this thread alone it's been documented how 1. the GAE is waging covert war on China in its periphery (containment) through a wide variety of NGOs, armed groups of insurgents, political subversion and economic blackmailing. 2. The GAE has, and is, inciting rebellion/ insurgency within China's borders, is in the process of deepening ethnical and religious fault lines, has introduced hardline Islam into the country, and supports destructive Western ideologies. 3. The all-but-official support for an illegal pretender state within the country's official borders 4. The existence of a wide variety of official, sometimes classified documents (some dating back as far as 1967) stating how China needs to be contained and/or confronted 5. The current state of affairs in the South China Sea
Yeah I didn't see the bit about Osama visiting the White House but otherwise it all makes sense.
The Mujahedin were a CIA project and I remember back in 1993 a British Council high up telling me that the US had dropped US $1 Million per head of population in weaponry on the NW Frontier of Pakistan - 'arm the populace' strategy.
It was the CIA and the SIS I believe managing the Mujahedin and in the 80s there were Mujahedin living in the fashionable areas of West London and going to and fro between there, journalists and politicians houses and parties and of course to Herat via Pakistan.
I understand Osama was well connected with the CIA so I can imagine him being on US bases overseas at least and meeting high up US officials when he was one of theirs ( a la John McCain and ISIS). Bear in mind that FOIA requests revealed that Mohammed Atta had the Saudi Ambassadors phone on speed dial in the build up to 9/11, Bandar 'Bush" was smoking cigars with the Bushes in the White House immediately after 9/11 and Osamas family was evacuated by the US itself. His family was obviously an important family to the US.
George Soros is in his 90s. Of course he's a figurehead now. Just as Mobutu of the Congo was always a figurehead for about 20-30 generals from Equateur province. But no-one ever told us that in the MSM.
Soros a figurehead now just as George W Bush was always a figurehead.
But in this case in the sense that we have to imagine Dubya Bush when he gets to his 90s - thats now a front man.
I was talking to some Leftie the other day. In their world Soros is no longer a real person to worry about because he no longer pulls the strings. And no-one seems to even know the names of his top 10 lieutenants from watching the media. An Emperor without a country - but the emperor is 92..and no one really knows his sub lieutenants?
But yes, on a wider scale, I am saying that his whole organisation is/was in some ways a front for the Octopus it happens to be one arm of.
The Octopus controls international finance and so I think Soros wasn't quite the genius speculator some made out as opposed to an arm of their operations.
he's still evil. that parts true.
I also think 2 things can be true at the same time.
1-5 all seem to be legit facts.
On 4.. well, the US had plans for a war with the UK back in the 1930s, just in case.
During the Falklands War Ronald Reagans administration played a big role in stitching Argentina up in their attempts to procure more Exocet missiles, . Nonetheless they made plans for an Argentinian win and befriending Argentina, even as they were making the main play that defeated the Argentineans. Did the same people do both sets of plans? No. Compartmentalisation.
1 - 5 are all true. The Pentagon poured all manner of blood sweat and toil into training up and aiding Shia soldiers in their fight against Sunni 'insurgents' whilst the CIA poured all their efforts into said insurgents who later branded as ISIS.
When ISIS over ran Iraq a British General went on the BBC and told us that Qatar Saudi the US etc "played no role in any of this". 'Sure'.
Recently an SADF Executive Outcomes expert said that ISIS over running Iraq was 'the fault of Iran'. Sure.
It was the CIA in Syria vs the Pentagon in Iraq. Compartmentalisation.
At the end of the day, 300 or so localised sectarian conflicts all over the Middle East. The Oded Yinon plan advances.
The way I see it is building a bigger and bigger scope of fact and opinion on here so that people can get a firmer handle on all the details of what Is going on.
The Gay Globalist African American Zionist Empire is doing 1 - 5.
But they are also in with China and doing a lot to enable and help China as it grows in power across the region.
They are doing both.
Including going hell for leather on the Anti-China war drums. But these are not the same people doing this. They do their role (fighting Shias/ fighting Sunnis) as hard as they can and the other people do theirs.
You're right that its Chaotic right now and the China Hawk Lobby is in ascendance. But consider the role of Armand Hammer in financing the Soviets all through the hostilities of the Cold War.
Thanks to the likes of Lindsey Graham and Gina Haspel Afghan will turn into a failed state with all manner of sectarian battles, but I would be surprised if China actually gets attacked that much in the region:
but even if they do get attacked there will be people in with China helping them whilst others in the US do everything they can to blow up Chinese convoys with IEDs.
The Tower of Babel Pincer movement - its what they do.