The Brave New World Has Been Realized

Roosh

Cardinal
Originally posted on RooshV.com

face-masks-group-1024x683.jpg



Twenty-five years after his popular novel Brave New World was published, Aldous Huxley wrote the nonfiction work Brave New World Revisited to directly explain how society can be managed by a select few without force. Unfortunately, his ideas seem to have been used as a blueprint, because what he wrote is more relevant today than when the book was released in 1958.

The elites are obsessed with the agenda of depopulation​

The problem of rapidly increasing numbers in relation to natural resources, to social stability and to the well-being of individuals—this is now the central problem of mankind; and it will remain the central problem certainly for another century, and perhaps for several centuries thereafter.

[…]

Rapidly mounting human numbers are pressing ever more heavily on natural resources. What is to be done? Obviously we must, with all possible speed, reduce the birth rate to the point where it does not exceed the death rate.

[…]

“The Pill” has not yet been invented. When and if it is invented, how can it be distributed to the many hundreds of millions of potential mothers (or, if it is a pill that works upon the male, potential fathers) who will have to take it if the birth rate of the species is to be reduced? And, given existing social customs and the forces of cultural and psychological inertia, how can those who ought to take the pill, but don’t want to, be persuaded to change their minds?”

Concern over the growth of the human population, which often coincides with eugenic notions of controlling who is able to be born, has been the pet cause of elites for decades, because it’s the one agenda that allows them to determine the direct fate of humankind while feeling like a god, something that George Soros himself has admitted. Almost every modern degeneracy you witness, from feminism to gay marriage, has the effect of reducing the population while at the same time condemning souls who participate in them.

If you accept the belief that Satan is the grand orchestrator of all evil on Earth, his goal would include reducing the number of souls that enter heaven through a variety of methods: (1) preventing human beings from being born, (2) sacrificing conceived humans before birth through abortion, and (3) deceiving the living with lies that lead to eternal hellfire. The human elites who rule us under their thumbs, while powerful in the earthly sense, are mere pawns in Satan’s game. Neither their riches nor their power will help them in the slightest when they face God after death.

Increasing concentration of power​

Whenever the economic life of a nation becomes precarious, the central government is forced to assume additional responsibilities for the general welfare. It must work out elaborate plans for dealing with a critical situation; it must impose ever greater restrictions upon the activities of its subjects; and if, as is very likely, worsening economic conditions result in political unrest, or open rebellion, the central government must intervene to preserve public order and its own authority. More and more power is thus concentrated in the hands of the executives and their bureaucratic managers.

[…]

Permanent crisis justified permanent control of everybody and everything by the agencies of the central government.

Coronavirus is a great example. Here is a “crisis” that requires the government to act, and through that action it restricts the freedom of citizens while allowing massive transfers of wealth and power from the middle class to the existing elites, particularly in Silicon Valley. Huxley may have written this book in 1958, but the idea remains exactly the same in our own time. Either gradually or suddenly, we lose our freedoms and become serfs of the elite who control the state with wealth gained through usury, vulture capitalism, and the mandates of scientific tyranny.

Corporations will control all business activity​

In a world of mass production and mass distribution the Little Man, with his inadequate stock of working capital, is at a grave disadvantage. In competition with the Big Man, he loses his money and finally his every existence as an independent producer; the Big Man has gobbled him up. As the Little Men disappear, more and more economic power comes to be wielded by fewer and fewer people. Under a dictatorship the Big Business, made possible by advancing technology and the consequent ruin of Little Business, is controlled by the State—that is to say, by a small group of party leaders and the soldiers, policemen and civil servants who carry out their orders.

Small businesses were possible in the United States, at least until 2020, especially related to food and hospitality, but that has been deemed too threatening to the oligarchs. The serfs must have their freedom, leisure, and choices constrained. Through the pretext of coronavirus, those businesses have been annihilated so that we become utterly dependent on Amazon, Walmart, and junk food chicken sandwiches delivered via apps that monitor you programmatically. Unless you directly serve the elites by working at one of their corporations (remember that transgender acceptance training is coming up this Friday) or you go the blue-collar route and become a tradesman, it will become increasingly difficult to earn your daily bread in an entrepreneurial fashion.

jeff-bezos-rich.jpg


The Power Elite​

This Power Elite directly employs several millions of the country’s working force in its factories, offices and stores, controls many millions more by lending them the money to buy its products, and, through its ownership of the media of mass communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of virtually everybody.

Huxley talks through both sides of his mouth. On one hand he is warning us about the freedoms we are on the verge of losing while on the other he was providing the oligarchs with material and intellectual aid in secret meetings to help them exert their plans over humanity. He ran a good hustle by profiting from both the elites directly and through the serfs (via book sales) while pretending to enlighten the masses.

