Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Living
Money
The Bitcoin (BTC) thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JayJuanGee" data-source="post: 1376250" data-attributes="member: 5330"><p>As long as you have the address correct, you do not have to be online to receive the funds.</p><p></p><p>If you are uncomfortable with something that you are doing, like that, then it may well be prudent to send a small amount ($5 or something that you consider to be small) to try it out.</p><p></p><p>You likely realize that best practices tend to NOT reuse addresses, and that is mostly because of mingling of addresses reasons, so sometimes we may need to account for the extent to which we are purposefully reusing addresses, and we feel it is to our benefit to do so.</p><p></p><p>For example, in the tipping hypothetical situation that Caractacus Potts mentioned earlier, maybe he would consider how many of those tips that he would like to have mingled? So perhaps, Caractacus might receive tips that are anywhere between $1 and $100, and he might decide that once the address has a certain value, then he will send it to some other location in which he was comfortable - maybe a mixer, and then send them back to himself - or if he is using Samouri, Wasabi, lightning or some other service or wallet, the proper term might not be mixer, but instead coin joining.. so at some point it becomes a bit more difficult for the transactions of Caractacus to be traced back to Caractacus. </p><p></p><p>We do not need to be suggesting at all that Caractacus has any kind of illegal intention, but instead, every guy should have a right to privacy, so that no one necessarily can link his various transactions - whether Uncle Sam, his neighbor, his girlfriend, his wife, his employer, some random joe down the street, or some thug that just purchased a $5 wrench.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JayJuanGee, post: 1376250, member: 5330"] As long as you have the address correct, you do not have to be online to receive the funds. If you are uncomfortable with something that you are doing, like that, then it may well be prudent to send a small amount ($5 or something that you consider to be small) to try it out. You likely realize that best practices tend to NOT reuse addresses, and that is mostly because of mingling of addresses reasons, so sometimes we may need to account for the extent to which we are purposefully reusing addresses, and we feel it is to our benefit to do so. For example, in the tipping hypothetical situation that Caractacus Potts mentioned earlier, maybe he would consider how many of those tips that he would like to have mingled? So perhaps, Caractacus might receive tips that are anywhere between $1 and $100, and he might decide that once the address has a certain value, then he will send it to some other location in which he was comfortable - maybe a mixer, and then send them back to himself - or if he is using Samouri, Wasabi, lightning or some other service or wallet, the proper term might not be mixer, but instead coin joining.. so at some point it becomes a bit more difficult for the transactions of Caractacus to be traced back to Caractacus. We do not need to be suggesting at all that Caractacus has any kind of illegal intention, but instead, every guy should have a right to privacy, so that no one necessarily can link his various transactions - whether Uncle Sam, his neighbor, his girlfriend, his wife, his employer, some random joe down the street, or some thug that just purchased a $5 wrench. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Living
Money
The Bitcoin (BTC) thread
Top