Baldwin81 said:
John Michael Kane said:
Baldwin81 said:
Their names are Brittany and Nicole... anyone in the US who fucks girls and speaks English should know better.
That is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read on this forum. Many American girls are slutty. Millions of American girls have a very common name in the United States. Now all girls that have a common game are sluts? What profoundly poor logic.
1. This is the halo effect at work.
2. You've made white knight posts defending their honor.
3. You did recon on their family background.
4. You determined :tard: NAWALT.
5. You're possibly
planning a party in hopes that they show up...
Sir, in spite of the above, please accept my best MikePenceAnimeTrad-wishes in securing the everlasting love and commitment of a
traditional American girl named "Brittany" with multiple, public, social media accounts and thousands of followers.
To respond to your post:
1. Halo effect? Are you saying that I'm defending them because I find them attractive? I dropped a gorgeous model that I had as a girlfriend because she was always acting flaky and was entitled. When I dumped her for bad female behavior, was that the halo effect? You should see some of my other posts on this forum. I'm always preaching for guy's to dump women that don't live up to expectations. Bad women are emotional and financial vampires. Good women can act a boost to a man's life. We must draw the distinction between women worth investing in, and those that aren't. This whole idea that all women are awful secret sluts/feminists/etc. is deeply wrong. I advocate for men to look for tells as to whether or not a woman is good news or bad news. You have to be willing on some level to trust, but also verify if you're ever going to be in a successful LTR. Game isn't just a tool for gaming short-term women into bed. It is an essential skill to learn how to filter for good women if you're looking to have an LTR or family some day.
2. You need to look up what it means to be a White Knight. A White Knight is a man that defends a woman's bad behavior and makes excuses for it. I haven't seen anything that these two have done that I find highly objectionable. I'm talking about behaviors the average American woman indulges in. (Slutty outfits, duck faces on their social media, talking crap about how feminism is great, how Clinton should be President because #Imwithher, tattoos, etc.) In fact, I'd argue that their behavior, from what we know of it, is far better than your average American girl. I've already listed all the reasons why in my previous posts, none of which you bothered directly address. My argument was based upon facts, your's was based upon conjecture about girl's with a common name, something utterly preposterous on its face. Either you address my points I've made in many previous posts, or you go back to the tenuous point about girls named Brittany and Nicole.
3. Gmac, a member who I trust, and has provided lots of great contributions to this forum, not to mention the Deploraball, has said his gut says they check out. Do we have reason to believe that Gmac is a White Knight too? Is Gmac trying to lie to us? A friend of mine that I've known for two decades is friends with Pettibones. This friend has been married to a wonderful, feminine woman that is strongly anti-feminist. My friend constantly is attacking feminists and cucks on facebook, and giving them shit. This man is a take-no-shit masculine man, and is married to a feminine woman, who has already given him several children. When a man like that who has excellent red pill insights as to women (and has proven to pick a good one) says that the Pettibones check out, then I'm going to take his word for it. I asked him about them, and he's known their family for a long time. They are family oriented people (ten kids total!), not some crypto-feminists as has been suggested. None of their published work suggests that they are anti-men, anti-family or the like.
4. All women are sexual, unless they have some type of medical condition that makes them asexual. Women's sexuality resides upon a spectrum of restricted versus unrestricted. On the far end of restricted, you have the religious virgin until marriage. On the far end of unrestricted you have porn stars with triple digit cock counts. AWALT is a lazy man's argument, because that says all women are sexual, and because they are sexual, they are all complete sluts. Nuance matters. Of course humans in general are sexual. AWALT is a profoundly simplistic way of looking at women's sexuality that doesn't take into account the individual woman, her upbringing, her social circle, if she is religious or not, etc. All women are sexual, but all women express that sexuality differently. Some want it strictly within the confines of a LTR or marriage, some will bang you in the back of club bathroom stall. Saying AWALT is overly simplistic.
5. I'm a sociable person. I'd invite you to a party if you lived near me. I've been to almost all 50 states and many countries around the world. I friends everywhere. I'm interested in meeting people that share my values. The Pettibone sisters preach anti-feminism, one is already married at a young age, and they come from a conservative Christian home that lives what they preach from what I can tell. I am outcome independent regarding the Pettibones. There's no "master plan", but I'm all for encouraging them to continue to their work to preach against feminism, and more for traditional gender roles. If you're ever between San Francisco and LA, I live off the 101 highway. Easy enough place for you to stop, Drop by and we'll have a beer, that's what I do when I extend the baton to anyone, be it the Pettibones or you.
The bottom line is, we live in a culture where femininity is utterly discouraged. When I see two girls who are being counter-cultural to that, you're damn right I'm going to support it. I live in California, home of the blue-haired SJW feminist. I like Western civilization, and believe in the patriarchy. How are we going to have a patriarchy if every woman is suspected to be a slut, even when her behavior suggestions otherwise? Are we going to write off even the Amish girls? The bottom line is, for men like myself, who are interested in having a family, you need to pick your battles very carefully about what kind of women deserve criticism and which ones deserve encouragement. I'm always open to reversing my judgement on the Pettibones or any other girl if they do a 180 and start acting up. A man should support and encourage feminine women conditionally. They get our support providing they support us back.
Last but not least, I wrote this lengthy post because I'm here on a forum run by a man who has been accused of being a rapist. Roosh the rapist. Has a nice ring to it, doesn't it? Too bad it is a complete lie. That's what happens when you paint people into a corner based upon conjecture, not evidence. I give Roosh and the Pettibones the same leeway. Roosh has stated that he believes in the patriarchy as the ideal method for culture, and I support him in that viewpoint. That makes me someone who supports an accused rapist. The internet makes it very easy to tear down someone's reputation, facts be damned. I don't cast judgement on anyone absent compelling evidence to support it, which is why I took issue with your character assessment of two women who have no history of being bad news. I encourage you to not jump to conclusions. We don't like it when the Mainstream Media paints Roosh as a rapist, do we? You're on a forum run by an accused rapist. Does that make you a rape apologist? Of course not! Just contemplate how putting strangers on the internet on blast without any evidence to back it up is a really poor form of argumentation or winning people over to your cause.
I, for one, want to win a culture war. Women are part of culture, even if men should lead it. Shooting down potential allies is not how we win. We must make friends and alliances, not have infighting. Leave the infighting and purges to the feminists, SJW's and assorted leftists. I say we stick together with like-minded people. That's how we win.