Modern society is sick​

Dr. Erich Fromm: “Our contemporary Western society, in spite of its material, intellectual and political progress, is increasingly less conducive to mental health, and tends to undermine the inner security, happiness, reason and the capacity for love in the individual; it tends to turn him into an automaton who pays for his human failure with increasing mental sickness, and with despair hidden under a frantic drive for work and so-called pleasure.”

We are in a scientific dictatorship​

In the more efficient dictatorships of tomorrow there will probably be much less violence than under Hitler and Stalin. The future dictator’s subjects will be painlessly regimented by a corps of highly trained social engineers.

[…]

The survival of democracy depends on the ability of large numbers of people to make realistic choices in the light of adequate information. A dictatorship, on the other hand, maintains itself by censoring or distorting the facts, and by appealing, not to reason, not to enlightened self-interest, but to passion and prejudice, to the powerful “hidden forces,” as Hitler called them, present in the unconscious depths of every human mind.

[…]

Under the relentless thrust of accelerating over-population and increasing over-organization, and by means of ever more effective methods of mind-manipulation, the democracies will change their nature; the quaint old forms—election, parliaments, Supreme Courts and all the rest—will remain. The underlying substance will be a new kind of non-violent totalitarianism. All the traditional names, all the hallowed slogans will remain exactly what they were in the good old days. Democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial—but democracy and freedom in a strictly Pickwickian sense. Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thoughts-manufacturers and mind-manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit.

Seventy years ago, Huxley explained our modern-day governance better than I could. Either he is the greatest prophet that modern man has seen or he was simply attending the meetings that planned out the future. We are essentially living in a material reality that was planned by men who have been in the grave for decades.

The deception behind marketing​

“We no longer buy oranges, we buy vitality. We do not buy just an auto, we buy prestige.” And so with all the rest. In toothpaste, for example, we buy, not a mere cleanser and antiseptic, but release from the fear of being sexually repulsive. In vodka and whisky we are not buying a protoplasmic poison which in small doses, may depress the nervous system in a psychologically valuable way; we are buying friendliness and good fellowship, the warmth of Dingley Dell and the brilliance of the Mermaid Tavern.

Don’t listen to modern music​

For the commercial propagandist, as for his colleagues in the fields of politics and religion, music possesses yet another advantage. Nonsense which would be shameful for a reasonable being to write, speak or hear spoken can be sung or listened to by that same rational being with pleasure and even with a kind of intellectual conviction. Can we learn to separate the pleasure of singing or of listening to song from the all too human tendency to believe in the propaganda which the song is putting over?

The trick they’ve mastered is to engineer “music” that releases dopamine while slapping the most degenerate lyrics imaginable atop it. Understand that only a few musicians gain access to the top producers who create the catchiest melodies and rhythms that can become hits. The owners of the music industry then task a music writer to jam pack as much sex and immorality into an individual song, and then the actor known as the singer will “sing” the song with the aid of advanced computer technology. While there is a profit motive to music, its main goal is to serve the agenda of the elites. Once you consent to listen to a song that is instantly pleasing on your ear in a way that an Orthodox hymn may not, you are now susceptible to abiding by the lyrics, or at least not objecting to the behavior featured. Even music from the 70s and 80s contain messages that created all manner of false idols, most usually the notion of eternal romantic love.

Public schools abuse children through repetitive programming​

“Think,” writes Mr. Clyde Miller ecstatically, “think of what it can mean to your firm in profits if you can condition a million or ten million children, who will grow up into adults trained to buy your product, as soldiers are trained in advance when they hear the trigger words, Forward march!” Yes, just think of it! And at the same time remember that the dictators and the would-be dictators have been thinking about this sort of thing for years, and that millions, tens of million, hundreds of millions of children are in the process of growing up to buy the local despot’s ideological product and, like well-trained soldiers, to respond with appropriate behavior to the trigger words implanted in those young minds by the despot’s propagandists.

students-masks-1024x683.jpg

Using extreme stress (i.e. torture) to change behavior​

[Pavlov learns that] on their way to the point of final breakdown, dogs become more than normally suggestible. New behavior patterns can easily be installed while the dog is at or near the limit of its cerebral endurance, and these new behavior patterns seem to be ineradicable. The animal in which they have been implanted cannot be deconditioned; that which it has learned under stress will remain an integral part of its make-up.

[…]

…it has been found that the deliberate induction of fear, rage or anxiety markedly heightens the dog’s suggestibility. If these emotion are kept at a high pitch of intensity for a long enough time, the brain goes “on strike.” When this happens, new behavior patterns may be installed with the greatest of ease.

[…]

If the indoctrination is given in the right way at the proper stage of nervous exhaustion, it will work. Under favorable conditions, practically everybody can be converted to practically anything.

