The climate change hoax
- Thread starter Viktor Zeegelaar
- Start date
Last edited:
I notice them once gabbling about the ozon layer. But that wasn't good marketing so they changed to climate heating. But a few decades ago the message was actually that it was too cold. So they've basically been shifting several narratives to see which one hit home best with the masses and stuck with that.
Was it KFC cans or something? I think Aussies have so much skin cancer not from the sun but from the "sunscreen" lotions full of carcinogen crap. I never use it becauseI don't trust the lot. Euros are not made for the sun here so just wear longs sleeves hat etc and you'll be alright.
Actually the whole "tanning" thing (as in people laying on the beach trying to get brown) seems absurd to me.
Further confirmation that the best thing to do in regards to staying healthy is to stay the hell away from these "health practitioners"
So let me get this straight. You're allowed to have an over-the-top emotional and indignant reaction to a completely BS and fictional narrative that supposedly will kill billions if we don't listen to the words out of his demonic mouth but if you call out the ACTUAL thing that is killing people, namely the coerced rat poison injections, that's not remotely tolerated by any of these traitors to mankind.
Similarly, the planned policies of taking farming abilities away from the small producers will destroy food security while other long-term policies to lessen the usage of oil and gas will lead the global population into complete destitution through purposeful deindustrialization.
But these deceivers will lie and obfuscate the truth while guiding their citizens into the bowels of hell using a hot summer as an excuse.
Despicable and outrageous.
Masterful actors.
I don't believe this has been posted before, but if it has I apologize.
I am a retired Mathematician/Engineer, with tons of computer experience. I done everything from Cartography to Digital Signal Processing. I have even use real super computers, both Convex and Cray.
I ran across this presentation several years ago. It does a good job of explaining why the Climate Models, used by IPCC, are useless. Early climatologists understood their models were not all encompassing, due to things they did not know or could not know. They took into consideration those unknowns, when looking at the results of their models.
With the introduction of computer models, a whole new set of conditions/unknowns are introduced, because computers cannot do mathematics (i.e. arithmetic) as well has humans. In particular, for small values of x, x+1=1, on a computer, even though a human knows x+1=/=x.
It is a long video, but worth the time. Don't let the math and physics, in the video, deter you. His summaries bring things back into perspective for normal people
I think the "Context" warning from the UN, on this video, is hilarious and proves a point.
As an aside, this presentation has implications for AI. If a computer cannot do real mathematics, how good can AI be?
I am a retired Mathematician/Engineer, with tons of computer experience. I done everything from Cartography to Digital Signal Processing. I have even use real super computers, both Convex and Cray.
I ran across this presentation several years ago. It does a good job of explaining why the Climate Models, used by IPCC, are useless. Early climatologists understood their models were not all encompassing, due to things they did not know or could not know. They took into consideration those unknowns, when looking at the results of their models.
With the introduction of computer models, a whole new set of conditions/unknowns are introduced, because computers cannot do mathematics (i.e. arithmetic) as well has humans. In particular, for small values of x, x+1=1, on a computer, even though a human knows x+1=/=x.
It is a long video, but worth the time. Don't let the math and physics, in the video, deter you. His summaries bring things back into perspective for normal people
I think the "Context" warning from the UN, on this video, is hilarious and proves a point.
As an aside, this presentation has implications for AI. If a computer cannot do real mathematics, how good can AI be?
I'm here in the States. We have "Decepticon Republicans" (IE MTG, Boebert, etc) that love to say stuff like Biden is a moron, blah blah blah.
But at the end of the day what do they stand for? They still support GAE such as calling January 6th an insurrection, not going full press on the Democrats (because we have to take the high road).
I see that being the case in Australia even with this politician. Just yelling at your oppornent solves what exactly?
It's just theatre - they are all on the same team.
These wind turbines always claim a certain max power output, based on some relatively high wind speed, like around 30 mph winds. This usually is also the maximum safe operating level for the windmill.
However, whenever there are sustained winds around the full capacity of the windmill, there are also gusts to higher levels, that will destroy the windmill the way it did in the video. So, you have to lock out the windmill anytime gusts over the safe level are possible. This is usually when sustained windspeeds are only half the maximum safe maximum, because gusts are routinely twice as fast as the sustained windspeeds.
Basically, this means windmills can never be operated with windspeeds at a level that can produce their claimed power generation capacity. At most, they can be expected to produce half the claimed capacity, or less. When winds are higher, which is common in places targeted for windmills, they have to be locked down much of the time, because the winds are too strong to risk operating.
Caduceus
Hummingbird
These huge machines also kill a enormous amount of different types of birds as well.
Bear in mind that this might be CGI. It would be an amazing coincidence for somebody to be standing there filming it at this exact moment