The climate change hoax
- Thread starter Viktor Zeegelaar
- Start date
^Geothermal for homes is good if:
-You're building a fairly large house. 2,750-3,000sqft and up
-You're building in a fairly cold region, not cost-efficient for instance if you're in coastal California. Great if you're in Chicago, NY or Toronto with long winters and steamy hot summers
-You're building it as the same time as you're building your house, so that you only have to dig a bit further from what you would to build your foundations
Otherwise it's not cost effective.
-You're building a fairly large house. 2,750-3,000sqft and up
-You're building in a fairly cold region, not cost-efficient for instance if you're in coastal California. Great if you're in Chicago, NY or Toronto with long winters and steamy hot summers
-You're building it as the same time as you're building your house, so that you only have to dig a bit further from what you would to build your foundations
Otherwise it's not cost effective.
Yes, I also should have mentioned that there are other alternative setups, the " a bit further than your foundation" would consist of going down only 12 feet or so, and making a big series of horizontal loops. Additionally you can also use the ocean as a heat source/dump if you're near that, but again only really economical on larger scale projects. The down side if you've ever done any thermo dynamics is that energy has both a quantity and quality. So a certain amount of energy coming in your house at 3 degrees from a loop 12 feet down, isn't as good as that same amount of energy coming from a hole 500 feet down at 25. But then it's probably cheaper to dig a larger shallow hole, then a very deep tiny one.
Anyone know what this is? It appeared as soon as I opened this thread?
To add something more related, I found an interesting Documentary about collective delusions that seems relevant to how they are trying to manufacture consent for authoritarianism using bots, propaganda and aggressive messaging. We need to speak:
To add something more related, I found an interesting Documentary about collective delusions that seems relevant to how they are trying to manufacture consent for authoritarianism using bots, propaganda and aggressive messaging. We need to speak:
What do the climate change folks say about archaeology showing sea levels at one time were a minimum of 150ft lower and there are ruins of cities under water, or that Antarctica used to be ice free? Central CA used to be under water.
That’s climate change at both ends of the spectrum prior to Chevy Tahoes.
That’s climate change at both ends of the spectrum prior to Chevy Tahoes.
Let's Review 50 Years of Dire Climate Forecasts and What Actually Happened
Here are 21 headlines from various news sources regarding dire climate predictions over the last 50 years. Many of the predictions are outrageously funny.
mishtalk.com
Global Warming with a Vengeance:
I was set to drive through this area tomorrow, but I have canceled my plans.Global Warming with a Vengeance:
They've been forecasting this for 3-4 days now. A lot of times, the actual event is less extreme than the forecasts, but so far the forecasts for this cold wave continue to get more extreme! I'm curious to see just how bad this turns out. It's suppose to sweep all the way to the Atlantic.
The Climate Money Monster Cabal may be starting to unravel… Vanguard flees GFANZ
Only a week after Ron de Santis pulled $2 billion in Florida funds from BlackRock, Vanguard, the second biggest asset manager in the world, has abruptly pulled out of GFANZ.Vanguard has $7 trillion in assets under management, and GFANZ is a conglomerate cabal of bankers insurers and asset managers that has snowballed into a 550 member cabal with a jawdropping, obscene, 150 trillion in assets. Together, for a moment, they almost created the illusion of a One World Government by Bankers. After all, the GDP of the United States of America is only $23 trillion. So when an organization with six times the pulling power tells the world to go Net Zero, which company, which government would say “No”? Well, Ron de Santis did — and 18 other US states are working on it too.
The key weakness to the $150,000 billion dollar GFANZ monster is — as I said last week — that it’s an illusion. They are wielding other people’s money — using their clients own pension funds to indirectly punish their own clients, and the good guys are figuring out how to call their bluff.
The ESG divestment grows: Florida takes $2 billion back from Blackrock
Good News: The best hope of unwinding the unholy alliance between Big-Money and Big-Government comes from the US States and they are starting to sink their teeth in.
BlackRock is the defacto Global Climate Police — but disguised as a monster investment fund. The way to break it is to expose that its primary interest is not in making money for its clients but as a Woke political tool.
BlackRock are able to intimidate most of the world with $10 trillion dollars in assets. They are effectively the third biggest “country” in the world by GDP. But it’s an illusion. They are wielding other people’s money — using their clients own pension funds to indirectly punish their own clients. And once those clients figure it out and pull their funds, BlackRock will become an empty shell. Couldn’t happen to a nicer company…
It’s a scam where BlackRock target legal corporations in states that voted to use fossil fuels to effectively undo what the voters wanted. A few months ago, 19 States in the USA started asking BlackRock and the US SEC some hot and hard legal questions. West Virginia announced they would boycott firms that boycott fossil fuels, and now Florida joins them in boycotting BlackRock.
EU approves CO2 tax on heating and transport, softened by new social climate fund
EU legislators agreed early on Sunday (18 December) to introduce a carbon price on buildings and road transport fuels, with a new €87-billion social climate fund established in parallel to cushion the impact on households and help them invest in green solutions.
www.euractiv.com
EU to introduce ~7% tax on fuel by 2027.
Its quite a boring book. Its a bit prophetic in a bureaucratic sense. Descriptive with many what if scenarios. As he speaks in public so he writes too. You will fall asleep. You won't learn anything new but there are some quotes you can use to prove he is guilty of conspiring something evil if that is of any value .