Historically, war has been used by regimes to make wholesale changes to human behavior, but what if humans have become so weak that they can’t even endure a war? Then a fake pandemic will suffice. Businesses are closed down to simulate a military invasion, random lockdowns simulate an unexpected bombing, and the covering of the face simulates a poison gas attack. The human is just as frightened as in a real war, if not more since they have been conditioned to fear an enemy they can’t see or perceive.

Realize that even if the fake pandemic ends today, many people will continue to wear a face mask for the rest of their lives while fearing public spaces. The longer the crisis continues, the more lasting that behavior change will be.

Slaves who think they are free​

It is perfectly possible for a man to be out of prison, and yet not free—to be under no physical constraint and yet to be a psychological captive, compelled to think, feel and act as the representatives of the national State, or of some private interest within the nation, want him to think, feel and act.

[…]

Any bird that has learned how to grub up a good living without being compelled to use its wings will soon renounce the privilege of flight and remain forever grounded. Something analogous is true of human beings. If the bread is supplied regularly and copiously three times a day, many of them will be perfectly content to live by bread alone—or at least by bread and circuses alone.

[…]

Nothing, except the absence of freedom; for when things go badly, and the rations are reduced, the grounded dodos will clamor again for their wings—only to renounce them, yet once more, when times grow better and the dodo-farmers become more lenient and generous.

You may be wondering: how can humans be so dumb? How can they not see that the choices they make are enslaving them? The answer is that they choose this way of life. They have willingly, voluntarily, and methodically chosen comfort and security above serving God, Who demands that we turn away from this world and all that it provides us to prepare for the next life. Therefore, it’s not a matter of intelligence that so many people are enslaved by the elites, but that the deadness of their spirit demands it, for if you do not have God, all you have left are pornography and Netflix, which the elites promise you as long as you obey them. Those who choose for Lord Jesus Christ can at least recognize the truth of their material reality, but otherwise it is a hopeless matter to help those who want to remain in a state of deception.

Did you say… adrenochrome?​

Within the body, hitherto unknown chemical substances such as adrenochrome and serotonin (of which Dr. Page was a co-discoverer) have been isolated and their far-reaching effects on our mental and physical functions are now being investigated.

Rumor has it that adrenochrome, which is released into the bloodstream by a frightened human, is a powerful stimulant and aphrodisiac used by the elites during rituals involving the abuse of children.

The end of history​

Under a scientific dictator education will really work—with the result that most men and women will grow up to live their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.

The answer is reaction, not revolution, but first we have to ask what Christ demands of us. Does he want us to take up arms to “fix” the world from the evil-doers, or does he want us to keep our eyes and heart on Him to endure a spiritual struggle for greater rewards in Heaven?

It was disturbing to read this book because Huxley might as well have been commenting on the year 2021, not 1958. Apparently, we are mere participants in a script that he and others have long ago written, and while our free will is preserved, it’s easy to see how seductive this scientific script is for most of humanity who only care about what appears in front of their noses. As Christians, our duty is to persevere through the growing evil of this age, and let others cast their lot as they see fit.

Learn More: Brave New World Revisited on Amazon
Permalink
 

Sitting Bull

Woodpecker
Huxley talks through both sides of his mouth. On one hand he is warning us about the freedoms we are on the verge of losing while on the other he was providing the oligarchs with material and intellectual aid in secret meetings to help them exert their plans over humanity. He ran a good hustle by profiting from both the elites directly and through the serfs (via book sales) while pretending to enlighten the masses.

I've heard many people claim that but I've never seen any proof, so I remain skeptical so far
 

Johnnyvee

Pelican
I think that all dictatorships will be overthrown eventually, (although it might take a long time for it to happen) simply due to the genetic variation that you find in humans. There will always be those with less servile genetics, and they will rebel in the end. (and have done so throughout history) The only way that you could alter that dynamic would be to eradicate that genetic phenotype.

This is not very likely, as that would require a bottleneck type event, (genetic drift becomes stronger) where humanity is reduced to a very small number of individuals, and only those that are passive would survive. That means that even the elites would have to die off really. But even passive organisms can pass on more dominant genes, so you would have to maintain the passive individuals advantage for long enough for those genetics to completely disappear from the gene pool.

Strong and righteous men will prevail in the end, but it might be decades/centuries before that happens. So if you have any ideas as to how to speed up that process, please feel free to share.
 

homersheineken

Kingfisher
I've always held an affinity to Brave New World and see more and more people (including close friends) become addicted to the Soma. Absolutely agree with the premise and the populace's chosen prison.

Though, it's somewhat comical that the prose rejects and criticizes spiritually devoid Big Corporations, yet recommends and links to the Biggest and Richest of them all - Amazon.
 
Most people never reflect deep enough to really understand why they are so miserable. The distractions to make them immediately feel better such as drugs, alcohol, TV and music are so readily available. So it’s a cycle of suffering, dopamine, suffering, dopamine. It’s not until some hit rock bottom and discover the truth in God do they finally change. The problem is that it is becoming more and more challenging to hit this point. Most are fed lies that the world/government/products have an answer for their unhappiness.

Without knowing God, we are all easily manipulated as there is no way to identify with a suffering servant, the Savior of the world.

The government will feed on these empty souls with the promise of a utopia now, as it continues to maintain more control with progressive destruction until it is too late.

What is defined as “too late”? I believe it’s coming soon.

Keep it up Roosh. Your articles create a lot of thought and discussion. And its effect is that those reading this continue to wake up others.
 

Ah_Tibor

Robin
Woman
I've always held an affinity to Brave New World and see more and more people (including close friends) become addicted to the Soma. Absolutely agree with the premise and the populace's chosen prison.

Though, it's somewhat comical that the prose rejects and criticizes spiritually devoid Big Corporations, yet recommends and links to the Biggest and Richest of them all - Amazon.

Brave New World was written after Huxley's (first, he later moved to work in Hollywood and I believe he lived/died in New Mexico, too lazy to look up) visit to the US. Soma was an analogue for pot, which he didn't like not because he didn't approve of drugs but because he thought it made people silly (pot bad, LSD and peyote good, the man was injected with LSD on his deathbed). Also "feelies" were a spoof of the newly released sound movies ("talkies"), sex-hormone chewing gum, etc.

It was a parody of HG Wells style, or books like "Looking Backward" (which I picked up at a thrift store last year). Huxley's later work "Island" has similar themes, but is a "good" planned society.
 

Sky

Chicken
If you accept the belief that Satan is the grand orchestrator of all evil on Earth, his goal would include reducing the number of souls that enter heaven through a variety of methods
I slightly don't agree with this initial premise if only because it's a common trope thrown around and without an explanation is ultimately deceptive. That is that satan as the 'grand orchestrator' on Earth is a common misconception if not clarified. By saying this you're implying God is not the one in charge. Maybe you're aware of this, it's a common misconception which needs clarification if only because it can cause over exaggeration within the rest of what you write. In other words it can become an aggressively overly exaggerated claim about the entire state of mankind, when in reality the state of mankind is mostly hidden from us.

If you're simply saying "he's orchestrating all evil" (which is what you said) that's a bit different, but you give point after point about how ultimately the world is broken in some way shape or form. Point is God is in charge and if not careful with that line of reasoning we can deprive Him of His power(s) if you're putting the devil on the pedestal. The reason I mention is because this forum, from the looks of it, has a tendency to go all in on the nihilistic attitudes of society without providing any actual solutions. By hammering the nail down repeatedly that 'satan is the grand orchestrator' it can have the opposite effect of maybe your initial intention, which is to preach the word of God right? A friendly suggestion would be for every evil you witness or write about, I'd make it a habit to write something positive or provide a solution which is biblical or is an attempt to repair.

I for one started reading this book, and once I got to the part about nude children I realized it was trash and stopped reading.

"Outside in a picturesque garden, hundreds of naked boys and girls play. The group watches some children playing a complicated game called Centrifugal Bumble-Puppy. With wonder, the Director recalls that, in Ford’s day, games were played with minimal equipment, like balls and sticks, and didn’t increase consumption" - Brave New World

Anyone wasting their time writing about children in this way is misguided. I personally don't believe we need to know the "script" of the "elites" or of anyone actually. The book isn't worth reading in my opinion not because it's a "script" but because it's just not very interesting or well written.

Since the fall, satan became the prince of demons (Matt. 12:24), ruler of the darkness (Eph. 6:12), and the “god of this world” (2 Cor. 4:4). The devil is absolutely opposed to good, which is why John the Evangelist describes him as such:

You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies (John 8:44).

If there's a lesson to be learned here it's do not speak according to your own nature and will but according to the will of God.

The Bible is clear that the devil is utterly opposed to God. This is important, because we identify God’s essence as perfect good (Summa Theologiae part I, question 6) and perfect love (part I, question 20; 1 John 14:16). Theologically, God’s essence (his nature) is his existence (I, 2; 3). If satan is opposed to good, then he is opposed to God’s existence. Therefore satan is entirely opposed to the good of redemption, of salvation.

The LORD said to Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world.” We may ask, then, whose kingdom is? The Savior also calls the evil one the “prince of this world.” Now, of course, God is the ultimate Master and Lord of all things whatsoever; “of things on the earth, in heaven, and under the earth,”. So how can the LORD Jesus call the devil “the prince of this world?”

The traditional theology of the Church, of both the Old and New Testament, has always understood that before their fall the angels were given various roles in the governing of the universe. The knowledge and power necessary for them to fulfill their offices in creation under God are a constituent part of their natures from the instant of their creation. It would appear that the devil or Satan is the angel to whom was given the care of human kingdoms and societies.

This means that the devil especially resents the good who perform their roles in human society - the family, government, business, education - without being his followers. After all, all these things would be his. So the very fact that there are good people in the world who follow the Savior rather than satan is to him a revolt, a punishable offense and an act of war. The appearance of Christ’s Church on the scene of the kingdoms of this world is actually the incursion of his enemy into his own territory and requires a violent response. This is why there has been and always will be spiritual war between the followers of Christ the King and the followers of the prince of this world.

And this title 'prince of this world' identifies not him as literally leader of creation, but simply as leader of fallen humans. This is the main clarification here. Because he does not 'rule everything' which again, is a common misunderstanding and trope. He rules evil humans, not the world. Simply because a person has a lot of money, it does not logically follow that they are also evil. There's many Saints who were rich and even kings and queens who were Saints, so this identification with wealth as equal to evil is a again, another common misunderstanding. If you believe money itself makes you evil then there's flaws in your overall thinking which need reconciled and examined. As far as the 'global elites', it's impossible to tell the state of their souls.

I don't disagree with the overall premise here, but I do find it misleading, ultimately because it shows a large amount of assumption on the individuals part to presume the state of others souls. We cannot judge someone based on the presumed state of their soul, this is an error. We know them based on their actions. Again, simply having a lot of money does not necessarily make someone evil. This can cloud your overall perception of world events if you think merely gathering wealth is an evil. Wealth does clearly allow for large amounts of influence, but having influence isn't evil either in and of itself.

As the LORD has told us, it is by His being lifted up on the cross in His Holy Passion that “the prince of this world is cast out.” The definitive battle has been fought already on Calvary, while the rest of history is a cleanup operation as the devil tries to desperately hold on to some power over human souls and bodies.

So it's not as though there's some battle to already be won or lost (except on a personal level), the battle is already over, Christ won. On a personal level you can still lose your soul of course, but on an Eschatological level there's nothing satan can do in the overall unfolding of time.

Small businesses were possible in the United States, at least until 2020
Again by and large I don't disagree with your overall analysis here, but you present these massive claims and don't provide any real solutions. I realize it's just a textual review of the book, but this notion of fatalism and alarmist behavior is seen throughout this forum. By knowing the 'script' of the elites what we really accomplished other bringing it up and adding fuel to the fire? Was Christ saying,"Look how Caesar is manipulating you. Why would you use Caesars currency? Go make your own currency." He never said this, in fact He said the exact opposite.

17 Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.” And they marveled at him. - Mark 12:17

All things are God's not Caesar's. Again I don't' necessarily completely disagree, yet there is an alarmist bent to this forum which I believe needs tempered with practical solutions rather than more end of the world hypothesiing.

The answer is reaction, not revolution, but first we have to ask what Christ demands of us. Does he want us to take up arms to “fix” the world from the evil-doers, or does he want us to keep our eyes and heart on Him to endure a spiritual struggle for greater rewards in Heaven?

Why not both? Regardless as already mentioned, the main battle is already over, Christ won. This doesn't mean don't do anything, it means if there's actual problems then apply actual solutions and focus on what you can change. Presuming you can alter world events or understand individuals you've never met, whom we you not know is an illusion. Let the 'elites' try to forecast events, they are the ones desperately trying to alter the world. Christians don't need to do this because they already know the outcome.
 
Last edited:

M'bare

Woodpecker
Gold Member
I've heard many people claim that but I've never seen any proof, so I remain skeptical so far

I haven't come across anything of certainty either. The only thing I have come across is that his parents were fairly prominent people in England, prominent enough anyways to be in social circles were these things were discussed. A lot of Huxleys ideas likely came from their thought experiments/think tanks and talks on how they would like to socially engineer society.

It would also appear from his letter to George Orwell, that he was well read and learned in areas of psychology, and was very good at analyzing how these might be used down the tunnel of time.

21 October, 1949

Dear Mr. Orwell,

It was very kind of you to tell your publishers to send me a copy of your book. It arrived as I was in the midst of a piece of work that required much reading and consulting of references; and since poor sight makes it necessary for me to ration my reading, I had to wait a long time before being able to embark on Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Agreeing with all that the critics have written of it, I need not tell you, yet once more, how fine and how profoundly important the book is. May I speak instead of the thing with which the book deals — the ultimate revolution? The first hints of a philosophy of the ultimate revolution — the revolution which lies beyond politics and economics, and which aims at total subversion of the individual’s psychology and physiology — are to be found in the Marquis de Sade, who regarded himself as the continuator, the consummator, of Robespierre and Babeuf.

The philosophy of the ruling minority in Nineteen Eighty-Four is a sadism which has been carried to its logical conclusion by going beyond sex and denying it. Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful. My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World.

I have had occasion recently to look into the history of animal magnetism and hypnotism, and have been greatly struck by the way in which, for a hundred and fifty years, the world has refused to take serious cognizance of the discoveries of Mesmer, Braid, Esdaile, and the rest.

Partly because of the prevailing materialism and partly because of prevailing respectability, nineteenth-century philosophers and men of science were not willing to investigate the odder facts of psychology for practical men, such as politicians, soldiers and policemen, to apply in the field of government. Thanks to the voluntary ignorance of our fathers, the advent of the ultimate revolution was delayed for five or six generations. Another lucky accident was Freud’s inability to hypnotize successfully and his consequent disparagement of hypnotism. This delayed the general application of hypnotism to psychiatry for at least forty years. But now psycho-analysis is being combined with hypnosis; and hypnosis has been made easy and indefinitely extensible through the use of barbiturates, which induce a hypnoid and suggestible state in even the most recalcitrant subjects.

Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.

In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World. The change will be brought about as a result of a felt need for increased efficiency.

Meanwhile, of course, there may be a large scale biological and atomic war — in which case we shall have nightmares of other and scarcely imaginable kinds.

Thank you once again for the book.

Yours sincerely,

Aldous Huxley

The last bit is in my mind the most telling.

It seems a lot of people who were young, or still had in their minds eye and memory, not being far in the timeline away from the world wars, wrote quite a bit about pandemics, the incredible growth of humans over the past 150 years and the insane levels of using up resources.

A George Stewart book named Earth Abides addresses this very subject and was written in 1949. He even drops little anecdotes throughout it regarding other species getting too populated, which always leads to disaster. His depiction is of natural origin, but I think in reality our situation is contrived. The printing of money, debt upon debt...etc. Of course this led to no regulation of peoples behavior. A sense that money and resources were endless, and a loss of perspective of what money represents (a store of value). I think the elites knew this. But they needed it to achieve their personal "god" pursuits on earth.

Another book called The Captive Mind by Milosz, written in 1951 discusses the thinking of the Left/totalitarian mind as well on this matter of population and disease. I think it's one of the most sophisticated books I've read on the mentality of the Left I've ever read.

Here's an excerpt:
As for the drastic methods employed -- after all, in the end everyone must die. Let us assume that a large percentage of the population was killed off by a plague, instead of by disciplinary expeditions. From the moment we acknowledge historical necessity to be something in the nature of a plague, we shall stop shedding tears over the fate of its victims. A plague or an earthquake do not usually provoke indignation. One admits they catastrophes, folds the morning paper, and continues eating breakfast. One can revolt only against someone. Here, there is no one. The people who have brought the plague are convinced they are merely fulfilling their historical duty.
 
Christians must continue to refuse the vaccine while doing whatever God's will is for them presently. The godless are really scared, we are not, but we pray for them to be enlightened, especially the church, which hardly exists anymore.
 

ben3529502

Chicken
I believe this world does need de-population, but not in the way many might want. First off, the African continent needs to be de-populated to a fraction of what it is now. There are too many African countries that are nothing but vast empty wastelands of desert, savanna, jungle and/or mountains with very little fresh water and geographic conditions not suitable for growing food. All of this foreign aid to these dozens of countries does nothing but fuel high birth rates and conflict within each other and has seldom improved. Most African countries NEVER had a population so large, and we can see why the things are in those places.

Second, the Middle East, South Asia and some countries in S.E Asia also need significant de-population due to similar reasons. I mean look at the bloody Philippines, nothing more than a bunch of small islands located in one of the most hazardous places for natural disasters, yet the population is ~106,651,394. The First World (mainly white countries) are in need of rejuvenating there native populations and not by importing non-whites who seek to replace them.

De-population needs to happen places like the African continent and parts along with Latin America.
 
I believe this world does need de-population, but not in the way many might want. First off, the African continent needs to be de-populated to a fraction of what it is now. There are too many African countries that are nothing but vast empty wastelands of desert, savanna, jungle and/or mountains with very little fresh water and geographic conditions not suitable for growing food. All of this foreign aid to these dozens of countries does nothing but fuel high birth rates and conflict within each other and has seldom improved. Most African countries NEVER had a population so large, and we can see why the things are in those places.

Second, the Middle East, South Asia and some countries in S.E Asia also need significant de-population due to similar reasons. I mean look at the bloody Philippines, nothing more than a bunch of small islands located in one of the most hazardous places for natural disasters, yet the population is ~106,651,394. The First World (mainly white countries) are in need of rejuvenating there native populations and not by importing non-whites who seek to replace them.

De-population needs to happen places like the African continent and parts along with Latin America.
Bill, is that you?
 
I believe this world does need de-population, but not in the way many might want. First off, the African continent needs to be de-populated to a fraction of what it is now. There are too many African countries that are nothing but vast empty wastelands of desert, savanna, jungle and/or mountains with very little fresh water and geographic conditions not suitable for growing food. All of this foreign aid to these dozens of countries does nothing but fuel high birth rates and conflict within each other and has seldom improved. Most African countries NEVER had a population so large, and we can see why the things are in those places.

Second, the Middle East, South Asia and some countries in S.E Asia also need significant de-population due to similar reasons. I mean look at the bloody Philippines, nothing more than a bunch of small islands located in one of the most hazardous places for natural disasters, yet the population is ~106,651,394. The First World (mainly white countries) are in need of rejuvenating there native populations and not by importing non-whites who seek to replace them.

De-population needs to happen places like the African continent and parts along with Latin America.
If I start pushing the narrative that ben352something's computer room is overpopulated, will I after a couple of years of relentless propaganda be morally mandated to 'phase you and your family out', sweep in meself, take over your house and your resources, and then call it a victory for humanity?


Screenshot_20210406_124453.jpg

Strange things are happening on this forum lately
 
Last edited:

Rick3

Chicken
I think that all dictatorships will be overthrown eventually, (although it might take a long time for it to happen) simply due to the genetic variation that you find in humans. There will always be those with less servile genetics, and they will rebel in the end. (and have done so throughout history) The only way that you could alter that dynamic would be to eradicate that genetic phenotype.

This is not very likely, as that would require a bottleneck type event, (genetic drift becomes stronger) where humanity is reduced to a very small number of individuals, and only those that are passive would survive. That means that even the elites would have to die off really. But even passive organisms can pass on more dominant genes, so you would have to maintain the passive individuals advantage for long enough for those genetics to completely disappear from the gene pool.

Strong and righteous men will prevail in the end, but it might be decades/centuries before that happens. So if you have any ideas as to how to speed up that process, please feel free to share.
 

Rick3

Chicken
Johnny, please have a look at you tube. Sam Vaknin. "warning young folks. Silence when we are gone." I think he gives hope but bear in mind that he is a narcissistic psychopath.
I haven't come across anything of certainty either. The only thing I have come across is that his parents were fairly prominent people in England, prominent enough anyways to be in social circles were these things were discussed. A lot of Huxleys ideas likely came from their thought experiments/think tanks and talks on how they would like to socially engineer society.

It would also appear from his letter to George Orwell, that he was well read and learned in areas of psychology, and was very good at analyzing how these might be used down the tunnel of time.













The last bit is in my mind the most telling.

It seems a lot of people who were young, or still had in their minds eye and memory, not being far in the timeline away from the world wars, wrote quite a bit about pandemics, the incredible growth of humans over the past 150 years and the insane levels of using up resources.

A George Stewart book named Earth Abides addresses this very subject and was written in 1949. He even drops little anecdotes throughout it regarding other species getting too populated, which always leads to disaster. His depiction is of natural origin, but I think in reality our situation is contrived. The printing of money, debt upon debt...etc. Of course this led to no regulation of peoples behavior. A sense that money and resources were endless, and a loss of perspective of what money represents (a store of value). I think the elites knew this. But they needed it to achieve their personal "god" pursuits on earth.

Another book called The Captive Mind by Milosz, written in 1951 discusses the thinking of the Left/totalitarian mind as well on this matter of population and disease. I think it's one of the most sophisticated books I've read on the mentality of the Left I've ever read.

Here's an excerpt:
OH, wow. Totally fascinating. Do have a look at Ben Davidson over at Suspicious 0bservers on you tube. Also Mathew Ehret at Canadian Patriot Review.
 

messaggera

Woodpecker
Woman
Modern society is sick Dr. Erich Fromm: “Our contemporary Western society, in spite of its material, intellectual and political progress, is increasingly less conducive to mental health, and tends to undermine the inner security, happiness, reason and the capacity for love in the individual; it tends to turn him into an automaton who pays for his human failure with increasing mental sickness, and with despair hidden under a frantic drive for work and so-called pleasure.”

Dr. Erich Fromm is an interesting character and his written work, The Art of Loving, was featured in series published by the World Perspectives (1956), edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen. I have a first edition hard copy - it was something read more than a decade ago; but the content is eerily similar to discussing this new age of technology manipulating society's morals, as Roosh as pointed out on more than one occasion.

There are several other series published by World Perspectives worth reading. One of the series objectives was to bring man back to his relationship with his Creator - in turn correcting society's moral crisis.

attitudes of society without providing any actual solutions.

The World Perspectives purpose was to publish information to identify and to solve society's moral issues. As Ruth Nanda Anshen wrote, during her time too (1956) the solution to society's moral crisis is the need for a Moral Revolution.

Historically, war has been used by regimes to make wholesale changes to human behavior, but what if humans have become so weak that they can’t even endure a war? Then a fake pandemic will suffice. Businesses are closed down to simulate a military invasion, random lockdowns simulate an unexpected bombing, and the covering of the face simulates a poison gas attack. The human is just as frightened as in a real war, if not more since they have been conditioned to fear an enemy they can’t see or perceive.

Now is the time to spread hope through spreading God's message. Individuals are in despair due to those who are 1) breaking down the human spirit, 2) providing no hope purposefully 3) creating fear for the use of control.

Individuals need to hear the Word of God (Jesus Christ is our Saviour- He is our hope ) now more than ever to counter the [forcible indoctrination inducing individuals to give up basic political, social, or religious beliefs and attitudes and to accept contrasting regimented ideas]. If we look to scripture the words reaffirm this idea, Romans 8:28:

And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

As Christians we need to be strong with fulfilling one of our purposes as God's sowers. Matthew 13: 1 -23.

They have willingly, voluntarily, and methodically chosen comfort and security above serving God, Who demands that we turn away from this world and all that it provides us to prepare for the next life. Therefore, it’s not a matter of intelligence that so many people are enslaved by the elites, but that the deadness of their spirit demands it, for if you do not have God, all you have left are pornography and Netflix, which the elites promise you as long as you obey them.

Problem is we look to our spiritual leaders, and in the United States our leaders are not taking a stand against mandates that are prohibiting fellowship to worship as God intended. Instead we have technology artificiality bringing us together without us experiencing our senses that God created as part of being human, God's children. Or enforcing face masks, which are a form of disrespect to God's creation.

The solution, A Moral Revolution, is easy to identify; but it is the implementing the objectives that require Christians to seek out an impactful [channel or system of communication]. As Christians our words and behaviours on how we choose to live our lives are only a start to a Moral Revolution.

How do we spread God's Word? Social media platforms censor content. Print is an option, but what about radio?

Daniel Knauf's, Carnivale.
 
I believe this world does need de-population, but not in the way many might want. First off, the African continent needs to be de-populated to a fraction of what it is now. There are too many African countries that are nothing but vast empty wastelands of desert, savanna, jungle and/or mountains with very little fresh water and geographic conditions not suitable for growing food. All of this foreign aid to these dozens of countries does nothing but fuel high birth rates and conflict within each other and has seldom improved. Most African countries NEVER had a population so large, and we can see why the things are in those places.

Second, the Middle East, South Asia and some countries in S.E Asia also need significant de-population due to similar reasons. I mean look at the bloody Philippines, nothing more than a bunch of small islands located in one of the most hazardous places for natural disasters, yet the population is ~106,651,394. The First World (mainly white countries) are in need of rejuvenating there native populations and not by importing non-whites who seek to replace them.

De-population needs to happen places like the African continent and parts along with Latin America.
Who are you to determine this?
 

Vigilant

Woodpecker
Woman
Dr. Erich Fromm is an interesting character and his written work, The Art of Loving, was featured in series published by the World Perspectives (1956), edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen. I have a first edition hard copy - it was something read more than a decade ago; but the content is eerily similar to discussing this new age of technology manipulating society's morals, as Roosh as pointed out on more than one occasion.

There are several other series published by World Perspectives worth reading. One of the series objectives was to bring man back to his relationship with his Creator - in turn correcting society's moral crisis.



The World Perspectives purpose was to publish information to identify and to solve society's moral issues. As Ruth Nanda Anshen wrote, during her time too (1956) the solution to society's moral crisis is the need for a Moral Revolution.



Now is the time to spread hope through spreading God's message. Individuals are in despair due to those who are 1) breaking down the human spirit, 2) providing no hope purposefully 3) creating fear for the use of control.

Individuals need to hear the Word of God (Jesus Christ is our Saviour- He is our hope ) now more than ever to counter the [forcible indoctrination inducing individuals to give up basic political, social, or religious beliefs and attitudes and to accept contrasting regimented ideas]. If we look to scripture the words reaffirm this idea, Romans 8:28:



As Christians we need to be strong with fulfilling one of our purposes as God's sowers. Matthew 13: 1 -23.



Problem is we look to our spiritual leaders, and in the United States our leaders are not taking a stand against mandates that are prohibiting fellowship to worship as God intended. Instead we have technology artificiality bringing us together without us experiencing our senses that God created as part of being human, God's children. Or enforcing face masks, which are a form of disrespect to God's creation.

The solution, A Moral Revolution, is easy to identify; but it is the implementing the objectives that require Christians to seek out an impactful [channel or system of communication]. As Christians our words and behaviours on how we choose to live our lives are only a start to a Moral Revolution.

How do we spread God's Word? Social media platforms censor content. Print is an option, but what about radio?

Daniel Knauf's, Carnivale.
"Our Lord does not compliment us by calling us sheep.
Sheep are foolish and stupid animals, blind followers and devoid of the ability to keep themselves clean.
Our Lord’s parable tells us what we are and also that there is protection if we follow Him faithfully.
Jesus Christ alone defines the church, not man, and all man-made definitions of the church are an implicit warfare against Him."
 
Top